Science & Education

, Volume 19, Issue 6–8, pp 523–538 | Cite as

Current Status of Research in Teaching and Learning Evolution: I. Philosophical/Epistemological Issues

  • Mike U. SmithEmail author


Scholarship that addresses teaching and learning about evolution has rapidly increased in recent years. This review of that scholarship first addresses the philosophical/epistemological issues that impinge on teaching and learning about evolution, including the proper philosophical goals of evolution instruction; the correlational and possibly causal relationships among knowing, understanding, accepting, and believing; and the factors that affect student understanding, acceptance, and/or belief. Second, I summarize the specific epistemological issues involved, including empiricism, naturalism, philosophical vs methodological materialism, science vs religion as non-overlapping magisteria, and science as a way of knowing. Third, the paper critically reviews the strengths and weaknesses of the research tools available to measure the nature of science, epistemological beliefs, and especially the acceptance of evolution. Based on these findings, further research in these areas, especially study of the factors that cause lack of explanatory coherence as well as replications of studies that promise to explain current confusing findings about the interrelationships among student understanding, acceptance, and belief in evolution, are called for. In addition, this review calls for more longitudinal studies to delineate causal connections as well as improved measurement tools.


Evolutionary Theory Scientific Explanation Evolution Education Epistemological Belief Epistemic Belief 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Lederman, N. G. (1998). The nature of science and instructional practice: Making the unnatural natural. Science Education, 82, 417–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alters, B. J., & Nelson, C. E. (2002). Perspective: Teaching evolution in higher education. Evolution, 56, 1891–1901.Google Scholar
  3. Asghar, A., Wiles, J. R., & Alters, B. (2007). Canadian pre-service elementary teachers’ conceptions of biological evolution and evolution education. McGill Journal of Education, 42, 189–209.Google Scholar
  4. Brem, S. K., Ranney, M., & Schindel, J. (2003). Perceived consequences of evolution: College students perceive negative personal and social impact in evolutionary theory. Science Education, 87, 181–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Colburn, A., & Henriques, L. (2006). Clergy views on evolution, creationism, science, and religion. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43, 419–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cooper, R. A. (2001). The goal of evolution instruction: Should we aim for belief or scientific literacy? Reports of the National Center for Science Education, 21, 14–18.Google Scholar
  7. Cummins, C. L., Demastes, S. S., & Hafner, M. S. (1994). Evolution: biological education's under-researched unifying theme. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 445–448.Google Scholar
  8. Dagher, Z. R., & BouJaoude, S. (1997). Scientific views and religious beliefs of college students: The case of biological evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, 429–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dagher, Z. R., & BouJaoude, S. (2005). Students’ perceptions of the nature of evolutionary theory. Science Education, 89, 378–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dagher, Z. R., Brickhouse, N. W., Shipman, H., & Letts, W. J. (2004). How some college students represent their understandings of the nature of scientific theories. International Journal of Science Education, 26, 735–755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Deniz, H., Donnelly, L. A., & Yilmaz, I. (2008). Exploring the factors related to acceptance of evolutionary theory among Turkish preservice biology teachers: Toward a more informative conceptual ecology for biological evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45, 420–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Downie, J. R., & Barron, N. J. (2000). Evolution and religion: Attitudes of Scottish first year biology and medical students to the teaching of evolutionary biology. Journal of Biological Education, 34, 139–146.Google Scholar
  13. Eckstrand, I. A. (1998). NABT and the society for the study of evolution collaborate to improve quality of evolution education in schools. The American Biology Teacher, 60, 482.Google Scholar
  14. Evans, E. M. (2008). Conceptual change and evolutionary biology: A developmental analysis. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on conceptual change (pp. 263–294). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  15. Fysh, R., & Lucas, K. B. (1998). Science and religion: Acknowledging student belief. Australian Science Teachers’ Journal, 44, 60–68.Google Scholar
  16. Good, R. G., Trowbridge, J. E., Demastes, S. S., Wandersee, J. H., Hafner, M. S., & Cummins, C. L. (1992). Toward a research base for evolution education: Report of a national conference. In Proceedings of the 1992 evolution education research conference. Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge. Available from Accessed Mar 20, 2009.
  17. Gould, S. J. (1997). Nonoverlapping magisterria. Natural History, 106, 60–62.Google Scholar
  18. Hermann, R. S. (2008). Evolution as a controversial issue: A review of instructional approaches. Science & Education, 17, 1011–1032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hogan, K. (2000). Exploring a process view of students’ knowledge about the nature of science. Science Education, 84, 51–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hokayem, H., & BouJaoude, S. (2008). College students’ perceptions of the theory of evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45, 395–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hull, D. L. (1973). Darwin and his critics: The reception of Darwin’s theory of evolution by the scientific community. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Ingram, E. L., & Nelson, C. E. (2006). Relationship between achievement and students’ acceptance of evolution or creation in an upper-level evolution course. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43, 7–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jungwirth, E. (1975). Preconceived adaptation and inverted evolution: A case of distorted concept formation in high school biology. Australian Science Teachers’ Journal, 21, 95–100.Google Scholar
  24. Kampourakis, K., & Zogza, V. (2009). Preliminary evolutionary explanations: A basic framework for conceptual change and explanatory coherence in evolution. Science & Education, 16, 393–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lawson, A. E. (1983). Predicting science achievement: The role of developmental level, disembedding ability, mental capacity, prior knowledge, and beliefs. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 20, 117–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lawson, A. E., & Weser, J. (1990). The rejection of nonscientific beliefs about life: Effects of instruction and reasoning skills. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27, 589–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lederman, N. G. (2007). Nature of science: Past, present, and future. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 831–880). Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  28. Lederman, N. G., Wade, P. D., & Bell, R. L. (1998). Assessing the nature of science: What is the nature of our assessments? Science & Education, 7, 595–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lombrozo, T., Shtulman, A., & Weisberg, M. (2006). The intelligent design controversy: Lessons from psychology and education. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 56–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mazur, A. (2004). Believers and disbelievers in evolution. Politics and the Life Sciences, 23, 55–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. McKeachie, W. J., Lin, Y. G., & Strayer, J. (2002). Creationist vs evolutionary beliefs: Effects on learning biology. The American Biology Teacher, 64, 189–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Meadows, L., Doster, E., & Jackson, D. F. (2000). Managing the conflict between evolution & religion. The American Biology Teacher, 62, 102–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Merriam-Webster. (1998). Merriam-Webster dictionary. Mass: Springfield.Google Scholar
  34. Miller, K. R. (2008). Only a theory: Evolution and the battle for America’s soul. New York: Viking Penguin.Google Scholar
  35. Moore, J. A. (1984). Science as a way of knowing—evolutionary biology. American Zoologist, 24, 467–534.Google Scholar
  36. Moore, J. A. (1991). Science as a way of knowing—VII: A conceptual framework for Biology Part III. American Zoologist, 31, 349–470.Google Scholar
  37. Moore, R., Mitchell, G., Bally, R., Inglis, M., Day, J., & Jacobs, D. (2002). Undergraduates’ understanding of evolution: Ascriptions of agency as a problem for student learning. Journal of Biological Education, 36, 65–70.Google Scholar
  38. National Academy of Sciences, Working Group on Teaching Evolution. (1998). Teaching about evolution and the nature of science. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  39. Nieswandt, M., & Bellomo, K. (2009). Written extended-response questions as classroom assessment tools for meaningful understanding of evolutionary theory. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46, 333–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Perry, W. G. (1970). Forms of intellectual and ethical development in the college years: A scheme. Holt. and Winston, New York: Rinehart.Google Scholar
  41. Perry, W. G, Jr. (1981). Cognitive and ethical growth: The making of meaning. In A. W. Chickering (Ed.), The modern American college (pp. 76–116). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  42. Pierce, C. (2007). Designing intelligent knowledge: Epistemological faith and the democratization of science. Educational Theory, 57, 123–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rudolph, J. L., & Stewart, J. (1998). Evolution and the nature of science: On the historical discord and its implications for education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, 1069–1089.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Rutledge, M. L., & Mitchell, M. A. (2002). High school biology teachers’ knowledge structure, acceptance & teaching of evolution. The American Biology Teacher, 64, 21–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rutledge, M. L., & Sadler, K. C. (2007). Reliability of the measure of acceptance of the theory of evolution (MATE) instrument with university students. The American Biology Teacher, 69, 332–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Rutledge, M. L., & Warden, M. A. (1999). The development and validation of the measure of acceptance of the theory of evolution instrument. School Science and Mathematics, 99, 13–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Rutledge, M., & Warden, M. (2000). Evolutionary theory, the nature of science & high school biology teachers: Critical relationships. The American Biology Teacher, 62, 23–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Schomer, M. (1990). Effects of beliefs about the nature of knowledge comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 498–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Schwab, J. J. (1962). The concept of the structure of a discipline. The Educational Record, 43, 197–205.Google Scholar
  50. Schwabb, J. J. (1968). The concept of the structure of a discipline. In L. J. Herbert & W. Murphy (Eds.), Structure in the social studies (pp. 43–56). Washington, DC: National Council for the Social Studies.Google Scholar
  51. Sinatra, G. M., Southerland, S. A., McConaughy, F., & Demastes, J. W. (2003). Intentions and beliefs in students’ understanding and acceptance of biological evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 510–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sinclair, A., Pendarvis, M. P., & Baldwin, B. (1997). The relationship between college zoology students’ beliefs about evolutionary theory and religion. Journal of Research and Development Education, 30, 118–125.Google Scholar
  53. Smith, M. U., & Scharmann, L. C. (1999). Defining versus describing the nature of science: A pragmatic analysis for classroom teachers and science educators. Science Education, 83, 493–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Smith, M. U., & Scharmann, L. (2008). A multi-year program developing an explicit reflective pedagogy for teaching pre-service teachers the nature of science by ostention. Science & Education, 17, 219–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Smith, M. U., & Siegel, H. (2004). Knowing, believing, and understanding: What goals for science education? Science & Education, 13, 553–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Smith, M. U., Enderle, P. J., & Golden, B. W. (2009). How does Darwin’s understanding of the nature of science align with current science education? Use of the terms knowledge, belief, acceptance, and understanding in the Origin of Species. Science Education (submitted).Google Scholar
  57. Sober, E. (1988). Reconstructing the past: Parsimony, evolution, and inference. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  58. Southerland, S. A., & Sinatra, G. M. (2005). The shifting roles of acceptance and dispositions in understanding biological evolution. In S. Alsop (Ed.), Beyond Cartesian dualism: Encountering affect in the teaching and learning of science (pp. 69–78). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
  59. Southerland, S. A., Sinatra, G. M., & Matthews, M. R. (2001). Belief, knowledge, and science education. Educational Psychology Review, 13, 325–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Sprinkle, R. H. (2006). Unremembered intimacies. [Review of beasts of the earth: Animals, humans and Disease by Torrey EF, Yolken RH]. Bioscience 56, 166–167.Google Scholar
  61. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. (2009). Accessed date: August 27, 2009. Available from:
  62. Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. A. (1998). Individual differences in rational thought. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 127, 161–181.Google Scholar
  63. Trani, R. (2004). I won’t teach evolution: It’s against my religio. And now for the rest of the story. The American Biology Teacher, 66, 419–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Tweney, R. D. (2009). Toward a cognitive understanding of science and religion. In Taylor & M. Ferrari (Eds.), Epistemology and science education: Understanding the evolution vs. intelligent design controversy (in press).Google Scholar
  65. Wood, P., & Kardash, C. (2002). Critical elements in the design and analysis of studies of epistemology. In B. K. Hofer & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Personal epistemology: The psychology of beliefs about knowledge and knowing (pp. 233–262). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Mercer University School of MedicineMaconUSA

Personalised recommendations