On the Hypothetico-Deductive Nature of Science—Darwin’s Finches
Allchin (2006) has misinterpreted a classic case of hypothetico-deductive (HD) science in terms of his preferred ‘let’s-gather-some-data-and-see-what-emerges’ view. The misrepresentation concerns the research program of Peter and Rosemary Grant on Darwin’s finches. The present essay argues that the Grants’ research is HD in nature and includes a statement by Peter Grant to that effect.
KeywordsBeak Size Galapagos Island Explicit Hypothesis Feeding Niche Missing Species
This material is based upon research partially supported by the National Science Foundation under award No. EHR 0412537. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. I wish to thank John Alcock for helpful suggestions on an earlier draft of this essay.
- Chown M (2001) The magic furnace: the search for the origin of atoms. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Grant PR (1986) Ecology and evolution of Darwin’s finches. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
- Grant BR, Grant PR (1989) Evolutionary dynamics of a natural population: the large cactus finch of the Galapagos. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
- Hershey DR (2003) Misconceptions about Helmont’s willow experiment. Plant Sci Bull 49:78–84Google Scholar
- Weiner J (1994) The beak of the finch. Alfred Knopf, New YorkGoogle Scholar