Advertisement

Science & Education

, Volume 17, Issue 8–9, pp 1011–1032 | Cite as

Evolution as a controversial issue: a review of instructional approaches

  • Ronald S. Hermann
Article

Abstract

Although evolution has long been considered a controversial issue, little effort has been made to ensure that instructional approaches address the controversial nature of the issue. A framework for understanding the nature of controversy and some defining characteristics of controversial issues are provided. In light of this framework evolution is evaluated to address the defining characteristics of the issue that make it controversial. The purpose of this exploratory review of evolution instruction is to identify a range of instructional approaches reported in extant literature and to determine the extent to which each approach is commensurate with teaching evolution as a controversial issue.

Keywords

Evolution Controversy Instruction 

References

  1. American Association for the Advancement of Science (1993) Benchmarks for Science Literacy. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Bailey C (1975) Neutrality and rationality in teaching. In: Bridges D, Scrimshaw P (eds) Values and authority in schools. Hodder and Stoughton, LondonGoogle Scholar
  3. Berra TM (1990) Evolution and the myth of creationism: a basic guide to the facts in the evolution debate. Stanford University Press, Stanford CAGoogle Scholar
  4. Bishop B, Anderson CW (1990) Student conceptions of natural selection and its role in evolution. J Res Sci Teach 27:415–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brem SK, Ranney M, Schindel J (2003) Perceived consequences of evolution: college students perceived negative personal and social impact in evolutionary theory. Sci Educa 87:181–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brickhouse NW, Dagher ZR, Letts WJ IV, Shipman HL (2000) Diversity of students’ views about evidence, theory, and the interface between science and religion in an astronomy course. J Res Sci Teach 37:340–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bridges D (1986) Dealing with controversy in the curriculum: a philosophical perspective. In: Wellington JJ (ed) Controversial issues in the curriculumGoogle Scholar
  8. Cherif A, Adams G, Loehr J (2001) What on “earth” is evolution?: the geological perspective of teaching evolutionary biology effectively. Am Biol Teach 64:569–591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Colburn A, Henriques L (2006) Clergy views on evolution, creationism, science, and religion. J Res Sci Teach 43:419–442CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dearden RF (1981) Controversial issues and the curriculum. J Curriculum Stud 13:37–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Demastes SS, Settlage JS, Jr. Good R (1995) Students’ conceptions of natural selection and its role in evolution: cases of replication and comparison. J Res Sci Teach 32:535–550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dembski WA (2000) The third mode of explanation: detecting evidence of intelligent design in the sciences. In: Behe MJ, Dembski WA, Meyer SC (eds) Science and evidence for design in the universe, Ignatius Press, San Francisco, pp 17–51Google Scholar
  13. Dobzhansky T (1973) Nothing in biology makes sense except in light of evolution. Am Biol Teach 35:125–129Google Scholar
  14. Duveen J, Solomon J (1994) The great evolution trial: use of role-play in the classroom. J Res Sci Teach 31:575–582CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ecker R (1990) Dictionary of science and creationism. Prometheus, BuffaloGoogle Scholar
  16. Farber P (2003) Teaching evolution and the nature of science. Am Biol Teach 65:347–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gardner P (1984) Another look at controversial issues. J Curriculum Stud 16:379–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Geddis AN (1991) Improving the quality of science classroom discourse on controversial issues. Sci Educ 75:169–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gould SJ (1999) Rocks of ages: science and religion in the fullness of life. Ballantine Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. Grover H (1985) Evolving state policy on creationism. Educ Leadersh 42:69–71Google Scholar
  21. Henderson J, Lally V (1988) Problem solving and controversial issues in biotechnology. J Biol Educ 22:144–150Google Scholar
  22. Hermann R (2005) The Interaction of belief and understanding of controversial science concepts: toward a grounded theory of cognitive apartheid. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Dallas, TexasGoogle Scholar
  23. Ingram EL, Nelson CE (2006) Relationship between achievement and students acceptance of evolution or creation in and upper-level evolution course. J Res Sci Teach 43:7–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jackson DF, Doster EC, Meadows L, Wood T (1995) Hearts and minds in the science classroom: the education of a confirmed evolutionist. J Res Sci Teach 32:585–611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jane B (2002) The Evolution/Creation science controversy: educate rather than debate. Proceedings from the International Organization for Science and Technology Education, Parana, BrazilGoogle Scholar
  26. Jensen MS, Finley FN (1995) Teaching evolution using historical arguments in a conceptual change strategy. Sci Educ 72:147–166Google Scholar
  27. Jensen MS, Finley FN (1996) Changes in students’ understanding of evolution resulting from different curricular and instructional strategies. J Res Sci Teach 33:879–900 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jensen MS, Finley FN (1997) Teaching evolution using historically rich curriculum and paired problem solving instructional strategy. Am Biol Teach 59:208–212Google Scholar
  29. Johnson RL, Peeples EE (1987) The role of scientific understanding in college: student acceptance of evolution. Am Biol Teach 49:93–97Google Scholar
  30. Kolstø SD (2001) Scientific literacy for citizenship: tools for dealing with the science dimension of controversial socioscientific issues. Sci Educ 85:291–310CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kupperman JJ (1985) Why some topics are controversial. Educ Leadersh 42:69–71Google Scholar
  32. Lawson AE, Weser J (1990) The rejection of nonscientific beliefs about life: effects of instruction and reasoning skills. J Res Sci Teach 27:589–606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lawson AE, Worsnop WA (1992) Learning about evolution and rejecting a belief in special creation: effects of reflective reasoning skill, prior knowledge, Prior belief and religious commitment. J Res Sci Teach 29:143–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Levinson R (2002) Teaching ethical issues in science. Proceedings from the International Organization for Science and Technology Education, Parana, BrazilGoogle Scholar
  35. Lord T, Marino S (1993) How university students view the theory of evolution. J Coll Sci Teach 22:353–357Google Scholar
  36. McKeachie WJ, Lin Y-G, Strayer J (2002) Creationist vs. evolutionary beliefs: effects on learning biology. Am Biol Teach 64:89–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mead JM, Scharmann LC (1994) Enhancing critical thinking through structured academic controversy. Am Biol Teach 56:416–419Google Scholar
  38. Meadows L, Doster E, Jackson DF (2000) Managing the conflict between evolution & religion. Am Biol Teach 62:102–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Miller JD, Scott EC, Okamoto S (2006) Public acceptance of evolution. Science 313:765–766CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Moore R (2004) How well do biology teachers understand the legal issues associated with the teaching of evolution? BioScience 54:860–865CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Morishita F (1991) Teaching about controversial issues: resolving conflict between creationism and evolution through law-related education. Am Biol Teach 53:91–93Google Scholar
  42. National Academy of Science (1998) Teaching about evolution and the nature of science. National Academy Press, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  43. National Association of Biology Teachers (1997) Position statement of the teaching of evolution. NABT News & Views, 4–5Google Scholar
  44. National Research Council (1996) National science education standards. National Academy Press, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  45. National Science Teachers Association (1997) An NSTA position statement on the teaching of evolution. J Coll Sci Teach 27(1):7–8Google Scholar
  46. National Science Board (2002) Science and Engineering Indicators-2002. National Science FoundationGoogle Scholar
  47. Nicholls JG, Nelson JR (1992) Students’ conceptions of controversial knowledge. J Educ Psychol 2:224–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Nickels MK, Nelson CE, Beard J (1996) Better biology teaching by emphasizing evolution and the nature of science. Am Biol Teach 59:332–336Google Scholar
  49. Nord WA (1999) Science, religion, and education. Phi Delta Kappan 81:28–33Google Scholar
  50. Oulton C, Dillon J, Grace MM (2004) Reconceptualizing the teaching of controversial issues, international. J Sci Educ 26:411–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Reiss M (1992) How should science teachers teach the relationship between science and religion?. Sch Sci Rev 74:127–129Google Scholar
  52. Rutledge ML, Mitchell MA (2002) High school biology teachers’ knowledge structure, acceptance & teaching of evolution. Am Biol Teach 64: 21–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Scharmann LC (1990) Enhancing an understanding of the premises of evolutionary theory: the influence of a diversified instructional strategy. Sch Sci Math 90:91–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Scott EC, Branch G (2003) Evolution: what’s wrong with ‘teach the controversy. Trends Ecol Evol 18:499–502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Shipman HL, Brickhouse NW, Dagher Z, Letts WJ IV (2002) Changes in student views of religion and science in a college astronomy course. Sci Educ 86:526–547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sinatra GM, Southerland SA, McConaughy F, Demastes JW (2003) Intentions and beliefs in students’ understanding and acceptance of biological evolution. J Res Sci Educ 40:510–528Google Scholar
  57. Sinclair A, Pendarvis MP (1997) Evolution vs. conservative religious beliefs: can biology instructors assist students with their dilemma?.J Coll Sci Teach 27:167–170Google Scholar
  58. Trowbridge JE, Wandersee JH (1994) Identifying critical junctures in learning in a college course on evolution. J Res Sci Teach 31:459–473CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Van Koevering TE, Stiehl RB (1989) Evolution, creation & wisconsin biology teachers. Am Biol Teach 51:200–202Google Scholar
  60. Van Rooy W (1999) Controversial biological issues: an exploratory tool for accessing teacher thinking in relation to classroom practice. In: Annual meeting of the national association for research in science teaching, Boston, MAGoogle Scholar
  61. Woods CS, Scharmann LC (2001) High school students’ perceptions of evolutionary theory, electronic. J Sci Educ 6:2Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Doctoral Programs in Mathematics and Science EducationMorgan State UniversityRising SunUSA

Personalised recommendations