Determinants of graduates’ entrepreneurial activity
Despite the depth and breadth of the existing literature on university entrepreneurship, research has focused almost exclusively on licensing patents and founding spin-offs by faculty and staff. In comparison, much less evidence has been produced on start-ups created by students and graduates, mainly due to a lack of comprehensive data. This paper evaluates the impact of education—academic subject and foreign education experience—on the creation of firms by university graduates. In terms of the academic subject, the focus is on the distinction between science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM) fields and non-STEM fields. With respect to foreign education experience, the focus is on graduates’ experience studying outside their home country. Our analysis extends the scope of existing research in two ways. First, we consider the entire education history of graduates, not just from the researched university. Second, the paper extends the traditional focus on international students and analyzes the foreign education experience of both domestic and international students. The results indicate a positive relationship between having a non-STEM degree and entrepreneurial activity. A combination of STEM and non-STEM degrees is also positively related to the entrepreneurial propensity of graduates. Students with foreign education experience are significantly more likely to become entrepreneurs than those without such experience. Many governments focus their policy on attracting and retaining foreign students, especially those with degrees in STEM fields. Our results suggest that it is more important for a government to focus on both foreign-born students and domestic students who have foreign study experience.
KeywordsEntrepreneurship Foreign education STEM Policy
JEL classificationF22 I23 I28 L26
The authors thank Vivek Goel and Stephannie Roy for their insights and support. Sana Maqbool and Brendan Hills provided valuable research assistance throughout the project.
The authors acknowledge financial support from the Office of the Vice-President, Research and Innovation (OVPRI), University of Toronto.
- Amior, M. (2015). Why are higher skilled workers more mobile geographically? The role of the job surplus. Centre for Economic Performance Discussion Paper 1338.Google Scholar
- Arrow, K. J. (1962). Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. In R. R. Nelson (Ed.), The rate and direction of inventive activity (pp. 609–626). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Åstebro, T., & Bazzazian, N. (2011). Universities, entrepreneurship and local economic development. In M. Fritsch (Ed.), Handbook of research on entrepreneurship and regional development: national and regional perspective (pp. 252–333). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
- Atkinson, R. D., & Mayo, M. (2010). Refueling the U.S. innovation economy: fresh approaches to Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) education. https://www.itif.org/files/2010-refueling-innovation-economy.pdf. Accessed 10 Jan 2019.
- Attour, A., & Lazaric, N. (2018). From knowledge to business ecosystems: emergence of an entrepreneurial activity during knowledge replication. Small Business Economics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-018-0035-3.
- Azoulay, P., Jones, B., Kin, J. D., & Miranda, J. (2018). Research: the average age of a successful startup founder is 45. https://hbr.org/2018/07/research-the-average-age-of-a-successful-startup-founder-is-45/. Accessed 10 Jan 2019.
- Barro, R. J., & Lee, J. W. (1996). International measures of schooling years and schooling quality. American Economic Review, 86(2), 218–223.Google Scholar
- Becker, G. (1964). Human capital: a theoretical and empirical analysis with special reference to education. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Benedict, M. E., McClough, D., & Hoag, J. (2012). STEM: a path to self-employment and jobs? Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, 15(1), 99–122.Google Scholar
- Blume-Kohout, M. E. (2016). Imported entrepreneurs: foreign-born scientists and engineers in U.S. STEM fields entrepreneurship. https://www.sba.gov/advocacy/imported-entrepreneurs-foreign-born-scientists-and. Accessed 10 Jan 2019.
- Breznitz, S. M., & Kenney, M. (2018). Slouching toward the Downtown Abbey university system. Issues in Science and Technology, 34(3), 74–82.Google Scholar
- Carpenter, M. A., Sanders, G., & Gregersen, H. B. (2001). Bundling human capital with organizational context: the impact of international assignment experience on multinational firm performance and CEO pay. Academy of Management Journal, 44(3), 493–511.Google Scholar
- CEBR. (2012). Employment and income in science-based occupations and industries: what’s happened and where things are going? London: Centre for Economics and Business Research.Google Scholar
- Chambers, E., Foulon, M., Handfield-Jones, H., Hankin, S., & Michaels, E. (1998). The war for talent. McKinsey Quarterly, 3, 44–57.Google Scholar
- Clark, B. R. (1998). Creating entrepreneurial universities: organizational pathways of transformation. Bingley: Emerald Group.Google Scholar
- Crant, J. M. (1996). The proactive personality scale as a predicator of entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Small Business Management, 34(3), 42–49.Google Scholar
- David, P. A. (1985). Clio and the economics of QWERTY. American Economic Review, 75(2), 332–337.Google Scholar
- DOE. (2014). Baccalaureate and beyond: a first look at the employment experience and lives of college graduates, 4 years on. U.S. DOE, Washington, DC: Department of Education.Google Scholar
- Etzkowitz, H. (1983). Entrepreneurial scientists and entrepreneurial universities in American academic science. Minerva, 21(2–3), 198–233.Google Scholar
- Fatlin, G. (2018). Brains versus capital: entrepreneurship for everyone. Singapore: World Scientific.Google Scholar
- Foray, D., & Lundvall, B.-A. (1996). The knowledge-based economy: From the economics of knowledge to the learning economy. In OECD, Employment and growth in the knowledge-based economy (pp. 11–32). Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
- GERA. (2018). GEM global report 2017/18. London: Global Entrepreneurship Research Association.Google Scholar
- Giannetti, M., & Simonov, A. (2004). On the determinants of entrepreneurial activity: social norms, economic environment and individual characteristics. Swedish Economic Policy Review, 11(2), 269–313.Google Scholar
- Greenwood, C., Harrison, M., & Vignoles, A. (2011). The labour market value of STEM qualifications and occupations. An analysis for the Royal Academy of Engineering. London: Department of Quantitative Social Science.Google Scholar
- Hunt, J., & Gauthier-Loiselle, M. (2010). How much does immigration boost innovation? American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 2(2), 31–56.Google Scholar
- IIE. (2016). Open doors 2016. New York, NY: Institute of International Education.Google Scholar
- Isenberg, D. (2014). Entrepreneurship always leads to inequality. https://hbr.org/2014/03/entrepreneurship-always-leads-to-inequality/. Accessed 10 Jan 2019.
- Korres, G. M. (2008). Technical change and economic growth: inside the knowledge based economy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Levine, R., & Rubinstein, Y. (2013). Small and illicit: who becomes an entrepreneur and do they earn more? NBER working paper 19276.Google Scholar
- Maré, D. C., Le, T., Fabling, R., & Chappell, N. (2017). Productivity and the allocation of skills. Motu Working Paper 17–04.Google Scholar
- Moretti, E. (2013). The new geography of jobs. New York, NY: Mariner Books.Google Scholar
- National Academies. (2010). Rising above the gathering storm: revisited. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
- North, D. C. (1994). Economic performance through time. American Economic Review, 84(3), 359–368.Google Scholar
- Obschonka, M., Schmitt-Rodermund, E., Silbereisen, R. K., Gosling, S. D., & Potter, J. (2013). The regional distribution and correlates of an entrepreneurship-prone personality profile in the United States, Germany, and the United Kingdom: a socioecological perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105(1), 104–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- OECD. (2017a). Education at a glance 2017. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
- OECD. (2017b). Entrepreneurship at a glance 2017. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
- Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy Management Review, 25(1), 217–226.Google Scholar
- Siepel, J., Camerani, R., Pellegrino, G., & Masucci, M. (2016). The fusion effect: the economic returns to combining arts and science skills. London: Nesta.Google Scholar
- Spicer, Z., Olmstead, N., & Goodman, N. (2018). Reversing the brain drain: where is Canadian STEM talent going? St. Catharine’s: Brock University.Google Scholar
- Universities, U. K. (2017). The economic impact of international students. London: Universities UK.Google Scholar
- Weitzman, M. L. (1996). Hybridizing growth theory. American Economic Review, 86(2), 207–212.Google Scholar