Determinants of novice, portfolio, and serial entrepreneurship: an occupational choice approach
In this paper, we first develop an original theory in which, based on their individual skills and the quality of their business, entrepreneurs can keep their original business (and thus remain novice entrepreneurs), start and keep a new business in the same or another sector along their current business (therefore becoming portfolio entrepreneurs), transfer or shut their original business down to either start a new one (turning themselves into serial entrepreneurs), or enter the labor market as wage workers. We then use the insights from our theory to develop three main hypotheses that are finally tested for a 10-year panel dataset (2001 to 2010) of more than 4000 Vietnamese manufacturing firms. We estimate an occupational choice model and a survival model and find that (i) a greater endowment of human capital is associated with a higher likelihood of a business owner to become a serial or a portfolio entrepreneur; (ii) a higher quality of the new business is associated to a higher likelihood that it is run by any type of habitual entrepreneur. Particularly, high entrepreneurial skills together with a high-quality business positively influence the likelihood of an individual to be serial or portfolio entrepreneur; (iii) ceteris paribus, firms run by serial or portfolio entrepreneurs tend to stay in business longer, although high-quality ones run by novice entrepreneurs endowed with high entrepreneurial skills are those with the lowest probability to leave the market.
KeywordsPortfolio entrepreneurship Serial entrepreneurship Occupational choice Industrial policy
JEL codesF02 L26 L53
Previous versions of this paper have been presented at the 8th Annual Conference for the Academy of Innovation and Entrepreneurship (Toronto, Ryerson University) and at seminars held at University of Saarland, University of Luxembourg, University of Trento, and Bucerius Law School (Hamburg). We thank seminar participants and, in particular, Bettina Müller for helpful suggestions.
- Baert, C., Meuleman, M., Debruyne, M., & Wright, M. (2016). Portfolio entrepreneurship and resource orchestration. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 10(4), 346–370.Google Scholar
- Bosma, N., Van Praag, C. M., Thurik, A. R., & de Wit, G. (2004). The value of human and social capital investments for the business performance of startups. Small Business Economics, 23(2), 227–236. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SBEJ.0000032032.21192.72.Google Scholar
- Bridge, S., O’Neil, K., & Cromie, S. (1998). Understanding enterprise, entrepreneurship and small business. Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Dollinger, M. (2008). Entrepreneurship strategies and resources (4 th ed.). Lombard: Marsh Publications.Google Scholar
- Kirzner, I. M. (1979). Perception, opportunity and profit. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Ljungqvist, L., & Sargent, T. J. (2004). Recursive macroeconomic theory. 2 nd ed. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Nguyen, Q. A., & Mort, G. S. (2016). Economic reform and entrepreneurship in Vietnam: a policy perspective. In J. Ateljević & J. Trivić (Eds.), Economic development and entrepreneurship in transition economies (pp. 109–127). Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
- Nguyen, T. H., Alam, Q., & Prajogo, D. (2008). State and market relationships: public financial policy support for SMEs growth in Vietnam. International Review of Business Research Papers, 4(2), 203–216.Google Scholar
- Opler, T. C., & Titman, S. (1994). Financial distress and corporate performance. Journal of Finance, 49(3), 1015–1040. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1994.tb00086.x.Google Scholar
- Pakes, A., & Ericson, R. (1988). Empirical implications of alternative models of firm dynamics. Manuscript. Madison: Univ. Wisconsin; published in Journal of Economic Theory. 1998, 79(1): 1–45. doi: https://doi.org/10.1006/jeth.1997.2358.
- Penrose, E. T. (1959). The theory of the growth of the firm. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Rand, J., & Tarp, F. (2007). Characteristics of the Vietnamese business environment: evidence from a SME survey in 2005. A study prepared under Component 5 – Business Sector Research of the Danida Funded Business Sector Program Support.Google Scholar
- Ronnås, P., & Ramamurthy, B. (2001). Entrepreneurship in Vietnam: transformation and dynamics. Copenhagen: NIAS Publishing.Google Scholar
- Ucbasaran, D., Westhead, P., & Wright, M. (2006). Habitual entrepreneurs. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
- Vijverberg, W., & Haughton, J. (2002). Household enterprises in Vietnam: survival, growth, and living standards. Discussion paper WPS 2773, The World Bank.Google Scholar
- Wennberg, K., Wiklund, J., DeTienne, D.R. & Cardon, M.S. (2010). Reconceptualizing entrepreneurial exit: Divergent exit routes and their drivers. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(4), 361–375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusven.2009.01.001.
- Westhead, P., & Wright, M. (1999). Contributions of novice, portfolio and serial founders in rural and urban areas. Regional Studies, 33(2), 157–173.Google Scholar
- World Bank (2009). Vietnam development report 2010: modern institutions. Joint Donor Report to the Vietnam Consultative Group Meeting, World Bank.Google Scholar
- Zhang, Z., Zyphur, M., Narayanan, J., Arvey, R., Chaturvedi, S., Avolio, B., Lichtenstein, B., & Larsson, G. (2009). The genetic basis of entrepreneurship: effects of gender and personality. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 110(2), 93–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2009.07.002.Google Scholar