Advertisement

Determinants of novice, portfolio, and serial entrepreneurship: an occupational choice approach

  • Emanuela Carbonara
  • Hien Thu Tran
  • Enrico SantarelliEmail author
Article

Abstract

In this paper, we first develop an original theory in which, based on their individual skills and the quality of their business, entrepreneurs can keep their original business (and thus remain novice entrepreneurs), start and keep a new business in the same or another sector along their current business (therefore becoming portfolio entrepreneurs), transfer or shut their original business down to either start a new one (turning themselves into serial entrepreneurs), or enter the labor market as wage workers. We then use the insights from our theory to develop three main hypotheses that are finally tested for a 10-year panel dataset (2001 to 2010) of more than 4000 Vietnamese manufacturing firms. We estimate an occupational choice model and a survival model and find that (i) a greater endowment of human capital is associated with a higher likelihood of a business owner to become a serial or a portfolio entrepreneur; (ii) a higher quality of the new business is associated to a higher likelihood that it is run by any type of habitual entrepreneur. Particularly, high entrepreneurial skills together with a high-quality business positively influence the likelihood of an individual to be serial or portfolio entrepreneur; (iii) ceteris paribus, firms run by serial or portfolio entrepreneurs tend to stay in business longer, although high-quality ones run by novice entrepreneurs endowed with high entrepreneurial skills are those with the lowest probability to leave the market.

Keywords

Portfolio entrepreneurship Serial entrepreneurship Occupational choice Industrial policy 

JEL codes

F02 L26 L53 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Previous versions of this paper have been presented at the 8th Annual Conference for the Academy of Innovation and Entrepreneurship (Toronto, Ryerson University) and at seminars held at University of Saarland, University of Luxembourg, University of Trento, and Bucerius Law School (Hamburg). We thank seminar participants and, in particular, Bettina Müller for helpful suggestions.

References

  1. Acs, Z. J., Desai, S., & Hessels, J. (2008). Entrepreneurship, economic development and institutions. Small Business Economics, 31(3), 219–234.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-008-9135-9.Google Scholar
  2. Agarwal, R., Echambadi, R., Franco, R., & Sarkar, M. (2004). Knowledge transfer through inheritance: spin–out generation, development and survival. Academy of Management Journal, 47(4), 501–522.  https://doi.org/10.2307/20159599.Google Scholar
  3. Akhter, N., Sieger, P., & Chirico, F. (2016). If we can’t have it, then no one should: shutting down versus selling in family business portfolios. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 10(4), 371–394.  https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1237.Google Scholar
  4. Amaral, A. M., Baptista, R., & Lima, F. (2011). Serial entrepreneurship: impact of human capital on time to re-entry. Small Business Economics, 37(1), 1–21.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-009-9232-4.Google Scholar
  5. Åstebro, T., & Bernhardt, I. (2003). Start-up financing, owner characteristics, and survival. Journal of Economics and Business, 55(4), 303–319.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-6195(03)00029-8.Google Scholar
  6. Åstebro, T., Cheng, J., & Thompson, P. (2011). Stars and misfits: self-employment and labor market frictions. Management Science, 57(11), 1999–2017.  https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1110.1400.Google Scholar
  7. Audretsch, D., Santarelli, E., & Vivarelli, M. (1999). Start-up size and industrial dynamics: some evidence from Italian manufacturing. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 17(7), 965–983.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-7187(98)00002-2.Google Scholar
  8. Baert, C., Meuleman, M., Debruyne, M., & Wright, M. (2016). Portfolio entrepreneurship and resource orchestration. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 10(4), 346–370.Google Scholar
  9. Barnir, A. (2014). Pre-venture managerial experience and new venture innovation. An opportunity costs perspective. Management Decision, 52(10), 1981–2001.  https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-03-2014-0158.Google Scholar
  10. Baumol, W. J. (1990). Entrepreneurship—productive, unproductive, and destructive. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), 893–921.  https://doi.org/10.1086/261712.Google Scholar
  11. Blanchflower, D. G., & Oswald, A. J. (1998). What makes an entrepreneur? Journal of Labor Economics, 16(1), 26–60.  https://doi.org/10.1086/209881.Google Scholar
  12. Bosma, N., Van Praag, C. M., Thurik, A. R., & de Wit, G. (2004). The value of human and social capital investments for the business performance of startups. Small Business Economics, 23(2), 227–236.  https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SBEJ.0000032032.21192.72.Google Scholar
  13. Bridge, S., O’Neil, K., & Cromie, S. (1998). Understanding enterprise, entrepreneurship and small business. Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  14. Carbonara, E., Santarelli, E., & Tran, H. T. (2016). De jure determinants of new firm formation: how the pillars of constitutions influence entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 47(1), 139–162.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-016-9715-z.Google Scholar
  15. Carbonara, E., Santarelli, E., Obschonka, M., Tran, H. T., Potter, J., & Gosling, S. (2018). Agency culture, constitutional provisions and entrepreneurship: a cross-country analysis. Industrial and Corporate Change, 27(1), 507–524.  https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtx047.Google Scholar
  16. Carter, S., & Ram, M. (2003). Reassessing portfolio entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 21(4), 371–380.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026115121083.Google Scholar
  17. Cefis, E., & Marsili, O. (2012). Going, going, gone: exit forms and the innovative capabilities of firms. Research Policy, 41(5), 795–807.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.01.006.Google Scholar
  18. Chen, J. (2013). Selection and serial entrepreneurs. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 22(2), 281–311.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jems.12016.Google Scholar
  19. Cramer, J. S., Hartog, J., Jonker, N., & Van Praag, C. M. (2002). Low risk aversion encourages the choice for entrepreneurship: an empirical test of a truism. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 48(1), 29–36.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2681(01)00222-0.Google Scholar
  20. Cumming, D. J. (2008). Contracts and exits in venture capital finance. Review of Financial Studies, 21(5), 1947–1982.  https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhn072.Google Scholar
  21. DeTienne, D. R. (2010). Entrepreneurial exit as a critical component of the entrepreneurial process: theoretical development. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(2), 203–215.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2008.05.004.Google Scholar
  22. DeTienne, D. R., & Cardon, M. S. (2012). Impact of founder experience on exit intentions. Small Business Economics, 38(4), 351–374.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-010-9284-5.Google Scholar
  23. DeTienne, D. R., McKelvie, A., & Chandler, G. N. (2015). Making sense of entrepreneurial exit strategies: a typology and test. Journal of Business Venturing, 30(2), 255–272.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2014.07.007.Google Scholar
  24. Dollinger, M. (2008). Entrepreneurship strategies and resources (4 th ed.). Lombard: Marsh Publications.Google Scholar
  25. Elfenbein, D. W., & Knott, A. M. (2015). Time to exit: rational, behavioral, and organizational delays. Strategic Management Journal, 36(7), 957–975.  https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2262.Google Scholar
  26. Evans, D. S., & Leighton, L. S. (1989). Why do smaller firms pay less? Journal of Human Resources, 24(2), 299–318.  https://doi.org/10.2307/145858.Google Scholar
  27. Gimeno, J., Folta, T., Cooper, A., & Woo, C. (1997). Survival of the fittest? Entrepreneurial human capital and the persistence of underperforming firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(4), 750–783.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2393656.Google Scholar
  28. Gottschalk, S., Greene, F. J., & Müller, B. (2017). The impact of habitual entrepreneurial experience on new firm closure outcomes. Small Business Economics, 48(2), 303–321.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-016-9780-3.Google Scholar
  29. Harhoff, D., Stahl, K., & Woywode, M. (1998). Legal form, growth and exit of West-German firms—empirical results for manufacturing, construction, trade and service industries. Journal of Industrial Economics, 46(4), 453–488.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6451.00083.Google Scholar
  30. Hessels, J., Grilo, I., Thurik, R., & Van Der Zwan, P. (2011). Entrepreneurial exit and entrepreneurial engagement. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 21(3), 447–471.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-010-0190-4.Google Scholar
  31. Holmes, T. J., & Schmitz, J. A., Jr. (1990). A theory of entrepreneurship and its application to the study of business transfers. Journal of Political Economy, 98(2), 265–294.  https://doi.org/10.1086/261678.Google Scholar
  32. Hyytinen, A., & Ilmakunnas, P. (2007). Entrepreneurial aspirations: another form of job search? Small Business Economics, 29(1), 63–80.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-005-4783-5.Google Scholar
  33. Katz, J. A. (1992). A psychosocial cognitive model of employment status choice. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 17(1), 29–37.  https://doi.org/10.1177/104225879201700104.Google Scholar
  34. Kihlstrom, R. E., & Laffont, J. J. (1979). General equilibrium entrepreneurial theory of firm formation based on risk aversion. Journal of Political Economy, 87(4), 719–748.  https://doi.org/10.1086/260790.Google Scholar
  35. Kirzner, I. M. (1979). Perception, opportunity and profit. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  36. Klepper, S., & Simons, K. (2000). The making of an oligopoly: firm survival and technological change in the evolution of the U.S. tire industry. Journal of Political Economy, 108(4), 728–760.  https://doi.org/10.1086/316100.Google Scholar
  37. Kolvereid, L. (1996). Prediction of employment status choice intentions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 21(1), 47–57.  https://doi.org/10.1177/104225879602100104.Google Scholar
  38. Koudstaal, M., Sloof, R., & Van Praag, C. M. (2016). Risk, uncertainty, and entrepreneurship: evidence from a lab-in-the-field experiment. Management Science, 62(10), 2897–2915.  https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2015.2249.Google Scholar
  39. Lafontaine, F., & Shaw, K. (2016). Serial entrepreneurship: learning by doing? Journal of Labor Economics, 34(2), S217–S254.  https://doi.org/10.1086/683820.Google Scholar
  40. Lazear, E. (2005). Entrepreneurship. Journal of Labor Economics, 23(4), 649–680.  https://doi.org/10.1086/491605.Google Scholar
  41. Li, S., Schulze, W., & Li, Z. (2009). Plunging into the sea, again? A study of serial entrepreneurship in China. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 26(4), 667–680.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-008-9102-7.Google Scholar
  42. Ljungqvist, L., & Sargent, T. J. (2004). Recursive macroeconomic theory. 2 nd ed. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  43. Lucas, R. E., Jr. (1978). On the size distribution of business firms. Bell Journal of Economics, 9(2), 508–523.  https://doi.org/10.2307/3003596.Google Scholar
  44. Maertz, C. P., & Campion, M. A. (2004). Profiles in quitting: integrating process and content turnover theory. Academy of Management Journal, 47(4), 566–582.  https://doi.org/10.2307/20159602.Google Scholar
  45. Mason, C. M., & Harrison, R. T. (2006). After the exit: acquisitions, entrepreneurial recycling and regional economic development. Regional Studies, 40(1), 55–73.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400500450059.Google Scholar
  46. Mulholland, K. (1997). The family enterprise and business strategy. Work Employment and Society, 11(4), 685–711.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017097114005.Google Scholar
  47. Nguyen, Q. A., & Mort, G. S. (2016). Economic reform and entrepreneurship in Vietnam: a policy perspective. In J. Ateljević & J. Trivić (Eds.), Economic development and entrepreneurship in transition economies (pp. 109–127). Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
  48. Nguyen, T. H., Alam, Q., & Prajogo, D. (2008). State and market relationships: public financial policy support for SMEs growth in Vietnam. International Review of Business Research Papers, 4(2), 203–216.Google Scholar
  49. Nicolaou, N., & Shane, S. (2010). Entrepreneurship and occupational choice: genetic and environmental influences. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 76(1), 3–14.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2010.02.009.Google Scholar
  50. Opler, T. C., & Titman, S. (1994). Financial distress and corporate performance. Journal of Finance, 49(3), 1015–1040.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1994.tb00086.x.Google Scholar
  51. Pakes, A., & Ericson, R. (1988). Empirical implications of alternative models of firm dynamics. Manuscript. Madison: Univ. Wisconsin; published in Journal of Economic Theory. 1998, 79(1): 1–45. doi:  https://doi.org/10.1006/jeth.1997.2358.
  52. Parker, S. C. (2009). Why do small firms produce the entrepreneurs? Journal of Socio-Economics, 38(2), 484–494.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2008.07.013.Google Scholar
  53. Parker, S. C. (2012). Theories of entrepreneurship, innovation and the business cycle. Journal of Economic Surveys, 26(3), 377–394.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6419.2012.00728.x.Google Scholar
  54. Parker, S. C. (2013). Do serial entrepreneurs run successively better businesses? Evidence from the PSID. Journal of Business Venturing, 28(5), 652–666.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2012.08.001.Google Scholar
  55. Parker, S. C. (2014). Who become serial and portfolio entrepreneurs? Small Business Economics, 43(4), 887–898.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-014-9576-2.Google Scholar
  56. Parker, S. C., & Van Praag, C. M. (2010). Group status and entrepreneurship. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 19(4), 919–945.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-9134.2010.00280.x.Google Scholar
  57. Penrose, E. T. (1959). The theory of the growth of the firm. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  58. Plehn-Dujowich, J. (2010). A theory of serial entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 35(4), 377–398.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-008-9171-5.Google Scholar
  59. Poschke, M. (2013). Who becomes an entrepreneur? Labor market prospects and occupational choice. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 37(3), 693–710.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jedc.2012.11.003.Google Scholar
  60. Rand, J., & Tarp, F. (2007). Characteristics of the Vietnamese business environment: evidence from a SME survey in 2005. A study prepared under Component 5 – Business Sector Research of the Danida Funded Business Sector Program Support.Google Scholar
  61. Rerup, C. (2005). Learning from past experience: footnotes on mindfulness and habitual entrepreneurship. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 21(4), 451–472.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2005.09.010.Google Scholar
  62. Robson, P. J. A., Akuetteh, C. K., Westhead, P., & Wright, M. (2012). Export intensity, human capital and business ownership experience. International Small Business Journal, 30(4), 367–387.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242610364426.Google Scholar
  63. Rocha, V., Carneiro, A., & Varum, C. A. (2015). Serial entrepreneurship, learning by doing and self-selection. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 40(1), 91–106.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijindorg.2015.04.001.Google Scholar
  64. Ronnås, P., & Ramamurthy, B. (2001). Entrepreneurship in Vietnam: transformation and dynamics. Copenhagen: NIAS Publishing.Google Scholar
  65. Santarelli, E., & Tran, H. T. (2013). The interplay of human and social capital in shaping entrepreneurial performance: the case of Vietnam. Small Business Economics, 40(2), 435–458.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-012-9427-y.Google Scholar
  66. Santarelli, E., & Tran, H. T. (2016). Diversification strategies and firm performance in Vietnam: evidence from parametric and semi-parametric approaches. The Economics of Transition, 24(1), 31–68.  https://doi.org/10.1111/ecot.12082.Google Scholar
  67. Santarelli, E., & Vivarelli, M. (2007). Entrepreneurship and the process of firms’ entry, survival and growth. Industrial and Corporate Change, 16(3), 455–488.  https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtm010.Google Scholar
  68. Santarelli, E., Carree, M., & Verheul, I. (2009). Unemployment and firm entry and exit: an update on a controversial relationship. Regional Studies, 43(8), 1061–1073.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400801968361.Google Scholar
  69. Sarasvathy, S. D., Menon, A. R., & Kuechle, G. (2013). Failing firms and successful entrepreneurs: serial entrepreneurship as a temporal portfolio. Small Business Economics, 40(2), 417–434.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-011-9412-x.Google Scholar
  70. Schultz, T. W. (1980). Investment in entrepreneurial ability. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 82(4), 437–448.  https://doi.org/10.2307/3439676.Google Scholar
  71. Sieger, P., Zellweger, T., Nason, R. S., & Clinton, E. (2011). Portfolio entrepreneurship in family firms: a resource-based perspective. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 5(4), 327–351.  https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.120.Google Scholar
  72. Smallbone, D., & Welter, F. (2001). The distinctiveness of entrepreneurship in transition economies. Small Business Economics, 16(4), 249–262.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011159216578.Google Scholar
  73. Sorgner, A., Fritsch, M., & Kritikos, A. (2017). Do entrepreneurs really earn less? Small Business Economics, 49(2), 251–272.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-017-9874-6.Google Scholar
  74. Teece, D. J. (1982). Towards an economic theory of the multiproduct firm. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 3(1), 39–63.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-2681(82)90003-8.Google Scholar
  75. Tihula, S., & Huovinen, J. (2010). Incidence of teams in the firms owned by serial, portfolio and first-time entrepreneurs. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 6(3), 249–260.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-008-0101-4.Google Scholar
  76. Tran, H. T., & Santarelli, E. (2014). Capital constraints and the performance of entrepreneurial firms in Vietnam. Industrial and Corporate Change, 23(3), 827–864.  https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtt030.Google Scholar
  77. Ucbasaran, D., Westhead, P., & Wright, M. (2006). Habitual entrepreneurs. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  78. Ucbasaran, D., Alsos, G. A., Westhead, P., & Wright, M. (2008). Habitual entrepreneurs. Foundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship, 4(4), 309–450.  https://doi.org/10.1561/0300000014.Google Scholar
  79. Vijverberg, W., & Haughton, J. (2002). Household enterprises in Vietnam: survival, growth, and living standards. Discussion paper WPS 2773, The World Bank.Google Scholar
  80. Wang, T., Thornhill, S., & De Castro, J. O. (2017). Entrepreneurial orientation, legitimation, and new venture performance. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 11(4), 373–392.  https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1246.Google Scholar
  81. Wennberg, K., Wiklund, J., DeTienne, D.R. & Cardon, M.S. (2010). Reconceptualizing entrepreneurial exit: Divergent exit routes and their drivers. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(4), 361–375.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusven.2009.01.001.
  82. Westhead, P., & Wright, M. (1998). Novice, portfolio, and serial founders: are they different? Journal of Business Venturing, 13(3), 173–204.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(97)90002-1.Google Scholar
  83. Westhead, P., & Wright, M. (1999). Contributions of novice, portfolio and serial founders in rural and urban areas. Regional Studies, 33(2), 157–173.Google Scholar
  84. Westhead, P., Ucbasaran, D., & Wright, M. (2003). Differences between private firms owned by novice, serial and portfolio entrepreneurs: implications for policy-makers and practitioners. Regional Studies, 37(2), 187–200.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0034340022000057488.Google Scholar
  85. Westhead, P., Ucbasaran, D., Wright, M., & Binks, M. (2005). Novice, serial and portfolio entrepreneur behaviour and contributions. Small Business Economics, 25(2), 109–132.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-003-6461-9.Google Scholar
  86. Westhead, P., Ucbasaran, D., & Wright, M. (2009). Information search and opportunity identification: the importance of prior business ownership experience. International Small Business Journal, 27(6), 659–680.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242609344255.Google Scholar
  87. Wiklund, J., & Shepherd, D. A. (2008). Portfolio entrepreneurship: habitual and novice founders, new entry, and mode of organizing. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(4), 701–725.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2008.00249.x.Google Scholar
  88. World Bank (2009). Vietnam development report 2010: modern institutions. Joint Donor Report to the Vietnam Consultative Group Meeting, World Bank.Google Scholar
  89. Wright, M., Westhead, P., & Sohl, J. (1998). Editors’ introduction: habitual entrepreneurs and angel investors. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 22(4), 5–21.  https://doi.org/10.1177/104225879802200401.Google Scholar
  90. Zhang, Z., Zyphur, M., Narayanan, J., Arvey, R., Chaturvedi, S., Avolio, B., Lichtenstein, B., & Larsson, G. (2009). The genetic basis of entrepreneurship: effects of gender and personality. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 110(2), 93–107.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2009.07.002.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Sociology and Business LawUniversity of BolognaBolognaItaly
  2. 2.Telfer School of ManagementUniversity of OttawaOttawaCanada
  3. 3.Department of EconomicsUniversity of BolognaBolognaItaly

Personalised recommendations