Advertisement

The efficacy of gender-based federal procurement policies in the United States

  • Barbara Orser
  • Allan Riding
  • Julie Weeks
Article

Abstract

Because procurement policies are one means of redressing discrimination and economic exclusion, the United States government has targeted 23% of its annual half-trillion dollar spend to SMEs and 5% of its spend to women-owned businesses. This research studies the efficacy of various certifications, with particular reference to that of women-owned, on the frequency with which SMEs bid on, and succeed in obtaining, US federal procurement contracts. The research framework is informed by two theoretical paradigms, feminist empiricism and entrepreneurial feminism, and employs a secondary analysis of survey data of active federal contractors. Empirical findings inform the extent to which certifications are associated with bid frequency and bid success. The results indicate that none of the various certifications increase either bid frequency or bid success. The findings are consistent with entrepreneurial feminism and calls for federal accountability in contracting with women-owned supplier firms. Study recommendations complement research that has criticized US federal government policy with respect to women’s enterprise. The study findings have implications for other economies; emulation of US federal government procurement processes and practices are not supported. Recommendations include the need to review the impact of consolidated tenders on designated (as certified) SME vendors and to train procurement personnel about the economic contributions of women-owned businesses.

Keywords

Procurement Gender Women SMEs 

JEL Classifications

O25 L26 

References

  1. Ács, Z. J., Autio, E., & Szerb, L. (2014). National systems of entrepreneurship: measurement issues and policy implications. Research Policy, 43(3), 476–494.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.08.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahl, H. (2004). The scientific reproduction of gender inequality. Copenhagen: CBS Press.  https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1314.041 Google Scholar
  3. Ahl, H. (2006). Why research on women entrepreneurs needs new directions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30, 595–621.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2006.00138.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ahl, H., & Nelson, T. (2015). How policy positions women entrepreneurs: a comparative analysis of state discourse in Sweden and the United States. Journal of Business Venturing, 30(2), 273–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Ai, C., & Norton, E. (2003). Interaction terms in logit and probit models. Economics Letters, 80(July), 123–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Aidis, R., & Weeks, J. (2016). Mapping the gendered ecosystem: The evolution of measurement tools for comparative high-impact female entrepreneur development. International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship, 8(4), 330–352.  https://doi.org/10.1108/IJGE-12-2015-0044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Aidis, R., Weeks, J., & Anacker, K. (2015). The Global Women Entrepreneur Leaders Scorecard 2015: From awareness to action. Report. ACG Inc. (2015). Developed by ACG Inc. https://www.dell.com/learn/us/en/vn/corporate~secure~en/documents~2015-gwel-scorecard-executive-summary.pdf. Accessed 20 June 2016.
  8. Arora, R. (2016). Women-Owned Businesses Grow, Yet Gender Gap In Small Business Finance Remains, Forbes, March 5, 2016. https://www.forbes.com/sites/rohitarora/2016/03/05/women-owned-businesses-grow-yet-gender-gap-in-small-business-finance-remains/#667814f55d6d. Accessed 4 March 2017.
  9. Aschhoffa, B., & Sofkaa, W. (2009). Innovation on demand—can public procurement drive market success of innovations? Research Policy, 38(8), 1235–1247.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2009.06.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Astebro, T., & Bernhardt, I. (2005). The winners curse of human capital. Small Business Economics, 24, 63–78.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-005-3097-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bardasi, E., Sabarwal, S., & Terrell, K. (2011). How do female entrepreneurs perform? Evidence from three developing regions. Small Business Economics, 37(4), 417–441.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-011-9374-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bourne, K. A. (2007). Encountering one another: feminist relationships in organizational research. Organization Management Journal Teaching & Learning, 4(2), 120–133.  https://doi.org/10.1057/omj.2007.13 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bradfield, P. A. (2015). Investigating Successful Federal Government Performance-based Service Contracts: A Multiple-Case Study (Doctoral dissertation). Northcentral University, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2015.10.044.
  14. Brush, C., Carter, N., Greene, P., & Hart, M. (2004). Gatekeepers of venture growth: a Diana project report on the role and participation of women in the venture capital industry. Kansas City, MO: Kauffman Centre for Entrepreneurial Leadership.Google Scholar
  15. Busenitz, L., & Barney, J. (1997). Differences between entrepreneurs and managers in organizations: biases and heuristics in strategic decision-making. Journal of Business Venturing, 12(1), 9–30.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(96)00003-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Byrne, J., & Fayolle, A. (2010). A feminist inquiry into entrepreneurship training, theory and practice of entrepreneurship: frontiers in European entrepreneurship research. In D. Smallbone, J. Leitão, M. Raposo, & F. Welter (Eds.), The theory and practice of entrepreneurship: frontiers in European entrepreneurship research (pp. 76–100). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  17. Campbell, R. (1994). The virtues of feminist empiricism. Hypatia, 9(1), 90–115.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527-2001.1994.tb00111.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Canadian Aboriginal and Minority Supplier Council (CAMSC) (2015). CAMSC impact report. https://www.camsc.ca/impact-report. Accessed 29 July 2015.
  19. Canadian Centre for Diversity Inclusion. (2016). Supplier diversity in Canada. In Research and analysis of the next step in diversity and inclusion for forward-looking organizations. Winnipeg, CA: Canadian Centre for Diversity Inclusion.  https://doi.org/10.3390/jof2040034 Google Scholar
  20. Canadian Federation of Independent Business (CFIB) (2004). Federal government review of procurement. An SME perspective. Presentation to the Hon. Walt Lastewka, Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Public Works and Government Services, 19 Oct 2004.Google Scholar
  21. Canadian Taskforce for Women's Business Growth. (2011). Action Strategies to Support Women's Enterprise Development. Accessed February 2, 2018 at http://sites.telfer.uottawa.ca/womensenterprise/.
  22. Centre for Women‘s Business Research (1998). Market opportunities for women entrepreneurs: A study of government procurement and corporate purchasing in women- and men-owned businesses. Prepared under contract for the National Women’s Business Council. http://www.womensbusinessresearch.org/press/details.php?id=82.
  23. Centre for Women’s Business Research. (2003). Access to markets: Perspectives from large corporations and women’s business enterprises. In Commissioned by Women’s Business Enterprise National Council, Women Entrepreneurs’ Commission. Ewing Marion Kauffman: Foundation.Google Scholar
  24. Coleman, S. (2007). The role of human and financial capital in the profitability and growth of women-owned small firms. Journal of Small Business Management, 45(3), 303–319.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-627X.2007.00214.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Coleman, S., & Robb, A. M. (2012). A rising tide: financing strategies for women-owned firms. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  26. de Bruin, A., Brush, C., & Welter, F. (2006). Advancing a framework for coherent research on women’s entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31(3), 323–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. De Clercq, D., & Honig, B. (2011). Entrepreneurship as an integrating mechanism for disadvantaged persons. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 23(5–6), 353–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Du Rietz, A., & Henrekson, M. (2000). Testing the female underperformance hypothesis. Small Business Economics, 14(1), 1–10.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008106215480 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Edquist, C., & Hommen, L. (2000). Public technology procurement and innovation theory. In C. Edquist, L. Hommen, & L. Tsipouri (Eds.), Public technology procurement and innovation. Economics of science, technology and innovation (Vol. 16, pp. 5–70). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Edquist, C., Vonortas, N. S., Zabala-Iturriagagoitia, J. M., & Edler, J. (Eds.). (2015). Public procurement for innovation. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  31. European Commission. (2013). EU 2013 Report on Policy Coherence for Development. Accessed February 2, 2017 at https://ec.europa.eu/europeaid/sites/devco/files/pcd-report-2013_en.pdf.
  32. European Commission. (2014). SMEs' access to public procurement markets and aggregation of demand in the EU. Commissioned by the European Commission, DG Internal Market and Services. Prepared by PwC, ICF GHK and Ecorys.Google Scholar
  33. Feld, B. (2012). Startup communities: building an entrepreneurial ecosystem in your city. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd..  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpg.2012.09.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Fischer, E., Reuber, R., & Dyke, L. (1993). A theoretical overview and extension of research on sex, gender and entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 8, 151–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. FreshMinds Research (2008). Evaluating SME Experiences of Government Procurement, Federation of Small Business. London, UK. http://shared.freshminds.co.uk/marketing/SME_Procurement_Report.pdf. Accessed 20 June 2016.
  36. Gammage, S., Jorgensen, H., McGill, E., & White, M. (2002). Trade impact review: framework for gender assessments of trade and investment agreements. Washington, D.C.: Women’s EDGE, Global Trade Program, The Coalition for Women’s Economic Development and Global Equality, Inc..  https://doi.org/10.1579/0044-7447-31.4.285 Google Scholar
  37. Geroski, P. A. (1990). Procurement policy as a tool of industrial policy. International Review of Applied Economics, 4(2), 182–198.  https://doi.org/10.1080/758523673 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Glover Committee (2008). Accelerating the SME economic engine: Through transparent, simple and strategic procurement. HM Treasury. Accessed 20 June 2016 at http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/http:/www.hm-treasury.gov.uk/d/pbr08_economicengine_2390.pdf
  39. Greene, W. (2012). Econometric analysis. Edinburgh, UK: Pearson/Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  40. Jung, O. (2010). Women entrepreneurs. Small business financing profiles. Ottawa, CA: [former] Small Business and Tourism Branch, Industry Canada. https://www.ic.gc.ca/eic/site/061.nsf/vwapj/Profile-Profil_Oct2010_eng.pdf/$file/Profile-Profil_Oct2010_eng.pdf. Accessed 17 Sept 2015.
  41. Klyver, K., & Grant, S. (2010). Gender differences in entrepreneurial networking and participation. International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship, 2(3), 213–227.  https://doi.org/10.1108/17566261011079215 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kovsted, J. A. (2010). Gender equality: Women’s empowerment and the Paris declaration of aid effectiveness: Issues brief 6. Integrating gender equality dimensions into public financial management reforms. Paris, FR: OECD. www.oecd.org/dac/gender/effectiveness. Accessed 20 June 2016.
  43. Layman, M. (2016). Mistakes, fraud, and waste: mass inefficiencies in small business programs that allow self-certification. Public Contract Law Journal, 46(1), 167–187.Google Scholar
  44. Liao, D., Orser, B., & Riding, A., (2017). Canadian Federal Procurement As A Policy Lever to Support Innovation and SME Growth. Accessed 1 July 2017 at telfer.uOttawa.ca/SMEprocurement.
  45. Malecki, E. J. (1997). Entrepreneurs, networks, and economic development: a review of recent research. In J. A. Katz (Ed.), Advances in entrepreneurship, firm emergence, and growth (Vol. 3, pp. 57–118). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  46. Marlow, S., & Swail, J. (2014). Gender, risk and finance why can’t a woman be more like a man? Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 26(1–2), 80–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Mayoux, L. (2001). Jobs, gender and small enterprises: Getting the policy environment right. In-focus programme on boosting employment through enterprise development, job creation and enterprise development. Geneva, SZ: International Labour Office.Google Scholar
  48. McCrudden, C. (2004). Using public procurement to achieve social outcomes. Natural Resources Forum, 28(4), 257–267.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-8947.2004.00099.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. McGill, E. (2004). Poverty and social analysis of trade agreements: a more coherent approach? Boston College International & Comparative Law Review, 27(2), 429–452.Google Scholar
  50. MacGregor, R., & Vrazalic, L. (2008). The role of gender in the perception of e-commerce adoption in SMES: An Australian study. Communications of the IBIMA, 4, 141–147.Google Scholar
  51. Mills, K. (2011). Gender divided: Driving prosperity through entrepreneurship and financial inclusion. Presentation to the APEC Women and the Economy Summit, 15 September 2016, San Francisco, U.S.A.Google Scholar
  52. Mirchandani, K. (1999). Feminist insight on gendered work: new directions in research on women and entrepreneurship. Gender, Work and Organization, 6(4), 224–235.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0432.00085 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Nakabayashi, J. (2010). Small Business Set-asides in Procurement Auctions: An Empirical Analysis. Tsukuba Economics Working Papers No. 2009–005. Retrieved April 28, 2017 from: http://www.econ.tsukuba.ac.jp/RePEc/2009-005.pdf
  54. Nilsson, P. (1997). Business counselling services directed towards female entrepreneurs—some legitimacy dilemmas. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 9(3), 39–258.Google Scholar
  55. Office of Government Accountability (OGA). (2014). Request to Congressional Requesters, Women-owned Small Business Program, Certifier Oversight and Additional Eligibility Controls are Needed. Accessed February 2, 2018 at https://www.gao.gov/assets/670/666431.pdf.
  56. Orser, B., & Elliott, C. (2015). Feminine capital. Unlocking the power of women entrepreneurs. Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  57. Orser, B., & Weeks, J. (2009). Procurement strategies to support women-owned enterprise. Ottawa, CA: WEConnect International Canada. http://www.weconnectcanada.org/links_research.html. Accessed 20 June 2016.
  58. Pearson, J. N., Stanley, E. F., & Alicia Cooper, A. (1993). Challenges and approaches to purchasing from minority-owned firms: a longitudinal examination. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 18(2), 71–88.Google Scholar
  59. Pettersson, K., Ahl, H., Berglund, K., & Tillmar, M. (2017). In the name of women? Feminist readings of policies for women’s entrepreneurship in Scandinavia. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 33(1), 50–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Public Works Government Services Canada (2013). Integral to the economy, integral to procurement. 2012 study of participation of small and medium enterprises in federal procurement. Ottawa, CA: Office of Small and Medium Enterprises and Strategic Engagement and Acquisition, Canada, https://buyandsell.gc.ca/sites/buyandsell.gc.ca/files/pwgsc_study-sme-federal-procurement_2012.pdf. Accessed 10 March 2016.
  61. Ram, M., & Smallbone, D. (2003). Supplier diversity initiatives and the diversification of ethnic minority businesses in the UK. Policy Studies, 24(4), 187–204.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0144287042000216117 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Reijonen, H., Saastamoinen, J. & Tammi, T. (2016). Does collaboration with public and private sector actors in public procurement of innovation improve SME competitiveness? Paper presentation to the 19th Uddevalla Symposium on "Geography, Open Innovation, Diversity and Entrepreneurship," June 30 to July 2, 2016, Birkbeck University of London, London, United Kingdom, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2015.12.046.
  63. Sergeant, W. (2015). Using entrepreneurial ecosystem development to foster economic growth. Presentation at George Washington University, Entrepreneurship Research & Policy Conference, 15 October 2015, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  64. Small Business Administration (SBA) (2015). Women-owned small businesses federal contracting program. https://www.sba.gov/content/women-owned-small-business-program. Accessed 15 Oct 2015.
  65. Smallbone, D., Athayde, R., & Meng, L. Y. (2007). Procurement opportunities for black and minority ethnic (BAME) businesses in three English regions, EQUAL: minority business. London, UK: Kingston University London.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-4658.2007.06076.x Google Scholar
  66. Spigel, B. (2015). The relational organization of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice.  https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12167
  67. Spigel, B. (2016). Resource acquisition and co-production in entrepreneurial ecosystems. Babson College Entrepreneurship Research Conference, 8 June 2016, Bodo, Norway.Google Scholar
  68. Stam, E. (2015). Entrepreneurial ecosystems and regional policy: a sympathetic critique. European Planning Studies, 23(9), 1759–1769.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2015.1061484 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Storey, D. (1998). Six steps to heaven: Evaluating the impact of public policies to support small businesses in developed economies. The Blackwell Handbook of Entrepreneurship, Blackwell Publishing Ltd., 176-193.Google Scholar
  70. U.K. Women’s Enterprise Task Force. (2009). Final report and recommendations greater return on women’s enterprise (GROWE) task force. SEEDA, women’s enterprise task force. London, UK: U.K. Women’s Enterprise Task Force.Google Scholar
  71. United Nations (UN) (2014). Empowering Women Entrepreneurs through Information and Communications Technologies. A Practical Guide. UN Conference on Trade and Development, Current studies on Sceince, Technology and Innovation, No.9. Accessed February 2, 2018 at http://unctad.org/en/pages/PublicationWebflyer.aspx?publicationid=875.
  72. UN Women (2015). Progress of the world’s women, 2015–2016. Transforming economies, realizing benefits. New York, The United Nations. http://progress.unwomen.org. Accessed 22 May 2016.
  73. United States Government Accountability Office (2014). Women-owned small business program certifier oversight and additional eligibility controls are needed. Accessed 2 March 2017 at http://www.gao.gov/assets/670/666431.pdf
  74. US Small Business Administration (2017). The women-owned small business program. An update and overview. Accessed March 2, 2017 at https://www.sba.gov/contracting/government-contracting-programs/women-owned-small-businesses
  75. Verveer, M. (2010). Keynote presentation. Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs) Ministerial Meeting and Women’s Entrepreneurship Summit (WES), 1 October 2010, Gifu City, Japan.Google Scholar
  76. Walker, D., & Joyner, B. (1999). Female entrepreneurship and the market process: gender-based public policy considerations. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 2(4), 21–31.Google Scholar
  77. Weeks, J. (2016). The 2016 State of Women-owned Businesses Report. Commissioned by American Express OPEN, A Summary of Important Trends, 2007-2016. Accessed on February 2, 2018 at http://www.womenable.com/content/userfiles/2016_State_of_Women-Owned_Businesses_Executive_Report.pdf.
  78. Welch, C. L., Welch, D. E., & Hewerdine, L. (2008). Gender and export behaviour: evidence from women-owned enterprises. Journal of Business Ethics, 83(1), 113–126.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9652-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Women Impacting Public Policy (2009). Economic blueprint: The women business owners’ platform for growth. http://www.wipp.org/resource/resmgr/logos/wipp_blueprint_sign-100.jpg. Accessed.
  80. Women’s Business Enterprise National Council (WBENC) (2016). About WBENC. http://www.wbenc.org/about-wbenc/. Accessed, DOI:  https://doi.org/10.3390/jof2040034.
  81. Women’s Enterprise Scotland (2014). Framework and action plan for women’s enterprise. Scotland, UK: Cabinet Secretary for Finance. https://wescotland.files.wordpress.com/2014/11/wes-action-framework.pdf. Accessed on 10 June 2016.
  82. World Bank Group International Finance Group. (2009). Embedding gender in sustainability reporting—a practitioner’s guide. Washington, D.C.: The World Bank Group Global Reporting Initiative.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Telfer School of ManagementUniversity of OttawaOttawaCanada
  2. 2.WomenableEmpireUSA

Personalised recommendations