Advertisement

Small Business Economics

, Volume 52, Issue 1, pp 27–45 | Cite as

Self-employment effects on regional growth: a bigger bang for a buck?

  • Alexandra TsvetkovaEmail author
  • Mark Partridge
  • Michael Betz
Article
  • 118 Downloads

Abstract

This paper estimates the net employment spillovers from changes in self-employment (SE) and compares them to spillovers from changes in wage and salary (WS) employment using US county-level data. Our findings offer a policy-relevant perspective on the relative importance of SE and WS employment and help bridge two entrepreneurship research traditions. Our estimated effects of self-employment, at the margin, are substantially larger than identical effects of paid employment. This supports the literature that points to a special role played by self-employed businesses in economic growth. At the same time, the little attention given to SE as a potential engine of growth among policymakers and scholars can be explained, at least in part, by the relatively small total economic impact of self-employment stemming from its small share of the economy. In an austere fiscal environment, however, spending a dollar to stimulate SE is likely to have greater returns as opposed to stimulating WS employment, assuming the costs of adding one SE and one WS job are comparable.

Keywords

Self-employment Entrepreneurship Employment growth Urban-rural hierarchy 

JEL classification

J21 O18 R11 R12 

Notes

Funding information

We appreciate the partial support of USDA AFRI grant no. 11400612 “Maximizing the Gains of Old and New Energy Development for America’s Rural Communities.”

References

  1. Acs, Z. J. (2006). How is entrepreneurship good for economic growth? Innovations, 1(1), 97–107.  https://doi.org/10.1162/itgg.2006.1.1.97.Google Scholar
  2. Acs, Z. J., & Sanders, M. (2013). Knowledge spillover entrepreneurship in an endogenous growth model. Small Business Economics, 41, 775–795.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-013-9506-8.Google Scholar
  3. Acs, Z. J., Braunerhjelm, P., Audretsch, D., & Carlsson, B. (2009). The knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 32(1), 15–30.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-008-9157-3.Google Scholar
  4. Allcott, H., & Keniston, D. (2014). Dutch disease or agglomeration? The local economic effects of natural resource booms in modern America. Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/w20508.  https://doi.org/10.3386/w20508.
  5. Bartik, T. J. (1991). Who benefits from state and local economic development policies? Kalamzoo: Upjohn.  https://doi.org/10.17848/9780585223940.Google Scholar
  6. Bartik, T. J. (1993). Who benefits from local job growth: migrants or the original residents? Regional Studies, 27(4), 297–311.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00343409312331347575.Google Scholar
  7. Becker, G. S., Murphy, K. M., & Tamura, R. (1994). Human capital: a theoretical and empirical analysis with special reference to education (3rd ed.). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  8. Betz, M. R., & Partridge, M. D. (2013). Country road take me home: migration patterns in Appalachian America and place-based policy. International Regional Science Review, 36(3), 267–295.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0160017612467646
  9. Betz, M. R., Farren, M., Lobao, L., & Partridge, M. (2015). Coal mining, economic development, and the natural resource curse. Energy Economics, 50, 105–116.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2015.04.005
  10. Birch, D. (1979). The job generation process. Unpublished manuscript. In MIT Program on Neighborhood and Regional Change for the Economic Development Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=1510007.
  11. Birch, D. (1987). Job creation in America: how our smallest companies put the most people to work. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  12. Blanchard, O. J., Katz, L. F., Hall, R. E., & Eichengreen, B. (1992). Regional evolutions. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1, 1–75.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2534556
  13. Braunerhjelm, P., Acs, Z. J., Audretsch, D., & Carlsson, B. (2010). The missing link: knowledge diffusion and entrepreneurship in endogenous growth. Small Business Economics, 34, 105–125.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-009-9235-1.Google Scholar
  14. Brown, C., Hamilton, J., & Medoff, J. L. (1990). Employers large and small. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Bunten, D., Weiler, S., Thompson, E., & Zahran, S. (2015). Entrepreneurship, information, and growth. Journal of Regional Science, 55(4), 560–584.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jors.12157.Google Scholar
  16. Carree, M., Congregado, E., Golpe, A., & van Stel, A. (2015). Self-employment and job generation in metropolitan areas, 1969–2009. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 27(3–4), 181–201.  https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2015.1025860.Google Scholar
  17. Christiaensen, L., & Todo, Y. (2014). Poverty reduction during the rural–urban transformation—the role of the missing middle. World Development, 63, 43–58.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.10.002.Google Scholar
  18. Christiaensen, L., Weerdt, J., & Todo, Y. (2013). Urbanization and poverty reduction: the role of rural diversification and secondary towns. Agricultural Economics, 44(4–5), 435–447.  https://doi.org/10.1111/agec.12028.Google Scholar
  19. Clarke, S., & Gaile, G. (1989). Moving towards entrepreneurial local development strategies: opportunities and barriers. Policy Studies Journal, 17(3), 574–598.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.1989.tb00803.x.Google Scholar
  20. Davis, S. J., Haltiwanger, J., & Schuh, S. (1996). Small business and job creation: dissecting the myth and reassessing the facts. Small Business Economics, 8(4), 297–315.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00393278.Google Scholar
  21. Davis, S. J., Haltiwanger, J. C., & Schuh, S. (1998). Job creation and destruction. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  22. Deller, S. (2010). Spatial variations in the role of microenterprises in economic growth. The Review of Regional Studies, 40(1), 71–97.Google Scholar
  23. Deller, S., & Goetz, S. (2009). Historical description of economic development policy. In S. Goetz, S. Deller, & T. Harris (Eds.), Targeting regional economic development (pp. 17–34). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Deller, S., & McConnon, J. C. (2009). Microenterprises and economic growth: a panel study of the US states 1977–1997. Applied Economics Letters, 16(13), 1307–1312.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13504850701367361.Google Scholar
  25. Duranton, G. (2016). Determinants of city growth in Colombia. Papers in Regional Science, 95, 101–131.  https://doi.org/10.1111/pirs.12225.Google Scholar
  26. Duranton, G., & Turner, M. A. (2011). The fundamental law of road congestion: evidence from US cities. American Economic Review, 101, 2616–2652.  https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.101.6.2616.Google Scholar
  27. Fleming, D. A., & Goetz, S. J. (2011). Does local firm ownership matter? Economic Development Quarterly, 25(3), 277–281.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0891242411407312.Google Scholar
  28. Fox, K. A., & Kumar, T. K. (1965). The functional economic area: delineation and implications for policy analysis. Papers of the Regional Science Association, 15, 57–85.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1435-5597.1965.tb01315.x.Google Scholar
  29. Fritsch, M., & Mueller, P. (2004). Effects of new business formation on regional development over time. Regional Studies, 38(8), 961–975.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0034340042000280965.Google Scholar
  30. Gaile, G. L. (1980). The spread-backwash concept. Regional Studies, 14(1), 15–25.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09595238000185021.Google Scholar
  31. Glaeser, E. L., Rosenthal, S. S., & Strange, W. C. (2010). Urban economics and entrepreneurship. Journal of Urban Economics, 67(1), 1–14.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2009.10.005.Google Scholar
  32. Goetz, S. J., Fleming, D. A., & Rupasingha, A. (2012). The economic impacts of self-employment. Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 44(03), 315–321.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S1074070800000432.Google Scholar
  33. Griliches, Z. (1979). Issues in assessing the contribution of R&D to productivity growth. Bell Journal of Economics, 10, 92–116.  https://doi.org/10.2307/3003321.Google Scholar
  34. Haltiwanger, J., Jarmin, R. S., & Miranda, J. (2013). Who creates jobs? Small versus large versus young. Review of Economics and Statistics, 95(2), 347–361.  https://doi.org/10.1162/REST_a_00288.Google Scholar
  35. Hart, D. M. (2008). The politics of “entrepreneurial” economic development policy of states in the U.S. Review of Policy Research, 25(2), 149–168.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.2007.00316.x.Google Scholar
  36. Henderson, J. V. (1997). Medium size cities. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 27(6), 583–612.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-0462(96)02169-2.Google Scholar
  37. Henry, M. S., Barkley, D. L., & Bao, S. (1997). The hinterland's stake in metropolitan growth: evidence from selected southern regions. Journal of Regional Science, 37(3), 479–501.  https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4146.00065.Google Scholar
  38. Holmes, T., & Stevens, J. (2014). An alternative theory of the plant size distribution, with geography and intra- and international trade. Journal of Political Economy, 122(2), 369–421.Google Scholar
  39. Komarek, T. M., & Loveridge, S. (2014). Too big? Too small? Just right? An empirical perspective on local firm size distribution and economic growth in US counties and high-poverty rural regions. Economic Development Quarterly, 28(1), 28–41.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0891242413506735.Google Scholar
  40. Komarek, T., & Loveridge, S. (2015). Firm sizes and economic development: estimating long-term effects on US county growth, 1990–2000. Journal of Regional Science, 55(2), 262–279.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jors.12159.Google Scholar
  41. Mueller, P., Van Stel, A., & Storey, D. J. (2008). The effects of new firm formation on regional development over time: the case of Great Britain. Small Business Economics, 30(1), 59–71.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-007-9056-z.Google Scholar
  42. Myrdal, G. (1963). Economic theory and underdeveloped regions. London: Methuen & Co., Ltd..Google Scholar
  43. Neumark, D., Wall, B., & Zhang, J. (2011). Do small businesses create more jobs? New evidence for the United States from the National Establishment Time Series. Review of Economics and Statistics, 93(1), 16–29.  https://doi.org/10.1162/REST_a_00060.Google Scholar
  44. Parr, J. B. (1987). Growth poles, regional development, and central place theory. Papers of the Regional Science Association, 31, 172–212.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1435-5597.1973.tb00893.x.Google Scholar
  45. Partridge, M. (2010). The duelling models: NEG vs amenity migration in explaining US engines of growth. Papers in Regional Science, 89(3), 513–536.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1435-5957.2010.00315.x.Google Scholar
  46. Partridge, M., Rickman, D. S., Ali, K., & Olfert, M. R. (2008). Lost in space: population growth in the American hinterlands and small cities. Journal of Economic Geography, 8(6), 727–757.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbn038.Google Scholar
  47. Partridge, M., Rickman, D. S., Ali, K., & Olfert, M. R. (2009). Agglomeration spillovers and wage and housing cost gradients across the urban hierarchy. Journal of International Economics, 78(1), 126–140.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2009.02.004.Google Scholar
  48. Polèse, M., & Shearmur, R. (2004). Is distance really dead? Comparing industrial patterns over time in Canada. International Regional Science Review, 27(4), 431–457.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0160017604267637.Google Scholar
  49. Romer, P. M. (1990). Endogenous technological change. The Journal of Political Economy, 98(5, Part 2: The Problem of Development: A Conference of the Institute for the Study of Free Enterprise Systems), S71–S102.Google Scholar
  50. Rupasingha, A., & Goetz, S. J. (2013). Self-employment and local economic performance: evidence from US counties. Papers in Regional Science, 92(1), 141–161.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1435-5957.2011.00396.x.Google Scholar
  51. Shane, S. A. (2008). The illusions of entrepreneurship: the costly myths that entrepreneurs, investors, and policy makers live by. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Shrestha, S. S., Goetz, S. J., & Rupasingha, A. (2007). Proprietorship formations and US job growth. The Review of Regional Studies, 37(2), 146.Google Scholar
  53. Solow, R. M. (1956). A contribution to the theory of economic growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70(1), 65–94.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1884513.Google Scholar
  54. Stephens, H. M., & Partridge, M. (2011). Do entrepreneurs enhance economic growth in lagging regions? Growth and Change, 42(4), 431–465.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2257.2011.00563.x.Google Scholar
  55. Stephens, H. M., Partridge, M. D., & Faggian, A. (2013). Innovation, entrepreneurship and economic growth in lagging regions. Journal of Regional Science, 53(5), 778–812.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jors.12019.Google Scholar
  56. Tsvetkova, A. (2015). Innovation, entrepreneurship, and metropolitan economic performance: empirical test of recent theoretical propositions. Economic Development Quarterly, 29(4), 299–316.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0891242415581398.Google Scholar
  57. Tsvetkova, A., & Partridge, M. (2017). The shale revolution and entrepreneurship: an assessment of the relationship between energy sector expansion and small business entrepreneurship in US counties. Energy, 141, 423–434.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.09.101
  58. Tsvetkova, A., Partridge, M., & Betz, M. R. (2017). Entrepreneurial and employment responses to economic conditions across the rural-urban continuum. The Annals of American Academy of Political and Social Sciences.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716217711884.
  59. Turner, R. C., & Cassell, M. K. (2007). When do states pursue targeted economic development policies? The adoption and expansion of state enterprise zone programs. Social Science Quarterly, 88(1), 86–103.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6237.2007.00448.x.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Ohio State UniversityColumbusUSA
  2. 2.Jinan UniversityGuangzhouChina
  3. 3.Urban Studies and Regional ScienceGran Sasso Science InstituteL’AquilaItaly

Personalised recommendations