Advertisement

Small Business Economics

, Volume 53, Issue 4, pp 1033–1050 | Cite as

Accounting information quality and guaranteed loans: evidence from Japanese SMEs

  • Hyonok Kim
  • Yukihiro YasudaEmail author
Article
  • 207 Downloads

Abstract

We empirically investigate the effects of accounting information quality, as measured by accruals quality, on the use of government guaranteed loans, which we regard as a form of transaction lending. We find that higher accruals quality is associated with higher usage rates of government guaranteed loans, but not with those of nonguaranteed loans, which we consider to constitute relationship lending within the Japanese context. We also find that higher accruals quality is not related to the interest rate for guaranteed loans, but rather is associated with a lower interest rate for nonguaranteed loans. These results indicate that the relevant accounting information is effectively used in screening processes for small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), but that effectiveness varies, depending on the particular lending technology employed.

Keywords

Accruals quality Guaranteed loans Transaction lending Relationship lending Interest rates 

JEL classification

G21 G31 G32 L26 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Julie Ann Elston (editor) and anoymous referees. This study is conducted as a part of the Project “Corporate financing and firm dynamics study group” undertaken at Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI). The original title of this paper was “Accounting Information Quality and Government Guaranteed Loans: Evidence from Japanese SMEs.” The authors are grateful to the valuable comments and suggestions by Masayuki Morikawa (RIETI), Keiichiro Oda (RIETI), Hiroshi Ohashi (University of Tokyo), Makoto Yano (Kyoto University), Olga Kandinskaia (CIIM), Arito Ono (Cho University), Iichrio Uesugi (Hitotsubashi University), DaisukeTsuruta (Nihon University), Shinya Okuda (Nagya City University), Kazuki Yokoyama (Nagoya City University), Kazuho Yoshida (Nagya City University), Joseph French (University of Northern Colorado), James A. Wilcox (University of California, Berkeley) and the members of the RIETI study group.

References

  1. Bartoli, F., Ferri, G., Murro, P., & Rotodi, Z. (2013). SME financing and the choice of lending technology in Italy: complementarity or substitutability? Journal of Banking and Finance, 37, 5476–5485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beck, T., Klapper, L. F., & Mendoza, J. C. (2010). The typology of partial credit guarantee funds around the world. Journal of Financial Stability, 6(4), 10–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berger, A. N., & Udell, G. F. (1992). Some evidence on the empirical significance of credit rationing. Journal of Political Economy, 100, 1047–1077.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berger, A. N., & Udell, G. F. (1995). Relationship lending and lines of credit in small firm finance. Journal of Business, 68, 351–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berger, A. N., & Udell, G. F. (2006). Amore complete conceptual framework for SME finance. Journal of Banking and Finance, 30, 2945–2966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Besanko, A. N., & Thakor, A. V. (1987). Collateral and rationing sorting equilibria in monopolistic and competitive markets. International Economic Review, 28, 671–689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Boot, A. W. A. (2000). Relationship banking: what do we know? Journal of Financial Intermediation, 9, 7–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cassar, G., Itter, C. D., Cavalluzzo, K. S. (2014). Alternative information sources and information asymmetry reduction: evidence from small business debt. Journal of Accounting and Economics, forthcoming.Google Scholar
  9. Christensen, J.L, Jackson, S., Mensah, S. and A. Riding (1999). Loan guarantee schemes in six countries, Working Paper, Aalborg University.Google Scholar
  10. Cowling, M., & Mitchell, P. (2003). Is the small firms’ loan guarantee scheme hazardous for banks or helpful to small business? Small Business Economics, 21, 63–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cowling, M. (2010). The role of loan guarantee schemes in alleviating credit rationing in the UK. Journal of Financial Stability, 6, 36–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cowling, M., & Siepel, J. (2013). Public intervention in UK small firm credit markets: value-for-money or waste of scarce resources? Technovation, 33, 265–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cowling, M., Ughetto, E., & Lee, N. (2018). The innovation debt penalty: cost of debt, loan default, and the effects of a public loan guarantee on high-tech firms. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 127, 166–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. DeAngelo, L. (1986). Accounting numbers as market valuation substitutes: a study of management buyouts of public stockholders. The Accounting Review, 61, 400–420.Google Scholar
  15. Dechow, P. M., Sloan, R. G., & Sweeney, A. P. (1995). Detecting earnings management. The Accounting Review, 70(2), 193–225.Google Scholar
  16. Dechow, P. M., & Dichev, I. D. (2002). The quality of accruals and earnings: the role of accrual estimation errors. The Accounting Review, 77(supplement), 35–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dechow, P., Ge, W., & Schrand, C. (2010). Understanding earnings quality: a review of the proxies, their determinants and their consequences. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 50, 344–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dechow, P., Khimich, N., Sloan, R. (2011). The accrual anomaly. In L. Zacks (Ed.), The handbook of equity market anomalies: translating market inefficiencies into effective investment strategies (pp.23–59). Wiley Finance.Google Scholar
  19. Dechow, P. M., Hutton, A. P., Kim, J. H., & Sloan, R. G. (2012). Detecting earnings management: a new approach. Journal of Accounting Research, 50(2), 275–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Elsas, R., & Krahnen, J. P. (1998). Is relationship lending special? Evidence from credit-file data in Germany. Journal of Banking & Finance, 22, 1283–1316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Francis, J., La Fond, R., Olsson, P. M., & Schipper, K. (2005). The market pricing of accruals quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 39, 295–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Garcia-Teruel, P. J., Martinez-Solano, P., & Sanchez-Ballesta, J. P. (2014). The role of accruals quality in the access to bank debt. Journal of Banking and Finance, 38, 186–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Goldfeld, S. M. (1966). Commercial bank behavior and economic activity: a structural study of monetary policy in the postwar United States. North Holland, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  24. Healy, P. M. (1985). The effect of bonus schemes on accounting decisions. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 7, 85–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jaffee, D. M. (1971). Credit rationing and commercial loan market. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  26. Jones, J. (1991). Earnings management during import relief investigations. Journal of Accounting Research, 29, 193–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kano, M., Uchida, H., Udell, G. F., & Watanabe, W. (2011). Information verifiability, bank organization, bank competition and bank-borrower relationships. Journal of Banking and Finance, 35, 935–954.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kirschenmann, K. (2016). Credit rationing in small firm-bank relationships. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 26, 68–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lee, G., & Masulis, R. W. (2009). Seasoned equity offerings: quality of accounting information and expected flotation costs. Journal of Financial Economics, 92, 443–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. McNichols, M. (2002). Discussion of the quality of accruals and earnings: the role of accrual estimation errors. Accounting Review, 77(supplement), 61–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Nitani, M., & Riding, A. (2005). Promoting enterprise development or subsidizing tradition? International Small Business Journal, 23, 48–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ono, A., Uesugi, I., & Yasuda, Y. (2013). Are lending relationships beneficial or harmful for public credit guarantees? Evidence from Japan’s Emergency Credit Guarantee Program. Journal of Financial Stability, 9, 151–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Petersen, M., & Rajan, R. (1994). The benefit of lending relationships: evidence from small business data. Journal of Finance, 49, 3–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Richardson, S. A., Sloan, R. G., Soliman, M. K., & Tuna, I. (2005). Accrual reliability, earnings persistence and stock prices. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 39, 437–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Riding, A. L., & Haines, G. (2001). Loan guarantees: cost of default and benefits to small firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 16, 595–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sette, E., & Gobbi, G. (2015). Relationship lending during a financial crisis. Journal of European Economic Association, 13(3), 453–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Stiglitz, J., & Weiss, A. (1981). Credit rationing in markets with imperfect information. American Economic Review, 71(3), 393–410.Google Scholar
  38. Udell, G.F. (2015). SME access to intermediated credit: what do we know and what don’t we know? Reserve Bank of Australia, Conference Volume.Google Scholar
  39. Uesugi, I., Saki, K., & Yamashiro, G. M. (2010). The effectiveness of the public credit guarantees in the Japanese loan market. Journal of the Japanese and International Economics, 24, 457–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Ughetto, E., Scellato, G., & Cowling, M. (2017). Cost of capital and public loan guarantees to small firms. Small Business Economics, 49, 319–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Wilcox, J. A., Yasuda, Y. (2009). Do government guarantees of bank loans lower, or raise, banks' nonguaranteed lending? In Reforming Financial Regulation. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Business AdministrationTokyo Keizai UniversityKokubunjiJapan
  2. 2.School of Business AdministrationHitotsubashi UniversityKunitachiJapan

Personalised recommendations