Advertisement

Small Business Economics

, Volume 52, Issue 2, pp 485–504 | Cite as

The governance of universities and the establishment of academic spin-offs

  • Michele Meoli
  • Stefano Paleari
  • Silvio VismaraEmail author
Article

Abstract

While the metaphor of entrepreneurial ecosystem has become popular in academia, industry and government, one aspect is almost neglected, the role of universities. In particular, there is a paucity of studies that examine the governance of universities in relation to their engagement within the ecosystem. This paper relates for the first time the governance structure of universities to their capacity to foster the establishment of academic spin-offs. Thanks to a regulatory change imposing to Italian State universities the enrollment of lay members (i.e., external directors) in their board of directors, we can observe their appointment as an exogenous shock. We find that, while half of the universities appoint the minimum required number of lay members, others appoint more, up to creating board of directors where only the rector is not external. Moreover, there is a strong variety in the type of experiential capital that these lay members bring to universities. While some are entrepreneurs or managers of private firms, others are local stakeholders, such as lawyers or members of foundations or chambers of commerce. Such variance is reflected in the stimulus they exert on the creation of spin-offs. Using a regression discontinuity design on a sample of 1234 spin-offs from 66 universities, our longitudinal study of 1122 university-year observations shows that the rate of establishment of technology spin-offs increases more when more entrepreneurs are appointed. Local stakeholders in the university’s board of directors, by contrast, are associated with increased establishments of service-oriented spin-offs.

Keywords

Academic entrepreneurship Spin-offs University Technology transfer Governance Higher education 

JEL classification

I23 M13 O38 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This paper was presented at the Small Business Economics Special Issue Development Conference “The Governance of Entrepreneurial Ecosystems,” held in Catania, Italy, on September 29–30, 2016. We thank the conference participants, the guest editors Massimo G. Colombo, Giovanni B. Dagnino, Erik E. Lehmann, and Mari-Paz Salmador as well as the two anonymous reviewers for helpful comments.

References

  1. Acs, Z. J., Audretsch, D. B., & Feldman, M. (1994). R&D spillovers and recipient firm size. Review of Economics and Statistics, 76, 336–340.Google Scholar
  2. Acs, Z. J., Audretsch, D. B., & Lehmann, E. E. (2013). The knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 46, 526–535.Google Scholar
  3. Acs, Z. J., Audretsch, D. B., Lehmann, E. E., & Licht, G. (2016). National systems of entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 41(4), 757–774.Google Scholar
  4. Agrawal, A., & Knoeber, C. R. (2001). Do some directors play a political role? Journal of Law and Economics, 44, 179–198.Google Scholar
  5. Amaral, A., & Magalhaes, A. (2002). The emergent role of external stakeholders in European higher education governance. In governing higher education: National perspectives on institutional governance. Amsterdam: Springer Netherlands.Google Scholar
  6. Audretsch, D. B. (2015). Everything in its place: entrepreneurship and the strategic management of cities, regions and states. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Audretsch, D. B., & Feldman, M. (1996). R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production. American Economic Review, 86, 630–640.Google Scholar
  8. Audretsch, D. B., & Lehmann, E. E. (2005a). Does the knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship hold for regions? Research Policy, 34, 1191–1202.Google Scholar
  9. Audretsch, D. B., & Lehmann, E. E. (2005b). Mansfield’s missing link: the impact of knowledge spillovers on firm growth. Journal of Technology Transfer, 30(1/2), 207–210.Google Scholar
  10. Audretsch, D., & Thurik, R. (2004). A model of the entrepreneurial economy. International Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, 2(2), 143–166.Google Scholar
  11. Audretsch, D. B., Lehmann, E. E., & Warning, S. (2005). University spillovers and new firm location. Research Policy, 34(7), 1113–1122.Google Scholar
  12. Audretsch, D. B., Lehmann, E. E., Meoli, M., & Vismara S. (Eds.), (2015). University Evolution, Entrepreneurial Activity and Regional Competitiveness. Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  13. Audretsch, D. B., Lehmann, E. E., Meoli, M., & Vismara, S. (Eds.). (2015). University evolution, entrepreneurial activity and regional competitiveness. Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  14. Audretsch, D. B., Lehmann, E. E., Paleari, S., & Vismara, S. (2016). Entrepreneurial finance and technology transfer. Journal of Technology Transfer, 41(1), 1–9.Google Scholar
  15. de Boer, H., Bosker, R. J., & van der Werf, M. P. C. (2010). Sustainability of teacher expectation bias effects on long-term student performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 168–179.Google Scholar
  16. Bonardo, D., Paleari, S., & Vismara, S. (2010). The M&A dynamics of european science based entrepreneurial firms. Journal of Technology Transfer, 35(1), 141–180.Google Scholar
  17. Bonardo, D., Paleari, S., & Vismara, S. (2011). Valuing university-based firms: the effects of academic affiliation on IPO performance. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 35(4), 755–776.Google Scholar
  18. Bozeman, B. (2000). Technology transfer and public policy: a review of research and theory. Research Policy, 29(4), 627–655.Google Scholar
  19. Braun, D., & Merrien, F. X. (Eds.). (1999). Towards a new model of governance for universities ? A comparative view. London: Jessica Kingsley.Google Scholar
  20. Brown, W. O. (2001). Faculty participation in university governance and the effects on university performance. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 44(2), 129–143.Google Scholar
  21. Capano, G., Regini, M., & Turri, M. (2016). Changing governance in universities: Italian higher education in comparative perspective. Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  22. Colombo, M., & Piva, E. (2012). Firms’ genetic characteristics and competence-enlarging strategies: a comparison between academic and non-academic high-tech start-ups. Research Policy, 41(1), 79–92.Google Scholar
  23. Colombo, M. G., D’Adda, D., & Piva, E. (2010a). The contribution of university research to the growth of academic start-ups: an empirical analysis. Journal of Technology Transfer, 35, 113–140.Google Scholar
  24. Colombo, M. G., Mustar, P., & Wright, M. (2010b). Dynamics of science-based entrepreneurship. Journal of Technology Transfer, 35(4), 1–15.Google Scholar
  25. Di Gregorio, D., & Shane, S. (2003). Why do some universities generate more start-ups than others? Research Policy, 32(2), 209–227.Google Scholar
  26. Donina, D., Meoli, M., & Paleari, S. (2015a). Higher education reform in Italy: tightening regulation instead of steering at a distance. Higher Education Policy, 28, 215–234.Google Scholar
  27. Donina, D., Meoli, M., & Paleari, S. (2015b). The new institutional governance of Italian state universities: what role for the new governing bodies? Tertiary Education and Management, 21(1), 16–28.Google Scholar
  28. Feld, B. (2012). Startup communities: building an entrepreneurial ecosystem in your city. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  29. Fini, R., Grimaldi, R., Santoni, S., & Sobrero, M. (2011). Complements or substitutes? The role of universities and local context in supporting the creation of academic spin-offs. Research Policy, 40(8), 1113–1127.Google Scholar
  30. Gelman, A., & Imbens, G. (2014). Why high-order polynomials should not be used in regression discontinuity designs (no. 20405). Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  31. Grimaldi, R., & Grandi, A. (2003). Exploring the networking characteristics of new venture founding teams: a study of Italian academic spin-offs. Small Business Economics, 21(4), 329–341.Google Scholar
  32. Hemsley-Brown, J. V., & Oplatka, I. (2010). Market orientation in Universities: a comparative study of two national higher education systems. International Journal of Educational Management, 24(3), 204–220.Google Scholar
  33. Hessels, J., Van Gelderen, M., & Thurik, R. (2008). Entrepreneurial aspirations, motivations, and their drivers. Small Business Economics, 31, 323–339.Google Scholar
  34. Horta, H., Meoli, M., & Vismara, S. (2016). Skilled unemployment and the creation of academic spin-offs: a recession-push hypothesis. Journal of Technology Transfer, 41, 798–817.Google Scholar
  35. Iliev, P. (2010). The effect of SOX section 404: costs, earnings quality, and stock prices. Journal of Finance, 65(3), 1163–1196.Google Scholar
  36. Imbens, G. W., & Lemieux, T. (2008). Regression discontinuity designs: a guide to practice. Journal of Econometrics, 142(2), 615–635.Google Scholar
  37. Jaffe, A. B. (1986). Technological opportunity and spillovers of R&D: evidence from firms’ patents profits, and market value. American Economic Review, 76(5), 984–1001.Google Scholar
  38. Kezar, A., & Eckel, P. D. (2002). The effect of institutional culture on change strategies in higher education: universal principles or culturally responsive concepts? Journal of Higher Education, 73(4), 435–460.Google Scholar
  39. Kretek, P. M., Dragšić, Ž., & Kehm, B. M. (2013). Transformation of university governance: on the role of university board members. Higher Education, 65, 39–58.Google Scholar
  40. Lehmann, E. E., Braun, T. V., & Krispin, S. (2012). Entrepreneurial human capital, complementary assets, and takeover probability. Journal of Technology Transfer, 37, 589–608.Google Scholar
  41. Link, A. N., & Scott, J. T. (2005). Opening the ivory Tower’s door: an analysis of the determinants of the formation of U.S. university spin-off companies. Research Policy, 34, 1106–1112.Google Scholar
  42. Martin, B. (2016). What is happening to our universities? Falmer: University of Sussex Working paper.Google Scholar
  43. Meoli, M., & Vismara, S. (2016). University support and the creation of technology and non-technology academic spin-offs. Small Business Economics, 47, 345–362.Google Scholar
  44. Meoli, M., Paleari, S., & Vismara, S. (2013). Completing the technology transfer process: M&As of science-based IPOs. Small Business Economics, 40(2), 227–248.Google Scholar
  45. Meoli, M., Pierucci, E. & Vismara, S. (2017). The effects of public policies in fostering university spinoffs in Italy. Economics of Innovation and New Technology.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2017.1374048.
  46. Mustar, P., & Wright, M. (2009). Convergence or path dependency in policies to foster the creation of university spin-off firms? A comparison of France and the United Kingdom. Journal of Technology Transfer, 35(1), 42–65.Google Scholar
  47. Mustar, P., Renault, M., Colombo, M. G., et al. (2006). Conceptualising the heterogeneity of research-based spin-offs: a multi dimensional taxonomy. Research Policy, 35, 289–308.Google Scholar
  48. Pertusa-Ortega, E. M., Zaragoza-Sáez, P., & Claver-Cortés, E. (2010). Can formalization, complexity, and centralization influence knowledge performance? Journal of Business Research, 63, 310–320.Google Scholar
  49. Pirnay, F., Surlemont, B., & Nlemvo, F. (2003). Toward a typology of university spin-offs. Small Business Economics, 21(4), 355–369.Google Scholar
  50. Rasmussen, E., & Borch, O. J. (2010). University capabilities in facilitating entrepreneurship: a longitudinal study of spin-off ventures at mid-range universities. Research Policy, 39, 602–612.Google Scholar
  51. Shah, S., & Pahnke, E. C. (2014). Parting the ivory curtain: understanding how universities support a diverse set of startups. Journal of Technology Transfer, 39, 780–792.Google Scholar
  52. Shattock, M. (2002). Re-balancing modern concepts of university governance. Higher Education Quarterly, 56(3), 235–244.Google Scholar
  53. Siegel, D. S., & Wright, M. (2015). Academic entrepreneurship: time for a rethink? British Journal of Management, 26(4), 582–595.Google Scholar
  54. Siegel, D. S., Westhead, P., & Wright, M. (2003). Science parks and the performance of new technology-based firms: a review of recent U.K. evidence and an agenda for future research. Small Business Economics, 20, 177–184.Google Scholar
  55. Siegel, D. S., Waldman, D. A., Atwater, L. E., & Link, A. N. (2004). Toward a model of the effective transfer of scientific knowledge from academicians to practitioners: qualitative evidence from the commercialization of university technologies. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 21(1), 115–142.Google Scholar
  56. Stam, E. (2015). Entrepreneurial ecosystems and regional policy: a sympathetic critique. European Planning Studies, 23(9), 1759–1769.Google Scholar
  57. Stuart, T. E., & Ding, W. W. (2006). When do scientists become entrepreneurs? The social structural antecedents of commercial activity in the academic life sciences. American Journal of Sociology, 112(1), 97–144.Google Scholar
  58. Sussan, F., & Acs, Z. J. (2017). The digital entrepreneurial ecosystem. Small Business Economics, 49(1), 55–73.Google Scholar
  59. Van Looy, B., Landoni, P., Callaert, J., van Pottelsberghe, B., Sapsalis, E., & Debackere, K. (2011). Entrepreneurial effectiveness of European universities: an empirical assessment of antecedents and trade-offs. Research Policy, 40, 553–564.Google Scholar
  60. Vismara, S. (2016). Equity retention and social network theory in equity crowdfunding. Small Business Economics, 46(4), 579–590.Google Scholar
  61. Vismara, S. (2017). Information cascades among investors in equity crowdfunding. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. Forthcoming.  https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12261.
  62. Vismara S., & Meoli, M. (2015). Poor opportunities in the academic labor market as a cause of spin-offs. In: P. H. Pham (Eds.), Academic entrepreneurship: translating discoveries to the marketplace (pp. 39–64). Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michele Meoli
    • 1
    • 2
  • Stefano Paleari
    • 1
    • 2
  • Silvio Vismara
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.CCSEUniversity of BergamoBergamoItaly
  2. 2.Department of Management, Information and Production EngineeringUniversity of BergamoDalmineItaly

Personalised recommendations