A social capital approach to the development of sustainable entrepreneurial ecosystems: an explorative study
The entrepreneurial ecosystem, an emerging and developing theoretical stream, has the potential to expand our understanding of entrepreneurship. In previous research, this concept has been studied from the university perspective, but it has not yet been introduced in the field of entrepreneurial support. Additionally, the growing number of university business incubators has led to increasing research interest in the entrepreneurial support field. This research project seeks to develop a more robust understanding of sustainable university-based entrepreneurial ecosystems through an in-depth analysis of an essential entrepreneurial support element: the university business incubator. Our exploratory research study draws on 48 face-to-face interviews with key members of university-based entrepreneurial ecosystems to explore the operation of three cases through the lens of social capital theory. Our analysis suggests that all three social capital dimensions are relevant to the effective functioning of the university-based entrepreneurial ecosystem and contribute to its sustainability: applying the structural dimension of social capital enhances access to resources; addressing the cognitive dimension strengthens relationships among ecosystem members; and investing in the relational dimension enhances complementarity and trust while the ecosystem evolves. Thus, the interaction of these dimensions may further contribute to the sustainability of the university-based entrepreneurial ecosystem. Enhancing the development and application of the three social capital dimensions as an aspect of proactive management of the entrepreneurship ecosystem has the potential to improve outcomes for ecosystem members.
KeywordsEcosystem Entrepreneurial support University business incubators Social capital approach Sustainability
JEL classificationsL26 L22 L29
We are grateful to participants and reviewers of the EURAM Conference in Warsaw on June 17–20, 2015, the special SMS Conference on the Entrepreneurial Ecosystems in Rome-IT on June 5–7, 2016, and the Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Symposium in Adelaide-AU on June 14–15, 2016, for their inspiring feedback. We appreciated suggestions from Professors Zoltan Acs, David Audretsch, Bart Clarysse, Allan O’Connor and Erik Stam. Special thanks to David Audretsch, Adam Lederer and the anonymous reviewers for their help and efforts in improving our work.
We are also grateful to LabEx Entreprendre for funding this study. LabEx Entreprendre received government funding through the Agence Nationale de la Recherche under the “Investissements d’Avenir” program; reference: ANR-10-LABX-11-01.
- Audretsch, D. B., & Belitski, M. (2016). Entrepreneurial ecosystems in cities: establishing the framework conditions. Journal of Technology Transfer, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-016-9473-8.
- Bazeley, P., & Jackson, K. (2013). Qualitative data analysis with NVivo. Los Angeles: Sage Publications Limited.Google Scholar
- Ben Letaifa, S. (2013). A methodology for ecosystem creation: how organizations can shift from supply chain to ecosystems. In S. Ben Letaifa, A. Gratacap, & T. Isckia (Eds.), Understanding business ecosystems. How firms succeed in the new world of conveergence (pp. 86–95). Brussels: De Boeck.Google Scholar
- Burt, R. S. (1992). The social structure of competition. In N. Nohria & R. G. Eccles (Eds.), Networks and organizations: structure, form, and action (pp. 57–91). Cambridge: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
- Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.Google Scholar
- Gilbert, L. S., Jackson, K., & di Gregorio, S. (2014). Tools for analyzing qualitative data: the history and relevance of qualitative data analysis software. In J. M. Sector, M. D. Merril, J. Elen, & M. J. Bishop (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 221–236). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Hansen, M. T., Chesbrough, H. W., Nohria, N., & Sull, D. N. (2000). Networked incubators. Hothouses of the new economy. Harvard Business Review, 78(5), 74–84 199.Google Scholar
- Iansiti, M., & Levien, R. (2004). Strategy as ecology. Harvard Business Review, 82(3), 68–78 126.Google Scholar
- Isenberg, D. (2011). The entrepreneurship ecosystem strategy as a new paradigm for economic policy: principles for cultivating entrepreneurship. Dublin: Institute of International European Affairs.Google Scholar
- Klofsten, M., Bank, N., & Bienkowska, D. (2016). The role of incubators in supporting sustainable entrepreneurship. In Work Package (Vol. 3). Linköping: SHIFT.Google Scholar
- Knopp, L. (2012). State of the business incubation industry. Athens: National Business Incubation Association (NBIA) Publicatons.Google Scholar
- Messeghem, K., Bakkali, C., Sammut, S., & Swalhi, A. (2017). Measuring Nonprofit Incubator Performance: Toward an Adapted Balanced Scorecard Approach. Journal of Small Business Management, 1-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12317.
- Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (2003). Analyse des données qualitatives. Brussels: de Boeck Supérieur.Google Scholar
- Moore, J. F. (1993). Predators and prey: a new ecology of competition. Harvard Business Review, 71(3), 75–86.Google Scholar
- Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242–266.Google Scholar
- Regele, M. D., & Neck, H. M. (2012). The entrepreneurship education subecosystem in the United States: opportunities to increase entrepreneurial activity. Journal of Business and Entrepreneurship, 23(2), 25–47.Google Scholar
- Rice, M. P., & Matthews, J. B. (1995). Growing new ventures, creating new jobs. Westport, CT: Quorum.Google Scholar
- Soetanto, D. (2004). Research of the role of the incubation policy in helping the growth of new technology based-firm. Lisbon: Globelics Academy.Google Scholar
- Somsuk, N., Laosirihongthong, T., & McLean, M. W. (2012). Strategic management of university business incubators (UBIs): resource-based view (RBV) theory. In IEEE International Conference on Management of Innovation & Technology (ICMIT) (pp. 611–618). Piscataway: IEEE Publications.Google Scholar
- Stangler, D., & Bell-Masterson, J. (2015). Measuring an entrepreneurial ecosystem. Kansas City: Kauffman Foundation Research Series on City, Metro, and Regional Entrepreneurship.Google Scholar
- Thomas, L. D., & Autio, E. (2013). The fifth facet: the ecosystem as an organizational field. In Proceeding of the Conference on DRUID Society: Innovation and Entrepreneurship Group Working Papers. Copenhagen: CBS.Google Scholar
- Yin, R. K. (2013). Case study research: design and methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar