Advertisement

Small Business Economics

, Volume 51, Issue 1, pp 153–170 | Cite as

A social capital approach to the development of sustainable entrepreneurial ecosystems: an explorative study

  • Christina TheodorakiEmail author
  • Karim Messeghem
  • Mark P. Rice
Article

Abstract

The entrepreneurial ecosystem, an emerging and developing theoretical stream, has the potential to expand our understanding of entrepreneurship. In previous research, this concept has been studied from the university perspective, but it has not yet been introduced in the field of entrepreneurial support. Additionally, the growing number of university business incubators has led to increasing research interest in the entrepreneurial support field. This research project seeks to develop a more robust understanding of sustainable university-based entrepreneurial ecosystems through an in-depth analysis of an essential entrepreneurial support element: the university business incubator. Our exploratory research study draws on 48 face-to-face interviews with key members of university-based entrepreneurial ecosystems to explore the operation of three cases through the lens of social capital theory. Our analysis suggests that all three social capital dimensions are relevant to the effective functioning of the university-based entrepreneurial ecosystem and contribute to its sustainability: applying the structural dimension of social capital enhances access to resources; addressing the cognitive dimension strengthens relationships among ecosystem members; and investing in the relational dimension enhances complementarity and trust while the ecosystem evolves. Thus, the interaction of these dimensions may further contribute to the sustainability of the university-based entrepreneurial ecosystem. Enhancing the development and application of the three social capital dimensions as an aspect of proactive management of the entrepreneurship ecosystem has the potential to improve outcomes for ecosystem members.

Keywords

Ecosystem Entrepreneurial support University business incubators Social capital approach Sustainability 

JEL classifications

L26 L22 L29 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to participants and reviewers of the EURAM Conference in Warsaw on June 17–20, 2015, the special SMS Conference on the Entrepreneurial Ecosystems in Rome-IT on June 5–7, 2016, and the Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Symposium in Adelaide-AU on June 14–15, 2016, for their inspiring feedback. We appreciated suggestions from Professors Zoltan Acs, David Audretsch, Bart Clarysse, Allan O’Connor and Erik Stam. Special thanks to David Audretsch, Adam Lederer and the anonymous reviewers for their help and efforts in improving our work.

Funding

We are also grateful to LabEx Entreprendre for funding this study. LabEx Entreprendre received government funding through the Agence Nationale de la Recherche under the “Investissements d’Avenir” program; reference: ANR-10-LABX-11-01.

References

  1. Ács, Z. J., Autio, E., & Szerb, L. (2014). National systems of entrepreneurship: measurement issues and policy implications. Research Policy, 43(3), 476–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adner, R., & Kapoor, R. (2010). Value creation in innovation ecosystems: how the structure of technological interdependence affects firm performance in new technology generations. Strategic Management Journal, 31(3), 306–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Adner, R., & Kapoor, R. (2016). Innovation ecosystems and the pace of substitution: re-examining technology S-curves. Strategic Management Journal, 37(4), 625–648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Adner, R., Oxley, J. E., & Silverman, B. S. (2013). Collaboration and competition in business ecosystems. Bingley: Emerald.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Aernoudt, R. (2004). Incubators: tool for entrepreneurship? Small Business Economics, 23(2), 127–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ahmad, A. J., & Ingle, S. (2011). Relationships matter: case study of a university campus incubator. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior and Research, 17(6), 626–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Audretsch, D. B., & Belitski, M. (2016). Entrepreneurial ecosystems in cities: establishing the framework conditions. Journal of Technology Transfer, 1-22.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-016-9473-8.
  8. Barbero, J. L., Casillas, J. C., Wright, M., & Ramos Garcia, A. R. (2014). Do different types of incubators produce different types of innovations? Journal of Technology Transfer, 39(2), 151–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bazeley, P., & Jackson, K. (2013). Qualitative data analysis with NVivo. Los Angeles: Sage Publications Limited.Google Scholar
  10. Ben Letaifa, S. (2013). A methodology for ecosystem creation: how organizations can shift from supply chain to ecosystems. In S. Ben Letaifa, A. Gratacap, & T. Isckia (Eds.), Understanding business ecosystems. How firms succeed in the new world of conveergence (pp. 86–95). Brussels: De Boeck.Google Scholar
  11. Ben Letaifa, S., & Rabeau, Y. (2013). Too close to collaborate? How geographic proximity could impede entrepreneurship and innovation. Journal of Business Research, 66(10), 2071–2078.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bergek, A., & Norrman, C. (2008). Incubator best practice: a framework. Technovation, 28(1–2), 20–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bøllingtoft, A., & Ulhøi, J. P. (2005). The networked business incubator—leveraging entrepreneurial agency? Journal of Business Venturing, 20(2), 265–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Burt, R. S. (1992). The social structure of competition. In N. Nohria & R. G. Eccles (Eds.), Networks and organizations: structure, form, and action (pp. 57–91). Cambridge: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  15. Clarysse, B., Wright, M., Bruneel, J., & Mahajan, A. (2014). Creating value in ecosystems: crossing the chasm between knowledge and business ecosystems. Research Policy, 43(7), 1164–1176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cohen, B. (2006). Sustainable valley entrepreneurial ecosystems. Business Strategy and the Environment, 15(1), 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cohen, B., & Winn, M. I. (2007). Market imperfections, opportunity and sustainable entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(1), 29–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Colombo, M. G., & Delmastro, M. (2002). How effective are technology incubators? Research Policy, 31(7), 1103–1122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dess, G. G., Lumpkin, G. T., & Covin, J. G. (1997). Entrepreneurial strategy making and firm performance: tests of contingency and configurational models. Strategic Management Journal, 18(9), 677–695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.Google Scholar
  21. Etzkowitz, H. (2002). Incubation of incubators: innovation as a triple helix of university-industry-government networks. Science and Public Policy, 29(2), 115–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fang, S.-C., Tsai, F.-S., & Lin, J. L. (2010). Leveraging tenant-incubator social capital for organizational learning and performance in incubation programme. International Small Business Journal, 28(1), 90–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gilbert, L. S., Jackson, K., & di Gregorio, S. (2014). Tools for analyzing qualitative data: the history and relevance of qualitative data analysis software. In J. M. Sector, M. D. Merril, J. Elen, & M. J. Bishop (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 221–236). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Grimaldi, R., & Grandi, A. (2005). Business incubators and new venture creation: an assessment of incubating models. Technovation, 25(2), 111–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Grimaldi, R., Kenney, M., Siegel, D. S., & Wright, M. (2011). 30 years after Bayh–Dole: reassessing academic entrepreneurship. Research Policy, 40(8), 1045–1057.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hackett, S. M., & Dilts, D. M. (2004a). A systematic review of business incubation research. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 29(1), 55–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hackett, S. M., & Dilts, D. M. (2004b). A real options-driven theory of business incubation. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 29(1), 41–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hackett, S. M., & Dilts, D. M. (2008). Inside the black box of business incubation: study B—scale assessment, model refinement, and incubation outcomes. Journal of Technology Transfer, 33(5), 439–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hansen, M. T., Chesbrough, H. W., Nohria, N., & Sull, D. N. (2000). Networked incubators. Hothouses of the new economy. Harvard Business Review, 78(5), 74–84 199.Google Scholar
  31. Hayter, C. S. (2016). A trajectory of early-stage spinoff success: the role of knowledge intermediaries within an entrepreneurial university ecosystem. Small Business Economics, 47(3), 633–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hoang, H., & Antoncic, B. (2003). Network-based research in entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(2), 165–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hobbs, K. G., Link, A. N., & Scott, J. T. (2017). Science and technology parks: an annotated and analytical literature review. Journal of Technology Transfer, 42(4), 957–976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Iansiti, M., & Levien, R. (2004). Strategy as ecology. Harvard Business Review, 82(3), 68–78 126.Google Scholar
  35. Inkpen, A. C., & Tsang, E. W. K. (2005). Social capital, networks, and knowledge transfer. Academy of Management Review, 30(1), 146–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Isenberg, D. (2011). The entrepreneurship ecosystem strategy as a new paradigm for economic policy: principles for cultivating entrepreneurship. Dublin: Institute of International European Affairs.Google Scholar
  37. Kale, P., Singh, H., & Perlmutter, H. (2000). Learning and protection of proprietary assets in strategic alliances: building relational capital. Strategic Management Journal, 21(3), 217–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Klofsten, M., Bank, N., & Bienkowska, D. (2016). The role of incubators in supporting sustainable entrepreneurship. In Work Package (Vol. 3). Linköping: SHIFT.Google Scholar
  39. Knopp, L. (2012). State of the business incubation industry. Athens: National Business Incubation Association (NBIA) Publicatons.Google Scholar
  40. Lado, A. A., Dant, R. R., & Tekleab, A. G. (2008). Trust-opportunism paradox, relationalism, and performance in interfirm relationships: evidence from the retail industry. Strategic Management Journal, 29(4), 401–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lasrado, V., Sivo, S., Ford, C., O’Neal, T., & Garibay, I. (2016). Do graduated university incubator firms benefit from their relationship with university incubators? Journal of Technology Transfer, 41(2), 205–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lee, S. S., & Osteryoung, J. S. (2004). A comparison of critical success factors for effective operations of university business incubators in the United States and Korea. Journal of Small Business Management, 42(4), 418–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Marshall, M. N. (1996). Sampling for qualitative research. Family Practice, 13(6), 522–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mathison, S. (1988). Why triangulate? Educational Researcher, 17(2), 13–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. McAdam, M., & Marlow, S. (2008). A preliminary investigation into networking activities within the university incubator. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior and Research, 14(4), 219–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Messeghem, K., Bakkali, C., Sammut, S., & Swalhi, A. (2017). Measuring Nonprofit Incubator Performance: Toward an Adapted Balanced Scorecard Approach. Journal of Small Business Management, 1-22.  http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12317.
  47. Mian, S. A. (1994). US university-sponsored technology incubators: an overview of management, policies and performance. Technovation, 14(8), 515–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Mian, S. A. (1996). The university business incubator: a strategy for developing new research/technology-based firms. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 7(2), 191–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (2003). Analyse des données qualitatives. Brussels: de Boeck Supérieur.Google Scholar
  50. Moore, J. F. (1993). Predators and prey: a new ecology of competition. Harvard Business Review, 71(3), 75–86.Google Scholar
  51. Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242–266.Google Scholar
  52. Neck, H. M., Meyer, G. D., Cohen, B., & Corbett, A. C. (2004). An entrepreneurial system view of new venture creation. Journal of Small Business Management, 42(2), 190–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Patton, D. (2014). Realising potential: the impact of business incubation on the absorptive capacity of new technology-based firms. International Small Business Journal, 32(8), 897–917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Peters, L., Rice, M., & Sundararajan, M. (2004). The role of incubators in the entrepreneurial process. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 29(1), 83–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Phan, P. H., Siegel, D. S., & Wright, M. (2005). Science parks and incubators: observations, synthesis and future research. Journal of Business Venturing, 20(2), 165–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Phillips, R. G. (2002). Technology business incubators: how effective as technology transfer mechanisms? Technology in Society, 24(3), 299–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Pierce, L. (2009). Big losses in ecosystem niches: how core firm decisions drive complementary product shakeouts. Strategic Management Journal, 30(3), 323–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Regele, M. D., & Neck, H. M. (2012). The entrepreneurship education subecosystem in the United States: opportunities to increase entrepreneurial activity. Journal of Business and Entrepreneurship, 23(2), 25–47.Google Scholar
  59. Rice, M. P. (2002). Co-production of business assistance in business incubators: an exploratory study. Journal of Business Venturing, 17(2), 163–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Rice, M. P., & Matthews, J. B. (1995). Growing new ventures, creating new jobs. Westport, CT: Quorum.Google Scholar
  61. Rice, M. P., Fetters, M. L., & Greene, P. G. (2014). University-based entrepreneurship ecosystems: a global study of six educational institutions. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 18(5/6), 481–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Rothaermel, F. T., & Thursby, M. (2005). Incubator firm failure or graduation? Research Policy, 34(7), 1076–1090.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Schwartz, M., & Hornych, C. (2008). Specialization as strategy for business incubators: an assessment of the Central German Multimedia Center. Technovation, 28(7), 436–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Schwartz, M., & Hornych, C. (2010). Cooperation patterns of incubator firms and the impact of incubator specialization: empirical evidence from Germany. Technovation, 30(9–10), 485–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Schwartz, M., & Hornych, C. (2012). Specialisation versus diversification: perceived benefits of different business incubation models. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 15(3), 177–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Simsek, Z., Lubatkin, M. H., & Floyd, S. W. (2003). Inter-firm networks and entrepreneurial behavior: a structural embeddedness perspective. Journal of Management, 29(3), 427–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Soetanto, D. (2004). Research of the role of the incubation policy in helping the growth of new technology based-firm. Lisbon: Globelics Academy.Google Scholar
  68. Soetanto, D., & van Geenhuizen, M. (2015). Getting the right balance: university networks’ influence on spin-offs’ attraction of funding for innovation. Technovation, 36–37, 26–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Somsuk, N., & Laosirihongthong, T. (2014). A fuzzy AHP to prioritize enabling factors for strategic management of university business incubators: resource-based view. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 85, 198–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Somsuk, N., Laosirihongthong, T., & McLean, M. W. (2012). Strategic management of university business incubators (UBIs): resource-based view (RBV) theory. In IEEE International Conference on Management of Innovation & Technology (ICMIT) (pp. 611–618). Piscataway: IEEE Publications.Google Scholar
  71. Spigel, B. (2017). The relational organization of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(1), 49–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Stam, E. (2015). Entrepreneurial ecosystems and regional policy: a sympathetic critique. European Planning Studies, 23(9), 1759–1769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Stangler, D., & Bell-Masterson, J. (2015). Measuring an entrepreneurial ecosystem. Kansas City: Kauffman Foundation Research Series on City, Metro, and Regional Entrepreneurship.Google Scholar
  74. Sternberg, R. (2014). Success factors of university-spin-offs: regional government support programs versus regional environment. Technovation, 34(3), 137–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Thomas, L. D., & Autio, E. (2013). The fifth facet: the ecosystem as an organizational field. In Proceeding of the Conference on DRUID Society: Innovation and Entrepreneurship Group Working Papers. Copenhagen: CBS.Google Scholar
  76. Tötterman, H., & Sten, J. (2005). Start-ups. International Small Business Journal, 23(5), 487–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. von Zedtwitz, M., & Grimaldi, R. (2006). Are service profiles incubator-specific? Results from an empirical investigation in Italy. Journal of Technology Transfer, 31(4), 459–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Yang, C.-H., Motohashi, K., & Chen, J.-R. (2009). Are new technology-based firms located on science parks really more innovative? Research Policy, 38(1), 77–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Yin, R. K. (2013). Case study research: design and methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of MontpellierMontpellier Management InstituteMontpellier Cedex 2France
  2. 2.Foisie Business School, Worcester Polytechnic InstituteWorcesterUSA

Personalised recommendations