Advertisement

Small Business Economics

, Volume 50, Issue 3, pp 625–642 | Cite as

Founder human capital and new technology venture R&D search intensity: the moderating role of an environmental jolt

  • Xian CaoEmail author
  • Junyon Im
Article

Abstract

We argue that founder human capital—formal education, same-industry work experience, and prior entrepreneurial experience—will be positively related to the research and development (R&D) search intensity of new technology ventures. In addition, these positive relationships will be strengthened when new technology ventures face an environmental jolt, such as the Great Recession. An empirical analysis of longitudinal data on new technology ventures in the manufacturing industry from the Kauffman Firm Survey (KFS) broadly supports our hypotheses. The results show that all dimensions of founder human capital increase new technology ventures’ R&D search intensity, and the positive effect of same-industry work experience becomes stronger during the Great Recession. However, in contrast to our expectation, the positive effect of prior entrepreneurial experience is weaker during the Great Recession, not stronger. Furthermore, we do not find support for our hypothesis that the positive relationship between founders’ formal education and new technology ventures’ R&D search intensity is stronger during the Great Recession. These seemly contradictory results suggest that although the different dimensions of founder human capital are all positively related to new technology ventures’ R&D search intensity, they exert divergent impacts on it when confronting an environmental jolt. As such, our study extends the situational and institutional determinants of R&D search intensity by focusing on founders’ human capital and provides deeper insights by considering environmental conditions. By shifting the focus from established firms to new ventures, our study also enriches the understanding of new technology ventures’ innovative activities.

Keywords

Founder human capital New technology ventures R&D search intensity Environmental jolts 

JEL classification

L26 O32 Q55 

References

  1. Ahuja, G., & Morris Lampert, C. (2001). Entrepreneurship in the large corporation: a longitudinal study of how established firms create breakthrough inventions. Strategic Management Journal, 22(6–7), 521–543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aldrich, H. E., & Ruef, M. (2006). Organizations evolving: TJ International Ltd.–Padstow, Cornwell.Google Scholar
  3. Alvarez, S. A., & Barney, J. B. (2014). Entrepreneurial opportunities and poverty alleviation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38(1), 159–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Audretsch, D. B., & Feldman, M. P. (1996). R & D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production. The American Economic Review, 86(3), 630–640.Google Scholar
  5. Bardhan, A., & Walker, R. A. (2010). California, pivot of the great recession. Institute for Research on Labor and Employment.Google Scholar
  6. Barlevy, G. (2007). On the cyclicality of research and development. American Economic Review, 97(4), 1131–1164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Baron, R. A., & Ensley, M. D. (2006). Opportunity recognition as the detection of meaningful patterns: evidence from comparisons of novice and experienced entrepreneurs. Management Science, 52(9), 1331–1344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Barringer, B. R., Jones, F. F., & Neubaum, D. O. (2005). A quantitative content analysis of the characteristics of rapid-growth firms and their founders. Journal of Business Venturing, 20(5), 663–687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Becker, G. S. (1962). Investment in human capital: a theoretical analysis. Journal of Political Economy, 9–49.Google Scholar
  10. Becker, W., & Dietz, J. (2004). R & D cooperation and innovation activities of firms—evidence for the German manufacturing industry. Research Policy, 33(2), 209–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Boeker, W. (1988). Organizational origins: entrepreneurial and environmental imprinting of the time of founding. Ecological models of organizations, 33–51.Google Scholar
  12. Bosma, N., Van Praag, M., Thurik, R., & De Wit, G. (2004). The value of human and social capital investments for the business performance of startups. Small Business Economics, 23(3), 227–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bradley, S. W., Aldrich, H., Shepherd, D. A., & Wiklund, J. (2011a). Resources, environmental change, and survival: asymmetric paths of young independent and subsidiary organizations. Strategic Management Journal, 32(5), 486–509. doi: 10.1002/smj.887.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bradley, S. W., Shepherd, D. A., & Wiklund, J. (2011b). The importance of slack for new organizations facing ‘tough’ environments. Journal of Management Studies, 48(5), 1071–1097.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bruton, G. D., Ahlstrom, D., & Li, H. L. (2010). Institutional theory and entrepreneurship: where are we now and where do we need to move in the future? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(3), 421–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Campbell, B. A. (2013). Earnings effects of entrepreneurial experience: evidence from the semiconductor industry. Management Science, 59(2), 286–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cassiman, B., & Veugelers, R. (2006). In search of complementarity in innovation strategy: internal R & D and external knowledge acquisition. Management Science, 52(1), 68–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Chatterji, A. K. (2009). Spawned with a silver spoon? Entrepreneurial performance and innovation in the medical device industry. Strategic Management Journal, 30(2), 185–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Chen, W.-R. (2008). Determinants of firms’ backward-and forward-looking R & D search behavior. Organization Science, 19(4), 609–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Chen, W. R., & Miller, K. D. (2007). Situational and institutional determinants of firms’ R & D search intensity. Strategic Management Journal, 28(4), 369–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Chrisman, J. J., Bauerschmidt, A., & Hofer, C. W. (1998). The determinants of new venture performance: an extended model. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23, 5–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1989). Innovation and learning: the two faces of R & D. Economic Journal, 99(397), 569–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Cooper, A. C., Gimeno-Gascon, F. J., & Woo, C. Y. (1994). Initial human and financial capital as predictors of new venture performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 9(5), 371–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Cooper, A. C., Folta, T. B., & Woo, C. (1995). Entrepreneurial information search. Journal of Business Venturing, 10(2), 107–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 2.Google Scholar
  26. Dahlqvist, J., Davidsson, P., & Wiklund, J. (2000). Initial conditions as predictors of new venture performance: a replication and extension of the Cooper et al. study. Enterprise and Innovation Management Studies, 1(1), 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Dalziel, T., Gentry, R. J., & Bowerman, M. (2011). An integrated agency–resource dependence view of the influence of directors’ human and relational capital on firms’ R & D spending. Journal of Management Studies, 48(6), 1217–1242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Davidsson, P., & Honig, B. (2003). The role of social and human capital among nascent entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(3), 301–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Dimov, D. (2010). Nascent entrepreneurs and venture emergence: opportunity confidence, human capital, and early planning. Journal of Management Studies, 47(6), 1123–1153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Douglas, E. J., & Shepherd, D. A. (2000). Entrepreneurship as a utility maximizing response. Journal of Business Venturing, 15(3), 231–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Dushnitsky, G., & Lenox, M. J. (2005). When do firms undertake R & D by investing in new ventures? Strategic Management Journal, 26(10), 947–965.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Fang, C., Kim, J. H. J., & Milliken, F. J. (2014). When bad news is sugarcoated: information distortion, organizational search and the behavioral theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 35(8), 1186–1201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Farber, H. S. (2012). Unemployment in the Great Recession: did the housing market crisis prevent the unemployed from moving to take jobs? American Economic Review, 102(3), 520–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Farhat, J. B., & Robb, A. (2014). Applied survey data analysis using Stata: the Kauffman firm survey data. Available at SSRN 2477217.Google Scholar
  35. Freeman, J., Carroll, G. R., & Hannan, M. T. (1983). The liability of newness: age dependence in organizational death rates. American Sociological Review, 692–710.Google Scholar
  36. Gimeno, J., Folta, T. B., Cooper, A. C., & Woo, C. Y. (1997). Survival of the fittest? Entrepreneurial human capital and the persistence of underperforming firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 750–783.Google Scholar
  37. Greve, H. R. (1998). Performance, aspirations, and risky organizational change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 58–86.Google Scholar
  38. Greve, H. R. (2003a). A behavioral theory of R & D expenditures and innovations: evidence from shipbuilding. Academy of Management Journal, 46(6), 685–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Greve, H. R. (2003b). Organizational learning from performance feedback: a behavioral perspective on innovation and change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Grusky, D. B., Western, B., and Wimer, C. (2011). The Great Recession.Google Scholar
  41. Gulati, R., Nohria, N., & Wohlgezogen, F. (2010). Roaring out of recession. Harvard Business Review, 88(3), 62–69.Google Scholar
  42. Helfat, C. E. (1997). Know-how and asset complementarity and dynamic capability accumulation: the case of R&D. Strategic Management Journal, 339–360.Google Scholar
  43. Hmieleski, K. M., & Baron, R. A. (2009). Entrepreneurs’ optimism and new venture performance: a social cognitive perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 52(3), 473–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kahle, K. M., & Stulz, R. M. (2013). Access to capital, investment, and the financial crisis. Journal of Financial Economics, 110(2), 280–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kaish, S., & Gilad, B. (1991). Characteristics of opportunities search of entrepreneurs versus executives: sources, interests, general alertness. Journal of Business Venturing, 6(1), 45–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lazear, E. P. (2004). Balanced skills and entrepreneurship. American Economic Review, 94(2), 208–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Levitt, B., & March, J. G. (1988). Organizational learning. Annual Review of Sociology, 319–340.Google Scholar
  48. Lim, E. N., & McCann, B. T. (2013). Performance feedback and firm risk taking: the moderating effects of CEO and outside director stock options. Organization Science, 25(1), 262–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Lumley, T. (2004). Analysis of complex survey samples. Journal of Statistical Software, 9(1), 1–19.Google Scholar
  50. Lund Vinding, A. (2006). Absorptive capacity and innovative performance: a human capital approach. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 15(4–5), 507–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Marvel, M. R. (2013). Human capital and search-based discovery: a study of high-tech entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37(2), 403–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Marvel, M. R., & Lumpkin, G. T. (2007). Technology entrepreneurs’ human capital and its effects on innovation radicalness. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31(6), 807–828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Matta, E., & McGuire, J. (2008). Too risky to hold? The effect of downside risk, accumulated equity wealth, and firm performance on CEO equity reduction. Organization Science, 19(4), 567–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Meyer, A. D. (1982). Adapting to environmental jolts. Administrative Science Quarterly, 515–537.Google Scholar
  55. Minniti, M., & Bygrave, W. (2001). A dynamic model of entrepreneurial learning. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 25(3), 5–5.Google Scholar
  56. Moore, J. F. (1993). Predators and prey: a new ecology of competition. Harvard Business Review, 71(3), 75–83.Google Scholar
  57. Palley, T. (2011). America’s flawed paradigm: macroeconomic causes of the financial crisis and great recession. Empirica, 38(1), 3–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Politis, D. (2005). The process of entrepreneurial learning: a conceptual framework. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(4), 399–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Preisendörfer, P., & Voss, T. (1990). Organizational mortality of small firms: the effects of entrepreneurial age and human capital. Organization Studies, 11(1), 107–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Priem, R. L., & Butler, J. E. (2001). Is the resource-based “view” a useful perspective for strategic management research? Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 22–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Rubin, D. B. (1978). Multiple imputations in sample surveys-a phenomenological Bayesian approach to nonresponse. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the survey research methods section of the American Statistical Association.Google Scholar
  62. Ryan, H. E., & Wiggins, R. A. (2001). The influence of firm-and manager-specific characteristics on the structure of executive compensation. Journal of Corporate Finance, 7(2), 101–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Samuelsson, M., & Davidsson, P. (2009). Does venture opportunity variation matter? Investigating systematic process differences between innovative and imitative new ventures. Small Business Economics, 33(2), 229–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Sapienza, H. J., Manigart, S., & Vermeir, W. (1996). Venture capitalist governance and value added in four countries. Journal of Business Venturing, 11(6), 439–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Shane, S. (2000). Prior knowledge and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities. Organization Science, 11(4), 448–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Shane, S. A. (2003). A general theory of entrepreneurship: the individual-opportunity nexus. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 217–226.Google Scholar
  68. Shepherd, D. A., Douglas, E. J., & Shanley, M. (2000). New venture survival: ignorance, external shocks, and risk reduction strategies. Journal of Business Venturing, 15(5), 393–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Sine, W. D., & David, R. J. (2003). Environmental jolts, institutional change, and the creation of entrepreneurial opportunity in the US electric power industry. Research Policy, 32(2), 185–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Sine, W. D., Mitsuhashi, H., & Kirsch, D. A. (2006). Revisiting burns and stalker: formal structure and new venture performance in emerging economic sectors. Academy of Management Journal, 49(1), 121–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Sorenson, O., & Stuart, T. E. (2001). Syndication networks and the spatial distribution of venture capital investments 1. American Journal of Sociology, 106(6), 1546–1588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Srivastava, A., & Lee, H. (2005). Predicting order and timing of new product moves: the role of top management in corporate entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 20(4), 459–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Stam, E., & Wennberg, K. (2009). The roles of R&D in new firm growth. Small Business Economics, 33(1), 77–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Starr, J. A., & MacMillan, I. C. (1990). Resource cooptation via social contracting: Resource acquisition strategies for new ventures. Strategic Management Journal, 11(4), 79–92.Google Scholar
  75. Stinchcombe, A. L. (1965). Social structure and organizations. Handbook of organizations, 142–193.Google Scholar
  76. Stinchcombe, A. L., & March, J. (1965). Social structure and organizations. Advances in Strategic Management, 17, 229–259.Google Scholar
  77. Stuart, R. W., & Abetti, P. A. (1990). Impact of entrepreneurial and management experience on early performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 5(3), 151–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Ucbasaran, D., Westhead, P., Wright, M., & Binks, M. (2003). Does entrepreneurial experience influence opportunity identification? The Journal of Private Equity, 7(1), 7–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Ucbasaran, D., Westhead, P., & Wright, M. (2008). Opportunity identification and pursuit: does an entrepreneur’s human capital matter? Small Business Economics, 30(2), 153–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Yunlu, D. G., & Murphy, D. D. (2012). R&D intensity and economic recession: investigating the moderating role of CEO characteristics. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 19(3), 284–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Zahra, S. A., Sapienza, H. J., & Davidsson, P. (2006). Entrepreneurship and dynamic capabilities: a review, model and research agenda. Journal of Management Studies, 43(4), 917–955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of BusinessUniversity of ConnecticutStorrsUSA
  2. 2.Asper School of BusinessUniversity of ManitobaWinnipegCanada

Personalised recommendations