Advertisement

Small Business Economics

, Volume 47, Issue 1, pp 179–199 | Cite as

Does corruption ever help entrepreneurship?

  • Nabamita Dutta
  • Russell Sobel
Article

Abstract

The current literature contains mixed results regarding the impact of corruption on entrepreneurship and economic growth. In this paper, we examine a much larger set of countries and time periods to attempt to gain insights into this relationship. In particular, the central question is whether corruption can compensate for a bad business climate. Our results are clear; corruption hurts entrepreneurship. The impact is smaller, but remains negative, when business climates are bad. This is in contrast to previous literature that suggests corruption may increase entrepreneurship under a bad business climate. We find corruption never improves entrepreneurship; it simply hurts less when business climates are not conducive to growth in the first place.

Keywords

Entrepreneurship Corruption Business regulations 

JEL Classifications

D73 L26 O43 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank the editor and the referees for their invaluable comments and suggestions. We also thank the session participants at Southern Economic Association, 2013, and the seminar participants at University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia, for their feedback.

References

  1. Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., Robinson, J. A., & Yared, P. (2008). Income and democracy. American Economic Review, 98, 808–842.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ackerman, R. S. (2006). International Handbook on the Economics of Corruption. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  3. Acs, Z. J., Desai, S., & Klapper, L. F. (2008). What does “Entrepreneurship” data really show? A comparison of the global entrepreneurship monitor and World Bank group datasets. Small Business Economics, 31(3), 265–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Aghion, P., Burgess, R., Redding, S., & Zilibotti, F. (2008). The unequal effects of liberalization: Evidence from dismantling the license raj in India. American Economic Review, 94(4), 1397–1412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Aidis, R., Estrin, S., & Mickiewicz, T. M. (2012). Size matters: Entrepreneurial entry and government. Small Business Economics, 39(1), 119–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Anokhin, S., & Schulze, W. S. (2009). Entrepreneurship, innovation, and corruption. Journal of Business Venturing, 24, 465–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Review of Economic Studies, 58, 277–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Armington, C., & Acs, Z. (2002). The determinants of regional variation in new firm formation. Regional Studies: The Journal of the Regional Studies Association, 36(1), 33–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Asiedu, E., Jin, Y., & Nandwa, B. (2009). Does foreign aid mitigate the adverse effect of expropriation risk on foreign direct investment? Journal of International Economics, 78(2), 268–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Asiedu, E., & Lien, D. (2011). Democracy, foreign direct investment and natural resources. Journal of International Economics, 84(1), 99–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Audretsch, D. B., & Keilbach, M. (2007). The localisation of entrepreneurship capital: Evidence from Germany. Papers in Regional Science, 86(3), 351–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Audretsch, D. B., Thurik, A. R., Verheul, I., & Wennekers, A. R. M. (Eds.). (2002). Entrepreneurship: Determinants and policy in an European—US Comparison. Boston/Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  13. Beck, T., Asli, D.-K., & Ross, L. (2000). A new database on financial development and structure. World Bank Economic Review, 14, 597–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bianchi, M. (2012). Financial development, entrepreneurship, and job satisfaction. Review of Economics and Statistics, 94(1), 273–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bjørnskov, C., & Foss, N. (2008). Economic freedom and entrepreneurial activity: Some cross-country evidence. Public Choice, 134(3), 307–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Blundell, R., & Bond, S. (1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 87, 115–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Brüderl, J., & Preisendörfer, P. (1998). Network support and the success of newly founded businesses. Small Business Economics, 10(3), 213–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Bruhn, M. (2008). License to sell: The effect of business registration reform on entrepreneurial activity in Mexico. World Bank, Washington, DC. © World Bank. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/6596 License: Creative Commons Attribution CC BY 3.0 Unported.
  19. Busenitz, L. W., Gomez, C., & Spencer, J. W. (2000). Country institutional profiles: Unlocking entrepreneurial phenomena. Academy of Management Journal, 43(5), 994–1003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. De Soto, H. (1989). The other path: The invisible revolution in the third world. New York: Harper Row.Google Scholar
  21. Delmar, F., & Davidsson, P. (2000). Where do they come from? Prevalence and characteristics of nascent entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 12, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Djankov, S., Montalvo, J. G., & Reynal-Querol, M. (2006). The curse of aid. Journal of Economic Growth, 13, 169–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Doing Business Database, The World Bank (http://www.doingbusiness.org), 2013
  24. Dreher, A., & Gassebner, M. (2013). Greasing the wheels? The impact of regulations and corruption on firm entry. Public Choice, 155(3), 413–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Du Rietz, A., & Henrekson, M. (2000). Testing the female underperformance hypothesis. Small Business Economics, 14(1), 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Dutta, N., Leeson, P. T., & Williamson, C. (2013). The amplification effect: Foreign aid’s impact on political institutions. Kyklos, 66(2), 208–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ehrlich, I., & Lui, F. (1999). Bureaucratic corruption and endogenous economic growth. Journal of Political Economy, 107(6), 270–293.Google Scholar
  28. Estrin, S., Korosteleva, J., & Mickiewicz, T. (2012). Which institutions encourage entrepreneurial growth aspirations? Journal of Business Venturing, 28(4), 564–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Fonseca, R., Lopez-Garcia, P., & Pissarides, C. A. (2001). Entrepreneurship, start-up costs and employment. European Economic Review, 45(4–6), 692–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Glaeser, E., & Goldin, C. (2006). Corruption and reform: An introduction. In Corruption and reform (pp. 3–22). NBER: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  31. Glaeser, E., & Saks, R. (2006). Corruption in America. Journal of Public Economics, 90, 1053–1072.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hellman, J. S., Jones, G., Kaufman, D., & Shankerman, M. (2000). Measuring governance, corruption and state capture: How firms and bureaucrats shape the business environment in transition economies. World Bank Policy Research Working Papers 2312. Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar
  33. International Country Risk Guide. (2012). Political Risk Service (PRS) Database, 2012.Google Scholar
  34. International Labor Organization (ILO). (1990). The promotion of self-employment. Geneva: ILO.Google Scholar
  35. Kaplan, D. S., Piedra, E., & Seira, E. (2009). Entry regulation and business startups: Evidence from Mexico. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 4322.Google Scholar
  36. Karaivanov, A. (2012). Financial constraints and occupational choice in Thai Villages. Journal of Development Economics, 27(2), 201–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kauffman, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2010). The worldwide governance indicators: Methodology and analytical issues. Policy Research Working Paper Series 5430, The World Bank.Google Scholar
  38. Keeble, D., & Walker, S. (1994). New firms, small firms and dead firms: Spatial patterns and determinants in the United Kingdom. Regional Studies, 28(4), 411–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Klapper, L., Laeven, L., & Rajan, R. G. (2006). Entry regulation as a barrier to entrepreneurship. Journal of Financial Economics, 82(3), 591–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (1999). The quality of government. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 15(1) 222–279.Google Scholar
  41. Le, A. T. (1999). Empirical studies of self-employment. Journal of Economic Surveys, 13(4), 381–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Leeson, P. T., & Sobel, R. S. (2008). Weathering corruption. Journal of Law and Economics, 51(4), 667–681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lipsey, R. G., & Lancaster, K. (1956). The general theory of second best. The Review of Economic Studies, 24(1), 11–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mauro, P. (1995). Corruption and growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(3), 681–712. doi: 10.2307/2946696.
  45. Ovaska, T., & Sobel, R. S. (2005). Entrepreneurship in post-socialist economies. Journal of Private Enterprise, 21(1), 8–28.Google Scholar
  46. Persson, T., & Tabellini, G. (2006). Democracy and development: The devil in the details. American Economic Review, 99, 319–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Posner, R. A. (1975). The social costs of monopoly and regulation. The Journal of Political Economy, 83, 807–827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Radaev, V. (2004). How trust is established in economic relationships when institutions and individuals are not trustworthy. In J. Kornai, B. Rothstein, & S. Rose-Ackerman (Eds.), Creating social trust in post-socialist transition (pp. 91–111). Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  49. Reynolds, P. D., Carter, N. M., Gartner, W. B., & Greene, P. G. (2004). The prevalence of nascent entrepreneurs in the United States: Evidence from the panel study of entrepreneurial dynamics. Small Business Economics, 23(4), 263–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Reynolds, P. D., Hay, M., & Camp, S. M. (1999). Global entrepreneurship monitor: 1999 executive report. Babson College, London Business School and Kauffman Center for Entrepreneurial Leadership.Google Scholar
  51. Reynolds, P. D., Miller, B., & Maki, W. R. (1995). Explaining regional variation in business births and deaths: U.S. 1976–1988. Small Business Economics, 7, 389–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Rohwer, A. (2009). Measuring corruption: A comparison between the transparency International’s corruption perceptions index and the world bank’s worldwide governance indicators. CESifo DICE Report, 7(3), 42–52. Ifo Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich.Google Scholar
  53. Roodman, D. (2009). A note on the theme of too many instruments. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 71(1), 135–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Rose, R. (2000). Getting things done in an anti-modern society: Social capital networks in Russia. In P. Dasgupta & I. Serageldin (Eds.), Social capital: A multifaceted perspective (pp. 147–171). Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar
  55. Sachs, J. D., & Warner, A. M. (1997). Fundamental sources of long-run growth. American Economic Review, 87(2), 184–188.Google Scholar
  56. Schwirtz, M. (2013). in filing, casino operator admits likely violation of an antibribery law. The New York Times (March 2). http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/03/business/in-filing-casino-operator-admits-likely-violation-of-an-antibribery-law.html?_r=0. Accessed March 8, 2013.
  57. Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (1993). Corruption. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(3) 599–617.Google Scholar
  58. Spiller, P. T. (1990). Politicians, interest groups, and regulators: A multiple-principals agency theory of regulation, or ‘Let Them Be Bribed’. Journal of Law and Economics, 33(1), 65–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Storey, D. J. (1994). Understanding the small business sector. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign’s Academy for Entrepreneurial Leadership Historical Research Reference in Entrepreneurship. SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1496214.
  60. Tamásy, C., & Le Heron, R. (2008). The geography of firm formation in New Zealand. Tijdschrift Voor Economische En Sociale Geografie, 99(1), 37–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Tidemann, N., & Tulloc, G. (1976). A new and superior process for making social choices. Journal of Political Economy 1145–1159.Google Scholar
  62. Tonoyan, V., Strohmeyer, R., Habib, M., & Perlitz, M. (2010). Corruption and entrepreneurship: How formal and informal institutions shape small firm behavior in transition and mature market economies. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34, 803–831.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Treisman, D. (2000). The causes of corruption: A cross-national study. Journal of Public Economics 399–457.Google Scholar
  64. Uhlaner, L. M., Thurik, A. R., & Hutjes, J. (2002). Post-materialism as a cultural factor influencing entrepreneurial activity across nations. ERIM Report ERS-2002-62-STR, Erasmus University Rotterdam.Google Scholar
  65. van der Sluis, J., van Praag, M., & Vijverberg, W. (2008). Education and entrepreneurship selection and performance: A review of the empirical literature. Journal of Economic Surveys, 22(5), 795–841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Verheul, I., Stel, A. V., & Thurik, R. (2006). Explaining female and male entrepreneurship at the country level. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 18(2), 151–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Wagner, R. K., & Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Practical intelligence in real-world pursuits: The role of tacit knowledge. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 436–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. World Bank. (2012). Doing business, entrepreneurship database. http://www.doingbusiness.org/data/exploretopics/entrepreneurship
  69. World Bank. (2013). World Development Indicators, Online Database.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Economics, College of Business AdministrationUniversity of WisconsinLa CrosseUSA
  2. 2.School of Business AdministrationThe CitadelCharlestonUSA

Personalised recommendations