Where are all the self-employed women? Push and pull factors influencing female labor market decisions
- 972 Downloads
Previous research focuses on factors that influence self-employment participation, in part because entrepreneurship has been associated with economic growth. This literature has tended to focus only on men or the comparison of women to men, while ignoring substantial heterogeneity in employment decisions among women. By investigating the impact of individual, household, and local economic and cultural characteristics on the labor market outcomes of different groups of women, we get a more comprehensive picture of their self-employment decision. Recognizing self-employment as one of multiple labor market choices, we use multinomial logit and two confidential, geocoded micro-level datasets to study women`s career choices in urban areas. We find that the effects of various push and pull factors differ between married and unmarried women. In particular, more progressive gender attitudes pull married women into self-employment, while household burdens associated with children push them into self-employment. For unmarried women, the local business climate and individual characteristics have the strongest influence. In both cases, the motivations for women are quite different than men.
KeywordsFemale labor force participation Self-employment Gender Culture
JEL ClassificationsJ22 R23 J70 L26
- Blau, D. (1987) A time-series analysis of self-employment in the United States. Journal of Political Economy, 95(3), 445–467. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1831972.
- Booth, A., & van Ours, J. (2013). Part-time jobs: What women want? Journal of Population Economics, 26, 263–283. doi:10.1007/s00148-012-0417-9.
- US Census Bureau. Census 2000 SF3.Google Scholar
- Cowling, M., & Hayward, R. (2000). Out of unemployment, research centre for industrial strategy. Birmingham: Birmingham University.Google Scholar
- Curl, A. L., Sharpe, D. L., & Noone, J. (2014). Gender differences in self-employment of older workers in the United States and New Zealand. Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare, 16(1), 29–52.Google Scholar
- Fairlie, R. (2006). Entrepreneurship among disadvantaged groups: Women, minorities and the less educated. In S. C. Parker, J. Zoltan, & D. R. Audretsch (Eds.), International handbook series on entrepreneurship (Vol. 2, pp. 437–475). New York: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-0-387-32313-8_15.Google Scholar
- Florida, R., & Gates, G. (2001). Technology and tolerance: The importance of diversity to high-tech growth. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
- General Social Survey. NORC at the University of Chicago. http://www.norc.org/Research/Projects/Pages/general-social-survey.aspx.
- Killingsworth, M., & Heckman, J. (1986). Female labor supply: A survey. In O. Ashenfelter & R. Layard (Eds.), Handbook of labor economics (Vol. 1, pp. 103–204). Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar
- Levine, R., & Rubinstein, Y. (2013). Smart and illicit: Who becomes an entrepreneur and does it pay? NBER Working Paper 19276. doi:10.3386/w19276.
- Pforr, K. (2014). femlogit-implementation of the multinomial logit model with fixed effects. The Stata Journal, 14(4), 847–862.Google Scholar
- Sapienza, P., Zingales, L., & Maestripieri, D. (2009). Gender differences in financial risk aversion and career choices are affected by testosterone. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106(36), 15268–15273. doi:10.1073/pnas.0907352106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Shrestha, S. S., Goetz, S. J., & Rupasingha, A. (2007). Proprietorship formations and US job growth. The Review of Regional Studies, 37, 146–168.Google Scholar
- Smith, T.W., Marsden, P., Hout, M., & Kim, J. General Social Surveys, 1972–2012 [machine-readable data file]/Principal Investigator, Tom W. Smith; Co-Principal Investigator, Peter V. Marsden; Co-Principal Investigator, Michael Hout; Sponsored by National Science Foundation. –NORC ed.– Chicago: National Opinion Research Center [producer]; Storrs, CT: The Roper Center for Public Opinion Research, University of Connecticut [distributor], 2013. 1 data file (57,061 logical records) + 1 codebook (3,432p.). – (National Data Program for the Social Sciences, No. 21).Google Scholar
- US Bureau of Labor Statistics. Restricted Access National Longitudinal Survey of Youth 1979.Google Scholar
- Waldfogel, J. (1997). The effect of children on women’s wages. American Sociological Review, 62, 209–17. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2657300.
- Wang, W., & Parker, K. (2014). Record share of Americans have never married as values, economics and gender patterns change. Pew Research Social and Demographic Trends. http://www.pewsocialtrends.org/2014/09/24/record-share-of-americans-have-never-married/.
- Wooldridge, J. M. (2010). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- IPUMS-CPS, University of Minnesota, www.ipums.org.
- Yao, R., & Hanna, S. (2005). The effect of gender and marital status on financial risk tolerance. Journal of Personal Finance, 4, 66–85.Google Scholar