Complementary or compensatory? A contingency perspective on how entrepreneurs’ human and social capital interact in shaping start-up progress
- 844 Downloads
Entrepreneurs can profit from both their human and social capital. However, research on how the two types of capital interact in shaping relevant outcomes has produced inconclusive results. Attempting to explain the inconsistencies in previous findings, we suggest that the relationship between entrepreneurs’ human and social capital is neither fundamentally complementary nor fundamentally compensatory; instead, the nature of this relationship is contingent on the type of support derived from the network. Our analyses, based on 474 solo nascent entrepreneurs from the PSED II, support our reasoning. While we find nascent entrepreneurs’ human capital and their financial social capital to positively interact in shaping start-up progress, we observe a negative interaction between nascent entrepreneurs’ human capital and their informational social capital. Implications for theory and practice are discussed.
KeywordsEntrepreneurship Nascent entrepreneurs Start-up progress Human capital Social capital Interaction Contingency perspective
JEL ClassificationsM13 L26
Earlier versions of this manuscript were presented at the 17th Annual Interdisciplinary Entrepreneurship Conference 2013 in Koblenz, Germany, and at the 74th Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management 2014 in Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Aldrich, H. (1999). Organizations evolving. London: SAGE.Google Scholar
- Aldrich, H. E., & Martinez, M. A. (2001). Many are called, but few are chosen: An evolutionary perspective for the study of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, 25(4), 41.Google Scholar
- Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural holes: The social structure of competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Gartner, W. B. (1985). A conceptual framework for describing the phenomenon of new venture creation. Academy of Management Review, 10(4), 696–706.Google Scholar
- Greve, A., & Salaff, J. W. (2003). Social networks and entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, 28(1), 1–22.Google Scholar
- Hanlon, D., & Saunders, C. (2007). Marshaling resources to form small new ventures: Toward a more holistic understanding of entrepreneurial support. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, 31(4), 619–641.Google Scholar
- Kim, P. H., & Aldrich, H. E. (2005). Social capital and entrepreneurship. Foundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship, 1(2), 1–52.Google Scholar
- Mosey, S., & Wright, M. (2007). From human capital to social capital: A longitudinal study of technology-based academic entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, 31(6), 909–935.Google Scholar
- Rauch, A., Frese, M., & Utsch, A. (2005). Effects of human capital and long-term human resources development and utilization on employment growth of small-scale businesses: A causal analysis. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(6), 681–698.Google Scholar
- Renko, M. (2013). Early challenges of nascent social entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 37(5), 1045–1069.Google Scholar
- Semrau, T., & Werner, A. (2014). How exactly do network relationships pay off? The effects of network size and relationship quality on access to start-up resources. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 38(3), 501–525.Google Scholar
- Shane, S., & Venkatraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 217–226.Google Scholar
- Starr, J. A., & MacMillan, I. C. (1990). Resource cooptation via social contracting: Resource acquisition strategies for new ventures. Strategic Management Journal, 11(4), 79–92.Google Scholar
- Unger, J. M., Keith, N., Hilling, C., Gielnik, M. M., & Frese, M. (2009). Deliberate practice among South African small business owners: Relationships with education, cognitive ability, knowledge, and success. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 82(1), 21–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar