Advertisement

Small Business Economics

, Volume 45, Issue 4, pp 771–785 | Cite as

The impact of small- and medium-sized family firms on economic growth

  • Esra Memili
  • Hanqing Fang
  • James J. Chrisman
  • Alfredo De MassisEmail author
Article

Abstract

Drawing on family business studies and the knowledge-based view of economic growth, we develop and test a model of how the prevalence of small- and medium-size enterprises (SMEs) under family control affects economic growth. Specifically, we propose there is an inverted U-shaped relationship between family SMEs’ proportional representation and economic growth owing to their relative strengths and limitations vis-à-vis non-family SMEs. Using state-level data from the US between 2004 and 2010, we find support for our hypothesis and the underlying contention that economic growth is maximized when an economy includes a balanced mix of family and non-family SMEs.

Keywords

Family business Economic growth Family firms SMEs Knowledge asymmetry 

JEL Classifications

D82 asymmetric information L26 entrepreneurship O47 empirical studies of economic growth O51 US 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

The authors declare that their manuscript is compliant with ethical standards and they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Acs, Z. J., Braunerhjelm, P., Audretsch, D. B., & Carlsson, B. (2009). The knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 32, 15–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Acs, Z. J., Brooksbank, D., O’Gorman, C, Pickernell, D. & Terjesen, S. (2007). The knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship and foreign direct investment. Jena Economic Research Papers, 2007-059.Google Scholar
  3. Acs, Z. J., & Szerb, L. (2007). Entrepreneurship, economic growth and public policy. Small Business Economics, 28(2–3), 109–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Agarwal, R., Audretsch, D. B., & Sarkar, M. B. (2007). The process of creative construction: Knowledge spillovers, entrepreneurship, and economic growth. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 1(3/4), 263–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Agarwal, R., Echambadi, R., April, F., & Sarkar, M. (2004). Knowledge transfer through inheritance: Spin-out generation, development and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 501–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Aldrich, H. E., & Cliff, J. E. (2003). The pervasive effects of family on entrepreneurship: Toward a family embeddedness perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(5), 573–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Arellano, M. (2003). Panel data econometrics: Advanced texts in econometrics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Arregle, J.-L., Hitt, M. A., Sirmon, D. G., & Very, P. (2007). The development of organizational social capital: Attributes of family firms. Journal of Management Studies, 44(1), 73–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Astrachan, J. H., & Shanker, M. C. (2003). Family businesses’ contribution to the U.S. economy: A closer look. Family Business Review, 16(3), 211–219.Google Scholar
  10. Audretsch, D. B. (2007). The entrepreneurial society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Audretsch, D. B., & Feldman, M. P. (1996). R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production. American Economic Review, 86(3), 630–640.Google Scholar
  12. Audretsch, D. B., Heger, D., & Veith, T. (2015). Infrastructure and entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 44(2), 219–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Audretsch, D. B., Keilbach, M. C., & Lehmann, E. E. (2006). Entrepreneurship and economic growth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Author, W. B. (1994). Increasing returns and path dependence in the economy. Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  15. Barro, R. J. (1991). Economic growth in a cross section of countries. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(2), 407–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Becchetti, L., & Trovato, G. (2002). The determinants of growth for small and medium sized firms: The role of the availability of external finance. Small Business Economics, 19(4), 291–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Benedict, B. (1968). Family firms and economic development. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology, 24(1), 1–19.Google Scholar
  18. Bennedsen, M., Perez-Gonzalez, F., & Wolfenzon, D. (2010). The governance of family firms. In K. H. Baker & R. Anderson (Eds.), Corporate governance: A synthesis of theory, research, and practice (pp. 371–389). Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
  19. Bjuggren, C. M., Johansson, D., & Sjögren, H. (2011). A note on employment and gross domestic product in Swedish family-owned businesses: A descriptive analysis. Family Business Review, 24(4), 362–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Brannon, D. L., Wiklund, J., & Haynie, J. M. (2013). The varying effects of family relationships in entrepreneurial teams. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37(1), 107–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cabrera-Suárez, K., De Saá-Pérez, P., & García-Almeida, D. (2001). The succession process from a resource-and knowledge-based view of the family firm. Family Business Review, 14(1), 37–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Carney, M. (2005). Corporate governance and competitive advantage in family-controlled firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(3), 249–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Chang, E. P. C., Chrisman, J. J., Chua, J. H., & Kellermanns, F. K. (2008). Regional economy as a determinant of the prevalence of family firms in the United States: A preliminary report. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(3), 559–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Chen, H.-L., & Hsu, W.-T. (2009). Family ownership, board independence, and R&D investment. Family Business Review, 22(4), 347–362.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Chrisman, J. J., Chua, J. H., De Massis, A., Frattini, F., & Wright, M. (2015). The ability and willingness paradox in family firm innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32(3), 310–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Chrisman, J. J., Chua, J. H., & Litz, R. (2004). Comparing the agency costs of family and non-family firms: Conceptual issues and exploratory evidence. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28(4), 335–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Chrisman, J. J., Chua, J. H., Pearson, A. W., & Barnett, T. (2012). Family involvement, family influence, and family-centered non-economic goals in small firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(2), 267–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Chrisman, J. J., Chua, J. H., & Steier, L. P. (2011). Resilience of family firms: An introduction. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(6), 1107–1119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Chrisman, J. J., & Patel, P. J. (2012). Variations in R&D investments of family and non-family firms: Behavioral agency and myopic loss aversion perspectives. Academy of Management Journal, 55, 976–997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Chrisman, J. J., Van Deusen, C., & Anyomi, S. M. K. (1992). Population growth and regional economy: An empirical analysis of business formation and job generation in the retail sector. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 4(4), 339–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Chua, J. H., Chrisman, J. J., & Sharma, P. (1999). Defining the family business by behavior. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23(4), 19–39.Google Scholar
  32. Chua, J. H., Chrisman, J. J., Steier, L. P., & Rau, S. B. (2012). Sources of heterogeneity in family firms: An introduction. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36, 1103–1113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Classen, N., Carree, M., Van Gils, A., & Peters, B. (2014). Innovation in family and non-family SMEs: An exploratory analysis. Small Business Economics, 42(3), 595–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Colombo, M. G., De Massis, A., Piva, E., Rossi-Lamastra, C., & Wright, M. (2014). Sales and employment changes in entrepreneurial ventures with family ownership: Empirical evidence from high-tech industries. Journal of Small Business Management, 52(2), 226–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. De Massis, A., Chirico, F., Kotlar, J., & Naldi, L. (2014). The temporal evolution of proactiveness in family firms: The horizontal s-curve hypothesis. Family Business Review, 27(1), 35–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. De Massis, A., Frattini, F., & Lichtenthaler, U. (2013a). Research on technological innovation in family firms: Present debates and future directions. Family Business Review, 26(1), 10–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. De Massis, A., Kotlar, J., Campopiano, G., & Cassia, L. (2013b). The impact of family involvement on SMEs’ performance: Theory and evidence. Journal of Small Business Management. doi: 10.1111/jsbm.12093.
  38. Donckels, R., & Frochlich, E. (1991). Are family businesses really different? European experiences from STRATOS. Family Business Review, 4(2), 149–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Dyer, W. G. (2003). The family: The missing variable in organizational research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27(4), 401–416.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Agency problems and residual claims. Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 327–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Freel, M. S. (2000). Strategy and structure in innovative manufacturing SMEs: The case of an English region. Small Business Economics, 15(1), 27–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Frye, M. B. (2004). Equity-based compensation for employee: Firm performance and determinants. Journal of Financial Research, 27(1), 31–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Fuchs, V. (1968). The service economy. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Gedajlovic, E., & Carney, M. (2010). Markets, hierarchies, and families: Toward a transaction cost theory of the family firm. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(6), 1145–1171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Gedajlovic, E., Carney, M., Chrisman, J. J., & Kellermanns, F. W. (2012). The adolescence of family firm research: Taking stock and planning for the future. Journal of Management, 38(4), 1010–1037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Gersick, K. E., Davis, J. A., Hampton, M. M., & Lansberg, I. (1997). Generation to generation: Life cycles of the family business. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  47. Gómez-Mejía, L. R., Cruz, C., Berrone, P., & De Castro, J. (2011). The bind that ties: Socioemotional wealth preservation in family firms. Academy of Management Annuals, 5, 653–707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Gómez-Mejia, L. R., Makri, M., & Larraza-Kintana, M. (2010). Diversification decisions in family-controlled firms. Journal of Management Studies, 47(2), 223–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Habbershon, T. G., & Williams, M. L. (1999). A resource-based framework for assessing the strategic advantages of family firms. Family Business Review, 12(1), 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Hamilton, B. H., & Nickerson, J. A. (2003). Correcting for endogeneity in strategic management research. Strategic Organization, 1(1), 51–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Harkavy, I., & Zuckerman, H. (1999). Eds and Meds: Cities’ Hidden Assets. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution Survey Series.Google Scholar
  52. Hicks, J. (1969). A theory of economic history. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  53. Hoopes, D. G., Madsen, T. L., & Walker, G. (2003). Why is there a resource-based view? Toward a theory of competitive heterogeneity. Strategic Management Journal, 24, 889–902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. James, H. (1999). Owners as managers, extended horizon and the family firm. International Journal of the Economics of Business, 6, 41–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Kanuk, L., & Berenson, C. (1975). Mail surveys and response rate: A literature review. Journal of Marketing Research, 12(4), 440–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Khalaf, S., & Shwayri, E. (1966). Family firms and industrial development: The Lebanese case. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 15(1), 59–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Knott, A. M. (2003). Persistent heterogeneity and sustainable innovation. Strategic Management Journal, 24(8), 687–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. König, A., Kammerlander, N., & Enders, A. (2013). The family innovator’s dilemma: How family influence affects the adoption of discontinuous technologies by incumbent firms. Academy of Management Review, 38(3), 418–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Kotlar, J., & De Massis, A. (2013). Goal setting in family firms: Goal diversity, social interactions, and collective commitment to family-centered goals. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37(6), 1263–1288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Kotlar, J., De Massis, A., Fang, H., & Frattini, F. (2014a). Strategic reference points in family firms. Small Business Economics, 43(3), 597–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Kotlar, J., Fang, H. C., De Massis, A., & Frattini, F. (2014b). Profitability goals, control goals, and the R&D investment decisions of family and nonfamily firms. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(6), 1128–1145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (1999). Corporate ownership around the world. Journal of Finance, 54(2), 471–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Le Breton-Miller, I., & Miller, D. (2011). Commentary: Family firms and the advantage of multitemporality. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(6), 1171–1177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Lumpkin, G. T., & Brigham, K. H. (2011). Long-term orientation and intertemporal choice in family firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(6), 1179–1197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Miller, D., Le Breton-Miller, I., Lester, R. H., & Cannella, A. A, Jr. (2007). Are family firms really superior performers? Journal of Corporate Finance, 13(5), 829–858.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Morck, R. K., Stangeland, D. A., & Yeung, B. (1998). Inherited wealth, corporate control and economic growth. The William Davidson Institute Working Paper Number 209.Google Scholar
  67. Morck, R., & Yeung, B. (2003). Agency problems in large family business groups. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27(4), 367–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Morck, R., & Yeung, B. (2004). Family control and the rent-seeking society. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28(4), 391–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Oppenheim, A. N. (1966). Questionnaire design and attitude measurement. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  70. Pollak, R. A. (1985). A transaction cost approach to families and households. Journal of Economic Literature, 23(2), 581–608.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  71. Rothwell, R., & Zegveld, W. (1982). Innovation and the small and medium sized firm. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign’s Academy for Entrepreneurial Leadership Historical Research Reference in Entrepreneurship.Google Scholar
  72. Schepers, J., Voordeckers, W., Steijvers, T., & Laveren, E. (2014). The entrepreneurial orientation–performance relationship in private family firms: The moderating role of socioemotional wealth. Small Business Economics, 43(1), 39–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Schulze, W. S., & Gedajlovic, E. R. (2010). Whither family business? Journal of Management Studies, 47(2), 191–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Schulze, W. S., Lubatkin, M. H., Dino, R. N., & Buchholtz, A. K. (2001). Agency relationships in family firms: Theory and evidence. Organization Science, 12(2), 99–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Schumpeter, J. (1934). The theory of economic development. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  76. Shanker, M. C., & Astrachan, J. H. (1996). Myths and realities: Family businesses’ contribution to the US economy—A framework for assessing family business statistics. Family Business Review, 9(2), 107–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Sharma, P., Chrisman, J. J., & Chua, J. H. (1997). Strategic management of the family business: Past research and future challenges. Family Business Review, 10(1), 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Sirmon, D. G., & Hitt, M. A. (2003). Managing resources: Linking unique resources, management, and wealth creation in family firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27(4), 339–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Tagiuri, R., & Davis, J. (1996). Bivalent attributes of the family firm. Family Business Review, 9(2), 199–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Tan, J., Fischer, E., Mitchell, R., & Phan, P. (2009). At the center of the action: Innovation and technology strategy research in the small business setting. Journal of Small Business Management, 47(3), 233–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Tether, B. S. (1998). Small and large firms: Sources of unequal innovations? Research Policy, 27(7), 725–745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Thurik, R., & Wennekers, S. (2004). Entrepreneurship, small business and economic growth. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 11(1), 140–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Wennekers, S., & Thurik, R. (1999). Linking entrepreneurship and economic growth. Small Business Economics, 13(1), 27–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Westhead, P., & Howorth, C. (2007). Types of private family firms: An exploratory conceptual and empirical analysis. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 19(5), 405–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Esra Memili
    • 1
  • Hanqing Fang
    • 2
    • 3
  • James J. Chrisman
    • 2
    • 4
  • Alfredo De Massis
    • 5
    Email author
  1. 1.Bryan School of Business and EconomicsUniversity of North Carolina at GreensboroGreensboroUSA
  2. 2.Department of Management and Information SystemsMississippi State UniversityMississippi StateUSA
  3. 3.China Small and Medium Business Research InstituteZhejiang University of TechnologyZhejiangChina
  4. 4.Centre for Entrepreneurship and Family EnterpriseUniversity of AlbertaEdmontonCanada
  5. 5.Centre for Family Business, Department of Entrepreneurship, Strategy and InnovationLancaster University Management SchoolBailrigg, LancasterUK

Personalised recommendations