Advertisement

Small Business Economics

, Volume 44, Issue 4, pp 727–735 | Cite as

Corporate entrepreneurship as knowledge creation and conversion: the role of entrepreneurial hubs

  • Shaker A. ZahraEmail author
Article

Abstract

Corporate entrepreneurship (CE) is an important means for inducing innovation, revitalizing organizations, and enhancing productivity. It is also the source of new knowledge that allows companies to create capabilities to enter new markets and achieve growth. This article highlights key findings from a 25-year-long stream of research, conducted in several countries, that shows how CE creates knowledge and the variety of knowledge that emerges from different CE activities. It also explains the role of entrepreneurial hubs in capturing, accumulating, converting and translating, and integrating this knowledge, enabling companies to build new revenue streams. The role of these hubs is pervasive, calling for engaged management and creativity in building linkages within and across the different units of an organization. Knowledge, the foundation of competitive superiority, is clearly one of the most important products of CE in today’s dynamic global markets.

Keywords

Corporate entrepreneurship Knowledge creation Knowledge conversion Knowledge integration Entrepreneurial hubs 

JEL Classifications

L26 

References

  1. Burgelman, R. A. (1983). A process model of internal corporate venturing in the diversified major firm. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28, 223–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Foss, N., Lyngsie, J., & Zahra, S. (2013). The role of external knowledge sources and organizational design in the process of exploiting strategic opportunities. Strategic Management Journal, 34, 1453–1471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Gibbons, M. (2008). Why is Knowledge Translation Important? Grounding the conversation, KT08 Conference presentation at Banff, Canada.Google Scholar
  4. Kelley, D., Ali, A., & Zahra, S. (2013). Where do breakthroughs come from? characteristics of high potential inventions. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 30, 1212–1226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Mahnke, V., Venzin, M., & Zahra, S. (2007). Governing entrepreneurial opportunity recognition in MNEs: Aligning interests and cognition under uncertainty. Journal of Management Studies, 44, 1278–1298. (Special Issue).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Maula, M., Keil, T., & Zahra, S. (2013). Top management’s attention to discontinuous technological change: Corporate venture capital as an alert mechanism. Organization Science, 24(3), 926–947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Miller, D. (1983). The correlates of entrepreneurship in three types of firms. Management Science, 29(7), 770–791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Narayanan, V., Yang, Y., & Zahra, S. (2009). Corporate venturing and value creation: A review and proposed framework. Research Policy, 38, 58–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Sapienza, H. J., Autio, E., George, G., & Zahra, S. A. (2006). A capabilities perspective on the effects of early internationalization on firm survival and growth. Academy of Management Review, 31(4), 914–933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Tsang, E., & Zahra, S. (2008). Organizational unlearning. Human Relations, 61, 1435–1462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Uotila, J., Maula, M., Keil, T., & Zahra, S. (2009). Exploration, exploitation and firm performance: Analysis of S&P 500 corporations. Strategic Management Journal, 30, 221–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Van de Ven, A. & Zahra, S. (2015). Knowledge complexity, boundary objects, and innovation. Working paper, Strategic Management and Entrepreneurship, Carlson School of Management, University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
  13. Zahra, S. (1991). Predictors and financial outcomes of corporate entrepreneurship: An exploratory study. Journal of Business Venturing, 6(4), 259–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Zahra, S. (1993). Environment, corporate entrepreneurship and financial performance: A taxonomic approach. Journal of Business Venturing, 8, 319–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Zahra, S. (1996). Governance, ownership, and corporate entrepreneurship: The moderating impact of industry technological opportunities. Academy of Management Journal, 39(6), 1713–1735.Google Scholar
  16. Zahra, S. (2003). International expansion of US manufacturing family business: The effect of ownership and involvement. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(4), 495–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Zahra, S. (2008). The virtuous cycle of discovery and creation of entrepreneurial opportunities. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 2, 243–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Zahra, S., & Covin, J. G. (1995). Contextual influences on the corporate entrepreneurship-performance relationship: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Business Venturing, 10(1), 43–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Zahra, S., & Flatotchev, I. (2004). Governing the entrepreneurial firm: A knowledge based view. Journal of Management Studies, 41(5), 885–898.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Zahra, S., & George, G. (2002). Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization and extension. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 185–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Zahra, S., & Hayton, J. (2008). The effect of international venturing on firm performance: The moderating influence of absorptive capacity. Journal of Business Venturing, 23, 195–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Zahra, S., Ireland, D. R., & Hitt, M. (2000a). International expansion by new venture firms: International diversity, mode of market entry, technological learning and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 925–950.Google Scholar
  23. Zahra, S., & Nasimbam, S. (2011). Entrepreneurship in global innovation networks. AMS Review, 1(1), 4–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Zahra, S., Neubaum, D. O., & Huse, M. (2000b). Entrepreneurship in medium-size companies: Exploring the effects of ownership and governance systems. Journal of Management, 26(5), 947–976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Zahra, S., & Nielsen, A. P. (2002). Sources of capabilities, integration and technology commercialization. Strategic Management Journal, 23, 377–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Zahra, S., Nielsen, A., & Bogner, W. (1999). Corporate entrepreneurship, knowledge and competence development. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 23(3), 169–189.Google Scholar
  27. Zahra, S., Randerson, K., & Fayolle, (2013). Corporate entrepreneurship research: Where are we? Where can we go from here? Management, 16(4), 357–360.Google Scholar
  28. Zahra, S., Sapienza, H., & Davidsson, P. (2006). Entrepreneurship and dynamic capabilities: A review, model and research agenda. Journal of Management Studies, 43(4), 917–955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Zahra, S., van deVelde, E., & Larrañeta, B. (2007). Knowledge conversion capability and the performance of corporate and university spin-offs. Industrial and Corporate Change, 16, 569–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Zahra, S., & Yavuz, R. I. (2008). Competing at the intersection: Entrepreneurialism, agility and organizational resilience. In D. Barry & H. Hansen (Eds.), The new and emerging in management and organization studies (pp. 381–382). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publication.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2015

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.

The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

To view a copy of this license, visit (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Strategic Management and Entrepreneurship Department, Carlson School of Management [Suite 3-430]University of MinnesotaMinneapolisUSA

Personalised recommendations