Advertisement

Small Business Economics

, Volume 44, Issue 4, pp 845–865 | Cite as

Supply chains and the internationalization of small firms

  • Giorgia Giovannetti
  • Enrico Marvasi
  • Marco Sanfilippo
Article

Abstract

This paper explores the relation between supply-chain participation and the internationalization of firms. We show that even small and less productive firms, if involved in production chains, can take advantage of reduced costs of entry and economies of scale that enhance their probability of exporting. The empirical analysis is carried out on an original database, obtained by merging and matching balance-sheet data with data from a survey on over 25,000 Italian firms, which include direct information on the involvement in supply chains. We find a positive and significant relation between being part of a supply chain and the probability of exporting, as well as the intensive margin of trade. The number of foreign markets served (the extensive margin), on the other hand, does not seem to be affected. We also investigate whether being in different positions along the chain, i.e., upstream or downstream, matters, and we find that downstream producers tend to benefit more. Our results are robust to different specifications, estimation methods, and the inclusion of the control variables typically used in heterogeneous firms models.

Keywords

Supply chains Global value chains Internationalization Small and medium enterprises Heterogeneous firms 

JEL Classifications

F12 F14 F21 L26 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank two anonymous referees, Tadashi Ito and the participants to the Royal Economics Society Conference (Manchester, April 7–9, 2014); the Italian Trade Study Group Conference (November 2013); the 15th European Trade Study Group Conference (September 2013); the 10th c.Met05 Workshop (July 2013) and seminars at University of Florence, and IDE-JETRO for their comments on previous drafts of the paper. Financial support from the Regione Sardegna for the project CIREM “Analysis of competitiveness of Sardinia’s production system” is gratefully acknowledged.

Supplementary material

11187_2014_9625_MOESM1_ESM.docx (97 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 96 kb)

References

  1. Accetturo A., Giunta A., & Rossi S. (2011). The Italian firms between crisis and the new globalization. Questioni di Economia e Finanza (Occasional Papers) 86, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.1849865.
  2. Agostino, M., Nugent, J. B., Scalera, D., Trivieri, F., & Giunta, A. (2014). The importance of being a capable supplier: Italian industrial firms in global value chains. International Small Business Journal,. doi: 10.1177/0266242613518358.Google Scholar
  3. Ai, C. R., & Norton, E. C. (2003). Interaction terms in logit and probit models. Economics Letters, 80(1), 123–129. doi: 10.1016/s0165-1765(03)00032-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Antràs, P. (2003). Firms, contracts, and trade structure. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118, 1375–1418. doi: 10.1162/003355303322552829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Antràs, P., & Chor, D. (2013). Organizing the global value chain. Econometrica, 81(6), 2127–2204. doi: 10.3982/ECTA10813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Antràs, P., Chor, D., Fally, T., & Hillberry, R. (2013). Measuring the upstreamness of production and trade flows. American Economic Review, 102(3), 412–416. doi: 10.1257/aer.102.3.412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Antràs, P., & Helpman, E. (2004). Global sourcing. Journal of Political Economy, 112(3), 552–580. doi: 10.1086/383099.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Antràs, P., & Yeaple, S. R. (2014). Multinational firms and the structure of international trade. Handbook of International Economics, 4, 55–130. doi: 10.1016/b978-0-444-54314-1.00002-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Atalay, E., Hortacsu, A., & Syverson, C. (2014). Vertical integration and input flows. American Economic Review,. doi: 10.1257/aer.104.4.1120.Google Scholar
  10. Baldwin, R., & Lopez-Gonzalez, J. (2014). Supply-chain trade: A portrait of global patterns and several testable hypotheses. The World Economy,. doi: 10.1111/twec.12189.Google Scholar
  11. Bartoli, F., Ferri, G., Murro, P., & Rotondi, Z. (2014). Bank support and export: Evidence from small Italian firms. Small Business Economics, 42, 245–264. doi: 10.1007/s11187-013-9486-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Becattini G. (1990). The Marshallian industrial district as a socio-economic notion. In F. Pyke, G. Becattini, & W. Sengenberger (Eds.), Industrial district and inter-firm cooperation in Italy (pp. 37–51). International Institute for Labour Studies, Geneva. ISBN:929014467X, 9789290144670.Google Scholar
  13. Becchetti, L., & Rossi, S. (2000). The positive effect of industrial district on the export performance of italian firms. Review of Industrial Organization, 16(1), 53–68. doi: 10.1023/a:1007783900387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Becker, S. O., & Caliendo, M. (2007). Sensitivity analysis for average treatment effects. Stata Journal, 7(1), 71–83.Google Scholar
  15. Becker, S. O., & Ichino, A. (2002). Estimation of average treatment effects based on propensity scores. Stata Journal, 2(4), 358–377.Google Scholar
  16. Bernard, A. B., Jensen, J. B., Redding, S. J., & Schott, P. K. (2007). Firms in international trade. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21(3), 105–130. doi: 10.1257/jep.21.3.105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bricongne, J. C., Fontagné, L., Gaulier, G., Taglioni, D., & Vicard, V. (2012). Firms and the global crisis: French exports in the turmoil. Journal of International Economics, 87(1), 134–146. doi: 10.1016/j.jinteco.2011.07.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Brusco S., & Paba S. (1997). Per una storia dei distretti industriali italiani dal secondo dopoguerra agli anni novanta. In F. Barca (Ed.), Storia del capitalismo italiano dal dopoguerra ad oggi (pp. 265–333). Donzelli Editore Roma. ISBN:9788860364616.Google Scholar
  19. Caliendo, M., & Kopeinig, S. (2008). Some practical guidance for the implementation of propensity score matching. Journal of Economic Surveys, 22(1), 31–72. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6419.2007.00527.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Castellani, D., Serti, F., & Tomasi, C. (2010). Firms in international trade: Importers’ and exporters’ heterogeneity in Italian manufacturing industry. The World Economy, 33(3), 424–457. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9701.2010.01262.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cerrato, D., & Piva, M. (2012). The internationalization of small and medium-sized enterprises: The effect of family management, human capital and foreign ownership. Journal of Management and Governance, 16(4), 617–644. doi: 10.1007/s10997-010-9166-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Crouch, C., Le Galès, P., Trigilia, C., & Voelzkow, H. (2001). Local production systems in Europe: Rise or demise?. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi: 10.1016/s0038-0296(03)00019-0.Google Scholar
  23. Dehejia, R. H., & Wahba, S. (1999). Causal effects in non-experimental studies: Reevaluating the evaluation of training programs. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 94(448), 1053–1062. doi: 10.1080/01621459.1999.10473858.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. del Gatto, M., Di Liberto, A., & Petraglia, C. (2011). Measuring productivity. Journal of Economic Surveys, 5, 952–1008. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6419.2009.00620.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Di Giacinto, V., Gomellini, M., Micucci, G., & Pagnini, M. (2014). Mapping local productivity advantages in Italy: industrial districts, cities or both? Journal of Economic Geography, 14, 365–394. doi: 10.1093/jeg/lbt021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Duranton, G., & Overman, H. G. (2008). Exploring the detailed location patterns of UK manufacturing industries using microgeographic data. Journal of Regional Science, 48(1), 213–243. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.0547.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Federico, S. (2012). Headquarter intensity and the choice between outsourcing versus integration at home or abroad. Industrial and Corporate Change, 21(6), 1337–1358. doi: 10.1093/icc/dts006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gereffi, G. (1999). International trade and industrial upgrading in the apparel commodity chain. Journal of International Economics, 48, 37–70. doi: 10.1016/s0022-1996(98)00075-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gereffi, G., Humphrey, J., Kaplinsky, R., & Sturgeon, T. J. (2001). Introduction: Globalisation, value chains and development. IDS Bulletin, 32(3), 1–8. doi: 10.1111/j.1759-5436.2001.mp32003001.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Giovannetti, G., Ricchiuti, G., & Velucchi, M. (2013). Location, internationalization and performance of firms in Italy: A multilevel approach. Applied Economics,. doi: 10.1080/00036846.2012.665597.Google Scholar
  31. Giunta, A., Nifo, A., & Scalera, D. (2012). Subcontracting in Italian industry: Labour division, firm growth and the north–south divide. Regional Studies, 46(8), 1067–1083. doi: 10.1080/00343404.2011.552492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Grossman, S. J., & Hart, O. D. (1986). The costs and benefits of ownership: A theory of vertical and lateral integration. Journal of Political Economy, 94, 691–719. doi: 10.1086/261404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Grossman, G. M., & Helpman, E. (1991). Innovation and growth in the global economy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. ISBN 0-262-57097-1.Google Scholar
  34. Grossman, G. M., & Helpman, E. (2002). Integration versus outsourcing in industry equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(1), 85–120. doi: 10.1162/003355302753399454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Grossman, G. M., & Rossi-Hansberg, E. (2008). Trading tasks: A simple theory of offshoring. American Economic Review, 98(5), 1978–1997. doi: 10.1257/aer.98.5.1978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Heckman, J. J., Ichimura, H., & Todd, P. (1998). Matching as an econometric evaluation estimator. Review of Economic Studies, 65(2), 261–294. doi: 10.1111/1467-937X.00044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Helpman, E., Melitz, M. J., & Yeaple, S. R. (2004). Export versus FDI with heterogeneous firms. American Economic Review, 94(1), 300–316. doi: 10.1257/000282804322970814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Higón, Añón D., & Driffield, N. (2011). Exporting and innovation performance: Analysis of the annual small business survey in the UK. International Small Business Journal,. doi: 10.1177/0266242610369742.Google Scholar
  39. Hosmer, D. W, Jr, & Lemeshow, S. (2000). Applied logistic regression (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley. doi: 10.1002/0471722146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Humphrey, J., & Schmitz, H. (2002). How does insertion in global value chains affect upgrading in industrial clusters? Regional Studies, 36(9), 1017–1027. doi: 10.1080/0034340022000022198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Imbens, G. W., & Wooldridge, J. M. (2009). Recent developments in the econometrics of program evaluation. Journal of Economic Literature, 47(1), 5–86. doi: 10.1257/jel.47.1.5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. ISTAT. (2013). Report—Le microimprese in Italia, Censimento dell’industria e dei servizi. http://censimentoindustriaeservizi.istat.it
  43. Leuven E., & Sianesi B. (2003). PSMATCH2: Stata module to perform full mahalanobis and propensity score matching, common support graphing, and covariate imbalance testing. Statistical Software Components S432001, Boston College Department of Economics, revised February 12, 2014.Google Scholar
  44. Levinsohn, J., & Petrin, A. (2003). Estimating production functions using inputs to control for unobservables. Review of Economic Studies, 70, 317–341. doi: 10.1111/1467-937X.00246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Mayer, T., & Ottaviano, G. I. P. (2008). The happy few: The internationalisation of European firms. Intereconomics: Review of European Economic Policy, 43(3), 135–148. doi: 10.1007/s10272-008-0247-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Melitz, M. J. (2003). The impact of trade on intra-industry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity. Econometrica, 71, 1695–1725. doi: 10.1111/1468-0262.00467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Melitz M. J., & Redding S. J. (2014). Heterogeneous firms and trade. Handbook of international economics (4th ed., Vol. 4, pp.1–54). Elsevier. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-54314-1.00001-X.
  48. Navaretti G. B., Bugamelli G., Schivardi F., Altomonte C., Horgos, D., & Maggioni D. (2011). The global operations of European firms: The second EFIGE policy report. Bruegel Bluepring Series. ISBN:978-9-078910-20-6.Google Scholar
  49. Norton, E. C., Wang, H., & Ai, C. R. (2004). Computing interaction effects and standard errors in logit and probit models. Stata Journal, 4(2), 154–167.Google Scholar
  50. OECD. (2008). Enhancing the role of SMEs in global value chains. OECD Publishing. doi: 10.1787/9789264051034-en.
  51. OECD. (2012). Fostering SMEs’ participation in global markets: Final report. OECD Centre for SMEs, Entrepreneurship and Local Development, Paris.Google Scholar
  52. Park, A., Nayyar, G., & Low, P. (Eds.). (2013). Supply chain perspectives and issues: A literature review. World Trade Organization and Fung Global Institute. ISBN:978-92-870-3893-7.Google Scholar
  53. Pieri, F., & Zaninotto, E. (2013). Vertical integration and efficiency: An application to the Italian machine tool industry. Small Business Economics, 40, 397–416. doi: 10.1007/s11187-011-9367-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Razzolini, T., & Vannoni, D. (2011). Export premia and sub-contracting discount passive strategies and performance in domestic and foreign markets. World Economy, 34, 984–1013. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9701.2011.01329.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Rosenbaum, P., & Rubin, D. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70, 41–55. doi: 10.1093/biomet/70.1.41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. van Beveren, I. (2012). Total factor productivity estimation: A practical review. Journal of Economic Surveys, 26(1), 98–128. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6419.2010.00631.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wagner, J. (2012). International trade and firm performance: A survey of empirical studies since 2006. Review of World Economics, 148(2), 235–267. doi: 10.1007/s10290-011-0116-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Wynarczyk, P., & Watson, R. (2005). Firm growth and supply chain partnerships: An empirical analysis of UK SME subcontractors. Small Business Economics, 24, 39–51. doi: 10.1007/s11187-005-3095-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Giorgia Giovannetti
    • 1
    • 2
  • Enrico Marvasi
    • 1
  • Marco Sanfilippo
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of EconomicsUniversity of FlorenceFlorenceItaly
  2. 2.Global Governance ProgrammeEuropean University InstituteSan Domenico di FiesoleItaly
  3. 3.Institute of Development Policy and ManagementUniversity of AntwerpAntwerpBelgium

Personalised recommendations