Advertisement

Small Business Economics

, Volume 44, Issue 4, pp 925–948 | Cite as

Cluster development policy, SME’s performance, and spillovers: evidence from Brazil

  • Lucas Figal Garone
  • Alessandro Maffioli
  • Joao Alberto de Negri
  • Cesar M. RodriguezEmail author
  • Gonzalo Vázquez-Baré
Article

Abstract

This paper studies the impact of the Brazilian Arranjos Productivos Locais (APL) policy, a cluster development policy, on small and medium enterprises’ (SMEs) performance. Using firm-level data on SMEs for the years 2002–2009, this paper combines fixed effects with reweighting methods to estimate both the direct and the indirect causal effects of participating in the APL policy on employment growth, value of total exports, and likelihood of exporting. Our results show that APL policy generates a positive direct impact on the three outcomes of interest. They also show evidence of short-term negative spillovers effects on employment in the first year after the policy implementation and positive spillovers on export outcomes in the medium and long term. Thus, our findings highlight the importance of accounting for the timing and gestation periods of the effects on firm performances when assessing the impact of clusters policies.

Keywords

Cluster policies SMEs Brazil Impact evaluation Spillovers Panel data Fixed-effects method 

JEL Classifications

C23 D22 H43 L25 L26 O12 O54 R10 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Patrick Franco Alves, Conner Mullaly, and Rodolfo Stucchi for useful discussions and comments on this project. We would also like to thank SEBRAE and two anonymous referees for their suggestions and comments. The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Inter-American Development Bank. The usual disclaimer applies. Senior authorship is not assigned.

References

  1. Anderson, T., Hansson, E., Schwaag, S., & Sörvik, J. (2004). The cluster policies white book. Malmo: Iked.Google Scholar
  2. Angrist, J., & Pischke, J.-S. (2008). Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist’s Companion. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Aranguren, M. J., Larrea, M., & Navarro, I. (2006). The policy process: Clusters versus spatial networks in the Basque country. In C. Pitelis, R. Sugden, & J. R. Wilson (Eds.), Clusters and globalization (pp. 258–280). Cheltenham and Northampton: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  4. Arráiz, I., Henriquez, F., & Stucchi, R. (2013). Supplier development programs and firm performance: Evidence from Chile. Small Business Economics, 41(1), 277–293.Google Scholar
  5. Arráiz, I., Melendez, M., & Stucchi, R. (2014). Partial credit guarantees and firm performance: Evidence from Colombia. Small Business Economics. doi: 10.1007/s11187-014-9558-4.Google Scholar
  6. Arrow, K. J. (1962). The economic implications of learning by doing. Review of Economic Studies, 29(3), 155–173.Google Scholar
  7. Aw, B. Y., Chung, S., & Roberts, M. J. (2000). Productivity and turnover in the export market: Micro-level evidence from the Republic of Korea and Taiwan (China). World Bank Economic Review, 14(1), 65–90.Google Scholar
  8. Beaudry, C., & Peter Swann, G. M. (2009). Firm growth in industrial clusters of the United Kingdom. Small Business Economics, 32(4), 409–424.Google Scholar
  9. Benavente, J., Crespi, G., Figal Garone, L., & Maffioli, A. (2012). The impact of national research funds: A regression discontinuity approach to the Chilean FONDECYT. Research Policy, 41(8), 1461–1475.Google Scholar
  10. Bernard, A. B., Eaton, J., Jensen, J. B., & Kortum, S. (2003). Plants and productivity in international trade. American Economic Review, 93(4), 1268–1290.Google Scholar
  11. Bernard, A. B., & Jensen, J. B. (1999). Exceptional exporter performance: Cause, effect, or both? Journal of International Economics, 47(1), 1–25.Google Scholar
  12. Bernard, A. B., & Jensen, J. B. (2004). Why some firms export?. Review of Economics and Statistics, 86(4), 561–569.Google Scholar
  13. Bertrand, M., Duflo, E., & Mullainathan, S. (2004). How much should we trust difference-in-differences estimates? The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119(1), 249–275.Google Scholar
  14. Blundell, R., & Costas Dias, M. (2000). Evaluation methods for non-experimental data. Fiscal Studies, 21(4), 427–468.Google Scholar
  15. Boekholt, P. (2003). Evaluation of regional innovation policies in Europe. In P. Shapira & S. Kuhlmann (Eds.), Learning from science and technology policy evaluation: Experiences from the United States and Europe (pp. 244–259). Cheltenham and Northampton: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  16. Bottazzi, L., & Peri, G. (2003). Innovation and spillovers in regions: Evidence from European patent data. European Economic Review, 47(4), 687–710.Google Scholar
  17. Bronzini, R., & Piselli, P. (2009). Determinants of long-run regional productivity with geographical spillovers: The role of R&D, human capital and public infrastructure. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 39(2), 187–199.Google Scholar
  18. Buendia, F. (2005). Towards a system dynamic-based theory of industrial clusters. In C. Karlsson, B. Johansson, & R. R. Stough (Eds.), Industrial clusters and inter-firm networks (pp. 83–106). Cheltenham and Northampton: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  19. Campos, R. Stallivieri, F., Vargas, M., Mato, M., (2010). politicas estaduais para arranjos produtivos locais no sul, sudeste e centro-oeste do Brasil. E-papers Servicos Editoriais Ltda., Rio de Janeiro. http://www.bndes.gov.br/SiteBNDES/export/sites/default/bndes_pt/Galerias/Arquivos/empresa/pesquisa/Consolidacao_APLs_Sul_Sudeste.pdf
  20. Cassiolato, J. E. (2012) Nota técnica síntese implementacao e avaliacao de politicas para arranjos produtivos locais: Proposta de modelo analitico e classificatório. Ministerio de Desenvolvimento, Indústria e Comércio Exterior. http://portalapl.ibict.br/export/sites/apl/galerias/biblioteca/Nota_Txcnica_6_VF.pdf
  21. Cassiolato, J. E., Lastres, H., & Maciel, M. L. (2003). Systems of innovation and development: Evidence from Brazil. Cheltenham, RU: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  22. Castillo, V., Maffioli, A., Rojo, S., & Stucchi, R. (2014). The effect of innovation policy on SMEs’ employment and wages in Argentina. Small Business Economics, 42(2), 387–406.Google Scholar
  23. Cheshire, P. C. (2003). Territorial competition: Lessons for (innovation) policy. In J. Brocker, D. Dohse, & R. Soltwedel (Eds.), Innovation clusters and interregional competition (pp. 331–346). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  24. Ciccone, A., & Hall, R. (1996). Productivity and the density of economic activity. American Economic Review, 86(1), 54–70.Google Scholar
  25. Clerides, S., Lack, S., & Tybout, J. R. (1998). Is learning by exporting important? Micro-dynamic evidence from Colombia, Mexico and Morocco. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113(3), 903–947.Google Scholar
  26. Combes, P., Duranton, G., & Gobillon, L. (2008). Spatial wage disparities: Sorting matters. Journal of Urban Economics, 63(2), 723–742.Google Scholar
  27. Combes, P., Duranton, G., Gobillon, L., & Roux, S. (2010). Estimating agglomeration economies with history, geology, and worker effects. In E. L. Glaeser (Ed.), Agglomeration Economics (pp. 15–66). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  28. Crespi, G., Maffioli A., Melendez, M. (2011). Public support to innovation: The Colombian Colciencias’ experience. Technical Notes No. IDB-TN-264, Science and Technology Division, Inter-American Development Bank, Washington, DC. http://www.iadb.org/wmsfiles/products/publications/documents/35940030.pdf
  29. De Propris, L., & Driffield, N. (2006). The importance of clusters for spillovers from foreign direct investment and technology sourcing. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 30(2), 277–291.Google Scholar
  30. Dehejia, R., & Wahba, S. (1999). Causal effects in nonexperimental studies: Reevaluating the evaluation of training programs. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 94(448), 1053–1062.Google Scholar
  31. DTI. (2004). A practical guide to cluster development: A report to the Department of Trade and Industry and the English RDAs. London: DTI.Google Scholar
  32. Dumais, G., Ellison, G., & Glaeser, E. (2002). Geographic concentration as a dynamic process. Review of Economics and Statistics, 84(2), 193–204.Google Scholar
  33. Ellison, G., & Glaeser, E. (1997). Geographic concentration in U.S. manufacturing industries: A dartboard approach. Journal of Political Economy, 105(5), 889–927.Google Scholar
  34. Ellison, G., & Glaeser, E. (1999). The geographic concentration of industry: Does natural advantage explain agglomeration? American Economic Review, 89(2), 311–316.Google Scholar
  35. Ellison, G., Glaeser, E., & Kerr, W. (2010). What causes industry agglomeration? Evidence from coagglomeration patterns. American Economic Review, 100(3), 1195–1213.Google Scholar
  36. European Commission. (2002). Regional clusters in Europe. Observatory of European SMEs 2002/3, Brussels: EC.Google Scholar
  37. Falk, O., Heblich, S., & Kipar, S. (2010). Industrial innovation: Direct evidence from a cluster-oriented policy. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 40(6), 574–582.Google Scholar
  38. Feser, E. (2002). The relevance of clusters for innovation policy in Latin America and the Caribbean. Background paper prepared for the World Bank, LAC Group. http://www.urban.uiuc.edu/faculty/feser/Pubs/Relevance%20of%20clusters.pdf
  39. Galiani, S., Gertler, P., & Schargrodsky, E. (2005). Water for life: The impact of the privatization of water services on child mortality. Journal of Political Economy, 113(1), 83–119.Google Scholar
  40. Giuliani, E., Maffioli, A., Pachecho, M. Pietrobelli, C., Stucchi, R. (2013). Evaluating the impact of cluster development programs. Technical Note No. IDB-TN-551, Competitiveness and Innovation Division, Institutions for Development, Inter-American Development Bank, Washington, DC. http://www.iadb.org/wmsfiles/products/publications/documents/37925857.pdf
  41. Giuliani, E., Pietrobelli, C., & Rabellotti, R. (2005). Upgrading in global value chains: Lessons from Latin American clusters. World Development, 33(4), 549–573.Google Scholar
  42. González, M., Maffioli, A., Salazar, L., Winters, P. (2010). Assessing the effectiveness of agricultural interventions. Special Topic, Development Effectiveness Overview, Inter-American Development Bank, Washington, DC. http://publications.iadb.org/bitstream/handle/11319/1240/Assessing%20the%20Effectiveness%20of%20Agricultural%20Interventions.pdf?sequence=1
  43. GTZ. (2007). Cluster management: A practical guide. Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Technische Zusammenarbeit (GTZ) GmbH: Eschborn.Google Scholar
  44. Hainmueller, J. (2012). Entropy balancing for causal effects: A multivariate reweighting method to produce balanced samples in observational studies. Political Analysis, 20(1), 25–46.Google Scholar
  45. Hainmueller, J., & Xu, Y. (2011). Ebalance: A Stata package for entropy balancing. Journal of Statistical Software, 54(7), 1–18.Google Scholar
  46. Hall, B., & Maffioli, A. (2008). Evaluating the impact of technology development funds in emerging economies: Evidence from Latin America. European Journal of Development Research, 20(2), 172–198.Google Scholar
  47. Hanson, G. (2001). Scale economies and the geographic concentration of industry. Journal of Economic Geography, 1(3), 255–276.Google Scholar
  48. Hartmann, C. (2002). Styria. In P. Raines (Ed.), Cluster development and policy (pp. 123–140). Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  49. Hay, D., & Morris, D. (1987). Industrial economics, theory and evidence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Heckman, J., & Hotz, V. (1989). Choosing among alternative non-experimental methods for estimating the impact of social programs: The case of Manpower training. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 84(408), 862–874.Google Scholar
  51. Heckman, J., Ichimura, H., Smith, J., & Todd, P. (1998). Characterizing selection bias using experimental data. Econometrica, 66(5), 1017–1098.Google Scholar
  52. Heckman, J., Ichimura, H., & Todd, P. (1997). Matching as an econometric evaluation estimator: Evidence from evaluating a job training program. Review of Economic Studies, 64(4), 605–654.Google Scholar
  53. Henderson, V., Kunkoro, A., & Turner, M. (1995). Industrial development of cities. Journal of Political Economy, 103(5), 1067–1090.Google Scholar
  54. Hoffman, W. (2004). A contribuição da Inteligência Competitiva para o Desenvolvimento de Arranjos Produtivos Locais: Caso Jaú-SP. Revista Eletrônica Biblioteconomia, Florianópolis. http://www.pg.utfpr.edu.br/dirppg/ppgep/dissertacoes/arquivos/4/Dissertacao.pdf
  55. Holland, P. (1986). Statistics and causal inference. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 81(396), 945–960.Google Scholar
  56. Imbens, G., Rubin, D., & Sacerdote, B. (2001). Estimating the effect of unearned income on labor earnings, savings, and consumption: Evidence from a survey of lottery players. The American Economic Review, 91(4), 778–794.Google Scholar
  57. Jaffe, A., Trajtenberg, M., & Henderson, R. (1993). Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patents citations. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(3), 577–598.Google Scholar
  58. Krugman, P. (1991). Geography and trade. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  59. Kullback, S. (1959). Information theory and statistics. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  60. La Rovere, R., Hasenclever, L., & Erber, F. (2004). Industrial and technology policy for regional development: Promoting clusters in Brazil. The International Journal of Technology Management and Sustainable Development, 2(3), 205–217.Google Scholar
  61. La Rovere, R., & Shibata, L. (2007). Politicas de apoio a micro e pequenas empresas e desenvolvimento local: alguns pontos de reflexao. Revista REDES, 11(3), 9–24.Google Scholar
  62. Lastres, H., Cassiolato, J. (2003). Glossario de arranjos e sistemas produtivos e inovativos locais. Rede de pesquisa em sistemas produtivos e inovativos locais, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. http://mdic.gov.br/portalmdic/arquivos/dwnl_1289323549.pdf
  63. Lastres, H., & Cassiolato, J. (2005). Innovation systems and local productive arrangements: New strategies to promote the generation, acquisition and diffusion of knowledge. Innovation and Economic Development, 7(2), 172–187.Google Scholar
  64. Lastres, H., Cassiolato, J., & Maciel, M. (2003). Systems of innovation for development in the knowledge era: An introduction. In J. E. Cassiolato, H. M. M. Lastres, & M. L. Maciel (Eds.), Systems of innovation and development: Evidence from Brazil (pp. 1–33). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  65. Li, D., Lu, Y., & Wu, M. (2012). Industrial agglomeration and firm size: Evidence from China. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 41(1–2), 135–143.Google Scholar
  66. Litzenberger, T., & Sternberg, R. (2005). Regional clusters and entrepreneurial activities: Empirical evidence from German regions. In C. Karlsson, B. Johansson, & R. R. Stough (Eds.), Industrial clusters and inter-firm networks (pp. 260–302). Cheltenham and Northampton: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  67. López Acevedo, G., & Tan, H. (2010). Impact evaluation of SME programs in Latin America and the Caribbean. Washington, DC: World Bank Publications.Google Scholar
  68. Machado, S. A. (2003). Dinâmica dos arranjos produtivos locais: Um estudo de caso em Santa Gertrudes, a nova capital da cerâmica brasileira. Tese de Doutorado, Escola Politécnica, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo. http://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/3/3136/tde-27102003-151054/
  69. Maffioli, A. (2005). The formation of network and public intervention: Theory and evidence from the Chilean experience. ISLA Working Paper 23, Univertità Bocconi. ftp://www.unibocconi.it/pub/RePEc/slp/papers/islawp23.pdf
  70. Maffioli, A., Ubfal, D., Vázquez Baré, G., & Cerdán Infantes, P. (2012). Extension services, product quality and yields: The case of grapes in Argentina. Agricultural Economics, 42(6), 727–734.Google Scholar
  71. Maine, E., Shapiro, D., & Vining, A. (2010). The role of clustering in the growth of new technology-based firms. Small Business Economics, 34(2), 127–146.Google Scholar
  72. Maliranta, M., Mohnen, P., & Rouvinen, P. (2009). Is inter-firm labor mobility a channel of knowledge spillovers? Evidence from a linked employer–employee panel. Industrial and Corporate Change, 18(6), 1161–1191.Google Scholar
  73. Marshall, A. (1920). The principles of economics. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  74. Martin, P., Mayer, T., & Mayneris, F. (2011). Public support to clusters: A firm level study of French ‘Local Productive Systems’. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 41(2), 108–123.Google Scholar
  75. Melitz, M. (2003). The impact of trade on intra-industry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity. Econometrica, 71(6), 1695–1725.Google Scholar
  76. Moretti, E. (2004). Workers’ education, spillovers, and productivity: Evidence from plant-level production functions. American Economic Review, 94(3), 656–690.Google Scholar
  77. Mytelka, L., & Farinelli, F. (2005). De aglomerados locais a sistemas de inovacao. In H. Lastres, J. E. Cassiolato, & A. Arroio (Eds.), Conhecimento, sistemas de inovacao e desenvolvimento. Rio de Janeiro: Editora UFRJ/Contraponto.Google Scholar
  78. Nishimura, J., & Okamuro, H. (2011). R&D productivity and the organization of cluster policy: An empirical evaluation of the Industrial Cluster Project in Japan. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 36(2), 117–144.Google Scholar
  79. Politica de Apoio ao Desenvolvimiento de Arranjos Productivos Locais. (2004). Termo de Referencia para Politica Nacional de Apoio ao Desenvolvimiento de Arranjos Produtivos Locais. Versao para Discussao do GT Interministerial, Versao Final (16/04/2004), Brasil. http://www.mdic.gov.br/arquivos/dwnl_1289322946.pdf
  80. Porter, M. (1990). The competitive advantage of nations. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  81. Porter, M. (1998). Clusters and the new economics of competition. Harvard Business Review, 76(6), 77–91.Google Scholar
  82. Porter, M. (2000). Location, competition, and economic development: Local clusters in a global economy. Economic Development Quarterly, 14(1), 15–34.Google Scholar
  83. Rip, A. (2003). Societal challenges for R&D evaluation. In P. Shapira & S. Kuhlmann (Eds.), Learning from science and technology policy evaluation: Experiences from the United States and Europe (pp. 32–53). Cheltenham and Northampton: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  84. Rizov, M., Oskam, A., & Walsh, P. (2012). Is there a limit to agglomeration? Evidence from productivity of Dutch firms. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 42(4), 595–606.Google Scholar
  85. Rodriguez-Clare, A. (2005). Coordination failures, clusters and microeconomic interventions. Economía, 6(1), 1–29.Google Scholar
  86. Rodriguez-Clare, A. (2007). Clusters and comparative advantage: Implications for industrial policy. Journal of Development Economics, 82(1), 43–57.Google Scholar
  87. Romer, P. M. (1986). Increasing returns and long-run growth. Journal of Political Economy, 94(5), 1002–1037.Google Scholar
  88. Rosenstein-Rodan, P. (1943). Problems of industrialization of Eastern and South-Eastern Europe. The Economic Journal, 53(210/211), 202–211.Google Scholar
  89. Rosenthal, S., & Strange, W. (2001). The determinants of agglomeration. Journal of Urban Economics, 50(2), 191–229.Google Scholar
  90. Rosenthal, S., & Strange, W. (2003). Geography, industrial organization, and agglomeration. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 85(2), 377–393.Google Scholar
  91. Rosenthal, S., & Strange, W. (2010). Small establishments/big effects: Agglomeration, industrial organization and entrepreneurship. In E. L. Glaeser (Ed.), Agglomeration economics (pp. 277–302). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  92. Santos, F., Crocco, M., Lemos, M. B. (2002a). Arranjos e sistemas produtivos locais em “espaços industriais” periféricos: Estudo comparativo de dois casos brasileiros. Belo Horizonte: UFMG/Cedeplar. http://internotes.fieb.org.br/rede_APL/arquivos/fabianamarcomauro.pdf
  93. Santos, F., Crocco, M., Simoes, R. (2002b). Arranjos productivos locais informais: Uma análise de components principais para Nova Serrana e Ubá—Minas Gerais. Anais do X Seminário sobre a Economia Mineira, Belo Horizonte, Cedeplar, UFMG. http://www.cedeplar.ufmg.br/diamantina2002/textos/D30.PDF
  94. Schmiedeberg, C. (2010). Evaluation of cluster policy: A methodological overview. Evaluation, 16(4), 389–412.Google Scholar
  95. Shefer, D. (1973). Localization economies in SMA’s: A production function analysis. Journal of Regional Science, 13(1), 55–65.Google Scholar
  96. Souza Filho, O. V., & Martins, R. S. (2013). A efetividade da colaboracao entre organizacoes do arranjo produtivo local (APL): Experiencias dos processos logísticos nas industrias do vale da eletronica de Minas Gerais—Brasil. Revista REDES, 18(2), 8–37.Google Scholar
  97. Sveikauskas, L. (1975). The productivity of cities. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 89(3), 393–413.Google Scholar
  98. Volpe, C., & Carballo, J. (2008). Is export promotion effective in developing countries? Firm-level evidence on the intensive and the extensive margins of exports. Journal of International Economics, 76(1), 89–106.Google Scholar
  99. Wemberg, K., & Lindqvist, G. (2010). The effect of clusters on the survival and performance of new firms. Small Business Economics, 34(3), 221–241.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lucas Figal Garone
    • 1
    • 2
  • Alessandro Maffioli
    • 1
  • Joao Alberto de Negri
    • 3
  • Cesar M. Rodriguez
    • 4
    Email author
  • Gonzalo Vázquez-Baré
    • 1
  1. 1.Inter-American Development BankWashingtonUSA
  2. 2.Universidad de San AndrésVictoriaArgentina
  3. 3.Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica AplicadaRio de JaneiroBrazil
  4. 4.Department of EconomicsPortland State UniversityPortlandUSA

Personalised recommendations