Small Business Economics

, Volume 44, Issue 1, pp 145–170 | Cite as

High-growth firms in changing competitive environments: the US pharmaceutical industry (1963 to 2002)

Article

Abstract

Firms across sectors and regions are highly skewed in their ability to engage with innovation and even more skewed in their ability to translate investments in innovation into higher growth. Recent attention has been placed on the importance of ‘high-growth firms’ (HGF) for innovation policy. Our paper explores under what conditions HGF matter for translating R&D investments into economic growth and how this depends on firm-specific and industry-specific factors. We use quantile regression techniques to study the R&D–growth relationship in HGF compared to low-growth firms. Unlike previous studies, we pay particular attention to whether this relationship depends on the particular period in the industry’s life cycle. We focus on the US pharmaceutical industry from 1963 to 2002 and find that the R&D–growth relationship is sensitive to the changing competitive environment over the industry’s history, which suggests that innovation policy must focus not only on firm attributes but also competitive structures.

Keywords

High-growth firms Research and development Competitive environment Quantile regression Pharmaceutical industry 

JEL Classifications

L22 L25 L26 O30 O32 

Supplementary material

11187_2014_9583_MOESM1_ESM.docx (67 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 67 kb)

References

  1. Acs, Z. J., & Audretsch, D. B. (1990). The determinants of small-firm growth in US manufacturing. Applied Economics, 22, 143–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Acs, Z. J., Parsons, W., & Spencer, T. (2008). High impact firms: Gazelles revisited. Technical report, Office of Advocacy working paper, US Small Business Administration.Google Scholar
  3. Acs, Z. J., & Yeung, B. (1999). Conclusion. In Z. Acs & B. Yeung (Eds.), Small and medium-sized enterprises in the global economy (pp. 164–173). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  4. Aghion, P., Bloom, N., Blundell, R., Griffith, R., & Howitt, P. (2005). Competition and innovation: An inverted-u relationship. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120(2), 701–728.Google Scholar
  5. Almus, M., & Nerlinger, E. A. (1999). Growth of new technology-based firms: Which factors matter?. Small Business Economics, 13(2), 141–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Arora, A., & Gambardella, A. (1994). The changing technology of technological change: General and abstract knowledge and the division of innovative labour. Research Policy, 23(5), 523–532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Arrow, K. J. (1962). Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for inventions. In R. R. Nelson (Ed.), The rate and direction of inventive activity: Economic and social factors. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Audretsch, D. B. (2012). Determinants of high-growth entrepreneurship. OECD/DBA report. http://www.oecd.org/cfe/leed/Audretsch_determinants%20of%20high-growth%20firms.pdf. Accessed November 1, 2013.
  9. Audretsch, D. B., Klomp, L., Santarelli, E., & Thurik, A. R. (2004). Gibrat’s law: Are the services different? Review of Industrial Organization, 24, 301–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Barney, J. E. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Baum, J. A. C., & Silverman, B. S. (2004). Picking winners or building them? Alliance, intellectual, and human capital as selection criteria in venture financing and performance of biotechnology start-ups. Journal of Business Venturing, 19, 411–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bentzen, J., Madsen, E., & Smith, V. (2012). Do firms’ growth rates depend on firm size? Small Business Economics, 39(4), 937–947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bloom, N., & van Reenen, J. (2006). Measuring and explaining management practices across firms and countries. London: Centre for Economic Performance.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bottazzi, G., & Secchi, A. (2006). Explaining the distribution of firm growth rates. The Rand Journal of Economics, 37(2), 235–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Brouwer, E., Kleinknecht, A., & Reijnen, J. O. N. (1993). Employment growth and innovation at the firm level. Evolutionary Economics, 3, 153–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Brown, J. R., Fazzari, S. M., & Petersen, B. C. (2009). Financing innovation and growth: Cash flow, external equity, and the 1990s R&D boom. The Journal of Finance, 64(1), 151–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cefis, E., & Orsenigo, L. (2001). The persistence of innovative activities across-countries and cross-sectors comparative analysis. Research Policy, 30, 1139–1158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Christensen, C. M. (1997). The innovator’s dilemma: When new technologies cause great firms to fail. Boston: Harvard Business Press.Google Scholar
  19. Coad, A. (2009). The growth of firms: A survey of theories and empirical evidence. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Coad, A., & Rao, R. (2008). Innovation and firm growth in high-tech sectors: A quantile regression approach. Research Policy, 37, 633–648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Colombelli, A., Krafft, J., & Quatraro, F. (2012). High growth firms and technological knowledge: Do gazelles follow exploration or exploitation strategies? http://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00666707/. Accessed November 1, 2013.
  22. Danzon, P. M., Epstein, A., & Nicholson, S. (2007). Mergers and acquisitions in the pharmaceutical and biotech industries. Managerial and Decision Economics, 28(4–5), 307–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Davidsson, P., & Delmar, F. (2006). High-growth firms and their contribution to employment: The case of Sweden. In P. Davidsson, F. Delmar, & J. Wiklund (Eds.), Entrepreneurship and the growth of firms (pp. 156–178). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Davidsson, P., Kirchhoff, B., Hatemi-J, A., & Gustavsson, H. (2002). Empirical analysis of business growth factors using Swedish data. Journal of Small Business Management, 40(4), 332–349Google Scholar
  25. Del Monte, A., & Papagni, E. (2003). R&D and the growth of firms: Empirical analysis of a panel of Italian firms. Research Policy, 32(6), 1003–1014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Delmar, F., Davidsson, P., & Gartner, W. (2003). Arriving at the high-growth firm. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(2), 189–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Demirel, P., & Mazzucato, M. (2012). Innovation and firm growth: Is R&D worth it? Industry and Innovation, 19(1), 45–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Dosi, G., & Mazzucato, M. (2006). Knowledge accumulation and industry evolution. The case of pharma-biotech. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Ejermo, O., Kander, A., & Henning, M. S. (2011). The R&D–growth paradox arises in fast-growing sectors. Research Policy, 40, 664–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. European Commission. (2010). Europe 2020: A strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth. http://ec.europa.eu/eu2020/pdf/COMPLET%20EN%20BARROSO%20%20%20007%20-%20Europe%202020%20-%20EN%20version.pdf. Accessed May 5, 2013.
  31. Evans, D. S. (1987). Tests of alternative theories of firm growth. The Journal of Political Economy, 95(4), 657–674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Falk, M. (2010). Quantile estimates of the impact of R&D intensity on firm performance. Small Business Economics, 39(1), 19–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Freel, M., & Robson, P. (2004). Small firm innovation, growth and performance. International Small Business Journal, 22(6), 561–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Freeman, C. (1995). The “national system of innovation” in historical perspective. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19(1), 5–24.Google Scholar
  35. Gambardella, A. (1995). Science and innovation in the US pharmaceutical industry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Geroski, P. A., Van Reenen, J., & Walters, C. F. (1997). How persistently do firms innovate? Research Policy, 26(1), 33–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Gibrat, R. (1931). Les Inégalités Economiques. Paris: Librairie du Recueil Sirey.Google Scholar
  38. Gompers, P. A., & Lerner, J. (2001). The venture capital revolution. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15(2), 145–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Grabowski, H., & Vernon, J. (1987). Pioneers, imitators, and generics: A simulation model of Schumpeterian competition. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 102(3), 491–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Grossman, G., & Helpman, E. (1991). Innovation and growth in the global economy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  41. Hall, B. H. (1987). The relationship between firm size and firm growth in the US manufacturing sector. Journal of Industrial Economics, 35(4), 583–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Hall, B. H., Jaffe, A. B., & Trajtenberg, M. (2001). The NBER patent citation data file: Lessons, insights and methodological tools. NBER working papers 8498, National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  43. Hall, B. H., & Mairesse, J. (1995). Exploring the relationship between R&D and productivity in French manufacturing firms. Journal of Econometrics, 65, 263–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Hall B. H., & Oriani, R. (2006). Does the market value R&D investment by European firms? Evidence from a panel of manufacturing firms in France, Germany, and Italy. International Journal of Industrial Organization 24(5), 971–993Google Scholar
  45. Hall, M., & Tideman, N. (1967). Measures of concentration. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 62(317), 162–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Haltiwanger, J., Jarmin, R. S., & Miranda, J. (2013). Who creates jobs? Small versus large versus young. Review of Economics and Statistics, 95(2), 347–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Hart, P. E., & Oulton, N. (1996). The growth and size of firms. The Economic Journal, 106(3), 1242–1252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Henrekson, M., & Johansson, D. (2010). Gazelles as job creators: A survey and interpretation of the evidence. Small Business Economics, 35, 227–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Hölzl, W. (2009). Is the R&D behaviour of fast growing SMEs different? Evidence from CIS III data for 16 countries. Small Business Economics, 33(1), 59–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Hymer, S., & Pashigian, P. (1962). Firm size and rate of growth. Journal of Political Economy, 70(6), 556–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. IMS. (2007). IMS health reports global pharmaceutical market grew 7.0 percent in 2006, to $643 billion. Press release, March 20. http://www.imshealth.com/media. Accessed April 10, 2010.
  52. Kirchhoff, B. A. (1994). Entrepreneurship and dynamic capitalism the economics of business firm formation and growth. Westport, CT: Greenwood.Google Scholar
  53. Klepper, S. (1997). Industry life cycles. Industrial and Corporate Change, 6(1), 145–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Koenker, R. W. (2004). Quantile regression for longitudinal data. Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 91(1), 74–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Koenker, R. W., & Basset, G. J. (1978). Regression quantiles. Econometrica, 46(1), 33–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Lang, G. (2009). Measuring the returns of R&D—An empirical study of the German manufacturing sector over 45 years. Research Policy, 38, 1438–1445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Lechner, C., & Dowling, M. (2003). Firm networks: External relationships as sources for the growth and competitiveness of entrepreneurial firms. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 15, 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Mansfield, E. (1962). Entry, Gibrat’s law, innovation, and the growth of firms. The American Economic Review, 52(5), 1023–1051.Google Scholar
  59. Mason, C., & Brown, R. (2013). Creating good public policy to support high-growth firms. Small Business Economics, 40, 211–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Mazzucato, M. (2000). Firm size, innovation and market structure: The evolution of market concentration and instability. Northampton: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  61. Mazzucato, M. (2002). The PC industry: New economy or early life-cycle. Review of Economic Dynamics, 5(2), 318–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Mazzucato, M. (2013). The entrepreneurial state: Debunking private vs public sector myths. London: Anthem. ISBN 978-0-85728-252-1.Google Scholar
  63. Mowery, D. C., & Ziedonis, A. A. (2002). Academic patent quality and quantity before and after the Bayh–Dole Act in the United States. Research Policy, 31(3), 399–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Nelson, R. (1991). Why do firms differ, and how does it matter? Strategic Management Journal, 12, 61–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge: Mass Bellknap.Google Scholar
  66. NESTA. (2009). The vital 6 per cent, how high growth innovative businesses generate prosperity and jobs. Research Summary October 2009. http://www.nesta.org.uk/publications/reports/assets/features/the_vital_6_per_cent. Accessed January 17, 2012.
  67. NESTA. (2011). Vital growth. March 2011. http://www.nesta.org.uk/publications/reports/assets/features/vital_growth. Accessed January 17, 2012.
  68. Nightingale, P., & Coad, A. (2014). Muppets and gazelles: Ideological and methodological biases in entrepreneurship research. Industrial and Corporate Change, 23(1), 113–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. OECD. (2010). High-growth enterprises: What governments can do to make a difference, OECD studies on SMEs and entrepreneurship. Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD).Google Scholar
  70. Orsenigo, L., Pammolli, F., & Riccaboni, M. (2001). Technological change and network dynamics. Research Policy, 30(3), 485–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Paul, S. M., Mytelka, D. S., Dunwiddie, C. T., Persinger, C. C., Munos, B. H., Lindborg, S. R., et al. (2010). How to improve R&D productivity: The pharmaceutical industry’s grand challenge. Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 9(3), 203–214.Google Scholar
  72. Penrose, E. (1959). The theory of the growth of the firm. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  73. Porter, M. E. (1985). Competitive advantage. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  74. Scannell, J. W., Blanckley, A., Boldon, H., & Warrington, B. (2012). Diagnosing the decline in pharmaceutical R&D efficiency. Nature Review of Drug Discovery, 11, 191–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Scherer, F. M. (1987). Market structure. Amsterdam: The New Palgrave.Google Scholar
  76. Scherer, F. M., & Ross, D. (1990). Industrial market structure and economic performance. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.Google Scholar
  77. Schumpeter, J. (1934). Capitalism, socialism, and democracy. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  78. Shane, S. (2009). Why encouraging more people to become entrepreneurs is bad public policy. Small Business Economics, 33(2), 141–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Stam, E., & Wennberg, K. (2009). The roles of R&D in new firm growth. Small Business Economics, 33, 77–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Storey, D. J. (1994). Understanding the small business sector. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  81. Verspagen, B. (2005). Innovation and economic growth. In R. R. Nelson, J. Fagerberg, & D. C. Mowery (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  82. Veugelers, R., & Cincera, M. (2010). Europe’s missing yollies. Bruegel discussion paper. http://www.bruegel.org/publications/publication-detail/publication/430-europes-missing-yollies/. Accessed January 22, 2013.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of SussexBrightonUK
  2. 2.The Open UniversityWalton Hall, Milton KeynesUK

Personalised recommendations