Small Business Economics

, Volume 43, Issue 4, pp 899–916 | Cite as

Charitable donations by the self-employed

Article
  • 424 Downloads

Abstract

This article analyzes an important aspect of the social behavior of the self-employed in America. We ask whether the self-employed express their social responsibility to society by giving more to charity than the general population, and if so which charitable causes they give to. We use social identity theory to generate hypotheses about the determinants and objectives of charitable giving among members of this socially and economically important group. Testing these hypotheses with nationally representative, longitudinal US data, we find that the American self-employed are indeed more likely to exhibit social responsibility toward their community by giving to charities than the general population. While the self-employed support broadly similar charities to the general population, they give substantially more to organizations which: address issues in the local community; provide health care; and serve the needy. We trace out implications of our findings for scholars, practitioners, and policy-makers.

Keywords

Charitable giving Donation Self-employed Social identity theory 

JEL classifications

D190 L26 L260 M140 

Supplementary material

11187_2014_9580_MOESM1_ESM.xlsx (30 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (XLSX 29 kb)

References

  1. Abrams, D., & Hogg, M. A. (2004). Metatheory: Lessons from social identity research. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 98–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Acs, Z. J., & Phillips, R. J. (2002). Entrepreneurship and philanthropy in American capitalism. Small Business Economics, 19, 189–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Adloff, F. (2009). What encourages charitable giving and philanthropy? Aging and Society, 29, 1185–1205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ai, C., & Norton, E. C. (2003). Interaction terms in logit and probit models. Economic Letters, 80, 123–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Amato, L. H., & Amato, C. H. (2007). The effect of firm size and industry on corporate giving. Journal of Business Ethics, 72, 229–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Andreoni, J. (1989). Giving with impure altruism: applications to charity and Ricardian equivalence. Journal of Political Economy, 97, 1447–1458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Audretsch, D. B. (2009). The entrepreneurial society. Journal of Technology Transfer, 34(3), 245–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Baumol, W. J. (2005). Education for innovation: Entrepreneurial breakthroughs versus corporate incremental improvements. In A. B. Jaffe, J. Lerner, & S. Stern (Eds.), NBER innovation policy and the economy (Vol. 5, pp. 33–56). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  9. Benavides-Velasco, C. A., Quintana-García, C., & Guzmán-Parra, V. F. (2013). Trends in family business research. Small Business Economics, 40, 41–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Berman, S. L., Wicks, A. C., Kotha, S., & Jones, T. M. (1999). Does stakeholder orientation matter? The relationship between stakeholder management models and firm financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 488–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Blanchflower, D. G., & Oswald, A. J. (1998). What makes an entrepreneur? Journal of Labor Economics, 16(1), 26–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bourhis, R. Y., & Gagnon, A. (2001). Social orientations in the minimal group paradigm. In R. Brown & S. Gaertner (Eds.), Intergroup processes (Vol. 4, pp. 89–111)., Blackwell handbook in social psychology Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  13. Brewer, M. B. (1979). In-group bias in the minimal group situation: A cognitive-motivational analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 307–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Brooks, A. (2004). The effects of public policy on private charity. Administration & Society, 36(2), 166–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Brown, E., & Ferris, J. M. (2007). Social capital and philanthropy: An analysis of the impact of social capital on individual giving and volunteering. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 36(1), 85–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Brown, E., & Lankford, H. (1992). Gifts of money and gifts of time—Estimating the effects of tax prices and available time. Journal of Public Economics, 47, 321–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Burgoyne, C., Young, B., & Walker, C. (2005). Deciding to give to charity: A focus group study in the context of the household economy. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 15, 383–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Burke, P. I. (1980). The self: Measurement requirements from an interactionist perspective. Social Psychology Quarterly, 43, 18–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Camerer, C. F. (2003). Behavioral game theory: Experiments on strategic interaction. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Carroll, A. B. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 4, 497–506.Google Scholar
  21. Carter, S. (2011). The rewards of entrepreneurship: Exploring the incomes, wealth, and economic well-being of entrepreneurial households. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(1), 39–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Carter, V. B., & Marx, J. (2007). What motivates African-American charitable giving: Findings from a national sample. Administration in Social Work, 31(1), 67–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Chell, E. (2007). Social enterprise and entrepreneurship—Towards a convergent theory of the entrepreneurial process. International Small Business Journal, 25(1), 5–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Chen, Y., & Li, S. X. (2008). Group identity and social preferences. American Economic Review, 99, 431–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Cnaan, R. A., Jones, K. H., Dickin, A., & Salomon, M. (2011). Estimating giving and volunteering: New ways to measure the phenomena. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 40, 497–525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Coombs, J. E., Shipp, A., & Christensen, L. (2008). Entrepreneur as change agent: Antecedents and moderators of individual-level philanthropic behavior. Frontiers of entrepreneurship research 2008. Accessed on October 22, 2011 at SSRN under: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1348127.
  27. Engelmann, D., & Fischbacher, U. (2009). Indirect reciprocity and strategic reputation building in an experimental helping game. Games and Economic Behavior, 67(2), 399–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Erikson, E. H. (1982). The life cycle completed. New York, NY: Norton.Google Scholar
  29. Fassin, Y., Van Rossem, A., & Buelens, M. (2011). Small-business owner-managers’ perception of business ethics and CSR-related concepts. Journal of Business Ethics, 98, 425–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Feldman, N. E., & Slemrod, J. (2007). Estimating tax noncompliance with evidence from unaudited tax returns. Economic Journal, 117, 327–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Figueiredo, O., Guimaraes, P., & Woodward, D. (2002). Home-field advantage: Location decisions of Portuguese entrepreneurs. Journal of Urban Economics, 52, 341–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Fitzgerald, M. A., Haynes, G. W., Schrank, H. L., & Danes, S. M. (2010). Socially responsible processes of small family business owners: Exploratory evidence from the national family business survey. Journal of Small Business Management, 48, 524–551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Fowler, J. H., & Kam, C. D. (2007). Beyond the self: Social identity, altruism, and political participation. Journal of Politics, 69, 813–827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Geletkanycz, M. A., & Hambrick, D. C. (1997). The external ties of top executives: Implications for strategic choice and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 654–681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Goette, L., Huffman, D., & Meier, S. (2006). The impact of group membership on cooperation and norm enforcement, evidence using random assignment to real social groups. American Economic Review, 96, 212–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91, 481–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Greene, W. H. (2003). Econometric analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  38. Hannah, S. T., Avolio, B. J., & Walumbwa, F. O. (2011). Relationships between authentic leadership, moral courage, and ethical and pro-social behaviors. Business Ethics Quarterly, 21, 555–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hite, J. M. (2005). Evolutionary processes and paths of relationally embedded network ties in emerging entrepreneurial firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29, 113–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hoang, H., & Antoncic, B. (2003). Network-based research in entrepreneurship: A critical review. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(2), 165–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hogg, M. A., Terry, D. J., & White, K. M. (1995). A tale of two theories: Critical comparison of identity theory and social identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 58, 255–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Holmes, J. (2009). Prestige, charitable deductions and other determinants of alumni giving: Evidence from a highly selective liberal arts college. Economics of Education Review, 28(1), 18–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Hughes, K. D., Jennings, J. E., Brush, C., Carter, S., & Welter, S. (2012). Extending women’s entrepreneurship research in new directions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(3), 429–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Jack, S. L., & Anderson, A. R. (2002). The effects of embeddedness on the entrepreneurial process. Journal of Business Venturing, 17, 467–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Johnstone, H., & Lionaise, D. (2004). Depleted communities and community business entrepreneurship: Revaluing space through place. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 16, 217–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Klor, E. F., & Shayo, M. (2010). Social identity and preferences over redistribution. Journal of Public Economics, 94, 269–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kraut, R. E. (1973). Effects of social labeling on giving to charity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 9(6), 551–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Lasby, D., & Sperling, J. (2007). Giving and volunteering for sports and recreation organizations in Alberta—Findings from the 2004 Canada survey of giving, volunteering and participating. Imagine Canada. Found Mau 20th 2013 under http://www.imaginecanada.ca/files/www/en/library/nsgvp/sports_and_recreation_short_report_-_alberta.pdf.
  49. Lechler, T. (2001). Social interaction: A determinant of entrepreneurial team venture success. Small Business Economics, 16(4), 263–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Lundstrom, A., & Stevenson, L. A. (2005). Entrepreneurship policy: Theory and practice. New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
  51. Mathur, A. (1996). Older adults’ motivations for gift giving to charitable organizations: An exchange theory perspective. Psychology & Marketing, 13(1), 107–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. McAdams, D. P., de St. Aubin, E., & Logan, R. L. (1993). Generativity among young, midlife, and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 8, 221–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Mesch, D. F., Rooney, P. M., Chin, W., & Steinberg, K. S. (2002). Race and gender differences in philanthropy: Indiana as a test case. New Directions for Philanthropic Fundraising, 37, 65–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Mesch, D. J., Rooney, P. M., Steinberg, K. S., & Denton, B. (2006). The effects of race, gender, and marital status on giving and volunteering in Indiana. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 35(4), 565–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Michelacci, C., & Silva, O. (2007). Why so many local entrepreneurs? Review of Economics and Statistics, 89, 615–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Midlarsky, E., & Hannah, M. E. (1989). The generous elderly: Naturalistic studies of donations across the life span. Psychology and Aging, 4, 346–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Nell, G., Sherk, J., & Winfree, P. L. (2008). Free-market philanthropy: The social aspect of entrepreneurship. Center for data analysis: Report #08-07.Google Scholar
  58. Nownes, A., & Neeley, G. (1996). Toward an explanation for public interest group formation and proliferation: “Seed money”, disturbances, entrepreneurship, and patronage. Policy Studies Journal, 24(1), 74–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Osili, U., Kou, X., Ackerman, J., Ward, J., Copple, M., Li, Y., et al. (2013). A Decade of million-dollar gifts. Report by the Lilly Family School of Philanthropy at Indiana University. Found on May 29th 2013 under http://philanthropy.iupui.edu/files/research/report_w_appendix_april_2013.pdf.
  60. Parker, S. C. (2009). The economics of entrepreneurship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Parker, S. C., & van Praag, M. (2010). Group status and entrepreneurship. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 19, 919–945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Perugini, M., Callucci, M., Presaghi, F., & Ercolani, A. P. (2003). The personal norm of reciprocity. European Journal of Personality, 17(4), 251–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Peterson, R. T., & Jun, M. (2009). Perceptions on social responsibility: The entrepreneurial vision. Journal of Business & Society, 48(3), 385–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Reece, W. S., & Zieschang, K. D. (1985). Consistent estimation of the impact of tax deductibility on the level of charitable contributions. Econometrica, 53, 271–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Schlegelmilch, B., Love, A., & Diamantopoulos, A. (1997). Responses to different charity appeals: The impact of donor characteristics on the amount of donations. European Journal of Marketing, 31, 548–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Seinen, I., & Schram, A. (2004). Social status and group norms: Indirect reciprocity in a repeated helping experiment. European Economic Review, 50, 581–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Sepulveda, L., Syrett, S., & Lyon, F. (2011). Population superdiversity and new migrant enterprise: The case of London. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 23(7–8), 469–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Settoon, R. P., Bennett, N., & Liden, R. C. (1996). Social exchange in organizations: Perceived organizational support, leader–member exchange, and employee reciprocity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81(3), 219–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Shelton, L. M. (2010). Fighting an uphill battle: Expansion barriers, intra-industry social stratification, and minority firm growth. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(2), 379–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Showers, V. E., Showers, L. S., Beggs, J. M., & Cox, J. E., Jr. (2011). Charitable giving expenditures and the faith factor. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 70, 152–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Smith, B. R., & Stevens, C. E. (2010). Different types of social entrepreneurship: The role of geography and embeddedness on the measurement and scaling of social value. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 22(6), 575–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Stets, J. E., & Burke, P. J. (2000). Identity theory and social identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63, 224–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Stryker, S. (1968). Identity salience and rote performance: The importance of symbolic interaction theory for family research. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 30, 558–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Stryker, S. (1987). Identity theory: Developments and extensions. In K. Yardley & T. Honess (Eds.), Self and identity (pp. 89–104). New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
  75. Stryker, S., & Serpe, R. T. (1982). Commitment, identity salience, and role behavior. In W. Ickes & E. S. Knowles (Eds.), Personality, roles, and social behavior (pp. 199–218). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Su, J., & He, J. (2010). Does giving lead to getting? Evidence from Chinese private enterprises. Journal of Business Ethics, 93, 73–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Monterey, CA: Brooks-Cole.Google Scholar
  78. Teal, E. J., & Carroll, A. B. (1999). Moral reasoning skills: Are entrepreneurs different? Journal of Business Ethics, 19, 229–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Tracey, P., Phillips, N., & Haugh, H. (2005). Beyond philanthropy: Community enterprise as a basis for corporate citizenship. Journal of Business Ethics, 58, 327–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Uzzi, B., & Gillespie, J. (1999). Corporate social capital and the cost of financial capital: An embeddedness approach. In J. Lenders & S. Gabbay (Eds.), Corporate social capital (pp. 446–459). New York: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Weber, P., & Shaper, M. (2004). Understanding the grey entrepreneur. Journal of Enterprising Culture, 12(2), 147–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Wellington, A. J. (2006). Self-employment: The new solution for balancing family and career. Labour Economics, 13(3), 357–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Werhane, P. H. (2010). Principles and practices for corporate responsibility. Business Ethics Quarterly, 20, 695–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Wilhelm, M. O. (2007). The quality and comparability of survey data on charitable giving. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 36, 65–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Wilson, K. E., Vyakarnam, S., Volkmann, C., Mariotti, S., & Rabuzzi, D. (2009). Educating the next wave of entrepreneurs: Unlocking entrepreneurial capabilities to meet the global challenges of the 21st century. World economic forum: A report of the global education initiative, working paper, retrieved on October 13, 2011 under: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1396704.
  86. Wood, D. J., & Jones, R. E. (1995). Stakeholder mismatching: A theoretical problem in empirical research on corporate social performance. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 3, 229–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Yen, S. T. (2002). An econometric analysis of household donations in the USA. Applied Economics Letters, 9, 837–841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.IE Business SchoolMadridSpain
  2. 2.Ivey Business SchoolWestern UniversityLondonCanada

Personalised recommendations