Advertisement

Small Business Economics

, Volume 43, Issue 2, pp 427–446 | Cite as

How much of a socialist legacy? The re-emergence of entrepreneurship in the East German transformation to a market economy

  • Michael FritschEmail author
  • Elisabeth Bublitz
  • Alina Sorgner
  • Michael Wyrwich
Article

Abstract

We investigate how institutional change—the transition from a socialist system to a western type market economy—relates to the re-emergence of entrepreneurship in East Germany. This region is particularly well suited for such a study because of the rapid change of the institutional framework and the possibility to use West Germany as a benchmark. It took about 15 years until self-employment levels in East Germany reached those of West Germany. Despite this catch up, we find a number of peculiarities in East German self-employment that appear to be a continuing legacy of the socialist period. There is also a considerable correspondence of the regional levels of self-employment before, during and after the socialist period, suggesting the existence of a long-lasting regional entrepreneurship culture that can be regarded as an informal institution. This is in line with the hypothesis that informal institutions change much more slowly than formal institutions.

Keywords

Entrepreneurship Self-employment New business formation Transformation East Germany 

JEL Classifications

L26 P3 O34 R11 

References

  1. Almus, M., Engel, D., & Prantl, S. (2002). Mannheimer Gründungspanels des Zentrums für Europäische Wirtschaftsforschung GmbH (ZEW). In Michael. Fritsch & Reinhold. Grotz (Eds.), Das Gründungsgeschehen in Deutschland – Darstellung und Vergleich der Datenquellen (pp. 79–102). Heidelberg: Physica.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andersson, M., & Koster, S. (2011). Sources of persistence in regional start-up rates—Evidence from Sweden. Journal of Economic Geography, 11, 179–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Audretsch, D. B., & Fritsch, M. (2002). Growth regimes over space and time. Regional Studies, 36, 113–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bauernschuster, S., Falck, O., Gold, R., & Heblich, S. (2012). The shadows of the past: Implicit institutions and entrepreneurship. European Journal of Political Economy, 28, 485–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baumol, W. J. (1990). Entrepreneurship: Productive, unproductive, and destructive. Journal of Political Economy, 98, 893–921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Becker, S.O., Boeckh, K., Hainz, C., & Woessmann, L. (2011). The Empire is Dead, Long Live the Empire! Long-Run Persistence of Trust and Corruption in the Bureaucracy. Munich: CESifo Working Paper Series 3392.Google Scholar
  7. Beugelsdijk, S. (2007). Entrepreneurial culture, regional innovativeness and economic growth. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 17, 187–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bird, E. J., Schwarze, J., & Wagner, G. G. (1994). Wage effects of the move toward free markets in East Germany. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 47, 390–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bosma, N., Hessels, J., Schutjens, V., van Praag, M., & Verheul, I. (2012). Entrepreneurship and role models. Journal of Economic Psychology, 33, 410–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brezinski, H. (1987). The second economy in the GDR: Pragmatism is gaining ground. Studies in Comparative Communism, XX, 85–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brezinski, H., & Fritsch, M. (1995). Transformation: The shocking German way. Moct-Most, 5, 1–25.Google Scholar
  12. Brixy, U. & Reinhold, G. (2004). Differences of the economic performance of newly founded firms in West- and East Germany. In M. Dowling, J. Schmude & D. zu Knyphausen-Aufsess (Eds.), Advances in Interdisciplinary European Entrepreneurship Research (pp. 143–152) Muenster: Lit.Google Scholar
  13. Bublitz, E., & Noseleit, F. (2014). The skill balancing act: when does broad expertise pay off? Small Business Economics, 24, 17–32.Google Scholar
  14. Burda, M. C., & Hunt, J. (2001). From re-unification to economic integration: Productivity and the labor market in eastern Germany. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2, 1–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Caliendo, M., & Kritikos, A. (2010). Start-ups by the unemployed: Characteristics, survival and direct employment effects. Small Business Economics, 35, 71–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Connelley, J. (2000). Captive university: The sovietization of East German, Czech, and Polish higher education, 1945–1956. Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
  17. Davidsson, P., & Honig, B. (2003). The role of social and human capital among nascent entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 301–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Etzioni, A. (1987). Entrepreneurship, adaptation and legitimation. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 8, 175–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fornahl, D. (2003). Entrepreneurial activities in a regional context. In D. Fornahl & T. Brenner (Eds.), Cooperation, Networks, and Institutions in Regional Innovation Systems (pp. 38–57). Northhampton: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  20. Freytag, A., & Thurik, R. (2007). Entrepreneurship and its determinants in a cross-country setting. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 17, 117–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fritsch, M. (2004). Entrepreneurship, entry and performance of new businesses compared in two growth regimes: East and West Germany. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 14, 525–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fritsch, M., Kritikos, A., & Rusakova, A. (2012). Who starts a business and who is self-employed in Germany? Jena Economic Research Paper 2012-001. Jena: Friedrich Schiller University and Max Planck Institute of Economics.Google Scholar
  23. Fritsch, M., & Rusakova, A. (2012). Self-employment after socialism: Intergenerational links, entrepreneurial values, and human capital. International Journal of Developmental Science, 6, 167–175.Google Scholar
  24. Fritsch, M. & Wyrwich, M. (2014). The long persistence of regional levels of entrepreneurship: Germany 1925–2005. Regional Studies, 48, (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  25. Gathmann, C. (2005). The skill loss of older East Germans after re-unification. Schmollers Jahrbuch, 125, 7–16.Google Scholar
  26. Hall, J. B., & Ludwig, U. (1995). German Unification and the “market adoption” Hypothesis. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19, 491–507.Google Scholar
  27. Hitchens, D. M. W. N., Wagner, K., & Esmond Birnie, J. (1993). East German productivity and the transition to the market economy: comparisons with West Germany and Northern Ireland. Aldershot: Avebury.Google Scholar
  28. Hitchens, D. M. W. N., et al. (1995). Competitiveness of industry in the Czech Republic and Hungary. Aldershot: Avebury.Google Scholar
  29. IWH. (2010). Ostdeutschlands Transformation seit 1990 im Spiegel wirtschaftlicher und sozialer Indikatoren. 2. aktualisierte und verbesserte Auflage, Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung: Halle.Google Scholar
  30. Johnson, S., & Loveman, G. (1995). Starting over in Eastern Europe, Entrepreneurship and Economic Renewal. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  31. Kawka, R. (2007). Regional disparities in the GDR: Do they still matter? In S. Lentz (Ed.), German annual of spatial research and policy: Restructuring Eastern Germany (pp. 111–122). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  32. Kshetri, N. (2009). Entrepreneurship in post-socialist economies: A typology and institutional contexts for market entrepreneurship. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 7, 236–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lazear, E. P. (2004). Balanced skills and entrepreneurship. American Economic Review, 94, 208–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lazear, E. P. (2005). Entrepreneurship. Journal of Labor Economics, 23, 649–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. McMillan, J., & Woodruff, C. (2002). The central role of entrepreneurs in transition economies. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 16, 153–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Minniti, M. (2005). Entrepreneurship and network externalities. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 57, 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mueller, P. (2006). Entrepreneurship in the region: Breeding ground for nascent entrepreneurs? Small Business Economics, 27, 41–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. North, D. C. (1994). Economic performance through time. American Economic Review, 84, 359–368.Google Scholar
  39. Parker, S. C. (2009a). The economics of entrepreneurship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Parker, S. C. (2009b). Why do small firms produce the entrepreneurs? Journal of Socio-Economics, 38, 484–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pickel, A. (1992). Radical transitions: the survival and revival of entrepreneurship in the GDR. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  42. Radosevic, S. (1999). Transformation of S&T systems into systems of innovation in central and Eastern Europe: The emerging patterns of recombination, path-dependency and change. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 10, 277–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Smallbone, D., & Welter, F. (2001). The Distinctiveness of Entrepreneurship in Transition Economies. Small Business Economics, 16, 249–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Smallbone, D., & Welter, F. (2009). Entrepreneurship and small business development in post-socialist economies. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  45. Statistik der Deutschen Demokratischen Republik. (1990). Statistisches Jahrbuch der DDR. Berlin: Staatsverlag.Google Scholar
  46. Statistik des Deutschen Reichs. (1927). Volks-, Berufs- und Betriebszählung vom 16. Juni 1925: Die berufliche und soziale Gliederung der Bevölkerung in den Ländern und Landesteilen. Band 403–Band 405), Berlin: Reimar Hobbing.Google Scholar
  47. Statistisches Bundesamt. (2009). Handbuch zum Mikrozensus-Panel 20012004. Wiesbaden: Statistische Bundesamt http://www.gesis.org/download/fileadmin/missy/erhebung/Panel/2001-2004/MZP0104_Handbuch.pdf.
  48. Thomas, M. (1996). How to become an entrepreneur in east Germany: Conditions, steps and effects of the constitution of new entrepreneurs. In H. Brezinski & M. Fritsch (Eds.), The economic impact of new firms in post-socialist countries: Bottom up transformation in Eastern Europe (pp. 227–232). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  49. Wagner, G., Frick, J. R., & Schupp, J. (2007). The German Socio-Economic Panel Study (SOEP): Scope, evolution and enhancements. Journal of Applied Social Science Studies, 127, 139–169.Google Scholar
  50. Wagner, J. (2004). Are young and small firms hothouses for nascent entrepreneurs? Evidence from German Micro Data. Applied Economics Quarterly, 50, 379–391.Google Scholar
  51. Williamson, O. (2000). The new institutional economics: Taking stock, looking ahead. Journal of Economic Literature, 38, 595–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wyrwich, M. (2010). Assessing the role of strategy and “socioeconomic heritage” for rapidly growing firms: Evidence from Germany. International Journal for Entrepreneurial Venturing, 1, 245–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wyrwich, M. (2012). Regional entrepreneurial heritage in a socialist and a post-socialist economy. Economic Geography, 88, 423–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wyrwich, M. (2013a). Can socioeconomic heritage produce a lost generation with regard to entrepreneurship? Journal of Business Venturing (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  55. Wyrwich, M. (2013b). Ready, set, go! Why are some regions entrepreneurial jump-starters? Jena Economic Research Paper 2013-037. Jena: Friedrich Schiller University and Max Planck Institute of Economics.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael Fritsch
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    Email author
  • Elisabeth Bublitz
    • 4
  • Alina Sorgner
    • 1
  • Michael Wyrwich
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Economics and Business AdministrationFriedrich Schiller University JenaJenaGermany
  2. 2.German Institute for Economic Research (DIW Berlin)BerlinGermany
  3. 3.Halle Institute for Economic Research (IWH)BerlinGermany
  4. 4.Hamburg Institute for International Economics (HWWI)HamburgGermany

Personalised recommendations