Small Business Economics

, Volume 43, Issue 2, pp 245–259 | Cite as

The origin of spin-offs: a typology of corporate and academic spin-offs

Article

Abstract

We provide a typology of corporate and academic spin-off types, distinguishing spin-offs involving new ventures from those that concern existing activities. We summarize the papers published in this special issue, relating them to the typology we develop. We conclude by developing an agenda for further research on spin-offs.

Keywords

Spin-offs Typology 

JEL Classifications

L26 M13 L33 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank the managing editors of Small Business Economics for affording us the opportunity to introduce the special issue with this editorial article. The first author is grateful for the opportunity to edit this special issue. The contribution of all anonymous reviewers who helped to improve the papers presented here is gratefully acknowledged.

References

  1. Agarwal, R., Audretsch, D., & Sarkar, M. (2010). Knowledge spillovers and strategic entrepreneurship. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 4(4), 271–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alvarez, S. A., & Barney, J. B. (2007). Discovery and creation: Alternative theories of entrepreneurial action. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 1(1–2), 11–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bonaccorsi, A., Colombo, M. G., Guerini, M., & Rossi Lamastra, C. (2013). The impact of local and external university knowledge on the creation of knowledge-intensive firms: Evidence from the Italian case, Small Business Economics, this issue. doi: 10.1007/s11187-013-9536-2.
  4. Bruneel, J., van de Velde, E., & Clarysse, B. (2013). Impact of the type of corporate spin-off on growth. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37(4), 943–959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Buenstorf, G. (2009). Opportunity spin-offs and necessity spin-offs. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Venturing, 1(1), 22–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chiesa, V., & Piccaluga, A. (2000). Exploitation and diffusion of public research: The case of academic spin-off companies in Italy. R&D Management, 30(4), 329–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Clarysse, B., Bruneel, J., & Wright, M. (2011a). Explaining growth paths of young technology-based firms: Structuring resource portfolios in different competitive environments. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 5(2), 137–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Clarysse, B., Wright, M., & van de Velde, E. (2011b). Entrepreneurial origin, technology endowments and the growth of spin-off companies. Journal of Management Studies, 48(6), 1420–1442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Czarnitzki, D., Rammer, C., & Toole, A. A. (2013). University Spinoffs and the “Performance Premium”, Small Business Economics, this issue. doi: 10.1007/s11187-013-9538-0.
  10. Di Gregorio, D., & Shane, S. (2003). Why do some universities generate more start-ups than others? Research Policy, 32, 209–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Djokovic, D., & Souitaris, V. (2008). Spinouts from academic institutions: A literature review with suggestions for further research. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 33(3), 225–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Drori, I., Honig, B., & Wright, M. (2009). Transnational entrepreneurship: An emergent field of study. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(5), 1001–1022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Egeln, J., Dinges, M., Knie, A., Simon, D., Braun-Thürmann, H., Fryges, H., et al. (2010). Evaluation des Existenzgründungsprogramms EXIST III, ZEW Wirtschaftsanalysen (Vol. 95). Baden-Baden: Nomos.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Egeln, J., Gottschalk, S., Rammer, C., & Spielkamp, A. (2003). Public research spin-offs in Germany, summary report, ZEW Documentation 03-04. Mannheim: Centre for European Economic Research.Google Scholar
  15. Eriksson, T., & Kuhn, J. M. (2006). Firm spin-offs in Denmark 1981–2000—Patterns of entry and exit. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 24(5), 1021–1040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ferriani, S., Garnsey, E., & Lorenzoni, G. (2012). Continuity and change in a spin-off venture: The process of reimprinting. Industrial and Corporate Change, 21(4), 1011–1048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fiet, J. (2002). The systematic search for entrepreneurial discoveries. Westport, CT: Quorum.Google Scholar
  18. Franco, A. M., & Filson, D. (2006). Spin-outs: Knowledge diffusion through employee mobility. The Rand Journal of Economics, 37(4), 841–860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fryges, H., Gottschalk, S., Gude, H., Kohn, K., Müller, K., Niefert, M. & Ullrich, K. (2010), Aufbruch nach dem Sturm. Junge Unternehmen zwischen Investitionsschwäche und Innovationsstrategie, Gründungspanelreport, Vol. 3, Creditreform, KfW, ZEW (eds.), Mannheim.Google Scholar
  20. Fryges, H., Müller, B., & Niefert, M. (2013). Job machine, think tank, or both—What makes corporate spinoffs different? Small Business Economics, this issue. doi: 10.1007/s11187-013-9540-6
  21. Gilligan, J., & Wright, M. (2012). Private equity demystified–2012 edition. London: ICAEW.Google Scholar
  22. Grimaldi, R., Kenney, M., Siegel, D. S., & Wright, M. (2011). 30 years after bayh–dole: Reassessing academic entrepreneurship. Research Policy, 40(8), 1045–1057.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Helfat, C., & Lieberman, M. (2002). The birth of capabilities—Market entry and the importance of pre-history. Industrial and Corporate Change, 11, 725–760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Huyghe, A., Knockaert, M., Wright, M., & Piva, E. (2013). Technology transfer offices as boundary spanners in the pre-spin-off process: The case of a hybrid model, Small Business Economics, this issue. doi: 10.1007/s11187-013-9537-1
  25. Ito, K. (1995). Japanese spinoffs: Unexplored survival strategies. Strategic Management Journal, 16(6), 431–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Klepper, S. (2002). The capabilities of new firms and the evolution of the US Automobile Industry. Industrial and Corporate Change, 11(4), 645–666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lejpras, A. (2013). How innovative are spin-offs at later stages of development? Comparing innovativeness of established research spin-offs and otherwise created firms, Small Business Economics, this issue. doi: 10.1007/s11187-013-9534-4
  28. Lejpras, A., & Stephan, A. (2011). Locational conditions, cooperation, and innovativeness: evidence from research and company spin-offs. The Annals of Regional Science, 46(3), 543–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Liu, X., Wright, M., Filatotchev, I., Dai, O., & Lu, J. (2010). Human mobility and international knowledge spillovers: Evidence from high-tech small and medium enterprises in an emerging market. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 4(4), 340–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Macfarlane, B., & Cheng, M. (2008). Communism, universalism and disinterestedness: Re-examining contemporary support among academics for Merton’s scientific norms. Journal of Academic Ethics, 6, 67–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Merton, R. K. (1942). The normative structure of science (1973), In N. Storer (Ed.), The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations (pp. 267–278). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  32. Morales-Gualdrón, S. T., Gutiérrez-Garcia, A., & Roig Dobón, S. (2009). The entrepreneurial motivation in academia: A multidimensional construct. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 5(3), 301–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mueller, K. (2010). Academic spin-off’s transfer speed—Analyzing the time from leaving university to venture. Research Policy, 39(2), 189–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Muendler, M.-A., Rauch, J. E., & Tocoian, O. (2012). Employee spinoffs and other entrants: Stylized facts from Brazil. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 30(5), 447–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mustar, P., Renault, M., Colombo, M. G., Piva, E., Fontes, M., Lockett, A., et al. (2006). Conceptualising the heterogeneity of research-based spin-offs: A multi-dimensional taxonomy. Research Policy, 35, 289–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mustar, P., & Wright, M. (2010). Convergence or path dependency in policies to foster the creation of university spin-off firms? A comparison of France and the United Kingdom. Journal of Technology Transfer, 35(1), 42–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Narayan, V., Yang, Y., & Zahra, S. (2009). Corporate venturing and value creation: A review and proposed framework. Research Policy, 38(1), 58–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Nicolaou, N., & Birley, S. (2003). Academic networks in a trichotomous categorisation of university spinouts. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(3), 333–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Parhankangas, A., & Arenius, P. (2003). From a corporate venture to an independent company: A base for a taxonomy for corporate spin-off firms. Research Policy, 32, 463–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Phan, P., & Siegel, D. S. (2006). The effectiveness of university technology transfer: Lessons learned, managerial and policy implications, and the road forward. Foundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship, 2(2), 77–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Phan, P., Wright, M., Ucbasaran, D., & Tan, W. (2009). Corporate entrepreneurship: Current research and future direction. Journal of Business Venturing, 24(3), 197–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Robbie, K., & Wright, M. (1996). Management Buyins. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Sapienza, H. J., Parhankangas, A., & Autio, E. (2004). Knowledge relatedness and post-spin-off growth. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(6), 809–829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Siegel, D. S., Veugelers, R., & Wright, M. (2007). Technology transfer offices and commercialization of university intellectual property: Performance and policy implications. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 23(4), 640–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Smilor, R. W., Gibson, D. V., & Dietrich, G. B. (1990). University spinout companies: Technology start-ups from UT-Austin. Journal of Business Venturing, 5(1), 63–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Stam, W., & Elfring, T. (2008). Entrepreneurial orientation and new venture performance: The moderating role of intra- and extraindustry social capital. Academy of Management Journal, 51(1), 97–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Stephan, A. (2013). Are public research spin-offs more innovative? Small Business Economics, this issue. doi: 10.1007/s11187-013-9539-z
  48. Stuart, T. E., & Ding, W. W. (2006). When do scientists become entrepreneurs? The social structural antecedents of commercial activity in the academic life sciences. American Journal of Sociology, 112(1), 97–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Van de Velde, E., Clarysse, B., Wright, M., & Bruneel, J. (2007). Exploring the boundary between entrepreneurship and corporate venturing: From assisted spin-outs to entrepreneurial spin-offs, working paper 2007/472. Ghent: Ghent University.Google Scholar
  50. Veld, C., & Veld-Merkoulova, Y. V. (2009). Value creation through spin-offs: A review of the empirical evidence. International Journal of Management Reviews, 11(4), 407–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Weatherston, J. (1995). Academic entrepreneurs: Is a spin-off company too risky? Proceedings of the 40th International Council for Small Business (ICSB), Small Business Advancement National Center, University of Central Arkansas, http://www.sbaer.uca.edu/research/icsb/1995/pdf/20.pdf.
  52. Wennberg, K., Wiklund, J., & Wright, M. (2011). The effectiveness of university knowledge spillovers: Performance differences between university spinoffs and corporate spinoffs. Research Policy, 40(8), 1128–1143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wright, M. (1986). The make-buy decision and managing markets: The case of management buy-outs. Journal of Management Studies, 23(4), 443–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wright, M. (2011). Entrepreneurial mobility, In D. Bergh, & D. Ketchen, Research Methodology in Strategy and Management (Vol. 6, pp. 137–162). Bingley: Emerald.Google Scholar
  55. Wright, M. (2013) Academic entrepreneurship, technology transfer and society: Where next? Journal of Technology Transfer, forthcoming.Google Scholar
  56. Wright, M., Clarysse, B., Mustar, P., & Lockett, A. (2007). Academic entrepreneurship in Europe. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wright, M., Hoskisson, R., Busenitz, L., & Dial, J. (2000). Privatisation and entrepreneurship: The upside of management buy-outs. Academy of Management Review, 25(3), 591–601.Google Scholar
  58. Wright, M., Lockett, A., Clarysse, B., & Binks, M. (2006). University spin-offs and venture capital. Research Policy, 35(4), 481–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wright, M., Thompson, S., & Robbie, K. (1993). Finance and control in privatisation by management buyout. Financial Accountability and Management, 9(2), 75–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Zahra, S., & Wright, M. (2011). Entrepreneurship’s next act. Academy of Management Perspectives, 25, 67–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Australian Innovation Research CentreUniversity of TasmaniaSandy BayAustralia
  2. 2.Center for Management Buyout ResearchImperial College Business SchoolLondonUK
  3. 3.University of GhentGhentBelgium

Personalised recommendations