Advertisement

Small Business Economics

, Volume 43, Issue 1, pp 39–55 | Cite as

The entrepreneurial orientation–performance relationship in private family firms: the moderating role of socioemotional wealth

  • Jelle Schepers
  • Wim VoordeckersEmail author
  • Tensie Steijvers
  • Eddy Laveren
Article

Abstract

Drawing on socioemotional wealth (SEW) literature, this paper revisits the established entrepreneurial orientation (EO)–performance relationship in a family business context. The main idea in entrepreneurship literature is that EO leads to increased firm performance. We question this logic in a family business context because family related non-financial goals, like SEW, may prevent the firm to reap the fruits of their entrepreneurial efforts. Specifically, we argue that SEW engenders inefficiencies that place constraints on the realization of the benefits of entrepreneurship. Therefore, we propose that a high level of SEW preservation hinders the transmission of the family firm’s EO into positive performance effects. To test this hypothesis, an empirical study was developed using a sample of 232 Belgian private family firms. Robust linear regression analysis reveals that the positive effect of EO on financial performance decreases as the level of SEW preservation increases.

Keywords

Entrepreneurial orientation Private family firms Socioemotional wealth Firm performance 

JEL Classifications

L21 L25 L26 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was partially funded by the National Bank of Belgium.

References

  1. Aldrich, H. E., & Cliff, J. E. (2003). The pervasive effects of family on entrepreneurship: Toward a family embeddedness perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(5), 573–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, R. C., & Reeb, D. M. (2003). Founding-family ownership and firm performance: Evidence from the S&P 500. Journal of Finance, 58(3), 1301–1328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bamberger, I. (1994). Product/market strategies of small and medium-sized enterprises. Aldershot, Hants: Ashgate Publishing Group.Google Scholar
  4. Bamberger, I., & Weir, A. (1990). Strategic orientations of small European businesses: The STRATOS group. Aldershot, Hants: Gower Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  5. Berrone, P., Cruz, C. C., & Gómez-Mejía, L. R. (2012). Socioemotional wealth in family firms: Theoretical dimensions, assessment approaches, and agenda for future research. Family Business Review, 25(3), 258–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Berrone, P., Cruz, C. C., Gómez-Mejía, L. R., & Larraza Kintana, M. (2010). Socioemotional wealth and corporate response to institutional pressures: Do family-controlled firms pollute less. Administrative Science Quarterly, 55(1), 82–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brambor, T. C., Clark, W. R., & Golder, M. (2006). Understanding interaction models: Improving empirical analyses. Political Analysis, 14(1), 63–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Casillas, J. C., & Moreno, A. M. (2010). The relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and growth: The moderating role of family involvement. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 22(3–4), 265–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Casillas, J. C., Moreno, A. M., & Barbero, J. L. (2010). A configurational approach of the relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and growth of family firms. Family Business Review, 23(1), 27–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chirico, F., Sirmon, D. G., Sciascia, S., & Mazzola, F. (2011). Resource orchestration in family firms: Investigating how entrepreneurial orientation, generational involvement, and participative strategy affect performance. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 5(4), 307–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chua, J. H., Chrisman, J. J., & Sharma, P. (1999). Defining the family business by behavior. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23(4), 19–39.Google Scholar
  12. Covin, J. G., Green, K. M., & Slevin, D. P. (2006). Strategic process effects on the entrepreneurial orientation–sales growth rate relationship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(1), 57–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Covin, J. G., & Lumpkin, G. T. (2011). Entrepreneurial orientation theory and research: Reflections on a needed construct. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, 35(5), 855–872.Google Scholar
  14. Covin, J. G., & Slevin, D. P. (1988). The influence of organization structure on the utility of an entrepreneurial top management style. Journal of Management Studies, 25(3), 217–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Covin, J. G., & Slevin, D. P. (1989). Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environments. Strategic Management Journal, 10(1), 75–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Covin, J. G., & Slevin, D. P. (1991). A conceptual model of entrepreneurship as firm behavior. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 16(1), 7–24.Google Scholar
  17. Covin, J. G., & Wales, J. W. (2011). The measurement of entrepreneurial orientation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(4), 677–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cruz, C., Justo, R., & De Castro, J. (2012). Does family employment enhance MSEs performance? Integrating socioemotional wealth and family embeddedness perspectives. Journal of Business Venturing, 27(1), 62–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cruz, C., & Nordqvist, M. (2012). Entrepreneurial orientation in family firms: A generational perspective. Small Business Economics, 38(1), 33–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Daily, C. M., Dalton, D. R., & Cannella, A. A. (2003). Corporate governance: Decades of dialogue and data. Academy of Management Review, 28(3), 371–382.Google Scholar
  21. Davidsson, P., Steffens, P., & Fitzsimmons, J. (2009). Growing profitable or growing from profits: Putting the horse in front of the cart? Journal of Business Venturing, 24(4), 388–406.Google Scholar
  22. De Clercq, D., Dimov, D., & Thongpapanl, N. (2010). The moderating impact of internal social exchange processes on the entrepreneurial orientation–performance relationship. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(1), 87–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dyer, W. G. (2003). The family: The missing variable in organizational research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27(4), 401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fey, C. F., Morgulis-Yakushev, S., Hyeon, J. P., & Björkman, I. (2009). Opening the black box of the relationship between HRM practices and firm performance: A comparison of MNE subsidiaries in the USA, Finland, and Russia. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(4), 690–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Frank, H., Kessler, A., & Fink, M. (2010). Entrepreneurial orientation and business performance—A replication study. Schmalenbach Business Review, 62(2), 175–198.Google Scholar
  26. George, B. A. (2011). Entrepreneurial orientation: An examination of the consequences of differing construct representations. Journal of Management Studies, 48(6), 1291–1313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. George, B. A., & Marino, L. (2011). The epistemology of entrepreneurial orientation: Conceptual formation, modeling, and operationalization. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(5), 989–1024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gersick, K. E., Davis, J. A., Hampton, M. M., & Lansberg, I. (1997). Generation to generation: Life cycles of the family business. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  29. Goel, S., Voordeckers, W., Van Gils, A., & van den Heuvel, J. (2013). CEO’s empathy and salience of socioemotional wealth in family SMEs—The moderating role of external directors. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 25(3/4), 111–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gómez-Mejía, L. R., Cruz, C., Berrone, P., & De Castro, J. (2011). The bind that ties: Socioemotional wealth preservation in family firms. The Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 653–707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gómez-Mejía, L. R., Haynes, K., Núñez-Nickel, M., Jacobson, K., & Moyano-Fuentes, J. (2007). Socioemotional wealth and business risks in family-controlled firms: Evidence from Spanish olive oil mills. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(1), 106–137.Google Scholar
  32. Gomez-Mejia, L. R., Nuñez-Nickel, M., & Gutierrez, I. (2001). The role of family ties in agency contracts. Academy of Management Journal, 44(1), 81–95.Google Scholar
  33. Gray, B., & Ariss, S. (1985). Politics and strategic change across organizational life cycles. Academy of Management Review, 10(4), 707–723.Google Scholar
  34. Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  35. Huybrechts, J., Voordeckers, W., Lybaert, N., & Vandemaele, S. (2011). The distinctiveness of family-firm intangibles: A review and suggestions for future research. Journal of Management & Organization, 17(2), 268–287Google Scholar
  36. Kam, C. D., & Franzese, R. J. (2007). Modeling and interpreting interactive hypotheses in regression analysis. Michigan: The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  37. Kanuk, L., & Berenson, C. (1975). Mail surveys and response rates: A literature review. Journal of Marketing Research, 12(4), 440–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kellermanns, F. W., Eddleston, K. A., & Zellweger, T. M. (2012). Extending the socioemotional wealth perspective: A look at the dark side. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 36(6), 1175–1182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kirchhoff, B. A., & Kirchhoff, J. J. (1987). Family contributions to productivity and profitability in small businesses. Journal of Small Business Management, 25(4), 25–31.Google Scholar
  40. Klein, S. B., Astrachan, J. H., & Smyrnios, K. X. (2005). The F-PEC scale of family influence: Construction, validation, and further implication for theory. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(3), 321–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Le Breton-Miller, I., & Miller, D. (2006). Why do some family businesses out-compete? Governance, long-term orientations, and sustainable capability. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(6), 731–746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lubatkin, M., Schulze, W., Ling, Y., & Dino, R. (2005). The effects of parental altruism on the governance of family-managed firms. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(3), 313–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lumpkin, G. T., Brigham, K. H., & Moss, T. W. (2010). Long-term orientation: Implications for the entrepreneurial orientation and performance of family businesses. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 22(3/4), 241–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. G. (1996). Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 135–172.Google Scholar
  45. Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. G. (2001). Linking two dimensions of entrepreneurial orientation to firm performance: The moderating role of environment and industry life cycle. Journal of Business Venturing, 16(5), 429–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lumpkin, G. T., Martin, W., & Vaughn, M. (2008). Family orientation: Individual-level influences on family firm outcomes. Family Business Review, 21(2), 127–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Mahto, R. V., Davis, P. S., Pearce, J. A., I. I., & Robinson, R. B., Jr. (2010). Satisfaction with firm performance in family businesses. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(5), 985–1001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Miller, D. (1983). The correlates of entrepreneurship in three types of firms. Management Science, 29(7), 770–790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Miller, D. (2011). Miller 1983. Revisited: A reflection on EO research and some suggestions for the future. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(5), 873–894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Miller, D., & Le Breton-Miller, I. (2006). Priorities, practices and strategies in successful and failing family businesses: An elaboration and test of the configuration perspective. Strategic Organization, 4(4), 379–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Miller, D., & Le Breton-Miller, I. (2011). Governance, social identity, and entrepreneurial orientation in closely held public companies. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(5), 1051–1076.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Moreno, A. M., & Casillas, J. C. (2008). Entrepreneurial orientation and growth of SMEs: A causal model. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(3), 507–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Naldi, L., Nordqvist, M., Sjöberg, K., & Wiklund, J. (2007). Entrepreneurial orientation, risk taking, and performance in family firms. Family Business Review, 20(1), 33–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Nordqvist, M., Habbershon, T. G., & Melin, L. (2008). Transgenerational entrepreneurship: Exploring entrepreneurial orientation in family firms. In H. Landström, D. Smallbone, H. Crijns, & E. Laveren (Eds.), Entrepreneurship, sustainable growth and performance: Frontiers in European entrepreneurship research (pp. 93–116). London, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  55. Phelps, R., Adams, R., & Bessant, J. (2007). Life cycles of growing organizations: A review with implications for knowledge and learning. International Journal of Management Reviews, 9(1), 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Jeong-Yeon, L., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Rauch, A., Wiklund, J., Lumpkin, G. T., & Frese, M. (2009). Entrepreneurial orientation and business performance: An assessment of past research and suggestions for the future. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 3(3), 761–787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Runyan, R., Droge, C., & Swinney, J. (2008). Entrepreneurial orientation versus small business orientation: What are their relationships to firm performance? Journal of Small Business Management, 46(4), 567–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Rutherford, M. W., Kuratko, D. F., & Holt, D. T. (2008). Examining the link between “familiness” and performance: Can the F-PEC untangle the family business theory jungle. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(6), 1089–1109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Schollhammer, H. (1982). Internal corporate entrepreneurship. In C. A. Kent, D. L. Sexton, & K. H. Vesper (Eds.), Encyclopedia of entrepreneurship (pp. 209–223). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  61. Schulze, W. S., Lubatkin, M. H., & Dino, R. N. (2003a). Exploring the agency consequences of ownership dispersion among the directors of private family firm. Academy of Management Journal, 46(2), 179–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Schulze, W. S., Lubatkin, M. H., & Dino, R. N. (2003b). Toward a theory of agency and altruism in family firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(4), 473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Schulze, W. S., Lubatkin, M. H., Dino, R. N., & Buchholtz, A. K. (2001). Agency relationships in family firms: Theory and evidence. Organization Science, 12(2), 99–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Sharma, P., Chrisman, J. J., & Chua, J. H. (1997). Strategic management of the family business: Past research and future challenge. Family Business Review, 10(1), 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Sharma, P., & Nordqvist, M. (2007). A typology for capturing the heterogeneity of family firms. Academy of Management Annual Meeting Proceedings, 1–6. doi: 10.5465/AMBPP.2007.26501993.
  66. Short, J. C., Payne, G. T., Brigham, K. H., Lumpkin, G. T., & Broberg, J. C. (2009). Family firms and entrepreneurial orientation in publicly traded firms: A comparative analysis of the S&P 500. Family Business Review, 22(1), 9–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Stets, J. E., & Burke, P. J. (2000). Identity theory and social identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63(3), 224–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Stockmans, A., Lybaert, N., & Voordeckers, W. (2010). Socioemotional wealth and earnings management in private family firms. Family Business Review, 23(3), 280–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Su, Z., Xie, E., & Li, Y. (2011). Entrepreneurial orientation and firm performance in new ventures and established firms. Journal of Small Business Management, 49(4), 558–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Tagiuri, R., & Davis, J. (1996). Bivalent attributes of the family firm. Family Business Review, 9(2), 199–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Tang, J., Tang, Z., Marino, L. D., Zhang, Y., & Li, Q. (2008). Exploring an inverted U-shape relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and performance in Chinese ventures. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(1), 219–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Uhlaner, L. M., Kellermanns, F. W., Eddleston, K. A., & Hoy, F. (2012). The entrepreneuring family: A new paradigm for family business research. Small Business Economics, 38(1), 1–11.Google Scholar
  73. Van Doorn, S., & Volberda, H. (2009). Entrepreneurial orientation and firm performance: The role of the senior team. Academy of Management Annual Meeting Proceedings, 1–6. doi:  10.5465/AMBPP.2009.44257958.
  74. Vandekerkhof, P., Steijvers, T., Hendriks, W., & Voordeckers, W. (forthcoming). The effect of organizational characteristics on the appointment of nonfamily managers in private family firms: The moderating role of socioemotional wealth. Family Business Review.Google Scholar
  75. Venkatraman, N., & Grant, J. H. (1986). Construct measurement in organizational strategy research: A critique and proposal. Academy of Management Review, 11(1), 71–87.Google Scholar
  76. Ward, J. L. (1987). Keeping the family business healthy. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  77. Ward, J. L., & Aronoff, C. E. (1991). Trust gives you the advantage. Nation’s Business, 79(8), 42–45.Google Scholar
  78. Westhead, P., & Cowling, M. (1998). Family firm research: The need for a methodological rethink. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 23(1), 31–56.Google Scholar
  79. Westhead, P., & Howorth, C. (2007). Types of private family firms: An exploratory conceptual and empirical analysis. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 19(5), 405–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Wiklund, J. (1999). The sustainability of the entrepreneurial orientation–performance relationship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 24(1), 37–48.Google Scholar
  81. Wiklund, J., & Shepherd, D. (2005). Entrepreneurial orientation and small business performance: A configurational approach. Journal of Business Venturing, 20(1), 71–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Yip, P. S. L., & Tsang, E. W. K. (2007). Interpreting dummy variables and their interaction effects in strategy research. Strategic Organization, 5(1), 13–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Zahra, S. A. (1991). Predictors and financial outcomes of corporate entrepreneurship: An exploratory study. Journal of Business Venturing, 6(4), 258–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Zahra, S. A., & Covin, J. G. (1995). Contextual influences on the corporate entrepreneurship–performance relationship: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Business Venturing, 10(1), 43–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Zahra, S. A., Hayton, J. C., & Salvato, C. (2004). Entrepreneurship in family vs. non-family firms: A resource-based analysis of the effect of organizational culture. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28(4), 363–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Zellweger, T., & Astrachan, J. (2008). On the emotional value of owning a firm. Family Business Review, 21(4), 347–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Zellweger, T., Eddleston, K., & Kellermanns, F. W. (2010). Exploring the concept of familiness: Introducing family firm identity. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 1(1), 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Zellweger, T., Kellermanns, F. W., Chrisman, J., & Chua, J. (2012). Family control and family firm valuation by family CEOs: The importance of intentions for transgenerational control. Organization Science, 23(3), 851–868.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Zellweger, T., & Sieger, P. (2012). Entrepreneurial orientation in long-lived family firms. Small Business Economics, 38(1), 67–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jelle Schepers
    • 1
  • Wim Voordeckers
    • 1
    Email author
  • Tensie Steijvers
    • 1
  • Eddy Laveren
    • 2
  1. 1.Kizok Research CenterHasselt UniversityHasseltBelgium
  2. 2.University of AntwerpAntwerpBelgium

Personalised recommendations