Small Business Economics

, Volume 42, Issue 4, pp 703–716 | Cite as

Institutional dimensions and entrepreneurial activity: an international study

Article

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to examine the influence of institutional dimensions (regulative, normative and cultural-cognitive) on the probability of becoming an entrepreneur. The main findings demonstrate, through logistic regression, that a favourable regulative dimension (fewer procedures to start a business), normative dimension (higher media attention for new business) and cultural-cognitive dimension (better entrepreneurial skills, less fear of business failure and better knowing of entrepreneurs) increase the probability of being an entrepreneur. Data were obtained from both the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor and the International Institute for Management and Development for the year 2008, considering a sample of 30 countries and 36,525 individuals. The study advances the literature by providing new information on the environmental factors that affect entrepreneurial activity in the light of institutional economics. Also, the research could be useful for designing policies to foster entrepreneurship in different environments.

Keywords

Entrepreneurial activity Entrepreneurship Institutional dimensions Regulative dimension Normative dimension Cultural-cognitive dimension GEM 

JEL Classification

L26 

References

  1. Aidis, R., Estrin, S., & Mickiewicz, T. (2008). Institutions and entrepreneurship development in Russia: A comparative perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 23(6), 656–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aldrich, H., & Fiol, C. M. (1994). Fools rush in? The institutional context of industry creation. Academy of Management Review, 19, 645–670.Google Scholar
  3. Alvarez, C., & Urbano, D. (2011). Environmental factors and entrepreneurial activity in Latin America. Academia, Revista Latinoamericana de Administración, 48, 126–139.Google Scholar
  4. Alvarez, C., & Urbano, D. (2012). Factores del entorno y creación de empresas: Un análisis institucional. Revista Venezolana de Gerencia, 57, 9–38.Google Scholar
  5. Amorós, J. E., Fernández, C., & Tapia, J. (2012). Quantifying the relationship between entrepreneurship and competitiveness development stages in Latin America. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 8(3), 249–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Anderson, A. R., Dodd, S. D., & Jack, S. L. (2012). Entrepreneurship as connecting: some implications for theorising and practice. Management Decision, 50(5), 958–971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Arenius, P., & Minniti, M. (2005). Perceptual variables and nascent entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 24(3), 233–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Audretsch, D. (2012). Entrepreneurship research. Management Decision, 50(5), 755–764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Becker S., & Woessmann L. (2007). Was weber wrong? A human capital theory of protestant economic history. CESifo Working Paper No. 1987. Munich: CESifo.Google Scholar
  10. Begley, T., Tan, W. L., & Schoch, H. (2005). Politico-economic factors associated with interest in starting a business: A multi-country study. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 29(1), 35–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Blanchflower, D. G. (2004). Self-employment: More may not be better. NBER Working Paper No. 10286. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  12. Bruton, G. D., Ahlstrom, D., & Li, H. L. (2010). Institutional theory and entrepreneurship: Where are we now and where do we need to move in the future? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(3), 421–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bruton, G., & Ahlstromb, D. (2003). An institutional view of China’s venture capital industry. Explaining the differences between China and the West. Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 233–259.Google Scholar
  14. Busenitz, L. W., & Lau, C. M. (1996). A cross-cultural cognitive model of new venture creation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 20(4), 25–39.Google Scholar
  15. Busenitz, L. W, Gomez, C., & Spencer, J. W. (2000). Country institutional profiles: Unlocking entrepreneurial phenomena. Academy of Management Journal, 43(5), 994–1003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Collins, R. (1997). An Asian route to capitalism: Religious economy and the origins of self-transforming growth in Japan. American Sociological Review, 62, 843–865.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Commons. (1924). Legal foundations of capitalism. Wisconsin: University of Wisconsin Press. Reprint Madison.Google Scholar
  18. Dana, L. P. (1987). Evaluating policies promoting entrepreneurship—A cross cultural comparison of enterprises case study: Singapore & Malaysia. Journal of Small Business and Entrepreneurship, 4(3), 36–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dana, L. P. (1990). Saint Martin/Sint Maarten: a case study of the effects of culture on economic development. Journal of Small Business Management, 28(4), 91–98.Google Scholar
  20. Davidsson, P. (1991). Continued entrepreneurship: ability, need and opportunity as determinants of small firm growth. Journal of Business Venturing, 6(6), 405–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Davidsson, P., & Honig, B. (2003). The role of social and human capital among nascent entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(3), 301–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. De Clercq, D., Danis, W. D., & Dakhli, M. (2010). The moderating effect of institutional context on the relationship between associational activity and new business activity in emerging economies. International Business Review, 19(1), 85–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Delacroix, J., & Nielsen, F. (2001). The beloved myth: Protestantism and the rise of industrial capitalism in nineteenth-century Europe. Social Forces, 80(2), 509–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Djankov, S., La Porta, R., Lopez-De-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (2002). The regulation of entry. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(1), 1–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Evans, D., & Leighton, L. (1989). Some empirical aspects of entrepreneurship. American Economic Review, 79, 519–535.Google Scholar
  27. Gnyawali, D. R., & Fogel, D. S. (1994). Environments for entrepreneurship development: Key dimensions and research implications. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, 18(4), 43–62.Google Scholar
  28. Gomez-Haro, S., Aragon-Correa, J. A., & Cordon-Pozo, E. (2011). Differentiating the effects of the institutional environment on corporate entrepreneurship. Management Decision, 49(10), 677–1693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gupta, V. K., Yayla, A. A., Sikdar, A., & Cha, M. S. (2012). Institutional environment for entrepreneurship: evidence from the developmental states of South Korea and United Arab Emirates. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 17(3), 1250013-1-1250013-21.Google Scholar
  30. Hamilton, W. H. (1932). Institution. In E. R. A. Seligman & A. Johnson (Eds.), Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences (Vol. 8, pp. 84–89). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  31. Hayton, J. C., George, G., & Zahra, S. A. (2002). National culture and entrepreneurship: A review of behavioural research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 26(4), 33–52.Google Scholar
  32. Ho, Y., & Wong, P. (2007). Financing, regulatory costs and entrepreneurial propensity. Small Business Economics, 28, 187–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hodgson, G. M. (2006). What are institutions? Journal of Economic Issues, XL(1), 1–25.Google Scholar
  34. Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences. Comparing values, behaviours, institutions, and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). California: Sage Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
  35. Hwang, H., & Powell, W. W. (2005). Institutions and entrepreneurship. In S. A. Alvarez, R. Agarwal, & O. Sorenson (Eds.), Handbook of entrepreneurship research: Disciplinary perspectives (pp. 179–210). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  36. Kirzner, I. M. (1973). Competition and entrepreneurship. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  37. Klapper, L., Laeven, L., & Rajan, R. (2006). Entry regulation as a barrier to entrepreneurship. Journal of Financial Economics, 82, 591–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kostova, T. (1997): Country Institutional profiles: concept and measurement. Academy of Management Proceedings, 180–184.Google Scholar
  39. Langowitz, N., & Minniti, M. (2007). The entrepreneurial propensity of women. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 31(3), 341–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lee, S. M., Lim, S. B., & Pathak, R. D. (2011). Culture and entrepreneurial orientation: A multi-country study. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 7(1), 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Levesque, M., & Minniti, M. (2006). The effect of aging on entrepreneurial behavior. Journal of Business Venturing, 21(2), 177–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Liñán, F., Urbano, D., & Guerrero, M. (2011). Regional variations in entrepreneurial cognitions: Start-up intentions of university students in Spain. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 23(3–4), 187–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Manolova, T. S., Eunni, R. V., & Gyoshev, B. S. (2008). Institutional environments for entrepreneurship: Evidence from emerging economies in Eastern Europe. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 32(1), 203–218.Google Scholar
  44. March, J. (1981). Decisions in organizations and theories of choice. In A. van de Ven & W. Joyce (Eds.), Perspectives on organizational design and behavior (pp. 205–244). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  45. Markus, H., & Zajonc, R. B. (1985). The cognitive perspective in social psychology. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (3rd ed., pp. 137–230). New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  46. McClelland, D. (1961). The achieving society. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Mueller, S. L., & Thomas, A. S. (2000). Culture and entrepreneurial potential: A nine country study of locus of control and innovativeness. Journal of Business Venturing, 16, 51–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Neale, W. C. (1987). Institutions. Journal of Economic Issues, 21(3), 1177–1206.Google Scholar
  49. Nielsen, S. L., & Lassen, A. H. (2012). Images of entrepreneurship: towards a new categorization of entrepreneurship. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 8(1), 35–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. North, D. C. (2005). Understanding the process of economic change. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Parsons, T. (1990). Prolegomena to a theory of social institutions. American Sociological Review, 55, 318–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Renko, M., Shrader, R. C., & Simon, M. (2012). Perception of entrepreneurial opportunity: A general framework. Management Decision, 50(7), 1233–1251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Reynolds, P. D., Hay, M., & Camp, S. (1999). Global entrepreneurship monitor: 1999 executive report. Kansas City, MO: Kauffman Foundation.Google Scholar
  55. Reynolds, P. D., Hay, M., Bygrave, W. D., Camp, S. M., & Autio, E. (2000). Global entrepreneurship monitor: 2000 executive report. Kansas City: Kauffman Center for Entrepreneurial Leadership.Google Scholar
  56. Reynolds, P., Camp, S., Bygrave, W., Autio, E., & Hay, M. (2001). Global Entrepreneurship Monitor. 2001 Executive Report. Babson College, London Business School, Kauffman Center for Entrepreneurial Leadership.Google Scholar
  57. Scott, W. R. (1995). Institutions and organizations. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage.Google Scholar
  58. Scott, W. R. (2001). Institutions and organizations (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  59. Scott, W.R. (2008). Institutions and organizations: ideas and interests (3rd ed.). Foundations for Organizational Science Series. Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  60. Selznick, P. (1957). Leadership in administration. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  61. Shane, S. (1993). Cultural influences on national rates of innovation. Journal of Business Venturing, 8(1), 59–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Shane, S. (2000). Prior knowledge and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities. Organization Science, 11(4), 448–469.Google Scholar
  63. Shane, S., & Kolvereid, L. (1995). National environment, strategy, and new venture performance: A three country study. Journal of Small Business Management, 33(2), 37–50.Google Scholar
  64. Shapero, A., & Sokol, L. (1982). The social dimensions of entrepreneurship. In C. Kent, L. Sexton, & K. Vesper (Eds.), Encylopedia of entrepreneurship (pp. 72–90). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  65. Spencer, J., & Gomez, C. (2004). The relationship among national institutional structures, economic factors, and domestic entrepreneurial activity: A multicountry study. Journal of Business Research, 57, 1098–1107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Stenholm, P., Acs, Z. J., & Wuebker, R. (2013). Exploring country-level institutional arrangements on the rate and type of entrepreneurial activity. Journal of Business Venturing, 28, 176–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Stephen, F., Urbano, D., & van Hemmen, S. (2009). The responsiveness of entrepreneurs to working time regulations. Small Business Economics, 32(3), 259–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Thornton, P., Ribeiro-Soriano, D., & Urbano, D. (2011). Socio-cultural factors and entrepreneurial activity: An overview. International Small Business Journal, 29(2), 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. van Gelderen, M., Thurik, R., & Bosma, N. (2006). Success and risk factors in the pre-startup phase. Small Business Economics, 26(4), 319–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. van Stel, A., Storey, D. J., & Thurik, R. (2007). The effect of business regulations on nascent and young business entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 28(2), 171–186.Google Scholar
  71. Veblen, T. (1914). The instinct of Workmanship and the State of the Industrial Arts, New York: August Kelley (reprinted with a new introduction by M.G. Murphey and a 1964 introductory note by J. Dorfman, New Brunswick, Transaction Book, 1990).Google Scholar
  72. Veblen, T. (1919). The place of science in modern civilization and other essays, New York, Huebsch (reprinted with a new introduction by W.J. Samuels, New Brunswick, Transaction Publishers, 1990).Google Scholar
  73. Veciana, J. M., & Urbano, D. (2008). The institutional approach to entrepreneurship research: Introduction. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 4(4), 365–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Weber, M. (1930). The protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism. New York: Scribner’s.Google Scholar
  75. Welter, F. (2005). Entrepreneurial behavior in differing environments. In H. Grimm, C. W. Wessner, & D. B. Audretsch (Eds.), Local heroes in the global village globalization and the new entrepreneurship policies. International studies in entrepreneurship (pp. 93–112). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  76. Welter, F., & Smallbone, D. (2011). Institutional perspectives on entrepreneurial behaviour in challenging environments. Journal of Small Business Management, 49(1), 107–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Wennekers, S., van Stel, A., Thurik, R., & Reynolds, P. (2005). Nascent entrepreneurship and the level of economic development. Small Business Economics, 24(3), 293–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. White, H. (1980). A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica, 48, 817–830.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Zucker, L. (1983). Organizations as institutions. In S. Bacharach (Ed.), Research in the sociology of organizations (Vol. 2, pp. 1–47) Greenwich.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Business Economics DepartmentAutonomous University of BarcelonaBellaterraSpain
  2. 2.University of MedellínMedellínColombia

Personalised recommendations