Advertisement

Small Business Economics

, Volume 41, Issue 4, pp 819–836 | Cite as

The missing pillar: the creativity theory of knowledge spillover entrepreneurship

  • David B. Audretsch
  • Maksim BelitskiEmail author
Article

Abstract

Knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship and the prevailing theory of economic growth treat opportunities as endogenous and generally focus on opportunity recognition by entrepreneurs. New knowledge created endogenously results in knowledge spillovers enabling inventors and entrepreneurs to commercialize it. This article discusses that knowledge spillover entrepreneurship depends not only on ordinary human capital, but more importantly also on creativity embodied in creative individuals and diverse urban environments that attract creative classes. This might result in self-selection of creative individuals into entrepreneurship or enable entrepreneurs to recognize creativity and commercialize it. This creativity theory of knowledge spillover entrepreneurship is tested utilizing data on European cities.

Keywords

Entrepreneurship Creativity spillover Human capital European city 

JEL Classifications

J24 L26 O1 O31 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Zoltan Acs, Michael Fritsch, Erik Stam, Sameeksch Desai and other participants in the Academic Policy and the Knowledge Theory of Entrepreneurship Workshop (University of Augsburg, Germany, 20–21 August 2012) for helpful comments. We greatly appreciate the valuable suggestions made by two anonymous reviewers. Suggestions and comments by Erik E. Lehmann on the final revision have significantly improved the quality of this paper. We would also like to thank Stadtsparkasse Augsburg for financial support of the workshop.

References

  1. Acs, Z. J., & Armington, C. (2006). Entrepreneurship, agglomeration and US regional growth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Acs, Z. J., Audretsch, D. B., Braunerhjelm, P., & Carlsson, B. (2004). The missing link: The knowledge filter and entrepreneurship in endogenous growth. Discussion Paper no. 4783. London, UK: Center for Economic Policy Research.Google Scholar
  3. Acs, Z. J., Audretsch, D. B., & Feldman, M. P. (1994). R&D spillovers and recipient firm size. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 76, 336–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Acs, Z. J., Braunerhjelm, P., Audretsch, D. B., & Carlsson, B. (2009). The knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 32(1), 15–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Acs, Z. J., Desai, S., & Klapper, L. F. (2008). What does “entrepreneurship” data really show? Small Business Economics, 31(3), 265–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Acs, Z. J., & Megyesi, M. I. (2009). Creativity and industrial cities: A case study of Baltimore. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 21, 421–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Acs, Z. J., & Qian, H. (2013). An absorptive capacity theory of knowledge spillover entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 40, 185–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Acs, Z. J., & Sanders, M. (2012). Patents, knowledge spillovers and entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 39(4), 801–817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Agarwal, R., Audretsch, D., & Sarkar, M. B. (2007). The process of creative construction: knowledge spillovers, entrepreneurship, and economic growth. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 1(3–4), 263–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Armington, C., & Acs, Z. J. (2002). The determinants of regional variation in new firm formation. Regional Studies, 36, 33–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Arrow, K. (1962). Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. In R. Nelson (Ed.), The rate and direction of inventive activity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press and NBER.Google Scholar
  12. Audretsch, D. B. (1995). Innovation and industry evolution. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  13. Audretsch, D. B., & Feldman, M. P. (1996). R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production. The American Economic Review, 86(3), 630–640.Google Scholar
  14. Audretsch, D. B., Hülsbeck, M., & Lehmann, E. E. (2012). Regional competitiveness, university spillovers, and entrepreneurial activity. Small Business Economics, 39(3), 587–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Audretsch, D. B., & Keilbach, M. C. (2007). The theory of knowledge spillover entrepreneurship. Journal of Management Studies, 44, 1242–1254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Audretsch, D. B., & Keilbach, M. C. (2008). Resolving the knowledge paradox: Knowledge-spillover entrepreneurship and economics growth. Research Policy, 37, 1697–1705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Audretsch, D. B., Keilbach, M. C., & Lehmann, E. E. (2006). Entrepreneurship and economic growth. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Audretsch, D. B., & Lehmann, E. E. (2005). Does the knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship hold for regions? Research Policy, 34(8), 1191–1202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Baltagi, B. (2008). Econometric Analysis of Panel Data. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  20. Belitski, M., & Korosteleva, J. (2010). Entrepreneurial Activity across European Cities. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, 30(4), Article 12.Google Scholar
  21. Belitski, M., & Korosteleva, J. (2011). Entrepreneurship and cities: Evidence from the Post-Communist world. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, 31(4), Article 3.Google Scholar
  22. Bhide, A. (1994). How entrepreneurs craft strategies that work. Harvard Business Review, 72, 150–161.Google Scholar
  23. Boschma, R., & Fritsch, M. (2009). Creative class and regional growth: empirical evidence from seven European countries. Economic Geography, 85, 391–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Braunerhjelm, P., Acs, Z. J., Audretsch, D. B., & Carlsson, B. (2010). The missing link: Knowledge diffusion and entrepreneurship in endogenous growth. Small Business Economics, 34(2), 105–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Desai, M., Gompers, P., & Lerner, J. (2003). Institutions and entrepreneurial firm dynamics: evidence from Europe. Harvard Negotiation, Organizations and Markets Research Paper No. 03–59.Google Scholar
  26. Dyer, J. H., Gregersen, H. B., & Christensen, C. (2008). Entrepreneur behaviors, opportunity recognition, and the origins of innovative ventures. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 2(4), 317–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Estrin, S., Korosteleva, J., & Mickiewicz, T. (2013). Which institutions encourage entrepreneurial growth aspirations? Journal of Business Venturing, 28, 564–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. European Commission. (2007). The state of European cities report. Retrieved June 22, 2013 at http://www.eukn.org/France/fr_en/E_library/Urban_Policy.
  29. Eurostat. (2012). European urban audit statistics. Retrieved June 21, 2013 at: http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/region_cities/city_urban/data_cities.
  30. Evans, D. S., & Leighton, L. S. (1989). Some empirical aspects of entrepreneurship. American Economic Review, 79, 519–535.Google Scholar
  31. Florida, R. L. (2002). The rise of the creative class. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  32. Florida, R. L. (2004). Cities and the creative class. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  33. Florida, R. L. (2011) A floating silicon valley for techies without green cards. Retrieved August 12, 2013 at: http://www.theatlanticcities.com/technology/2011/12.
  34. Fritsch, M. (2008). How does new business formation affect regional development? Introduction to the special issue. Small Business Economics, 30, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. GEM. (2012). Global entrepreneurship monitor data. Key indicators. Retrieved 21 June, 2013 at http://www.gemconsortium.org/key-indicators.
  36. Glaeser, E. L., Rosenthal, S. S., & Strange, W. C. (2010). Urban economics and entrepreneurship. Journal of Urban Economics, 67, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Griliches, Z. (1979). Issues in assessing the contribution of research and development to productivity growth. Bell Journal of Economics, 10(1), 92–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hellmann, T. (2007). When do employees become entrepreneurs? Management Science, 53, 919–933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hoaglin, D., Monsteller, F., & Tukey, J. (1983). Understanding robust and exploratory data analysis. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  40. Jacobs, J. (1969). The economy of cities. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  41. Jaffe, A. B. (1986). Technological opportunity and spillovers of R&D: Evidence from firms’ patents, profits, and market value. American Economic Review, 76(5), 984–1001.Google Scholar
  42. Klarl, T. (2013). Comment on Acs and Varga: Entrepreneurship. Agglomeraiton and Technological Change, Small Business Economics, 41, 215–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Krugman, P. (1991). Increasing returns and economic geography. The Journal of Political Economy, 99, 483–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lazear, E. P. (2005). Entrepreneurship. Journal of Labor Economics, 23, 649–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Lee, S. Y., Florida, R. L., & Acs, Z. J. (2004). Creativity and entrepreneurship: A regional analysis of new firm formation. Regional Studies, 38, 879–891.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Link, A., & Welsh, D. H. B. (2013). From laboratory to market: On the propensity of young inventors to form a new business. Small Business Economics, 40(1), 1–7.Google Scholar
  47. Lucas, R. (2009). Ideas and growth. Economica, 76, 1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Manolova, T., Eunni, R., & Gyoshev, B. (2008). Institutional environments for entrepreneurship: Evidence from emerging economies in Eastern Europe. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 32, 203–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Markusen, A., Wassall, G. H., DeNatale, D., & Cohen, R. (2008). Defining the creative economy: Industry and occupational approaches. Economic Development Quarterly, 22, 24–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Marlet, G., & van Woerkens, C. (2004). The Dutch creative class and how it fosters urban employment growth. Urban Studies, 44, 2605–2626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Marrocu, E., & Paci, R. (2012). Education or creativity: What matters most for economic performance? Economic Geography, 88(4), 369–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Marshall, A. (1920). Principles of economics. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  53. Michelacci, C. (2002). Low returns in R&D due to the lack of entrepreneurial skills. The Economic Journal, 113, 207–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Minniti, M., & Lévesque, M. (2010). Entrepreneurial types and economic growth. Journal of Business Venturing, 25, 305–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Parker, S. C. (2004). The economics of self-employment and entrepreneurship. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Parker, S. C. (2009). The economics of entrepreneurship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Piergiovanni, R., Carree, M., & Santarelli, E. (2012). Creative industries, new business formation, and regional economic growth. Small Business Economics, 39, 539–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Rabe-Hesketh, S., Skrondal, A., & Pickles, A. (2005). Maximum likelihood estimation of limited and discrete dependent variable models with nested random. Journal of Econometrics, 128, 301–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Reynolds, P. D., Carter, N. M., Gartner, W. B., & Greene, P. G. (2004). The prevalence of nascent entrepreneurs in the United States: Evidence from the panel study of entrepreneurial dynamics. Small Business Economics, 23(4), 263–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Reynolds, P., Miller, B., & Maki, W. (1995). Explaining regional variation in business births and deaths: US 1976–88. Small Business Economics, 7, 389–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Romer, P. M. (1990). Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), S71–S102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Sala-I-Martin, X., Blanke, J., Hanouz, M. D., Geiger, T., Mia, I., & Paua, F. (2009). The global competitiveness index: Prioritizing the economic policy agenda. In M. E. Porter & K. Schwab (Eds.), The global competitiveness report (pp. 2008–2009). Washington: World Economic Forum.Google Scholar
  63. Saxenian, A. (1994). Regional advantage: Culture and com- petition in Silicon Valley and route 128. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  64. Stam, E. (2007). Why butterflies don‘t leave: Locational behavior of entrepreneurial firms. Economic Geography, 83(1), 27–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Stam, E., & Wennberg, K. (2009). The roles of R&D in new firm growth. Small Business Economics, 33(1), 77–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Stenholm, P., Acs, Z. J., & Wuebker, R. (2013). Exploring country-level institutional arrangements on the rate and type of entrepreneurial activity. Journal of Business Venturing, 28(1), 176–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Stuetzer, M., Obschonka, M., Brixy, U., Sternberg, R., & Cantner, U. (2013). Regional characteristics, opportunity perception and entrepreneurial activities. Small Business Economics, forthcoming,. doi: 10.1007/s11187-013-9488-6.Google Scholar
  68. World Bank. (2012). Doing business data. Historical Data. Retrieved June 21, 2013 at http://www.doingbusiness.org/custom-query.
  69. Zahra, S. A., & Wright, M. (2011). Entrepreneurship’s next act. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 25(4), 67–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Zucker, L. G., Darby, M. R., & Brewer, M. B. (1998). Intellectual human capital and the birth of us biotechnology enterprises. The American Economic Review, 88, 290–306.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Development StrategiesIndiana University BloomingtonBloomingtonUSA
  2. 2.School of Economics and ManagementFree University of Bolzano-BozenBozenItaly

Personalised recommendations