Small Business Economics

, Volume 41, Issue 3, pp 701–715 | Cite as

Perceived credit constraints in the European Union

  • Erik Canton
  • Isabel Grilo
  • Josefa Monteagudo
  • Peter van der Zwan
Article

Abstract

The promotion and support of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) is an essential component of policies designed to help improve Europe’s economic performance. A crucial issue is whether SMEs face difficulty obtaining bank loans. Using pre-crisis survey data from 2005 and 2006 for nearly 3,500 SMEs (firms with fewer than 250 employees) in the European Union (EU), we investigate the determinants of perceived bank loan accessibility at the firm level and at the country level. Based on hierarchical (multi-level) binomial logit regressions, our findings show that the youngest and smallest SMEs have the worst perception of access to bank loans. The SMEs in nations with concentrated banking sectors are more positive about loan accessibility. In addition, a high fraction of foreign-owned banks is associated with improved perception of loan accessibility in the EU 15 but not in the EU 10.

Keywords

Bank loans Money supply SMEs Credit constraints Concentration index Multi-level 

JEL Classifications

E44 E51 G15 G21 

Notes

Acknowledgments

At the time of writing this paper, Erik Canton was employed at the European Commission (DG Enterprise and Industry). The views expressed here are those of the authors and should not be attributed to Ecorys or the European Commission. The authors would like to thank Jozef Konings, Jacques Mairesse, Roy Thurik, seminar participants at the European Commission and Erasmus University Rotterdam, and two anonymous reviewers for useful comments. This study benefited from a grant by the “Van Cappellen Stichting”.

References

  1. Aghion, P., Fally, T., & Scarpetta, S. (2007). Credit constraints as a barrier to the entry and post-entry growth of firms. Economic Policy, 22(52), 731–779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allen, F., Bartilori, L., & Kowalewski, O. (2006). The financial system of the EU 25. In K. Liebscher, J. Christl, P. Mooslechner, & D. Ritzberger-Grunwald (Eds.), Financial development, integration, and stability: Evidence from Central, Eastern, and South-Eastern Europe (pp. 80–104). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  3. Beck, T., Demirgüç-Kunt, A., Laeven, L., & Maksimovic, V. (2006). The determinants of financing obstacles. Journal of International Money and Finance, 25(6), 932–952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beck, T., Demirgüç-Kunt, A., & Maksimovic, V. (2008). Financing patterns around the world: Are small firms different? Journal of Financial Economics, 89(3), 467–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Behr, P., & Güttler, A. (2007). Credit risk assessment and relationship lending: An empirical analysis of German small and medium-sized enterprises. Journal of Small Business Management, 45(2), 194–213.Google Scholar
  6. Berger, A., & Udell, G. (1995). Relationship lending and lines of credit in small firm finance. The Journal of Business, 68(3), 351–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Berger, A., Klapper, L., & Udell, G. (2001). The ability of banks to lend to informationally opaque small businesses. Journal of Banking & Finance, 25(12), 2127–2167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Besanko, D., & Thakor, A. V. (1987). Collateral and rationing: Sorting equilibria in monopolistic and competitive credit markets. International Economic Review, 28(3), 671–689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Binks, M. R., & Ennew, C. T. (1996). Growing firms and the credit constraint. Small Business Economics, 8(1), 17–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Block, J., Thurik, A. R., Van der Zwan, P., & Walter, S. (2012). Business takeover or new venture? Individual and environmental determinants from a cross-country study. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6520.2012.00521.x.
  11. Bruns, V., & Fletcher, M. (2008). Banks’ risk assessment of Swedish SMEs. Venture Capital, 10(2), 171–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cabral, L. M. B., & Mata, J. (2003). On the evolution of the firm size distribution: Facts and theory. The American Economic Review, 93(4), 1075–1090.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Carree, M. A., & Thurik, A. R. (2007). The lag structure of the impact of business ownership on economic performance in OECD countries. Small Business Economics, 30(1), 101–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Carree, M. A., & Thurik, A. R. (2010). The impact of entrepreneurship on economic growth. In D. B. Audretsch & Z. J. Acs (Eds.), Handbook of entrepreneurship research (pp. 557–594). Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chakravarty, S., & Xiang, M. (2009). What discourages small businesses from asking for loans? The international evidence on borrower discouragement. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1344098. Accessed 11 September 2012.
  16. Chan, Y., & Kanatas, G. (1985). Asymmetric valuations and the role of collateral in loan agreements. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 17(1), 84–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Claessens, S., Demirgüç-Kunt, A., & Huizinga, H. (2001). How does foreign entry affect domestic banking markets? Journal of Banking & Finance, 25(5), 891–911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Clarke, C. R. G., Cull, R., & Soledad Martínez Pería, M. (2006). Foreign bank participation and access to credit across firms in developing countries. Journal of Comparative Economics, 34(4), 774–795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cressy, R. (2002). Funding gaps: A symposium. The Economic Journal, 112, F1–F16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cressy, R. (2003). Credit constraints on small businesses: Theory versus evidence. International Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, 1(4), 515–538.Google Scholar
  21. De Kok, J. M. P., Vroonhof, P., Verhoeven, W., Timmermans, N., Kwaak, T., Snijders, J., & Westhof, F. (2011). Do SMEs create more and better jobs? Report prepared by EIM for the European Commission’s DG Enterprise and Industry, Brussels: European Commission. Accessed September 11, 2012, from http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/policies/sme/facts-figures-analysis/performance-review/files/supporting-documents/2012/do-smes-create-more-and-better-jobs_en.pdf.
  22. De Meza, D. (2002). Overlending? The Economic Journal, 112(477), F17–F31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. De Meza, D., & Webb, D. C. (1987). Too much investment: A problem of asymmetric information. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 102(2), 281–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Devereux, M., & Schiantarelli, F. (1990). Investment, financial factors and cash flow from U.K. panel data. In G. Hubbard (Ed.), Information, capital markets and investment (pp. 279–306). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  25. Egeln, J., Licht, G., & Steil, F. (1997). Firm foundations and the role of financial constraints. Small Business Economics, 9(2), 137–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. European Central Bank (2005). EU banking structures. Accessed September 11, 2012, from http://www.ecb.int/pub/pdf/other/eubankingstructure102005en.pdf.
  27. Federal Reserve Bank. (1998). Concentration, the HHI, and the Department of Justice merger guidelines. Federal Reserve Bulletin, 84(9), 704–715.Google Scholar
  28. Freel, M. S. (2007). Are small innovators credit rationed? Small Business Economics, 28(1), 23–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gertler, M. (1988). Financial structure and aggregate economic activity: An overview. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 20(3), 559–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Han, L., Fraser, S., & Storey, D. J. (2009). Are good or bad borrowers discouraged from applying for loans? Evidence from US small business credit markets. Journal of Banking & Finance, 33(2), 415–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Harhoff, D., & Körting, T. (1998). Lending relationships in Germany—Empirical evidence from survey data. Journal of Banking & Finance, 22(10–11), 1317–1353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Harrison, A., & McMillan, M. (2003). Does direct foreign investment affect domestic firm credit constraints? Journal of International Economics, 61(1), 73–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hyytinen, A., & Pajarinen, M. (2008). Opacity of young businesses: Evidence from rating disagreements. Journal of Banking & Finance, 32(7), 1234–1241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kim, G. O. (2006). Do equally owned small businesses have equal access to credit? Small Business Economics, 27(4–5), 369–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kon, Y., & Storey, D. J. (2003). A theory of discouraged borrowers. Small Business Economics, 21(1), 37–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Levenson, A. R., & Willard, K. K. (2000). Do firms get the financing they want? Measuring credit rationing experienced by small businesses in the US. Small Business Economics, 14(2), 83–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lin, H. (2011). Foreign bank entry and firms’ access to bank credit: Evidence from China. Journal of Banking & Finance, 35(4), 1000–1010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Parker, S. C., & Van Praag, C. M. (2006). Schooling, capital constraints, and entrepreneurial performance: The endogenous triangle. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 24(4), 416–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Petersen, M., & Rajan, R. (1994). The benefits of lending relationships, evidence from small business data. The Journal of Finance, 49(1), 3–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Petersen, M., & Rajan, R. (1995). The effect of credit market competition on lending relationships. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(2), 407–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Peterson, M. F., Arregle, J.-L., & Martin, X. (2012). Multilevel models in international business research. Journal of International Business Studies, 43(5), 451–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models. Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  43. Raudenbush, S. W., Bryk, A. S., Cheong, Y. F., Congdon, R. T., Jr., & Du Toit, M. (2011). HLM 7: hierarchical linear and nonlinear modeling. Lincolnwood: Scientific Software International, Inc.Google Scholar
  44. Schiantarelli, F., & Sembenelli, A. (2000). Form of ownership and financial constraints. Empirica, 27(2), 175–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. St. Pierre, J., & Bahri, M. (2011). The determinants of risk premium: The case of bank lines of credit granted to SMEs. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 16(4), 459–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Stein, J. (2002). Information production and capital allocation: Decentralized versus hierarchical firms. Journal of Finance, 57(5), 1891–1921.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Stiglitz, J. E., & Weiss, A. (1981). Credit rationing in markets with imperfect information. The American Economic Review, 71(3), 393–410.Google Scholar
  48. Storey, D. J. (2004). Racial and gender discrimination in the micro firms credit market? Evidence from Trinidad and Tobago. Small Business Economics, 23(5), 401–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. The World Bank. (2008). Finance for all? Policies and pitfalls in expanding access. Washington, DC: World Bank Policy Research Report.Google Scholar
  50. Turk-Ariss, R. (2010). On the implications of market power in banking: Evidence from developing countries. Journal of Banking & Finance, 34(4), 765–775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Van Praag, C. M., & Versloot, P. H. (2007). What is the value of entrepreneurship? A review of recent research. Small Business Economics, 29(4), 351–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wagenvoort, R. (2003a). Are finance constraints hindering the growth of SMEs in Europe? EIB Papers, 7(2), 22–50.Google Scholar
  53. Wagenvoort, R. (2003b). SME Finance in Europe: Introduction and overview. EIB Papers, 8(2), 10–20.Google Scholar
  54. Williamson, O. (1975). Markets and hierarchies, analysis and antitrust implications: A study in the economics of internal organization. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Erik Canton
    • 1
  • Isabel Grilo
    • 2
  • Josefa Monteagudo
    • 2
  • Peter van der Zwan
    • 3
    • 4
  1. 1.Ecorys NederlandRotterdamThe Netherlands
  2. 2.DG Economic and Financial AffairsEuropean CommissionBrusselsBelgium
  3. 3.Erasmus School of EconomicsErasmus University RotterdamRotterdamThe Netherlands
  4. 4.Panteia/EIM Business and Policy ResearchZoetermeerThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations