Advertisement

Small Business Economics

, Volume 40, Issue 2, pp 293–307 | Cite as

Dismissal protection and small firms’ hirings: evidence from a policy reform

  • Stefan Bauernschuster
Article

Abstract

Small firms are important drivers of employment creation and innovation. Dismissal protection raises firms’ adjustment costs and thus reduces worker flows. In many countries, small firms are exempted from dismissal protection regulations in order to increase their flexibility. This paper exploits a shift in the firm-size threshold of the German dismissal protection law in 2004 to analyze the causal effects of relaxed dismissal protection on the hiring behavior of small firms. Using difference-in-differences techniques, we find positive effects on hirings. Placebo treatment tests based on pre-treatment periods and a fake treatment group confirm the validity of our empirical strategy.

Keywords

Dismissal protection Small firms Difference-in-differences 

JEL Classifications

J38 K31 M21 L26 

Notes

Acknowledgments

I am indebted to Oliver Falck, participants of the 2009 EEA/ESEM Conference in Barcelona and the 2009 EALE Conference in Tallinn. Moreover, I am thankful to the associate editor Miriam van Praag, and two anonymous referees for very constructive comments.

References

  1. Acs, Z. J., & Audretsch, D. B. (1987). Innovation, market structure, and firm size. Review of Economics and Statistics, 69(4), 567–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Acs, Z. J., & Audretsch, D. B. (1988). Innovation in large and small firms: An empirical analysis. American Economic Review, 78(4), 678–690.Google Scholar
  3. Acs, Z. J., & Audretsch, D. B. (1990). Innovation and small firms. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Angrist, J., & Pischke, J. S. (2009). Mostly harmless econometrics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Ashenfelter, O. (1978). Estimating the effect of training programs on earnings. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 60(1), 47–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Audretsch, D. B. (1995). Innovation and industry evolution. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  7. Audretsch, D. B. (2002). The dynamic role of small firms. Small Business Economics, 18(1–3), 13–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Autor, D. H., Kerr, W. R., & Kugler, A. D. (2007). Does employment protection reduce productivity? Evidence from US states. Economic Journal, 117(521), 189–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bauer, T. K., Bender, S., & Bonin, H. (2007). Dismissal protection and worker flows in small establishments. Economica, 74(296), 804–821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Baumol, W. J. (2002). Entrepreneurship, innovation and growth: The David–Goliath symbiosis. Journal of Entrepreneurial Finance and Business Ventures, 7, 1–10.Google Scholar
  11. Bellmann, L. (2002). Das IAB-Betriebspanel: Konzeption und Anwendungsbereiche. Allgemeines Statistisches Archiv, 86, 177–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bertola, G. (1992). Labor turnover costs and average labor demand. Journal of Labor Economics, 10(4), 389–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bertrand, M., Duflo, E., & Mullainathan, S. (2004). How much should we trust differences-in-differences estimates? Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119(1), 249–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Blanchard, O., & Portugal, P. (2001). What hides behind an unemployment rate: Comparing Portuguese and U.S. labor markets. American Economic Review, 91(1), 187–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Boeri, T., & Jimeno, J. F. (2005). The effects of employment protection: Learning from variable enforcement. European Economic Review, 49(8), 2057–2077.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Brown, C., Hamilton, J., & Medoff, J. (1990). Employers large and small. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Falck, O. (2009). Routinization of innovation in German manufacturing: The David–Goliath symbiosis revisited. Industrial and Corporate Change, 18(3), 497–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hopenhayn, H., & Rogerson, R. (1993). Job turnover and policy evaluation: A general equilibrium analysis. Journal of Political Economy, 101(5), 915–938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jahn, E., & Schnabel, C. (2003). Bestandsschutz durch Abfindungen: Höhere Rechtssicherheit und Effizienz. Wirtschaftsdienst, 83, 219–223.Google Scholar
  20. Kugler, A., & Pica, G. (2008). Effects of employment protection on worker and job flows: Evidence from the 1990 Italian reform. Labour Economics, 15, 78–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lazear, E. P. (1990). Job security provisions and employment. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 105(3), 699–726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Martins, P. (2009). Dismissals for cause: The difference that just eight paragraphs can make. Journal of Labor Economics, 27(2), 257–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Messina, J., & Vallanti, G. (2007). Job flow dynamics and firing restrictions: Evidence from Europe. Economic Journal, 117, F279–F301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nickell, S. (1997). Unemployment and labor market rigidities: Europe versus North America. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 11(3), 55–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Nickell, S., & Layard, R. (1999). Labour market institutions and economic performance. In O. Ashenfelter & D. Card (Eds.), Handbook of labor economics (Vol. 3, No. 3, pp. 3029–3084). Elsevier.Google Scholar
  26. OECD. (1999). Employment outlook. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  27. OECD. (2004). Employment outlook. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  28. Pratten, C. F. (1971). Economies of scale in manufacturing industry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Robbins, D. K., Pantuosco, L. J., Parker, D. F., & Fuller, B. K. (2000). An empirical assessment of the contribution of small business employment to U.S. state economic performance. Small Business Economics, 15(4), 293–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Rogers, W. H. (1993). Regression standard errors in clustered samples. Stata Technical Bulletin, 13, 19–23.Google Scholar
  31. Scarpetta, S. (1996). Assessing the role of labour market and social policies on unemployment: A cross-country study. OECD Economic Studies, 26, 43–98.Google Scholar
  32. Scherer, F. M. (1973). The determinants of industrial plant sizes in six nations. Review of Economics and Statistics, 55(2), 135–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Scott, A. J. (2006). Entrepreneurship, innovation and industrial development: Geography and the creative field revisited. Small Business Economics, 26(1), 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Troost, A., & Wagner, A. (2002). Teilzeitarbeit in Deutschland. Bremen, Germany: Progress Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung.Google Scholar
  35. van Praag, M., & Versloot, P. (2007). What is the value of entrepreneurship? A review of recent research. Small Business Economics, 29, 351–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Verick, S. (2004). Threshold effects of dismissal protection legislation in Germany. IZA Working Paper, No. 991. Bonn, Germany: IZA.Google Scholar
  37. Wagner, J., Schabel, C., & Kölling, A. (2001). Arbeitsrecht als Bremse für die Arbeitsplatzschaffung in Kleinbetrieben? In D. Ehrig & P. Kalmbach (Eds.), Weniger Arbeitslose—Aber wie? (pp. 177–198). Marburg: Metropolis.Google Scholar
  38. Weiss, L. W. (1964). The survival technique and the extent of suboptimal capacity. Journal of Political Economy, 72, 246–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Weiss, L. W. (1979). The structure-conduct-performance paradigm and antitrust. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 127, 1104–1140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of MunichMunichGermany
  2. 2.CESifoMunichGermany

Personalised recommendations