Advertisement

Small Business Economics

, Volume 39, Issue 3, pp 561–574 | Cite as

Innovation, entrepreneurial activity and competitiveness at a sub-national level

  • José L. González-Pernía
  • Iñaki Peña-Legazkue
  • Ferran Vendrell-Herrero
Article

Abstract

The capability to generate new knowledge and to create new firms differs across regions. Our study is an attempt to test the extent to which differences in such capabilities are associated with regional competitiveness. Using data from Spanish NUTS2 regions for the period 2000–2004, our results show that a higher capacity of a region to simultaneously generate new knowledge and start-up firms is positively linked to its level of competitiveness. This finding supports the belief that innovation per se is a necessary, but not sufficient, condition for regional economic development.

Keywords

Entrepreneurial activity Innovation Productivity Regional competitiveness 

JEL Classifications

R11 O33 D24 L26 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors are sincerely grateful to the comments received from two anonymous referees, Juan José Gibaja, Erik Lehman, Pedro Ortín and Scott Shane on previous versions of the paper. All errors, interpretations and omissions are the authors’ responsibility. Ferran Vendrell-Herrero acknowledges the financial support received from the Spanish Ministry of Education and Science (Project SEJ 2007-67895-C04-04). José L. González-Pernía and Iñaki Peña-Legazkue acknowledge the financial support received from the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (Project ECO2009-08735).

References

  1. Abascal-Fernández, E., García-Lautre, I., & Landaluce-Calvo, M. I. (2006). Trayectorias de las comunidades autónomas según sus tasas de paro por categorías de edad. Un análisis de tablas tridimensionales. Estadística Española, 48(163), 525–550.Google Scholar
  2. Acs, Z. J., Audretsch, D. B., & Feldman, M. P. (1994). R&D spillovers and recipient firm size. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 76(2), 336–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Acs, Z. J., Braunerhjelm, P., Audretsch, D. B., & Carlsson, B. (2009). The knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 32(1), 15–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Acs, Z. J., & Varga, A. (2005). Entrepreneurship, agglomeration and technological change. Small Business Economics, 24(3), 323–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Agarwal, R., Audretsch, D., & Sarkar, M. B. (2007). The process of creative construction: Knowledge spillovers, entrepreneurship, and economic growth. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 1(3–4), 263–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Arrow, K. J. (1962). Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. In Universities-National-Bureau-Committee-for-Economic-Research (Ed.), The rate and direction of inventive activity: Economic and social factors (pp. 609–626). Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Audretsch, D. B. (1995). Innovation and industry evolution. Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  8. Audretsch, D. B. (2009). The entrepreneurial society. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 34(3), 245–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Audretsch, D. B., & Keilbach, M. (2004a). Entrepreneurship and regional growth: An evolutionary interpretation. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 14(5), 605–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Audretsch, D. B., & Keilbach, M. (2004b). Entrepreneurship capital and economic performance. Regional Studies, 38(8), 949–959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Audretsch, D. B., & Keilbach, M. (2008). Resolving the knowledge paradox: Knowledge-spillover entrepreneurship and economic growth. Research Policy, 37(10), 1697–1705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Audretsch, D. B., & Thurik, A. R. (2001). What is new about the new economy: Sources of growth in managed and entrepreneurial economies. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(1), 267–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Barro, R. J., & Sala-i-Martin, X. (1991). Convergence across states and regions. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1(1), 107–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Best, M. H. (1999). Regional growth dynamics: A capabilities perspective. Contributions to Political Economy, 18(1), 105–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bloom, N., Sadun, R., & Van Reenen, J. (2007). Americans Do I.T. Better: US Multinationals and the Productivity Miracle, NBER Working Paper No. 13085.Google Scholar
  17. Buesa, M., Martínez, M., Heijs, J., & Baumert, T. (2002). Los sistemas regionales de innovación en España: Una tipología basade en indicadores económicos e institucionales. Economía Industrial, 347, 15–32.Google Scholar
  18. Cantwell, J., & Janne, O. (1999). Technological globalisation and innovative centres: The role of corporate technological leadership and locational hierarchy. Research Policy, 28(2–3), 119–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Casson, M., & Wadeson, N. (2007). Entrepreneurship and macroeconomic performance. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 1(3–4), 239–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cattel, R. B. (1996). The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1(2), 245–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cooke, P., & Schienstock, G. (2000). Structural competitiveness and learning regions. Enterprise and Innovation Management Studies, 1(3), 265–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Costello, A. B., & Osborne, J. W. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment Research & Evaluation, 10(7), 1–9.Google Scholar
  23. De la Fuente, A. (2002). On the sources of convergence: A close look at the Spanish regions. European Economic Review, 46(3), 569–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dutta, S., Narasimhan, O., & Rajiv, S. (2005). Conceptualizing and measuring capabilities: Methodology and empirical application. Strategic Management Journal, 26(3), 277–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Eisenhardt, K. M., & Martin, J. A. (2000). Dynamic capabilities: What are they? Strategic Management Journal, 21(10–11), 1105–1121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Erken, H., Donselaar, P., & Thurik, A. R. (2009). Total factor productivity and the role of entrepreneurship, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper No. 2009-034/3.Google Scholar
  27. Fagerberg, J. (1996). Technology and competitiveness. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 12(3), 39–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Fritsch, M., & Mueller, P. (2008). The effect of new business formation on regional development over time: The case of Germany. Small Business Economics, 30(1), 15–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Fundación BBVA-IVIE. (2007). El stock y los servicios del capital en España y su distribución territorial (1964–2005): Nueva metodología. Bilbao: Fundación BBVA.Google Scholar
  30. Hausman, J. A. (1978). Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica, 46(6), 1251–1271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hessels, J., van Gelderen, M., & Thurik, R. (2008). Entrepreneurial aspirations, motivations, and their drivers. Small Business Economics, 31(3), 323–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hessels, J., & van Stel, A. (2009). Entrepreneurship, export orientation, and economic growth. Small Business Economics (Online first version), 1–14.Google Scholar
  33. Isaksen, A. (2005). Regional clusters building on local and non-local relations: A European comparison. In A. Lagendijk & P. Oinas (Eds.), Proximity, distance and diversity: Issues on economic interaction and local development. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  34. Johannessen, J.-A., Olsen, B., & Lumpkin, G. T. (2001). Innovations as newness: What is new, how new, and new to whom? European Journal of Innovation Management, 4(1), 20–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kaiser, H. F. (1960). The application of electronic computers to factor analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 141–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lippman, S. A., & Rumelt, R. P. (1982). Uncertain imitability: An analysis of interfirm differences in efficiency under competition. The Bell Journal of Economics, 13(2), 418–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Murphy, K. M., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1991). The allocation of talent: Implications for growth. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106(2), 503–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. O’Mahony, M., & van Ark, B. (2003). EU productivity and competitiveness: An industry perspective: Can Europe resume the catching-up process? Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.Google Scholar
  39. OECD. (1990). The technology and economic policy report. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  40. Penrose, E. T. (1995). The theory of the growth of the firm. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Porter, M. E. (1990). The competitive advantage of nations. Harvard Business Review, 68(2), 73–93.Google Scholar
  42. Porter, M. E. (1998). On competition. Boston: Harvard Business Review Press.Google Scholar
  43. Porter, M. E. (2003). The economic performance of regions. Regional Studies, 37(6), 545–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Romer, P. M. (1986). Increasing returns and long-run growth. Journal of Political Economy, 94(5), 1002–1037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Romer, P. M. (1990). Endogenous technological change. The Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), 71–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Romer, P. M. (2007). Economic Growth. The Concise Encyclopedia of Economics Retrieved June 30th, 2009, from http://www.econlib.org/library/Enc/EconomicGrowth.html.
  47. Rosen, S. (1982). Authority, control, and the distribution of earnings. The Bell Journal of Economics, 13(2), 311–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development: An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Scott, A., & Storper, M. (2003). Regions, globalization, development. Regional Studies, 37(6&7), 579–593.Google Scholar
  50. Segarra, A., & Callejón, M. (1999). Business dynamics and efficiency in industries and regions: The case of Spain. Small Business Economics, 13(4), 253–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Solow, R. M. (1956). A contribution to theory of economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 70(1), 65–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sternberg, R., & Wennekers, S. (2005). Determinants and effects of new business creation using global entrepreneurship monitor data. Small Business Economics, 24(3), 193–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
  54. van Stel, A., Carree, M., & Thurik, R. (2005). The effect of entrepreneurial activity on national economic growth. Small Business Economics, 24(3), 311–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. van Stel, A., & Storey, D. J. (2004). The link between firm births and job creation: Is there a upas tree effect? Regional Studies, 38(8), 893–909.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Vendrell-Herrero, F. (2008). Transfer of knowledge from the lab to the market: The idiosyncrasy of academic entrepreneurs. Unpublished Doctoral dissertation, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellatera.Google Scholar
  57. Wennekers, S., van Stel, A., Carree, M., & Thurik, R. (2010). The relationship between entrepreneurship and economic development: Is it U-shaped? Foundations and Trends® in Entrepreneurship, 6(3), 167–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Wennekers, S., van Stel, A., Thurik, R., & Reynolds, P. (2005). Nascent entrepreneurship and the level of economic development. Small Business Economics, 24, 293–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wong, P. K., Ho, Y. P., & Autio, E. (2005). Entrepreneurship, innovation and economic growth: Evidence from GEM data. Small Business Economics, 24(3), 335–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Zahra, S. A., Sapienza, H. J., & Davidsson, P. (2006). Entrepreneurship and dynamic capabilities: A review, model and research agenda. Journal of Management Studies, 43(4), 917–955.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • José L. González-Pernía
    • 1
  • Iñaki Peña-Legazkue
    • 1
  • Ferran Vendrell-Herrero
    • 1
  1. 1.Basque Institute of Competitiveness, and University of DeustoSan SebastiánSpain

Personalised recommendations