Small Business Economics

, Volume 39, Issue 4, pp 1043–1067 | Cite as

Turbulence underneath the big calm? The micro-evidence behind Italian productivity dynamics

  • Giovanni Dosi
  • Marco Grazzi
  • Chiara Tomasi
  • Alessandro Zeli
Article

Abstract

Italy ranked last in terms of manufacturing productivity growth according to OECD estimates over the last decade, with a flat, if not declining, trend. In this work we investigate the underlying firm-level dynamics of enterprises on the basis of a database developed by the Italian Statistical Office (ISTAT) covering the period 1989–2004 and containing information on more than 100,000 firms. Over this period not only have the indicators of the central tendency of the distribution of labor productivity not significantly changed, but also the whole sectoral distributions have remained relatively stable over time, with their support at least not shrinking, or even possibly widening, over time. This is even more surprising if one takes into consideration the “Euro” shock that occurred during the period investigated. On the contrary, we observe that inter-decile differences in productivity have been increasing. Further, heterogeneous firms’ characteristics (i.e. export activity and innovation) seem to have contributed to boosting such intra-industry differences. Given such wide heterogeneities we resort to quantile regressions to identify the impact of a set of regressors at different levels of the conditional distribution of labor productivity. One phenomenon that we observe is what we call a tendency toward “neo-dualism” involving the co-existence of a small group of dynamic firms with a bigger ensemble of much less technologically progressive ones.

Keywords

Productivity Firm dynamics Market selection Trade Euro introduction Quantile regressions 

JEL Classifications

C14 D20 F10 L10 L16 L25 

References

  1. Aw, B. Y., Roberts, M. J., & Xu, D. Y. (2008). R&D investments, exporting, and the evolution of firm productivity. American Economic Review, 98(2), 451–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baily, M. N., Hulten, C., & Campbell, D. (1992). Productivity dynamics in manufacturing establishments. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity: Microeconomics, 4, 187–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baldwin, R., Barba Navaretti, G., & Boeri, T. (2007). Come sta cambiando l’Italia, Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
  4. Banca d’Italia (2009). Rapporto sulle tendenze nel sistema produttivo italiano, Questioni di economia e finanza 45, Banca d’Italia.Google Scholar
  5. Bartelsman, E. J., & Dhrymes, P. J. (1998). Productivity dynamics: U.S. manufacturing plants, 1972–1986. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 9(1), 5–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bartelsman, E. J., & Doms, M. (2000). Understanding productivity: Lessons from longitudinal microdata. Journal of Economic Literature, 38(2), 569–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bernard, A. B., & Jensen, B. J. (1995). Exporters, jobs, and wages in US manufacturing: 1976–87. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity: Microeconomics, 1995, 67–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bernard, A. B., & Jensen, B. J. (1999). Exceptional exporter performance: Cause, effect, or both? Journal of International Economics, 47(1), 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bottazzi, G., Cefis, E., Dosi, G., & Secchi, A. (2007). Invariances and diversities in the evolution of Italian manufacturing industry. Small Business Economics, 29(1–2), 137–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bottazzi, G., Dosi, G., Jacoby, N., Secchi, A., & Tamagni, F. (2010). Corporate performances and market selection. some comparative evidence, Industrial and Corporate Change, 19(6), 1953–1996. forthcoming.Google Scholar
  11. Bottazzi, G., & Grazzi, M. (2010). Wage–size relation and the structure of work-force composition in italian manufacturing firms. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 34(4), 649–669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bottazzi, G., Grazzi, M., & Secchi, A. (2005). Input output scaling relations in Italian manufacturing firms. Physica A, 355, 95–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bottazzi, G., & Secchi, A. (forthcoming). Maximum likelihood estimation of the symmetric and asymmetric exponential power distribution, Industrial and Corporate Change.Google Scholar
  14. Bugamelli, M., Schivardi, F., & Zizza, R. (2010). The euro and firm restructuring. Europe and the Euro, NBER Chapters, National Bureau of Economic Research, pp. 99–138.Google Scholar
  15. Castellani, D., & Zanfei, A. (2007). Internationalisation, innovation and productivity: How do firms differ in Italy? The World Economy, 30(1), 156–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Clerides, S. K., Lach, S., & Tybout, J. R. (1998). Is learning by exporting important? micro-dynamic evidence from Colombia, Mexico, and Morocco. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113(3), 903–947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Coltorti, F. (2004). Le medie imprese industriali italiane: nuovi aspetti economici e finanziari. Economia e Politica Industriale, 121, 2–25.Google Scholar
  18. Davis, S. J., Haltiwanger, J. C., & Schuh, S. (1996). Job creation and destruction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  19. Dosi, G., Faillo, M., & Marengo, L. (2008). Organizational capabilities, patterns of knowledge accumulation and governance structures in business firms: an introduction. Organization Studies, 29, 1165–1185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dosi, G., & Grazzi, M. (2006). Technologies as problem-solving procedures and technologies as input–output relations: Some perspectives on the theory of production. Industrial and Corporate Change, 15(1), 173–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dosi, G., Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. (Eds.). (2000). The nature and dynamics of organizational capabilities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Dunne, T. (1994). Plant age and technology use in U.S. manufacturing industries. RAND Journal of Economics, 25(3), 488–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dunne, T., Roberts, M. J., & Samuelson, L. (1988). Patterns of firm entry and exit in U.S. manufacturing industries. Rand Journal of Economics, 19, 495–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dunne, T., Roberts, M. J., & Samuelson, L. (1989). The growth and failure of U.S. manufacturing plants. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 104(4), 671–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fligner, M. A., & Policello, G. E. (1981). Robust rank procedures for the Behrens–Fisher problem. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 76(373), 141–206.Google Scholar
  26. Foster, L., Haltiwanger, J., & Syverson, C. (2008). Reallocation, firm turnover, and efficiency: Selection on productivity or profitability?. American Economic Review, 98(1), 394–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Grazzi, M. (2009). Trade and profitability: Is there an export premium? Evidence from Italian manufacturing firms, LEM Papers Series 2009/16, Laboratory of Economics and Management (LEM), Sant’Anna School of Advanced Studies, Pisa, Italy.Google Scholar
  28. Grazzi, M., Sanzo, R., Secchi, A., & Zeli, A. (2009). Micro.3 some notes on the development of the integrated system of data 1989-2004, Documenti n. 11, Istat.Google Scholar
  29. Hall, B. H., & Mairesse, J. (1995). Exploring the relationship between R&D and productivity in french manufacturing firms. Journal of Econometrics, 65(1), 263–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Haltiwanger, J. C., Lane, J. I., & Spletzer, J. R. (1999). Productivity differences across employers: The roles of employer size, age, and human capital. American Economic Review, 89(2), 94–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Koenker, R. (2005). Quantile regression, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Koenker, R., & Basset, G. W. (1978). Regression quantiles. Econometrica, 46, 33–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lanza, A., & Quintieri, B. (Eds) (2007). Eppur si muove. Come cambia l’export italiano. Soveria Mannelli: Rubbettino.Google Scholar
  34. Lilien, D. (1982). Sectoral shifts and cyclical unemployment. Journal of Political Economy, 90, 773–793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mediobanca–Unioncamere (2008). Le medie imprese industriali italiane (1996-2005), Technical report, Mediobanca–Unioncamere. http://www.mbres.it.
  36. Merton, R. K. (1968). The matthew effect in science. Science, 159(3810), 56–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. OECD. (2008). Compendium of productivity indicators. Cedex, France: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
  38. Pavitt, K. (1984). Sectoral pattern of technical change: Towards a taxonomy and a theory. Research Policy, 13, 343–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Roberts, M. J., & Tybout, J. R. (1997). The decision to export in colombia: An empirical model of entry with sunk costs. American Economic Review, 87(4), 545–64.Google Scholar
  40. Rossi, S. (2009). Controtempo. L’Italia nella crisi mondiale. Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
  41. Serti, F., & Tomasi, C. (2008). Self-selection and post-entry effects of exports: Evidence from Italian manufacturing firms. Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), 144(4), 660–694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Subbotin, M. F. (1923). On the law of frequency of errors. Matematicheskii Sbornik, 31, 296–301.Google Scholar
  43. Teece, D. J., Rumelt, R., Dosi, G., & Winter, S. (1994). Understanding corporate coherence: Theory and evidence. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 23(1), 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Winter, S. G. (1987). Knowledge and competences as strategic assets. In D. J. Teece (Eds.), The competitive challenge: Strategy and organization for Industrial Innovation and renewal. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.Google Scholar
  45. Wooldridge, J. M. (2002). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Giovanni Dosi
    • 1
  • Marco Grazzi
    • 1
  • Chiara Tomasi
    • 1
    • 2
  • Alessandro Zeli
    • 3
  1. 1.LEM, Scuola Superiore Sant’AnnaPisaItaly
  2. 2.Department of EconomicsUniversity of TrentoTrentoItaly
  3. 3.ISTATRomaItaly

Personalised recommendations