Small Business Economics

, Volume 39, Issue 2, pp 473–493 | Cite as

Part-time entrepreneurship and financial constraints: evidence from the Panel Study of Entrepreneurial Dynamics

Article

Abstract

To date, entrepreneurship literature overlooks part-time entrepreneurs, i.e., those who devote time to entrepreneurial ventures and wage employment at the same time. In contrast, recent evidence from the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor, a large cross-national study on the level of entrepreneurial activity, establishes that 80% of nascent entrepreneurs also hold regular wage jobs. This paper offers a model of entrepreneurial entry under financial constraints where individuals choose between wage employment, part-time, and full-time entrepreneurship. Those who become nascent entrepreneurs must further decide how much capital to invest and what proportion of time to spend in business. I test this model using data from the Panel Study of Entrepreneurial Dynamics, which covers start-ups and nascent entrepreneurs. My findings show that part-time entrepreneurs are not affected by financial constraints. The analysis suggests that industry barriers, risk aversion, and learning by doing might be other factors worth investigating.

Keywords

Entrepreneurial entry Part-time entrepreneurship Full-time entrepreneurship Wage employment Nascent entrepreneurs Financial constraints 

JEL Classifications

C21 J22 J23 J24 M13 

References

  1. Acs, Z., Arenius, P., Hay, M., & Minniti, M. (2004). Global Entrepreneurship Monitor Executive Report (pp. 29–31). Babson Park: Babson College and London Business School.Google Scholar
  2. Ashcroft, B., Holden, D., & Law, K. (2009). Entrepreneurial interest, vision, and the self-employment choice decision in UK regions. Regional Studies, 43, 1075–1090.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bates, T. (1999). Exiting self-employment: An analysis of Asian immigrant-owned small businesses. Small Business Economics, 13, 171–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Blanchflower, D., & Oswald, A. (1998). What makes an entrepreneur? Journal of Labor Economics, 16, 26–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bergmann, H., & Sternberg, R. (2007). The changing face of entrepreneurship in Germany. Small Business Economics, 28, 205–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Blumberg, B., & Letterie, W. (2008). Business starters and credit rationing. Small Business Economics, 30, 187–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bosma, N., & Harding, R. (2006). Global entrepreneurship monitor summary results (pp. 20–21). Babson Park: Babson College and London Business School.Google Scholar
  8. Box, G. E. P., & Cox. D. R. (1964). An analysis of transformations. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society B, 26, 211–243.Google Scholar
  9. Brush, C. G., & Vanderwerf, P. A. (1992). A comparison of methods and sources for obtaining estimates of new venture performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 7, 175–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Burke, A. E., FitzRoy, F. R., & Nolan, M. A. (2002). Self-employment wealth and job creation: The role of gender, non-pecuniary motivation and entrepreneurial ability. Small Business Economics, 19, 255–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Caliendo, M., & Kritikos, A. (2010). Start-ups by the unemployed: Characteristics, survival and direct employment effects. Small Business Economics, 35, 71–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Caliendo, M., Fossen, F., & Kritikos, A. (2009). Risk attitudes of nascent entrepreneurs: New evidence from an experimentally validated survey. Small Business Economics, 32, 153–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Carod, J. M. A., Solís, D. L., & Bofarull, M. M. (2008). New business formation and employment growth: Some evidence for the Spanish Manufacturing Industry. Small Business Economics, 30, 73–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Clark, K., & Drinkwater, S. (2000) Pushed out or pulled in? Self-employment among ethnic minorities in England and Wales. Labor Economics, 7, 603–628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Colombier, N., & Masclet, D. (2008). Intergenerational correlation in self employment: Some further evidence from French ECHP data. Small Business Economics, 30, 423–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cressy, R. (1996). Are business start-ups debt rationed? Economic Journal, 106, 1253–1270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dahlin, K., Taylor, M., & Fichman, M. (2004). Today’s Edisons or weekend hobbyists: Technical merit and success of inventions by independent inventors. Research Policy, 33, 1167–1183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Davidson, P. (2006). Nascent entrepreneurship: Empirical studies and developments. Foundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship, 2, 1–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. De Wit, G., & Van Winden, E. (1986). An empirical analysis of self-employment in the Netherlands. Economics Letters, 32, 97–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dolton, P. J., & Makepeace, G. H. (1990). Self-employment among graduates. Bulletin of Economic Research, 42, 35–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dunn, T., & Holtz-Eakin, D. (2000). Financial capital, human capital, and the transition to self-employment: Evidence from intergenerational links. Journal of Labor Economics, 18, 282–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Evans, D., & Jovanovic, B. (1989). An estimated model of entrepreneurial choice under liquidity constraints. Journal of Political Economy, 97, 808–827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Evans, D., & Leighton, L. (1989). Some empirical aspects of entrepreneurship. The American Economic Review, 79, 519–535.Google Scholar
  24. Freel, M. S. (2007). Are small innovators credit rationed? Small Business Economics 28, 22–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Frith, K. (2007). Fickle rooster productions: Making a business from a hobby. The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 8, 149–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gartner, W., Shaver, K., Carter, N., & Reynolds, P. (Eds.). (2004). Handbook of entrepreneurial dynamics. The process of business creation. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  27. Gentry, W., & Hubbard, R. G. (2000). Entrepreneurship and household savings. American Economic Review, 90, 283–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Harada, N. (2002). Productivity and entrepreneurial characteristics in New Japanese firms. Small Business Economics, 23, 299–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Harada, N., & Kijima, K. (2005). Consumption–leisure preference structure: A new explanation of the Evans–Jovanovic results for entrepreneurial choice. Small Business Economics, 24, 423–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hausman, J. A. (1978). Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica, 46, 1251–1271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hausman, J. A., & McFadden, D. L. (1984). Specification tests for the multinomial logit model. Econometrica, 52, 1219–1240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Henley, A. (2005) Job creation by the self-employed: The roles of entrepreneurial and financial capital. Small Business Economics, 25, 175–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Holtz-Eakin, D., Joulfaian, D., & Rosen, H. (1994) Sticking it out: Entrepreneurial survival and liquidity constraints. Journal of Political Economy, 102, 53–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hurst, E., & Lusardi, A. (2004). Liquidity constraints, household wealth, and entrepreneurship. Journal of Political Economy, 112, 319–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hyytinen, A., & Vnnen, L. (2006). Where do financial constraints originate from? An empirical analysis of adverse selection and moral hazard in capital markets. Small Business Economics, 27, 323–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kihlstrom, R., & Laffont, J. J. (1979). A general equilibrium entrepreneurial theory of firm formation based on risk-aversion. Journal of Political Economy, 87, 719–748.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kim, P., Aldrich, H., & Keister, L. (2006). Access (not) denied: The impact of financial, human, and cultural capital on entrepreneurial entry in the United States. Small Business Economics, 27, 5—22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Knight, F. (1921). Risk, uncertainty, and profit. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.Google Scholar
  39. Koellinger, P. (2008). Why are some entrepreneurs more innovative than others? Small Business Economics, 31, 21–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Liao, J., & Gartner, W. (2006). The effects of pre-venture plan timing and perceived environmental uncertainty on the persistence of emerging firms. Small Business Economics, 27, 23–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lucas, R. E., Jr. (1978). On the size distribution of business firms. Bell Journal of Economics, 9, 508–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Maddala, G. S. (1983). Limited-dependent and qualitative variables in econometrics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Minniti, M., Bygrave, D., & Autio, E. (2005). Global Entrepreneurship Monitor Executive Report (pp. 32–34). Babson Park: Babson College and London Business School.Google Scholar
  44. Newman, A. (2007). Risk-bearing and entrepreneurship. Journal of Economic Theory, 137, 11–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Oliveira, B., & Fortunato, A. (2007). Firm growth and liquidity constraints: A dynamic analysis. Small Business Economics, 27, 139–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Parker, S. C. (2000). Saving to overcome borrowing constraints: Implications for small business entry and exit. Small Business Economics, 15, 223–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Parker, S., & Belghitar, Y. (2006). What happens to nascent entrepreneurs? An econometric analysis of the PSED. Small Business Economics, 27, 81–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Rees, H., & Shah, A. (1986). An empirical analysis of self-employment in the UK. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 1, 95–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Reynolds, P. (2009). Screening item effects in estimating the prevalence of nascent entrepreneurs. Small Business Economics, 33, 151–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Reynolds, P., Bygrave, W., & Autio, E. (2003). Global Entrepreneurship Monitor Executive Report (pp. 40–41). Babson Park/Kansas: Babson College, London Business School/Kaufman Foundation.Google Scholar
  51. Reynolds, P. D., Carter, N. M., Gartner, W. B., & Greene, P. G. (2004). The prevalence of nascent entrepreneurs in the United States: Evidence from the Panel Study of Entrepreneurial Dynamics. Small Business Economics, 23, 263–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Rosti, L., & Chelli, F. (2005). Gender discrimination, entrepreneurial talent and self-employment. Small Business Economics, 24, 131–142.Google Scholar
  53. Samuelsson, M., & Davidsson, P. (2009). Does venture opportunity variation matter? Investigating systematic process differences between innovative and imitative new ventures. Small Business Economics, 33, 229–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Train, K. E. (2003). Discrete choice methods with simulation. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. van Gelderen, M., Thurik, R., & Bosma, N. (2006). Success and risk factors in the pre-startup phase. Small Business Economics, 26, 319–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Wagner, J. (2007). What a difference a Y makes—Female and male nascent entrepreneurs in Germany. Small Business Economics, 28, 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wennberg, K., & Lindqvist, G. (2010). The effect of clusters on the survival and performance of new firms. Small Business Economics, 34, 221–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Wu, B., & Knott, A. M. (2006) Entrepreneurial risk and market entry. Management Science, 52, 1315–1330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Xu, B. (1998). A re-estimation of the Evans—Jovanovic entrepreneurial choice model. Economic Letters, 58, 91–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Economics and FinanceState University of New York, College at PlattsburghPlattsburghUSA

Personalised recommendations