Advertisement

Small Business Economics

, Volume 38, Issue 1, pp 33–49 | Cite as

Entrepreneurial orientation in family firms: a generational perspective

  • Cristina Cruz
  • Mattias NordqvistEmail author
Article

Abstract

We adopt a generational perspective to investigate entrepreneurial orientation (EO) in family firms. We test a model that determines how the influence on EO of external factors and internal factors differs in first-, second- and third-and-beyond-generation family firms. We argue that while the founder is vital in the first generation, EO is more subject to interpretations of the competitive environment in the second generation and that in the third generation and beyond, access to non-family resources drives EO to a greater extent. Our findings show that perceptions of the competitive environment and EO correlate differently in family firms, depending on the generation in charge, and it is generally stronger in second-generation family firms. Further, we find that non-family managers on the top management team makes a positive difference for EO only in the third-generation and beyond family firms. The significance of non-family investors’ on EO is particularly strong in third-generation-and-beyond firms.

Keywords

Entrepreneurial orientation Family businesses Generation Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) 

JEL Classifications

L26 M1 M10 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the four guest editors and two reviewers for their constructive and helpful feedback on previous versions of this article. Mattias Nordqvist thanks The Bank of Sweden Tercentenary Foundation and Center for Family Enterprise and Ownership (CeFEO) for generous financial support.

References

  1. Aldrich, H. E., & Cliff, J. E. (2003). The pervasive effects of family on entrepreneurship: Toward a family embeddedness perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 573–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Astrachan, J. H., & Kolenko, T. A. (1994). A neglected factor in family business success: Human resources practices. Family Business Review, 7(3), 257–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Astrachan, J. H., & McConaughy, D. (2001). Venture capitalists and closely held IPOs: Lessons for family-controlled firms. Family Business Review, 14(4), 295–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bammens, Y., Voorderckers, W., & Van Gils, A. (2008). Boards of directors in family firms: A generational perspective. Small Business Economics, 31, 163–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blake, C. G., & Saleh, S. D. (1995). A model of family owned small business performance. Family Business Annual, 1(Section I), 22–30.Google Scholar
  6. Bourgeois, L. J. (1981). On the measurement of organizational slack. Academy of Management Review, 6, 29–39.Google Scholar
  7. Brun de Pontet, S., Wrosch, C., & Gagne, M. (2007). An exploration of the generational differences in levels of control held among family businesses approaching succession. Family Business Review, 20(4), 337–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cabrera-Suarez, K., Saa-Perez, P. D., & Almeida, D. G. (2001). The succession process from a resource- and knowledge-based view of the family firm. Family Business Review, 14(1), 37–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cameron, K. (1978). Measuring organizational effectiveness in institutions of higher education. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23, 604–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Carney, M. (2005). Corporate governance and competitive advantage in family-controlled firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29, 249–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Coleman, S., & Carsky, M. (1999). Sources of capital for small family-owned businesses: Evidence from the national survey of small business finances. Family Business Review, 12, 73–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Covin, J., & Slevin, D. (1989). Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environments. Strategic Management Journal, 10, 75–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Covin, J., & Slevin, D. (1991). A conceptual model of entrepreneurship as firm behavior. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 16, 7–25.Google Scholar
  14. Davis, P., & Harveston, P. (1999). In the founder’s shadow: Conflict in the family firm. Family Business Review, 12, 311–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dess, G. G., & Rasheed, A. (1991). Conceptualizing and measuring organizational environments: A critique and suggestions. Journal of Management, 17, 701–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dess, G. G., Lumpkin, G. T., & Covin, J. G. (1997). Entrepreneurial strategy making and firm performance: Tests of contingency and configurational models. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 677–695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ensley, M. D., & Pearson, A. W. (2005). An exploratory comparison of the behavioral dynamics of top management teams in family and nonfamily new ventures: cohesion, conflict, potency, and consensus. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, May, 267–284.Google Scholar
  18. Gallo, M., & Villaseca, A. (1996). Finance in family business. Family Business Review, 9, 387–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gersick, K. E., Davis, J. A., McCollom-Hampton, M., & Lansberg, I. (1997). Generation to generation: Life cycles of the family business. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Scholl Press.Google Scholar
  20. Greiner, L. E. (1972). Evolution and revolution as organisations grow. Harvard Business Review, 4, 37–46.Google Scholar
  21. Habbershon, T. G., & Pistrui, J. (2002). Enterprising families domain: Family-influenced ownership groups in pursuit of transgenerational wealth. Family Business Review, 15(3), 223–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Habbershon, T. G., & Williams, M. (1999). A resource-based framework for assessing the strategic advantages of family firms. Family Business Review, 12, 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hall, A., Melin, L., & Nordqvist, M. (2001). Entrepreneurship as radical change in family business: Exploring the role of cultural patterns. Family Business Review, 14(3), 193–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Handler, W. C. (1992). The succession experience of the next generation. Family Business Review, 5(3), 283–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Harrison, R., & Mason, C. (1992). International perspectives on the supply of informal venture capital. Journal of Business Venturing, 7, 459–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hollander, B., & Ellman, N. (1988). Family-owned businesses: An emerging field of inquiry. Family Business Review, 1(1), 145–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hoy, F. (2006). The complicating factor of life cycles in corporate venturing. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30, 831–836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jaffe, D., & Lane, S. (2004). Sustaining a family dynasty: Key issues facing complex multigenerational business- and investment-owning families. Family Business Review, 17, 81–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jennings, R., & Lumpkin, G. T. (1989). Functioning modelling corporate entrepreneurship. Journal of Small Business Management, 30, 12–23.Google Scholar
  30. Keats, B. W., & Hitt, M. A. (1988). A causal model of linkages among environmental dimensions, macro organizational characteristics, and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 31, 570–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kellermanns, F. W., & Eddleston, K. A. (2006). Corporate entrepreneurship in family firms: A family perspective. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30, 809–830.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kellermanns, F. W., Eddleston, K. A., Barnett, T., & Pearson, A. (2008). An exploratory study of family member characteristics and involvement: Effects on entrepreneurial behavior in the family firm. Family Business Review, 21(1), 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kelly, L., Athanassiou, N., & Crittenden, W. (2000). Founder centrality and strategic behavior in the family-owned firm. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 25, 27–42.Google Scholar
  34. Lévesque, M., & Minniti, M. (2006). The effect of aging on entrepreneurial behavior. Journal of Business Venturing, 21, 177–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Litz, R. A., & Kleysen, R. F. (2001). Your old men shall dream dreams, your young men shall see visions: Toward a theory of family firm innovation with help from the Brubeck family. Family Business Review, 14(4), 335–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. G. (1996). Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of Management Review, 21, 135–173.Google Scholar
  37. Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. G. (2001). Linking two dimensions of entrepreneurial orientation to firm performance: The moderating role of environment and industry life cycle. Journal of Business Venturing, 16, 429–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lyon, D. W., Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. G. (2000). Enhancing entrepreneurial orientation research: Operationalizing and measuring a key strategic decision making process. Journal of Management, 26(5), 1055–1085.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Martin, W., & Lumpkin, G. T. (2003). From entrepreneurial orientation to family orientation: generational differences in the management of family businesses. Paper presented at the Babson College Entrepreneurship Research Conference, Babson College, Wellesley, MA, USA.Google Scholar
  40. Mason, C. M., & Harrison, R. T. (2000). Is it worth it? The rates of return from informal venture capital investments. Journal of Business Venturing, 17(3), 211–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. McConaughy, D. L., & Phillips, G. M. (1999). Founders versus descendants: The profitability, efficiency, growth characteristics and financing in large, public, founding-family-controlled firms. Family Business Review, 12, 123–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Miller, D. (1983). The correlates of entrepreneurship in three types of firms. Management Science, 29, 770–792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Mintzberg, H. (1973). Strategy-making in three modes. California Management Review, 16, 44–78.Google Scholar
  44. Mintzberg, H., & Waters, J. A. (1983). The mind of the strategist. In S. Srivastva (Ed.), The executive mind (pp. 58–83). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
  45. Miskin, V., & Rose, J. (1999). Women entrepreneurs: Factors related to success. In N. Churchill, et al. (Eds.), Frontiers of entrepreneurship research (pp. 27–38). Wellesley, MA: Babson College.Google Scholar
  46. Naldi, L., Nordqvist, M., Sjöberg, K., & Wiklund, J. (2007). Entrepreneurial orientation, risk taking and performance in family firms. Family Business Review, 10, 33–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Nordqvist, M., Habbershon, T. G., & Melin, L. (2008). Transgenerational entrepreneurship: Exploring entrepreneurial orientation in family firms. In H. Landström, D. Smallbone, H. Crijns, & E. Laveren (Eds.), Entrepreneurship, sustainable growth and performance: Frontiers in European entrepreneurship research (pp. 93–116). London: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  48. Olson, P., Zuiker, V. S., Danes, S. M., Stafford, K., Heck, R. K. Z., & Duncan, K. A. (2003). The impact of family and business on family business sustainability. Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 639–666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Peiser, R., & Wooten, L. (1983). Life-cycle changes in small family businesses. Business Horizons, 26(3), 58–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Posakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1986). Self reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12, 531–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Rauch, A., Wiklund, J., Lumpkin, G. T., & Freese, M. (2009). Entrepreneurial orientation and business performance: Cumulative empirical evidence. Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice, 33(3), 761–781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Romanelli, E. (1987). New venture strategies in the minicomputer industry. California Management Review, Fall, 160–173.Google Scholar
  53. Salvato, C. (2004). Predictors of entrepreneurship in family firms. Journal of Private Equity, 7(3), 68–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Schein, E. (1983). The role of the founder in creating organizational culture. Organizational Dynamics, 14, 23–45.Google Scholar
  55. Schulze, W., Lubatkin, M., & Dino, R. (2003). Toward a theory of agency and altruism in family firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 473–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sharma, P. (2004). An overview of the field of family business studies: Current status and directions for future. Family Business Review, 17(1), 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Sharma, P., Chrisman, J., & Chua, J. (1997). Strategic management of the family business: Past research and future challenges. Family Business Review, 10, 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Sirmon, D., & Hitt, M. (2003). Managing resources: Linking unique resources, management and wealth creation in family firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27, 339–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Sonfield, M., & Lussier, R. (2004). First-, second-, and third-generation family firms: A comparison. Family Business Review, 17, 189–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Steier, L. (2003). Variants of agency contracts in family financed ventures: The multiple roles of family. Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 597–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Stevenson, H., & Jarillo, J. (1990). A perspective of entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurial management. Strategic Management Journal, 11, 17–27.Google Scholar
  62. Tasi, W. (2001). Knowledge transfer in intraorganizational networks: Effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 996–1004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Upton, N., & Petty, W. (2000). Venture capital investment and US family business. Venture Capital, 2, 27–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Vilaseca, A. (2002). The shareholder role in the family business: Conflict of interests and objectives between nonemployed shareholders and top management team. Family Business Review, 15(4), 299–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Ward, J. (1997). Growing the family business: Special challenges and best practices. Family Business Review, 10, 323–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Westhead, P., & Howorth, C. (2007). Types of private family firms: An exploratory conceptual and empirical analysis. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 19, 405–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Wiklund, J. (1998). Small firm growth and performance: Entrepreneurship and beyond. Published Doctoral Dissertation, Jönköping: Jönköping International Business School, Sweden.Google Scholar
  68. Wiklund, J., & Shepherd, D. (2003). Knowledge-based resources, entrepreneurial orientation and the performance of small and medium-sized businesses. Strategic Management Journal, 24, 1307–1314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Wiklund, J., & Shepherd, D. (2005). Entrepreneurial orientation and small business performance: a configurational approach. Journal of Business Venturing, 20, 71–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Zahra, S. A. (1991). Predictors and financial outcomes of corporate entrepreneurship: An explorative study. Journal of Business Venturing, 6, 259–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Zahra, S. A. (1996). Governance, ownership, and corporate entrepreneurship: The moderating impact of industry technological opportunities. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 1713–1735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Zahra, S. A. (2005). Entrepreneurial risk taking in family firms. Family Business Review, 18, 23–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Zahra, S. A., Hayton, J., & Salvato, C. (2004). Entrepreneurship in family vs. non-family firms: A resource based analysis of the effect of organizational culture. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28, 363–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Instituto de EmpresaMadridSpain
  2. 2.Jönköping International Business SchoolJönköpingSweden

Personalised recommendations