Advertisement

Small Business Economics

, Volume 36, Issue 4, pp 401–418 | Cite as

Creative destruction and regional productivity growth: evidence from the Dutch manufacturing and services industries

  • Niels Bosma
  • Erik Stam
  • Veronique Schutjens
Article

Abstract

Do firm entry and exit improve the competitiveness of regions? If so, is this a universal mechanism or is it contingent on the type of industry or region in which creative destruction takes place? This paper analyses the effect of firm entry and exit on the competitiveness of regions, as measured by total factor productivity (TFP) growth. Based on a study across 40 regions in the Netherlands over the period 1988–2002, we find that firm entry is related to productivity growth in services, but not in manufacturing. The positive impact found in services does not necessarily imply that new firms are more efficient than incumbent firms; high degrees of creative destruction may also improve the efficiency of incumbent firms. We also find that the impact of firm dynamics on regional productivity in services is higher in regions exhibiting diverse but related economic activities.

Keywords

Firm entry Firm exit Regional competitiveness Total factor productivity Turbulence 

JEL Classifications

L10 L26 M13 O18 R11 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Koen Frenken, Michael Fritsch, Frank Neffke, Richard Nelson, Roderik Ponds, André van Stel and two anonymous referees for comments on previous versions. Previous versions of this paper have been presented at the International Schumpeter Society Conference 2006 (Sophia-Antipolis, Nice, 21-24 June 2006), and the DIME Workshop “Policy Implications from Recent Advances in the Economics of Innovation and Industrial Dynamics” (Open University London, 15-16 December 2006). All errors are those of the authors.

References

  1. Acs, Z. J., & Armington, C. (2004). Employment growth and entrepreneurial activity in cities. Regional Studies, 38(8), 911–927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Agarwal, R., Audretsch, D. B., & Sarkar, M. B. (2007). The process of creative construction: Knowledge spillovers, entrepreneurship and economic growth. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 1, 263–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aghion, P., & Bessonova, E. (2006). On entry and growth: Theory and evidence. Revue de l’OFCE, 2006, 259–278.Google Scholar
  4. Andersson, M., & Noseleit, F. (this issue). Start-ups and employment dynamics within and across sectors. Small Business Economics. doi: 10.1007/s11187-009-9252-0.
  5. Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Review of Economic Studies, 58, 277–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Audretsch, D. B., & Fritsch, M. (1994). On the measurement of entry rates. Empirica, 21(1), 105–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Audretsch, D. B., & Fritsch, M. (2002). Growth regimes over time and space. Regional Studies, 36, 113–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Audretsch, D. B., & Keilbach, M. (2004a). Does entrepreneurship capital matter? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28(5), 419–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Audretsch, D. B., & Keilbach, M. (2004b). Entrepreneurship capital and economic performance. Regional Studies, 38, 949–959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Audretsch, D. B., Klomp, L., Santarelli, E., & Thurik, A. R. (2004). Gibrat’s law: Are the services different? Review of Industrial Organization, 24(3), 301–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Baily, M. N., & Chakrabarti, A. K. (1985). Innovation and productivity in US industry. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2, 609–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Baily, M. N., Hulten, C. & Campbell, D. (1992). Productivity dynamics in manufacturing plants. Brookings papers on economic activity: Microeconomics, 187–267.Google Scholar
  13. Baldwin, J. R., & Gu, W. (2006). Plant turnover and productivity growth in Canadian manufacturing. Industrial and Corporate Change, 15(3), 417–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bartelsman, E. J. (2004). Firm dynamics and innovation in the Netherlands; A comment on Baumol. De Economist, 152(3), 353–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bartelsman, E. J., & Doms, M. (2000). Understanding productivity: Lessons from longitudinal microdata. Journal of Economic Literature, 38, 569–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bartelsman, E. J., Scarpatta, S., & Schivardi, F. (2005). Comparative analysis of firm demographics and survival: Evidence from micro-level sources in OECD countries. Industrial and Corporate Change, 14, 365–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Baumol, W. J. (2004). Four sources of innovation and stimulation of growth in the Dutch economy. De Economist, 152(3), 321–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Blundell, R., & Bond, S. (1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 87, 115–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Bosma, N. S., De Wit, D., & Carree, M. A. (2005). Modeling entrepreneurship: Unifying the equilibrium and entry/exit approach. Small Business Economics, 25(1), 35–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Bosma, N. S., & Schutjens, V. A. J. M. (2007). Outlook on Europe: Patterns of promising entrepreneurial activity in European regions. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 98(5), 675–686.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Bosma, N. S, Suddle, K. & Schutjens, V. A. J. M. (2008a). Whither a flat landscape? Regional differences in entrepreneurship in the Netherlands. Zoetermeer: EIM. (EIM Scales Paper, no. H200805).Google Scholar
  22. Bosma, N. S., Van Stel, A. J., & Suddle, K. (2008b). The geography of new firm formation: Evidence from independent start-ups and new subsidiaries in the Netherlands. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 4(2), 129–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Braunerhjelm, P., & Borgman, B. (2004). Geographical concentration, entrepreneurship and regional growth: Evidence from regional data in Sweden, 1975–99. Regional Studies, 38(8), 929–947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Breschi, S. & Lissoni, F. (2003). Mobility and social networks: Localised knowledge spillovers revisited. CESPRI Working Papers 142. Milan: CESPRI (Centre for Research on Innovation and Internationalisation)Google Scholar
  25. Callejón, M., & Segarra, A. (1999). Business dynamics and efficiency in industries and regions: The case of Spain. Small Business Economics, 13, 253–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Camagni, R. (2002). On the concept of territorial competitiveness: Sound or misleading? Urban Studies, 39(13), 2395–2411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Carlin, W., Haskel, J., & Seabright, P. (2001). Understanding ‘the essential fact about capitalism’: Markets, competition and creative destruction. National Institute Economic Review, 175, 67–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Carree, M. A., & Nijkamp, J. (2001). Deregulation in retailing: The Dutch experience. Journal of Economics and Business, 53(2–3), 225–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Carree, M. A., & Thurik, A. R. (2003). The impact of entrepreneurship on economic growth. In Z. J. Acs & D. B. Audretsch (Eds.), Handbook of entrepreneurship research (pp. 437–472). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  30. Castells, M., & Hall, P. (1994). Technopoles of the world: The making of 21st century industrial complexes. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  31. Caves, R. (1998). Industrial organization and new findings on the turnover and mobility of firms. Journal of Economic Literature, 36, 1947–1982.Google Scholar
  32. Dejardin, M. (this issue). Linking net entry to regional economic growth. Small Business Economics. doi: 10.1007/s11187-009-9255-x.
  33. Eliasson, G. (1996). Firm objectives, controls and organization. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  34. Feldman, M. P. (2001). The entrepreneurial event revisited: Firm formation in a regional context. Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(4), 861–891.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Frenken, K., Van Oort, F., & Verburg, T. (2007). Related variety, unrelated variety and regional economic growth. Regional Studies, 41(5), 685–697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Fritsch, M. (2008). How does new business formation affect regional development? Introduction to the special issue. Small Business Economics, 30(1), 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Fritsch, M., & Mueller, P. (2004). The effects of new business formation on regional development over time. Regional Studies, 38, 961–975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Fritsch, M., & Schmude, J. (Eds.). (2006). Entrepreneurship in the Region. International Studies in Entrepreneurship (Vol. 14). New York: Springer Science.Google Scholar
  39. Fritsch, M., & Schroeter, A. (this issue). Why does the effect of new business formation differ across regions? Small Business Economics. doi: 10.1007/s11187-009-9256-9.
  40. Geroski, P. A. (1989). Entry, innovation and productivity growth. Review of Economics and Statistics, 71, 572–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Glaeser, E. L., Kallal, H. D., Scheinkman, J. A., & Shleifer, A. (1992). Growth in cities. Journal of Political Economy, 100(6), 1126–1152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Griliches, Z., & Lichtenberg, F. (1984). Productivity and R&D at the firm level. In Z. Griliches (Ed.), R&D, patents and productivity (pp. 330–374). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  43. Hall, B. H., & Mairesse, J. (1995). Exploring the relationship between R&D and productivity in French manufacturing firms. Journal of Econometrics, 65, 263–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Inklaar, R., O’Mahony, M., Robinson, C., & Timmer, M. P. (2003). Productivity and competitiveness in the EU and the US. In M. O’Mahony & B. van der Ark (Eds.), EU productivity and competitiveness: An industry perspective (pp. 73–147). Luxembourg: Office for Official Publication of the European Communities.Google Scholar
  45. Jacobs, J. (1969). The economy of cities. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  46. Jaffe, A. B., Trajtenberg, M., & Henderson, R. (1993). Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(3), 577–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Jovanovic, B. (1982). Selection and the evolution of industry. Econometrica, 50, 649–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Kitson, M., Martin, R., & Tyler, P. (2004). Regional competitiveness: An elusive yet key concept? Regional Studies, 38(9), 991–999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Kleinknecht, A. (1998). Is labor market flexibility harmful to innovation? Cambridge Journal of Economics, 22, 387–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Kleinknecht, A., & Poot, T. (1992). Do regions matter for R&D? Regional Studies, 26, 221–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Kloosterman, R. C. (2003). Creating opportunities. Policies aimed at increasing openings for immigrant entrepreneurs in the Netherlands. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 15(2), 167–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Koster, S. (this issue). Individual foundings and organizational foundings: Their effect on employment growth in The Netherlands. Small Business Economics. doi: 10.1007/s11187-009-9253-z.
  53. Krugman, P. (1990). The age of diminished expectations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  54. Krugman, P. (2005). Second winds for industrial regions? In D. Coyle, W. Alexander, & B. Ashcroft (Eds.), New wealth for old nations: Scotland’s economic prospects (pp. 35–47). Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  55. Liu, L. (1993). Entry-exit, learning, and productivity change evidence from Chile. Journal of Development Economics, 42(2), 217–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Madsen, J. B., & Damania, R. (2001). Labor demand and wage-induced innovations: Evidence from the OECD countries. International Review of Applied Economics, 15(3), 323–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Metcalfe, J. S. (2002). Knowledge of growth and growth of knowledge. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 12, 3–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Michelacci, C., & Silva, O. (2007). Why so many local entrepreneurs? The Review of Economics and Statistics, 89(4), 615–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Porter, M. E. (1990). The competitive advantage of nations. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  60. Porter, M. E. (1998). On competition. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  61. Porter, M. E. (2000). Location, competition and economic development: Local clusters in the global economy. Economic Development Quarterly, 14, 15–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Robinson, C., O’Leary, B., & Rincon, A. (2006). Business start-ups, closures and economic churn. A review of the literature. London: National Institute of Economic and Social Research.Google Scholar
  63. Roodman, D. (2006). How to do xtabond2: An introduction to “difference” and “system” GMM in Stata. (Working paper 103. Washington, DC: Center for Global Development.Google Scholar
  64. Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  65. Schumpeter, J. A. (1942). Capitalism, socialism and democracy. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  66. Schutjens, V., & Stam, E. (2003). The evolution and nature of young firm networks: A longitudinal perspective. Small Business Economics, 21, 115–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Shane, S. (2009). Why encouraging more people to become entrepreneurs is bad public policy. Small Business Economics, 33, 141–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Stam, E. (2007). Why butterflies don’t leave: Locational behavior of entrepreneurial firms. Economic Geography, 83(1), 27–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Stam, E., & Wennberg, K. (2009). The role of R&D in new firm growth. Small Business Economics, 33, 77–89.Google Scholar
  70. Stevenson, L., & Lundström, A. (2001). Patterns and trends in entrepreneurship/SME policy and practice in ten economies. Entrepreneurship Policy for the Future Series 3. Stockholm: Swedish Foundation for Small Business Research.Google Scholar
  71. Storper, M. (1997). The regional world: Territorial development in a global economy. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  72. Van Ark, B., Monnikhof, E., & Mulder, N. (1999). Productivity in services: An international comparative perspective. Canadian Journal of Economics, 33(2), 471–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Van Oort, F. (2002). Agglomeration, economic growth and innovation; Spatial analysis of growth- and R&D externalities in the Netherlands. PhD thesis. Rotterdam: Tinbergen Institute, Erasmus University.Google Scholar
  74. Van Stel, A. J., & Nieuwenhuijsen, H. R. (2004). Knowledge spill overs and economic growth: An analysis using data of Dutch regions in the period 1987–1995. Regional Studies, 38, 393–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Van Stel, A. J., & Storey, D. J. (2004). The link between firm births and job creation: Is there a upas tree effect? Regional Studies, 38, 893–909.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Van Stel, A. J., & Suddle, K. (2008). The impact of new firm formation on regional development in the Netherlands. Small Business Economics, 30(1), 31–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Wennekers, A. R. M. (2006), Entrepreneurship at country level; Economic and non-economic determinants. PhD thesis. Rotterdam: Erasmus University.Google Scholar
  78. Wennekers, A. R. M., & Thurik, R. (1999). Linking entrepreneurship and economic growth. Small Business Economics, 13, 27–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Windmeijer, F. (2005). A finite sample correction for the variance of linear efficient two-step GMM estimators. Journal of Econometrics, 126, 25–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. World Bank. (2007). Review of the Dutch administrative burden reduction programme. Washington, DC: Worldbank Group.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Urban and Regional research Centre Utrecht (URU)Utrecht UniversityUtrechtThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Utrecht School of EconomicsUtrecht UniversityUtrechtThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Urban and Regional research Centre Utrecht (URU)Utrecht UniversityUtrechtThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations