Advertisement

Small Business Economics

, Volume 36, Issue 4, pp 419–442 | Cite as

New firm formation and employment growth: regional and business dynamics

  • Rui Baptista
  • Miguel Torres PretoEmail author
Article

Abstract

This study examines differences in the effects of start-up rates on subsequent employment change. Two sources of such differences—types of start-ups and types of regions—are analyzed. We find that differences between knowledge-based and other start-ups dominate differences between highly agglomerated and modestly agglomerated regions. In particular, differences in the effects of new start-ups on subsequent employment growth between highly agglomerated and modestly agglomerated regions are greater for knowledge-based start-ups than for other types of start-ups. The results suggest that, while knowledge-based start-ups are likely to impart greater benefits on future employment than other types of start-ups, these benefits are greater when those start-ups locate in more agglomerated regions.

Keywords

Entrepreneurship Employment growth Knowledge based firms Regional agglomeration 

JEL Classifications

J23 L26 M13 O52 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Marcus Dejardin, Michael Fritsch, Pamela Mueller, Andre van Stel, and participants in the Special Session “Entrepreneurship and the Region” of 2007 ERSA Conference at ESSEC Business School (Paris). We are indebted to the Portuguese Ministry of Labor and Social Solidarity and to the Portuguese National Statistics Office (INE) for allowing us access to the data used in this paper. Miguel Torres Preto gratefully acknowledges the financial support of the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT grant SFRH/BD/22648/2005).

References

  1. Acs, Z. J., Audretsch, D. B., Braunerhjelm, P., & Carlsson, B. (2004). The missing link: The knowledge filter and entrepreneurship in endogenous growth. CEPR Discussion Papers 4783, Centre for Economic and Policy Research, London.Google Scholar
  2. Acs, Z. J., & Mueller, P. (2008). Employment effects of business dynamics: Mice, Gazelles and Elephants. Small Business Economics, 30, 85–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aghion, P., Blundell, R., Griffith, R., Howitt, P., & Prantl, S. (2004). Entry and productivity growth: Evidence from microlevel panel data. Journal of the European Economic Association, 2, 265–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anselin, L. (1988). Spatial econometrics: Methods and models. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  5. Anselin, L., & Florax, R. (1995). New directions in spatial econometrics: Introduction. In L. Anselin & R. Florax (Eds.), New directions in spatial econometrics (pp. 3–18). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  6. Arauzo-Carod, J.-M., Liviano-Solis, D., & Martin-Bofarull, M. (2008). New business formation and employment growth: Some evidence for the Spanish manufacturing industry. Small Business Economics, 30, 73–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ashcroft, B., Love, J., & Malloy, E. (1991). New firm formation in the British counties with special reference to Scotland. Regional Studies, 25, 395–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Audretsch, D. B. (2003). Innovation and spatial externalities. International Regional Science Review, 26, 167–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Audretsch, D. B., & Fritsch, M. (1994). On the measurement of entry rates. Empirica, 21, 105–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Audretsch, D. B., & Fritsch, M. (2002). Growth regimes over time and space. Regional Studies, 36, 113–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Audretsch, D. B., & Thurik, A. R. (2004). The model of the entrepreneurial economy. International Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, 2, 143–166.Google Scholar
  12. Baptista, R. (1998). Industrial clusters and the geography of innovation and production: A survey of the literature. In P. Swann, M. Prevezer, & D. Stout (Eds.), The dynamics of industrial clustering (pp. 106–123). London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Baptista, R. (2000). Do innovations diffuse faster within geographical clusters? International Journal of Industrial Organization, 18, 515–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Baptista, R., Escária, V., & Madruga, P. (2008). Entrepreneurship, regional development and job creation: The case of Portugal. Small Business Economics, 30, 49–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Baptista, R., & Mendonça, J. (2009). Proximity to knowledge sources and the location of knowledge based start-ups. Annals of Regional Science. doi:  10.1007/s00168-009-0289-4.
  16. Baptista, R., & Preto, M. T. (2009). Long term effects of new firm formation by type of start-up. Paper presented at the IECER 2009—Interdisciplinary European Conference on Entrepreneurship Research, March 2009, Lisbon, Portugal.Google Scholar
  17. Beck, N., & Katz, J. N. (1995). What to do (and not to do) with time-series cross-section data. American Political Science Review, 89, 634–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Beesley, M. E., & Hamilton, M. T. (1984). Small firms’ seedbed role and the concept of turbulence. Journal of Industrial Economics, 33, 217–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Birch, D. L. (1981). Who creates jobs? The Public Interest, 65, 3–14.Google Scholar
  20. Blien, U., Südekum, J., & Wolf, K. (2006). Local employment growth in West Germany: A dynamic panel approach. Labour Economics, 13, 445–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Disney, R., Haskel, J., & Heden, Y. (2003). Entry, exit and establishment survival in UK manufacturing. Journal of Industrial Economics, 51, 91–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Feldman, M. P. (1994). The geography of innovation. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  23. Fritsch, M., Brixy, U., & Falck, O. (2006). The effect of industry, region and time on new business survival—A multi-dimensional analysis. Review of Industrial Organization, 28, 285–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fritsch, M., & Falck, O. (2007). New business formation by industry over space and time: A multi-dimensional analysis. Regional Studies, 41, 157–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fritsch, M., & Mueller, P. (2004). The effects of new business formation on regional development over time. Regional Studies, 38, 961–975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fritsch, M., & Mueller, P. (2008). The effect of new business formation on regional development over time: The case of Germany. Small Business Economics, 30, 15–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fritsch, M., & Noseleit, F. (2009). Investigating the anatomy of the employment effects of new business formation. Jena Economic Research Papers in Economics 2009–2001, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena and Max-Planck-Institute of Economics.Google Scholar
  28. Garofoli, G. (1994). New firm formation and regional development: The case of Italy. Regional Studies, 28, 381–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Geroski, P. A. (1995). What do we know about entry? International Journal of Industrial Organization, 13, 421–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Glaeser, E. L., Kallal, H. D., Scheinkman, J. A., & Shleifer, A. (1992). Growth in cities. Journal of Political Economy, 100, 1126–1152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Henrekson, M., & Johansson, D. (2009). Gazelles as job creators—A survey and interpretation of the evidence. Small Business Economics. doi: 10.1007/s11187-009-9172-z.
  32. Hoetker, G., & Agarwal, R. (2007). Death hurts, but it isn’t fatal: The post-exit diffusion of knowledge created by innovative companies. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 446–467.Google Scholar
  33. Jaffe, A., Trajtenberg, M., & Henderson, R. (1993). Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108, 577–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mueller, P., van Stel, A. J., & Storey, D. J. (2008). The effects of new firm formation on regional development over time: The case of Great Britain. Small Business Economics, 30, 59–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. OECD. (2002). OECD science, technology and industrial outlook. Paris: OECD.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Parks, R. W. (1967). Efficient estimation of a system of regression equation when disturbances are both serially and contemporaneously correlated. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 62, 500–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Romer, P. M. (1986). Increasing returns and long-run growth. Journal of Political Economy, 94, 1002–1037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Romer, P. M. (1990). Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy, 98, S71–S102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Shane, S. (1996). Explaining variation in rates of entrepreneurship in the United States: 1899–1988. Journal of Management, 22, 747–781.Google Scholar
  40. Trivedi, P. K. (1978). Estimation of a distributed lag model under quadratic loss. Econometrica, 46, 1181–1183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. van Praag, M., & Versloot, P. (2007). What is the value of entrepreneurship? A review of recent research. Small Business Economics, 29, 351–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. van Stel, A. J., & Storey, D. J. (2004). The link between firm births and job creation: Is there an Upas tree effect. Regional Studies, 38, 893–909.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. van Stel, A. J., & Suddle, K. (2008). The impact of new firm formation on regional development in the Netherlands. Small Business Economics, 30, 31–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Engineering and Management and IN+ Centre for Innovation, Technology and Policy Research, Instituto Superior TécnicoTechnical University of LisbonLisbonPortugal
  2. 2.Department of Social and Decision SciencesCarnegie Mellon UniversityPittsburghUSA
  3. 3.Max Planck Institute of EconomicsJenaGermany

Personalised recommendations