Advertisement

Small Business Economics

, Volume 36, Issue 3, pp 365–376 | Cite as

University spillovers and new business location in high-technology sectors: Spanish evidence

  • Manuel Acosta
  • Daniel Coronado
  • Esther Flores
Article

Abstract

This paper examines the relationship between knowledge spillovers from universities and new business location in high-technology sectors. We focus on the contribution to new business formation through spillovers stemming from three main university outputs: knowledge-based graduates, research activities, and technological knowledge. We construct a new dataset with information on 604 companies and 63 universities in Spain and group the data across 36 geographical areas from 2001 to 2004 (144 observations). After controlling for several traditional cost factors and agglomeration characteristics, we find that university spillovers are relevant in explaining the location of new businesses in high-technology sectors in Spain. Further, our analysis draws attention to the relevance of graduates as the main source of spillovers, while research activities and university technology do not have significant effects.

Keywords

University spillovers Scientific knowledge Technological knowledge Business location 

JEL Classifications

C29 L26 M13 O18 O33 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research is supported by a grant from the Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia (SEJ2005-08972/ECON) and the Junta de Andalucía (P06-SEJ-02087 and P08-SEJ-03981). Earlier drafts were presented at the 11th European Network on Industrial Policy (EUNIP), San Sebastian (Spain), 10–12 September 2008, and EuroMOT 2008 (International Association for Management of Technology), Nice (France), September 17–19, 2008. The authors express their thanks to colleagues at these conferences for their helpful suggestions. The authors are also very grateful to an anonymous reviewer for constructive and insightful comments on earlier versions of this paper.

References

  1. Abramovsky, L., Harrison, R., & Simpson, H. (2007). University research and the location of business R&D. The Economic Journal, 117(519), C114–C141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Acs, Z. J., Fitzroy, F. R., & Smith, I. (1999). High technology employment, wages and university R&D spillovers: Evidence from US cities. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 8, 57–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anselin, L., Varga, A., & Acs, Z. (1997). Local geographic spillovers between university research and high technology innovations. Journal of Urban Economics, 42, 422–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anselin, L., Varga, A., & Acs, Z. (2000). Geographic and sectoral characteristics of academic knowledge externalities. Papers in Regional Science, 79, 435–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arauzo, J. M., Liviano, D., & Martín, M. (2008). New business formation and employment growth: Some evidence for the Spanish manufacturing industry. Small Business Economics, 30, 73–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Armington, C., & Acs, Z. J. (2002). The determinants of regional variation in new firm formation. Regional Studies, 36, 33–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Audretsch, D., & Fritsch, M. (1999). The industry component of regional new firm formation processes. Review of Industrial Organization, 15, 239–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Audretsch, D., & Keilbach, M. (2004). Entrepreneurship capital and economic performance. Regional Studies, 38, 949–959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Audretsch, D. B., & Lehmann, E. E. (2005). Does the knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship hold for regions? Research Policy, 34, 1191–1202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Audretsch, D., Lehmann, E., & Warning, S. (2004). University spillovers: Does the kind of science matter? Industry and Innovation, 11, 193–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Audretsch, D. B., Lehmann, E. E., & Warning, S. (2005). University spillovers and new firm location. Research Policy, 34, 1113–1122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bania, N., Eberts, R., & Fogarty, M. (1993). Universities and the start-up of new companies: Can we generalize from route 128 and silicon valley? The Review of Economics and Statistics, 75, 761–766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brenner, T. (2007). Local knowledge resources and knowledge flows. Industry and Innovation, 14, 121–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cameron, A., & Trivedi, P. (1986). Econometrics models based on count data: Comparisons and applications of some estimators and tests. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 1, 29–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cameron, A., & Trivedi, P. (1998). Regression analysis of count data. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Cohen, W., & Levinthal, D. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 128–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cohen, J. P., & Paul, C. J. M. (2005). Agglomeration economies and industry location decisions: The impacts of spatial and industrial spillovers. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 35, 215–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cohen, W., Nelson, R., & Walsh, J. (2002). Links and impacts: The influence of public research on industrial R&D. Management Science, 48, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Crozet, M., Mayer, T., & Mucchielli, J.-L. (2004). How do firms agglomerate? A study of FDI in France. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 34, 27–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Di Gregorio, D., & Shane, S. (2003). Why do some universities generate more start-ups than others? Research Policy, 32, 209–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Egeln, J. R., Gottschalk, S., & Rammer, C. (2004). Location decisions of spin-offs from public research institutions. Industry and Innovation, 11, 207–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Feldman, M., & Florida, R. (1994). The geographic sources of innovation: Technological infrastructure and product innovation in the United States. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 84, 210–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fischer, M., & Varga, A. (2003). Spatial knowledge spillovers and university research: Evidence from Austria. Annals of Regional Science, 37, 303–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fritsch, M. (2008). How does new business formation affect regional development? Introduction to the special issue. Small Business Economics, 30, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fritsch, M., & Falck, O. (2007). New business formation by industry over space and time: A multidimensional analysis. Regional Studies, 41, 157–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Guimaraes, P., Figueiredo, O., & Woodward, D. (2003). A tractable approach to the firm location decision problem. Review of Economics and Statistics, 85, 201–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Harhoff, D. (1999). Firm formation and regional spillovers—evidence from Germany. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 8, 27–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jaffe, A. (1989). Real effects of academic research. American Economic Review, 79, 957–970.Google Scholar
  29. Jaffe, A., Fogarty, M., & Banks, B. (1998). Evidence from patents and patent citations on the impact of NASA and other labs on commercial innovations. Journal of Industrial Economics, 46, 183–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kirchhoff, B. A., Newbert, S. L., Hasan, I., & Armington, C. (2007). The influence of university R&D expenditures on new business formations and employment growth. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 31, 543–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Koo, J. (2007). Determinants of localized technology spillovers: Role of regional and industrial attributes. Regional Studies, 41, 995–1011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Martinelli, A., Meyer, M., & Tunzelmann, N. (2008). Becoming an entrepreneurial university? A case study of knowledge exchange relationships and faculty attitudes in a medium-sized, research-oriented university. Journal of Technology Transfer, 33, 259–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Perkmann, M., & Walsh, K. (2007). University–industry relationships and open innovation: Towards a research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 9, 259–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rathelot, R., & Sillard, P. (2008). The importance of local corporate taxes in business location decisions: Evidence from French micro data. Economic Journal, 118, 499–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Reynolds, P. (1994). Autonomous firm dynamics and economic growth in the United States, 1986–1990. Regional Studies, 28, 429–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Reynolds, P. D., Miller, B., & Maki, W. R. (1995). Explaining regional variation in business births and deaths: U.S. 1976–88. Small Business Economics, 7, 389–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Schartinger, D., Rammer, C., Fischer, M., & Fröhlich, J. (2002). Knowledge interactions between universities and industry in Austria: Sectoral patterns and determinants. Research Policy, 31, 303–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Shane, S. (2001a). Technology regimes and new firm formation. Management Science, 47, 1173–1190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Shane, S. (2001b). Technological opportunities and new firm creation. Management Science, 47, 205–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Tamasy, C., & Heron, R. L. (2008). The geography of firm formation in New Zealand. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 99, 37–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Thursby, J., & Thursby, M. (2003). Industry/university licensing: Characteristics, concerns and issues from the perspective of the buyer. Journal of Technological Transfer, 28, 207–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Van Stel, A. J., & Storey, D. J. (2004). The link between firm births and job creation: Is there a Upas tree effect? Regional Studies, 38, 893–909.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Varga, A. (1998). University research and regional innovation: A spatial econometric analysis of academic technology transfers. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google Scholar
  44. Woodward, D., Figueiredo, O., & Guimaraes, P. (2006). Beyond the Silicon Valley: University R&D and high-technology location. Journal of Urban Economics, 60, 15–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Wooldridge, J. M. (2002). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data (1st ed.). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  46. Zucker, L. G., Darby, M. R., & Brewer, M. B. (1998). Intellectual human capital and the birth of U.S. biotechnology enterprises. American Economic Review, 88, 290–306.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of CadizCadizSpain

Personalised recommendations