Small Business Economics

, Volume 36, Issue 2, pp 187–208 | Cite as

The advantage of experienced start-up founders in venture capital acquisition: evidence from serial entrepreneurs

Article

Abstract

Entrepreneurs with prior firm-founding experience are expected to have more skills and social connections than novice entrepreneurs. Such skills and social connections could give experienced founders some advantage in the process of raising venture capital. This paper uses a large database of venture-backed companies and their founders to examine the advantage associated with prior founding experience. Compared with novice entrepreneurs, entrepreneurs with venture-backed founding experience tend to raise more venture capital at an early round of financing and tend to complete the early round much more quickly. In contrast, experienced founders whose earlier firms were not venture-backed do not show a similar advantage over novice entrepreneurs, suggesting the importance of connections with venture capitalists in the early stage of venture capital financing. However, when the analysis also takes into account later rounds of financing, all entrepreneurs with prior founding experience appear to raise more venture capital. This implies that skills acquired from any previous founding experience can make an entrepreneur perform better and in turn attract more venture capital.

Keywords

Firm-founding experience Serial entrepreneur Venture capital 

JEL Classifications

G24 L26 M13 

References

  1. Amit, R., Glosten, L., & Muller, E. (1990). Entrepreneurial ability, venture investments, and risk sharing. Management Science, 38, 1232–1245.Google Scholar
  2. Audretsch, D. B., Bonte, W., & Mahagaonkar, P. (2007). Nascent entrepreneurs, innovation and financing constraints. Paper presented at the DRUID Summer Conference on Appropriability, Proximity, Routines and Innovation.Google Scholar
  3. Baron, R. A., & Shane, S. A. (2008). Entrepreneurship: A process perspective (2nd ed.). Cincinnati, OH: South-Western College Publishing.Google Scholar
  4. Batjargal, B., & Liu, M. M. (2004). Entrepreneurs’ access to private equity in China: The role of social capital. Organization Science, 15, 159–172. doi:10.1287/orsc.1030.0044.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bengtsson, O. (2008). Relational venture capital financing of serial founders. Unpublished Working Paper, Cornell University.Google Scholar
  6. Birley, S. (1985). The role of networks in the entrepreneurial process. Journal of Business Venturing, 1, 107–117. doi:10.1016/0883-9026(85)90010-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Birley, S., & Westhead, P. (1994). A comparison of new businesses established by ‘novice’ and ‘habitual’ founders in Great Britain. International Small Business Journal, 12, 38–60. doi:10.1177/0266242693121003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bruno, A. V., & Tyebjee, T. T. (1983). The one that got away: A study of ventures rejected by venture capitalists. In J. A. Hornaday, J. A. Timmons, & K. H. Vesper (Eds.), Frontiers of entrepreneurship research (pp. 289–306). Wellesley, MA: Babson College.Google Scholar
  9. Bruno, A. V., & Tyebjee, T. T. (1986). The destinies of rejected venture capital deals. Sloan Management Review, 27, 43–53.Google Scholar
  10. Burt, R. S. (1997). The contingent value of social capital. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 339–365. doi:10.2307/2393923.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bygrave, W. D., & Timmons, J. A. (1992). Venture capital at the crossroads. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  12. Carland, J. C., Carland, J. W., & Stewart, W. H., Jr. (2000). The indefatigable entrepreneur: A study of the dispositions of multiple venture founders. Journal of Business and Entrepreneurship, 12, 1–18.Google Scholar
  13. Carter, S., & Ram, M. (2003). Reassessing portfolio entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 21, 371–380. doi:10.1023/A:1026115121083.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chambers, B. R., Hart, S. L., & Denison, D. R. (1988). Founding team experience and new firm performance. In B. Kirchhoff, W. Long, E. McMullan, K. Vesper, & W. Wetzel (Eds.), Frontiers of entrepreneurship research (pp. 106–118). Wellesley, MA: Babson College.Google Scholar
  15. Cochrane, J. H. (2005). The risk and return of venture capital. Journal of Financial Economics, 75, 3–52. doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2004.03.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cooke, P., & Wills, D. (1999). Small firms, social capital and the enhancement of business performance through innovation programmes. Small Business Economics, 13, 219–234. doi:10.1023/A:1008178808631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Davidsson, P., & Honig, B. (2003). The role of social and human capital among nascent entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing, 18, 301–331. doi:10.1016/S0883-9026(02)00097-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Donkels, R., Dupont, B., & Michel, P. (1987). Multiple business starters. Who? Why? What? Journal of Small Business and Entrepreneurship, 5, 48–63.Google Scholar
  19. Elfring, T., & Hulsink, W. (2003). Networks in entrepreneurship: The case of high-technology firms. Small Business Economics, 21, 409–422. doi:10.1023/A:1026180418357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Florin, J., Lubatkin, M., & Schulze, W. (2003). A social capital model of high-growth ventures. Academy of Management Journal, 46, 374–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Franke, N., Gruber, M., Harhoff, D., & Henkel, J. (2007). Venture capitalists’ evaluations of start-up teams: Trade-offs, knock-out criteria, and the impact of VC experience. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32, 459–483.Google Scholar
  22. Fried, V. H., & Hisrich, R. D. (1994). Toward a model of venture capital investment decision making. Financial Management, 23, 28–37. doi:10.2307/3665619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gompers, P. A. (1995). Optimal investment, monitoring, and the staging of venture capital. The Journal of Finance, 50, 1461–1489. doi:10.2307/2329323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gompers, P. A., & Lerner, J. (1999). The venture capital cycle. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  25. Gompers, P. A., & Lerner, J. (2000). Money chasing deals? The impact of fund inflows on private equity valuations. Journal of Financial Economics, 55, 281–325. doi:10.1016/S0304-405X(99)00052-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gompers, P. A., Lerner, J., & Scharfstein, D. (2005). Entrepreneurial spawning: Public corporations and the genesis of new ventures, 1986–1999. The Journal of Finance, 60, 577–614. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.2005.00740.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gompers, P. A., Kovner, A., Lerner, J., & Scharfstein, D. (2009). Performance persistence in entrepreneurship. Journal of Financial Economics (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  28. Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91, 481–510. doi:10.1086/228311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hansen, E. L. (1995). Entrepreneurial networks and new organization growth. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 19, 7–29.Google Scholar
  30. Heckman, J. J. (1979). Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica, 47, 153–161. doi:10.2307/1912352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hellmann, T. F. (2000). Venture capitalists: The coaches of silicon valley. In C.-M. Lee, W. F. Miller, M. G. Hancock, & H. S. Rowen (Eds.), The silicon valley edge: A habitat for innovation and entrepreneurship (pp. 276–294). Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Hisrich, R. D., & Jankowitz, A. D. (1990). Intuition in venture capital decisions: An exploratory study using a new technique. Journal of Business Venturing, 5, 49–62. doi:10.1016/0883-9026(90)90026-P.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hsu, D. H. (2007). Experienced entrepreneurial founders and venture capital funding. Research Policy, 36, 722–741. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2007.02.022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hutt, R. W., & Thomas, B. (1985). Venture capital in Arizona. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research (pp. 155–169). Wellesley, MA: Babson College.Google Scholar
  35. Jenssen, J. I. (2001). Social networks, resources and entrepreneurship. The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 2, 103–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Jenssen, J. I., & Koenig, H. F. (2002). The effect of social networks on resource access and business start-ups. European Planning Studies, 10, 1039–1046. doi:10.1080/0965431022000031301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kaplan, S., Sensoy, B. A., & Strömberg, P. (2002). How well do venture capital databases reflect actual investments? manuscript, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  38. Kaplan, S. N., Sensoy, B. A., & Strömberg, P. (2009). Should investors bet on the jockey or the horse? Evidence from the evolution of firms from early business plans to public companies. The Journal of Finance, 64, 75–115. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.2008.01429.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kaplan, S., & Strömberg, P. (2001). Venture capitalists as principals: Contracting, screening, and monitoring. The American Economic Review, 91, 426–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kaplan, S., & Strömberg, P. (2003). Financial contracting theory meets the real world: Evidence from venture capital contracts. The Review of Economic Studies, 70, 281–316. doi:10.1111/1467-937X.00245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kaplan, S., & Strömberg, P. (2004). Contracts, characteristics, and actions: Evidence from venture capitalist analyses. The Journal of Finance, 59, 2177–2210. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.2004.00696.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kolvereid, L., & Bullvag, E. (1993). Novices versus experienced founders: An exploratory investigation. In S. Birley & I. MacMillan (Eds.), Entrepreneurship research: Global perspectives (pp. 275–285). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers.Google Scholar
  43. Lazear, E. (2004). Balanced skills and entrepreneurship. American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings, 94(2), 208–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lazear, E. (2005). Entrepreneurship. Journal of Labor Economics, 23, 649–680. doi:10.1086/491605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. MacMillan, I. C. (1986). To really learn about entrepreneurship, let’s study habitual entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing, 1, 241–243. doi:10.1016/0883-9026(86)90001-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. MacMillan, I. C., Siegel, R., & SubbaNarasimha, P. N. (1985). Criteria used by venture capitalists to evaluate new venture proposals. Journal of Business Venturing, 1, 119–128. doi:10.1016/0883-9026(85)90011-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. MacMillan, I. C., Zemann, L., & SubbaNarasimha, P. N. (1987). Criteria distinguishing successful from unsuccessful ventures in the venture screening process. Journal of Business Venturing, 2, 123–137. doi:10.1016/0883-9026(87)90003-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Muzyka, D., Birley, S., & Leleux, B. (1996). Trade-offs in the investment decisions of European VCs. Journal of Business Venturing, 11, 273–288. doi:10.1016/0883-9026(95)00126-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Podolny, J. M. (1994). Market uncertainty and the social character of economic exchange. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 458–483. doi:10.2307/2393299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Riquelme, H., & Rickards, T. (1992). Hybrid conjoint analysis: An estimation probe in new venture decisions. Journal of Business Venturing, 7, 505–518. doi:10.1016/0883-9026(92)90022-J.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Rosa, P. (1998). Entrepreneurial processes of business cluster formation and growth by ‘habitual’ entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 22, 43–61.Google Scholar
  52. Sandberg, W. R., Schweiger, D. M., & Hofer, C. W. (1988). Use of verbal protocols in determining venture capitalists’ decision process. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 13, 182–196.Google Scholar
  53. Sarasvathy, S. D., & Menon, A. R. (2003). Failing firms and successful entrepreneurs: Serial entrepreneurship as a temporal portfolio. Darden Business School Working Paper No. 04-05.Google Scholar
  54. Saxenian, A. L. (1999). Silicon valley’s new immigrant entrepreneurs. San Francisco, CA: Public Policy Institute of California.Google Scholar
  55. Schaper, M., Mankelow, G., & Gibson, B. (2005). Serial entrepreneurship: An exploratory analysis of Australian firms. Paper presented at the 50th International Council for Small Business (ICSB) World Conference.Google Scholar
  56. Scott, M., & Rosa, P. (1996). Has firm level analysis reached its limits? Time for a rethink. International Small Business Journal, 14, 81–89. doi:10.1177/0266242696144006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Shane, S., & Cable, D. (2002). Network ties, reputation, and the financing of new ventures. Management Science, 48, 364–381. doi:10.1287/mnsc.48.3.364.7731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Shane, S., & Stuart, T. (2002). Organizational endowments and the performance of university start-ups. Management Science, 48, 154–170. doi:10.1287/mnsc.48.1.154.14280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Shepherd, D. A., & Zacharakis, A. (1999). Conjoint analysis: A new methodology for researching the decision policies of venture capitalists. Venture Capital, 1, 197–217. doi:10.1080/136910699295866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Smith, W. L., Schallenkamp, K., & Eichholz, O. E. (2007). Entrepreneurial skills assessment: An exploratory study. International Journal of Management and Enterprise, 4, 179–201. doi:10.1504/IJMED.2007.011791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Sorenson, O., & Stuart, T. E. (2001). Syndication networks and the spatial distribution of venture capital investments. American Journal of Sociology, 106, 1546–1586. doi:10.1086/321301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Starr, J. A., & Bygrave, W. D. (1991). The assets and liabilities of prior start-up experience: An exploratory study of multiple venture entrepreneurs. In N. C. Churchill, W. D. Bygrave, J. G. Covin, D. L. Sexton, D. P. Slevin, K. H. Vesper, & W. E. Wetzel (Eds.), Frontiers of entrepreneurship research (pp. 213–227). Wellesley, MA: Babson College.Google Scholar
  63. Tyebjee, T. T., & Bruno, A. V. (1981). Venture capital decision making: Preliminary results from three empirical studies. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research (pp. 316–334). Wellesley, MA: Babson College.Google Scholar
  64. Tyebjee, T. T., & Bruno, A. V. (1984). A model of venture capitalist investment activity. Management Science, 30, 1051–1066. doi:10.1287/mnsc.30.9.1051.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Ucbasaran, D., Alsos, G. A., Westhead, P., & Wright, M. (2008). Habitual entrepreneurs. Foundations and Trends in Entrepreneurship, 4, 309–450. doi:10.1561/0300000014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Ucbasaran, D., Westhead, P., & Wright, M. (2006). Habitual entrepreneurs. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  67. Ucbasaran, D., Westhead, P., & Wright, M. (2009). The extent and nature of opportunity identification by experienced entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing, 24, 99–115. doi:10.1016/j.jbusvent.2008.01.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Ucbasaran, D., Wright, M., & Westhead, P. (2003). A longitudinal study of habitual entrepreneurs: Starters and acquirers. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 15, 207–228. doi:10.1080/08985620210145009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Uzzi, B. (1996). The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: The network effect. American Sociological Review, 61, 674–698. doi:10.2307/2096399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Uzzi, B. (1999). Embeddedness in the making of financial capital: How social relations and networks benefit firms seeking financing. American Sociological Review, 64, 481–505. doi:10.2307/2657252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. VentureOne Corporation. (2000). The VentureOne venture capital sourcebook. San Francisco, CA: VentureOne Corporation.Google Scholar
  72. VentureOne Corporation. (2001). Venture capital industry report. San Francisco, CA: VentureOne Corporation.Google Scholar
  73. Westhead, P., Ucbasaran, D., & Wright, M. (2005a). Experience and cognition: Do novice, serial and portfolio entrepreneurs differ? International Small Business Journal, 23, 72–98. doi:10.1177/0266242605049104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Westhead, P., Ucbasaran, D., & Wright, M. (2005b). Decisions, actions, and performance: Do novice, serial, and portfolio entrepreneurs differ? Journal of Small Business Management, 43, 393–417. doi:10.1111/j.1540-627X.2005.00144.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Westhead, P., Ucbasaran, D., Wright, M., & Binks, M. (2005c). Novice, serial and portfolio entrepreneur behaviour and contributions. Small Business Economics, 25, 109–132. doi:10.1007/s11187-003-6461-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Westhead, P., & Wright, M. (1998a). Novice, portfolio, and serial founders: Are they different? Journal of Business Venturing, 13, 173–204. doi:10.1016/S0883-9026(97)90002-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Westhead, P., & Wright, M. (1998b). Novice, portfolio, and serial founders in rural and urban areas. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 22, 63–100.Google Scholar
  78. Wright, M., Robbie, K., & Ennew, C. (1997a). Venture capitalists and serial entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing, 12, 227–249. doi:10.1016/S0883-9026(96)06115-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Wright, M., Robbie, K., & Ennew, C. (1997b). Serial entrepreneurs. British Journal of Management, 8, 251–268. doi:10.1111/1467-8551.00064.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Wright, M., Westhead, P., & Shol, J. (1998). Editors’ introduction: Habitual entrepreneurs and angel investors. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 22, 5–21.Google Scholar
  81. Yli-Renko, H., Autio, E., & Sapienza, H. J. (2001). Social capital, knowledge acquisition, and knowledge exploitation in young technology-based firms. Strategic Management Journal, 22, 587–613. doi:10.1002/smj.183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Zhang, J. (2007a). Access to venture capital and the performance of venture-backed start-ups in silicon valley. Economic Development Quarterly, 21(2), 124–147. doi:10.1177/0891242406298724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Zhang, J. (2007b). The advantage of experienced start-up founders in venture capital acquisition: Evidence from serial entrepreneurs. IZA Discussion Paper No. 2964.Google Scholar
  84. Zhang, J. (2009). Why do some U.S. universities generate more venture-backed academic entrepreneurs than others? Venture Capital, 11, 133–162. doi:10.1080/13691060802525270.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsClark UniversityWorcesterUSA

Personalised recommendations