Advertisement

Small Business Economics

, Volume 33, Issue 3, pp 353–373 | Cite as

The influence of family ownership on SME performance: evidence from public firms in Taiwan

  • Wenyi Chu
Article

Abstract

The relationship between family ownership and firm performance has gained increased attention in the business strategy and financial economics literature. Most existing studies use large companies as the research sample; studies that explicitly investigate the influence of family ownership on the performance of small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) remain sparse. This study raises this issue explicitly by investigating the influence of founding-family ownership on the return on assets and Tobin’s q of 341 public SMEs in Taiwan, during the period of 2002–2006. It emerges from the data that family ownership is prevalent and substantial in Taiwan, representing half of the public SMEs and accounting for more than 11 percent of their outstanding equity. It was found that the influence of family ownership on SME performance is positive and significant. Overall, the results suggest that family ownership is an effective organizational structure for SMEs in Taiwan.

Keywords

Family ownership Family firm Performance SME 

JEL Classifications

G32 L25 L26 M1 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The helpful comments on the earlier version of this paper from Constantinos Markides, participants of the Academy of Management Annual Meeting, Strategic Management Society Annual Conference, the editor of this Journal and two anonymous reviewers, are gratefully acknowledged. This paper also benefits from the financial support provided by the Taiwan National Science Consul. All errors remaining are the author’s.

References

  1. Anderson, R. C., & Reeb, D. M. (2003). Founding family ownership and firm performance: Evidence from the S&P 500. Journal of Finance, 58(3), 1301–1329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Astrachan, J. H., Zahra, S. A., & Sharma, P. (2003). Family-sponsored ventures. Kansas, MO: Kauffman Foundation.Google Scholar
  3. Bain, J. S. (1968). Industrial organization. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  4. Barclay, M. J., & Holderness, C. G. (1989). Private benefits from control of public corporations. Journal of Financial Economics, 25(2), 371–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17, 99–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bartholomeusz, S., & Tanewski, G. A. (2006). The relationship between family firms and corporate governance. Journal of Small Business Management, 44(2), 245–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Berle, A., & Means, G. (1932). The modern corporation and private property. New York: Harcourt, Brace, & World.Google Scholar
  8. Brenes, E. R., Madrigal, K., & Molina-Navarro, G. E. (2006). Family business structure and succession: Critical topics in Latin American experience. Journal of Business Research, 59(3), 372–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brooksbank, R. (1991). Defining the small business: A new classification of company size. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 3(1), 17–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Burkart, M., Gromb, D., & Panunzi, F. (1997). Large shareholders, monitoring, and the value of the firm. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(3), 693–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Burkart, M., Panunzi, F., & Shleifer, A. (2003). Family firms. Journal of Finance, 58(5), 2167–2201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Buzzell, R. D., Gale, B. T., & Sultan, R. G. M. (1975). Market share—a key to profitability. Harvard Business Review, 53(1), 97–106.Google Scholar
  13. Carney, M. (1998). A management capacity constraint? Obstacle to the development of overseas Chinese family business. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 15(2), 137–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cavery, B. (1998). Availability of credit to family businesses. Small Business Economics, 11(1), 75–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chang, S. J., & Choi, U. (1988). Strategy, structure and performance of Korean business group: A transactions cost approach. Journal of Industrial Economics, 37(2), 141–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Claessens, S., Djankov, S., Fan, J. P. H., & Lang, L. H. P. (2002). Disentangling the incentive and entrenchment effects of large shareholdings. Journal of Finance, 57(6), 2741–2772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm. New York: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  18. Daily, C. M., & Dollinger, M. J. (1993). Alternative methodologies for identifying family-versus nonfamily-managed business. Journal of Small Business Management, 31(2), 79–90.Google Scholar
  19. Davis, J. F., Schoorman, D., & Donaldson, L. (1997). Toward a stewardship theory of management. Academy of Management Review, 22, 20–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. DeAngelo, H., & DeAngelo, L. (2000). Controlling stockholders and the disciplinary role of corporate payout policy: a study of the Times Mirror company. Journal of Financial Economics, 56(2), 153–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. de Leeuw, J., & Kreft, G. G. (1986). Ransom coefficient models for multilevel analysis. Journal of Educational Statistics, 11, 57–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Demsetz, H. (1983). The structure of ownership and the theory of the firm. Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 375–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Demsetz, H., & Lehn, K. (1985). The structure of corporate ownership: Causes and consequences. Journal of Political Economy, 93(6), 1155–1177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Dyer, W. G., Jr. (2006). Examining the “family effect” on firm performance. Family Business Review, 19(4), 253–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Agency theory: An assessment and review. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 57–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Faccio, M., Lang, L. H. P., & Young, L. (2001). Dividends and expropriation. American Economic Review, 91(1), 54–78.Google Scholar
  27. Fama, E. F., & Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics, 26(2), 301–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Fox, M. A., & Hamilton, R. T. (1994). Ownership and diversification: Agency theory or stewardship theory. Journal of Management Studies, 31(1), 69–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Galbraith, J. (1973). Designing complex organizations. Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  30. Gomez-Mejia, L., Nunez-Nickel, M., & Gutierrez, I. (2001). The role of family ties in agency contracts. Academy of Management Journal, 44(1), 81–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Grant, R. M. (1996). Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17, 109–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Habbershon, T. G., & Williamson, M. L. (1999). A resource-based framework for assessing the strategic advantages of family firms. Family Business Review, 21(1), 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hamilton, G. G. (1996). Asian business networks. New York: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  34. Handler, W. C. (1989). Methodological issues and considerations in studying family businesses. Family Business Review, 2(3), 257–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hannan, M. T., & Freeman, J. (1989). Organizational ecology. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Hansen, J. A. (1992). Innovation, firm size, and firm age. Small Business Economics, 4, 37–44.Google Scholar
  37. Hermalin, B. E., & Weisbach, M. S. (1991). The effects of board composition and direct incentives on firm performance. Financial Management, 20(4), 101–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Himmelberg, C. P., Hubbard, R. G., & Palia, D. (1999). Understanding the determinants of managerial ownership and the link between ownership and performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 53, 353–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Human, S. E., & Provan, K. G. (1997). An emergent theory of structure and outcomes in small-firm strategic manufacturing networks. Academy of Management Journal, 40(2), 368–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. James, H. (1999). Owner as manager, extended horizons and the family firm. International Journal of the Economics of Business, 6(1), 41–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Julien, P. (1993). Small businesses as a research subject: Some reflections on knowledge of small businesses and its effects on economic theory. Small Business Economics, 5, 157–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kepner, E. (1983). The family and the firm: A coevolutionary perspective. Organizational Dynamics, 12(1), 57–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kets de Vries, M. F. R. (1993). The dynamics of family controlled firm: The good and the bad news. Organizational Dynamics, 21(3), 59–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Khanna, T., & Palepu, K. (2000). Is group affiliation profitable in emerging markets? An analysis of diversified Indian business groups. Journal of Finance, 55(2), 867–891.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kimberly, J. R. (1976). Organizational size and the structural perspective: A review, critique, and proposal. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21(4), 571–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kirchhoff, B. A., & Kirchhoff, J. J. (1987). Family contributions to productivity and profitability in small business. Journal of Small Business Management, 25(4), 25–31.Google Scholar
  47. Kole, S. (1995). Measuring managerial equity ownership: A comparison of sources of ownership data. Journal of Corporate Finance, 1(3–4), 413–435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Lansberg, I. S. (1983). Managing human resources in family firms: The problem of institutional overlap. Organizational Dynamics, 12(1), 39–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Lauterbach, B., & Vaninsky, A. (1999). Ownership structure and firm performance: Evidence from Israel. Journal of Management and Governance, 3(2), 189–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Lindenberg, E. B., & Ross, S. A. (1981). Tobin’s q ratio and industrial organization. Journal of Business, 54(1), 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. McConaughy, D., Walker, M., Henderson, G., & Mishra, C. S. (1998). Founding family controlled firms: Efficiency and value. Review of Financial Economics, 7(1), l–l19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. McConnell, J., & Servaes, H. (1990). Additional evidence on equity ownership structure, and firm performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 27(2), 595–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Morck, R. K., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (1988). Management ownership and market valuation: An empirical analysis. Journal of Financial Economics, 20(1,2), 293–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Morck, R. K., Stangeland, D. A., & Yeung, B. (2000). Inherited wealth, corporate control, and economic growth: The Canadian disease. In R. K. Morck (Ed.), Concentrated corporate ownership (pp. 319–369). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  55. Ng, C. Y. M. (2005). An empirical study on the relationship between ownership and performance in a family-based corporate environment. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 20(2), 121–146.Google Scholar
  56. Osteryoung, J. S., & Newman, D. (1993). What is a small business? Journal of Small Business Finance, 2(3), 219–231.Google Scholar
  57. Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive strategy. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  58. Poza, E. J. (2007). Family business. New York: Thomson South-Western.Google Scholar
  59. Rumelt, R. P. (1974). Strategy, structure, and economic performance. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  60. Sathe, V. (2003). Corporate entrepreneurship: Top managers and new business creation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  61. Schulze, E. S., Lubatkin, M. H., & Dino, R. N. (2003). Toward of theory of agency and altruism in family firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 18(4), 473–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (1986). Large shareholders and corporate control. Journal of Political Economy, 94(3), 461–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (1997). A survey of corporate governance. Journal of Finance, 52(2), 737–783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Silva, F., Majluf, N., & Paredes, R. D. (2006). Family ties, interlocking directors and performance of business groups in emerging countries: The Case of Chile. Journal of Business Research, 59(3), 315–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Sirmon, D. G., & Hitt, M. (2003). Managing resources: Linking unique resources, management, and wealth creation in family firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27(4), 339–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Smith, B. F., & Amoako-Adu, B. (1999). Management success and financial performance of family controlled firms. Journal of Corporate Finance, 5(4), 341–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Stein, J. (1989). Efficient capital markets, inefficient firms: A model of myopic corporate behavior. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 104(4), 655–669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Stopford, J. M., & Baden-Fuller, C. W. F. (1994). Creating corporate entrepreneurship. Strategic Management Journal, 15, 521–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Sutton, C. J. (1973). Management behavior and a theory of diversification. Scottish Journal of Political Economics, 20(1), 27–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Thomsen, S., & Pedersen, T. (2000). Ownership structure and economic performance in the largest European companies. Strategy Management Journal, 21(6), 689–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. UNCTAD, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. (1998). Handbook on foreign direct investment by small and medium-sized enterprises: Lessons from Asia. New York and Geneva: UNCTAD.Google Scholar
  72. Venkatraman, N. (1989). The concept of fit in strategy research: Toward verbal and statistical correspondence. Academy of Management Review, 14(3), 423–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Villalonga, B., & Amit, R. (2006). How do family ownership, control and management affect firm value? Journal of Financial Economics, 80(2), 385–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Wade, R. (1990). Governing the market: Economic theory and the role of government in East Asian industrialization. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  75. Weidenbaum, M., & Hughes, S. (1996). The bamboo network. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  76. Westhead, P., Cowling, M., & Howorth, C. (2001). The development of family companies: Management and ownership imperatives. Family Business Review, 14(4), 369–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Yammeesri, J., & Lodh, S. C. (2004). Is family ownership a pain or gain to firm performance? Journal of American Academy of Business, 4(1/2), 263–270.Google Scholar
  78. Zahra, S. A. (2005). Entrepreneurial risk taking in family firms. Family Business Review, 18(1), 23–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Taiwan UniversityTaipeiRepublic of China

Personalised recommendations