Advertisement

Small Business Economics

, Volume 33, Issue 3, pp 335–351 | Cite as

Evaluation of credit guarantee policy using propensity score matching

  • Inha Oh
  • Jeong-Dong Lee
  • Almas Heshmati
  • Gyoung-Gyu Choi
Article

Abstract

In this article, we evaluate the effect of the credit guarantee policy by comparing a large sample of guaranteed firms and matched non-guaranteed firms from 2000 to 2003. The sample firms are compared with respect to growth rates of different performance indicators including: productivity, sales, employment, investment, R&D, wage level, and the survival of firms in the post crisis period. In order to avoid the selectivity problem, propensity score matching methodologies are adopted. Results suggest that credit guarantees influenced significantly firms’ ability to maintain their size, and increase their survival rate, but not to increase their R&D and investment and hence, their growth in productivity. Moreover, due to the adverse selection problem, firms with lower productivity were receiving guarantees.

Keywords

Credit guarantee Selection bias Propensity score matching SME 

JEL Classifications

C40 H43 H81 L25 L26 L53 

References

  1. Abadie, A., & Imbens, G. (2006). Large sample properties of matching estimators for average treatment effects. Econometrica, 74, 235–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arnold, J. M., & Hussinger, K. (2005). Export behavior and firm productivity in German manufacturing: A firm-level analysis. Review of World Economics, 141, 219–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aw, B. Y., Chen, X., & Roberts, M. J. (2001). Firm-level evidence on productivity differentials and turnover in Taiwanese manufacturing. Journal of Development Economics, 66, 51–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Becchetti L., & Trovato, G. (2002). The determinants of growth for small and medium sized firms: The role of availability of external finance. Small Business Economics, 19, 291–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Becker, S. O., & Ichino, A. (2002). Estimation of average treatment effects based on propensity scores. STATA Journal, 2, 358–377.Google Scholar
  6. Bendick, M., & Egan, M. L. (1987). Transfer payment diversion for small business development: British and French experience. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 40, 528–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bester, H. (1985) Screening vs. rationing in credit markets with imperfect information. American Economic Review, 75, 850–855.Google Scholar
  8. Blundell, R., & Costa Dias, M. (2000). Evaluation methods for non-experimental data. Fiscal Studies, 21(4), 427–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Boocock, G., & Shariff, M. N. M. (2005). Measuring the effectiveness of credit guarantee schemes: Evidence from Malaysia. International Small Business Journal, 23, 427–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Borensztein, E., & Lee, J.-W. (2002). Financial crisis and credit crunch in Korea: Evidence from firm-level data. Journal of Monetary Economics, 49, 853–875.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Caliendo, M. (2006). Microeconometric evaluation of labour market policies. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  12. Carpenter, R. E., & Peterson, B. C. (2002). Capital market imperfections, high-tech investment, and new equity financing. The Economic Journal, 112, F54–F72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cowling, M. (1998). Regional determinants of small firm loans under the U.K. loan guarantee scheme. Small Business Economics, 11, 155–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cowling, M., & Mitchell, P. (1997). The evolution of U.K. self-employment: A study of government policy and the role of the macroeconomy. The Manchester School, 65, 427–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cowling, M., & Mitchell, P. (2003). Is the small firms loan guarantee scheme hazardous for banks or helpful to small business? Small Business Economics, 21, 63–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cowling, M., & Westhead, P. (1996). Bank lending decisions and small firms: Does size matter? International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research, 2, 52–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cressy, R. (1996). Are business startups debt-rationed? The Economic Journal, 106, 1253–1270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cressy, R. (2002). Funding gaps: A symposium. The Economic Journal, 112, F1–F16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cressy, R., & Toivanen, O. (2001). Is there adverse selection in the credit market? Venture Capital, 3, 215–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. David, P. A., Hall, B. H., & Toole, A. A. (2000). Is public R&D a complement of substitute for private R&D? A review of the econometric evidence. Research Policy, 29, 497–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Dehejia, R. H. (2005). Practical propensity score matching: A reply to Smith and Todd. Journal of Econometrics, 125, 355–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dehejia, R. H., & Wahba, S. (1999). Causal effects in nonexperimental studies: Reevaluating the evaluation of training programs. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 94(448), 1052–1062.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Dehejia, R. H., & Wahba, S. (2002). Propensity score-matching methods for nonexperimental causal studies. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 84(1), 151–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. de Meza, D. (2002). Overlending? The Economic Journal, 112, F17–F31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Evans, D. S., & Jovanovic, B. (1989). An estimated model of entrepreneurial choice under liquidity constraints. Journal of Political Economy, 97, 808–827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Frölich, M. (2004). Finite-sample properties of propensity-score matching and weighting estimators. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 86, 77–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Frölich, M., Heshmati, A., & Lechner, M. (2004). Microeconometric evaluation of rehabilitation of long-term sickness in Sweden. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 19, 375–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Good, D. H. (1985). The effect of deregulation on the productive efficiency and cost structure of the Airline Industry. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
  29. Gregory, G., Harvie, C., & Lee, H. H. (2002). Korean SMEs in the wake of the financial crisis: Strategies, constraints and performance in a global economy. Economic Working Papers wp02-12, School of Economics and Information Systems, University of Wollongong, NSW, Australia.Google Scholar
  30. Heckman, J. J., Ichimura, H., & Todd, P. E. (1997). Matching as econometric evaluation estimator: Evidence from evaluating a job training programme. Review of Economic Studies, 64, 605–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hong, K., & Lee, J.-W. (2000) Korea: Returning to sustainable growth? In W. T. Woo, J. D. Sachs, & K. Schwab (Eds.), The Asian financial crisis: Lessons for a resilient Asia. The MIT press.Google Scholar
  32. Hoshi, T. (2006). Economics of the living dead. Japanese Economic Review, 57, 30–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. IMF. (2005). Republic of Korea: 2004 article IV consultation-staff report; staff statement; and public information notice on the executive board discussion. IMF Country Report 05/49, International Monetary Fund, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  34. Jaffe, A. B. (2002). Building programme evaluation into the design of public research-support programmes. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 18(1), 22–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kang, D. (2005, July). Corporate distress and restructuring policy of Korean small and medium sized enterprises: Role of credit guarantee scheme. (Paper presented at the 2005 KDI-KAEA conference, Korea Development Institute, Seoul, Korea).Google Scholar
  36. Kang, J.-W., Heshmati, A., & Choi, G.-G. (2006). The effect of credit guarantees on survival and performance of SMEs in Korea. RATIO Working Paper No. 92, The RATIO Institute, Sweden.Google Scholar
  37. Kim, J.-K., & Lee, C. H. (2002). Insolvency in the corporate sector and financial crisis in Korea. Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy, 7(2), 267–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Koo, J., & Kiser, S. L. (2001). Recovery from a financial crisis: The case of South Korea. Economic and Financial Review, Q, IV, 24–36.Google Scholar
  39. Lee, K. (2006a). An evaluation of loan guarantee system for S&M firms in Korea. The Korea Journal of Public Finance, 20, 203–229 (in Korean).Google Scholar
  40. Lee, W.-S. (2006b). Propensity score matching and variations on the balancing test. Working Paper, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, The University of Melbourne (Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=936782).
  41. Lerner, J. (2002). When bureaucrats meet entrepreneurs: The design of effective ‘public venture capital’ programmes. The Economic Journal, 112, F73–F84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lööf, H., & Heshmati, A. (2005). The Impact of public funding on private R&D investment: New evidence from a firm level innovation study. CESIS Electronic Working Paper Series No. 06., Centre of Excellence for Science and Innovation Studies, Sweden.Google Scholar
  43. Meager, N., Bates, P., & Cowling, M. (2003). An evaluation of business start-up support for young people. National Institute Economic Review, 186, 59–72.Google Scholar
  44. Nitani, M., & Riding, A. (2005) Promoting enterprise development or subsidizing tradition?: The Japan credit supplementation system. International Small Business Journal, 23, 48–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Oh, I., Heshmati, A., Baek, C., & Lee, J.-D. (2006). Comparative analysis of firm dynamics by size: Korean manufacturing. RATIO Working Papers No. 94, The RATIO Institute, Sweden.Google Scholar
  46. Rosenbaum, P., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrica, 70, 41–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Rubin, D. B. (1974). Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and non-randomized studies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 66, 688–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Smith, J. (2000). A critical survey of empirical methods for evaluating employment and training programs. Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics, 136(3), 247–268.Google Scholar
  49. Stiglitz, J. E., & Weiss, A. (1981). Credit rationing in markets with imperfect information. The American Economic Review, 71, 393–410.Google Scholar
  50. Yasar, M., & Rejesus, R. M. (2005). Exporting status and firm performance: Evidence from a matched sample. Economics Letters, 88, 397–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Inha Oh
    • 1
  • Jeong-Dong Lee
    • 1
  • Almas Heshmati
    • 2
  • Gyoung-Gyu Choi
    • 3
  1. 1.Technology Management, Economics and Policy ProgramSeoul National UniversitySeoulRepublic of Korea
  2. 2.Department of EconomicsUniversity of Kurdistan HawlerErbilIraq
  3. 3.School of Business AdministrationDongguk UniversitySeoulKorea

Personalised recommendations