Advertisement

Springer Nature is making SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Firm Size and Innovation in European Manufacturing

  • 1072 Accesses

  • 86 Citations

Abstract

The paper investigates the differences between small, medium-sized and large firms regarding their performance in the introduction of new products and processes. After a review of the relevant literature, two models are proposed and tested in search for different business strategies and innovation inputs connected to product and process innovations. The empirical analysis uses innovation survey (CIS 2) data at the industry level for 22 manufacturing sectors, broken down in three firm size classes, for eight European countries. Special attention is devoted to tackling the issues of possible endogeneity of the regressors and of unobserved sectoral heterogeneity. The results – strengthening the findings of previous studies – show that product and process innovations, though having some complementarities, are associated to different innovative inputs and strategies pursued by firms. Systematic differences also emerge between the behaviour of large firms and SMEs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Acs ZJ Audretsch DB (1987) Innovation, Market Structure and Firm Size. Review of Economics and Statistics 69:567–575.

  2. Acs ZJ, Audretsch DB (1988) Innovation in Large and Small Firms: An Empirical Analysis. American Economic Review 78:678–690.

  3. Acs ZJ, Audretsch DB (1990) Innovation and Small Firms. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.

  4. Acs ZJ, Audretsch DB (1991) R&D, Firm Size and Innovative Activity. In Acs ZJ, Audretsch DB (eds.), Innovation and Technological Change, Harvester Wheatsheaf, London 39–59.

  5. Acs ZJ, Audretsch DB, Feldman MP (1994) R&D Spillovers and Recipient Firm Size. Review of Economics and Statistics, 76(2):336–339.

  6. Amemya T (1971) The Estimation of the Variances in a Variance-covariance Model. International Economic Review 12:1–13.

  7. Antonucci T, Pianta M (2002) The Employment Effects of Product and Process Innovations in Europe. International Review of Applied Economics 16(3):295–308.

  8. Arvanitis S (1997) The Impact of Firm Size on Innovative Activity – an Empirical Analysis Based on Swiss Firm Data. Small Business Economics 9:473–490.

  9. Audretsch D, Vivarelli M (1994) Small Firms and R&D Spillovers: Evidence from Italy. Revue d’Economie Industrielle 67(1):225–37.

  10. Balestra P, Nerlove M (1973) Pooling Cross Section and Time Series Data in the Estimation of Error Components Models. Journal of Econometrics 1:17–28.

  11. Baltagi BH (1985) Pooling Cross Sections with Unequal Time Series Length. Economics Letters 18:133–136.

  12. Baltagi BH (2003) Econometric Analysis of Panel Data. Wiley, New York.

  13. Berman E, Bound J, Machin S (1998) Implications of Skill Biased Technological Change: International Evidence. Quarterly Journal of Economics 113:1245–79.

  14. Berry S (1994) Estimating discrete-choice models of product differentiation. Rand Journal of Economics 25:242–262.

  15. Black S, Lynch L (2001) How to Compete: The Impact of Workplace Practices and Information Technology on Productivity. Review of Economics and Statistics 83(3):434–445.

  16. Bound J, Cummins C, Griliches Z, Hall BH, Jaffe A (1984) Who Does R&D and Who Patents. In Griliches Z (eds.), R&D Patents and Productivity, University of Chicago Press for the NBER Chicago.

  17. Cohen WM, Klepper S (1994) Firm Size and the Nature of Innovation within Industries: the Case of Process and Product R&D. Review of Economics and Statistics 788(2):232–243.

  18. Cohen WM, Klepper S (1996) A Reprise of Size and R&D. Economic Journal 106:925–951.

  19. Cohen WM (1995) Empirical Studies of Innovation Activity. Blackwell, Oxford.

  20. Crepon B, Duguet E, Mairesse J (1998) Research, Innovation and Productivity: an Econometric Analysis at the Firm Level. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 7(2):115–158.

  21. Crespi, F. and M. Pianta, 2005, Technical Strategies, Demand and Innovation. mimeo.

  22. Davis P (2002) Estimating Multi-way Error Components Models with Unbalanced Data Structures. Journal of Econometrics 106:67–95.

  23. Davis P., 2003, ‚System Estimation of Multi-way Error Component Models using Unbalanced Data Structures’. mimeo.

  24. de Jong, J. and P. Vermeulen, 2004, ‚Determinants of Product Innovation in Small Firms: a Comparison Across Industries’, SCALES paper N200410, EIM, Zoetermeer, the Netherlands.

  25. Edquist C, Hommen L, McKelvey M (2001) Innovation and Employment: Product versus Process Innovation. Elgar Cheltenham.

  26. European Commission (2003) Observatory of European SMEs. SMEs in Europe 2003/7. European Commission, Luxembourg .

  27. European Commission-Eurostat (2001) Statistics on innovation in Europe. Data 1996–1997. European Commission, Luxembourg.

  28. European Commission-Eurostat (2004) Innovation in Europe. Results for the EU, Iceland and Norway. Data 1998–2001. European Commission, Luxembourg.

  29. Fuller WA, Batese GE (1973) Estimation of Linear Functions with Crossed-error Structure. Journal of Econometrics 2:67–78.

  30. Hausman JA (1978) Specification tests in Econometrics. Econometrica 46:1251–1271.

  31. Link A (1982) A Disaggregated Analysis of Industrial R&D Product versus Process Innovation. In Sahal D (eds.) The Transfer and Utilization of Technical Knowledge, Lexington Books, Lexington, MA.

  32. Loof H, Heshmati A (2002) “Knowledge Capital and Performance Heterogeneity: A firm-level Innovation Study. International Journal of Production Economics 76(1):61–85.

  33. Love JH, Ashcroft B (1999) Market Versus Corporate Structure in Plant-level Innovation Performance. Small Business Economics 13(2):97–109.

  34. Malerba, F. (ed.), 2004, Sectoral Systems of Innovation, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

  35. Mazodier P (1972) L’Estimation de Modèles à Errors Composées. Annales de l’INSEE 7:43–72.

  36. Moulton BR, Randolph WC (1989) Alternative Tests of the Error Components Model. Econometrica 57:685–693.

  37. Moulton BR (1986) Random Group Effects and the Precision of Regression Estimates. Journal of Econometrics 32:385–397.

  38. Nerlove A (1971a) Further Evidence on the Estimation of Dynamic Economic Relations from Time Series of Cross Sections. Econometrica 39:359–382.

  39. Nerlove A (1971b) A Note on Error Components Models. Econometrica 39:383–396.

  40. Pianta M (2001) Innovation, Demand and Employment. In Petit P, Soete L (eds.), Technology and the future of European Employment. Elgar, Cheltenham 142–165.

  41. Rogers M (2004) Networks, Firm Size and Innovation. Small Business Economics 22:141–153.

  42. Rothwell R, Dodgson M (1994) Innovation and Size of Firm. In Dodgson M, Rothwell R (eds.), The Handbook of Industrial Innovation, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK.

  43. Roy SN (1957) Some Aspects of Multivariate Analysis. Wiley, New York.

  44. Scherer FM (1965) Firm Size, Market Structure, Opportunity and the Output Patented Inventions. American Economic Review 55:1097–1125.

  45. Scherer FM (1984) Innovation and Growth: Schumpeterian Perspectives. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.

  46. Scherer FM (1991) Changing Perspectives on the Firm Size Problem. In Acs et ZJ, Audretsch DB (eds.) Innovation and Technological Change: an International Comparison, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.

  47. Schumpeter, J. A., 1942, Theory of Economic Development, Cambridge (Mass.), Harvard University Press (1st edn 1911).

  48. Soete LLG (1979) Firm Size and Innovative Activity: the Evidence Reconsidered. European Economic Review 12:319–340.

  49. Van Dijk B, Hertog R, Menkveld B, Thurik R (1997) Some New Evidence on the Determinants of Large and Small – Firm Innovation. Small Business Economics 9:335–343.

  50. Wallace TD, Hussain A (1969) The Use of Error Components Models in Combining Cross-section and Time-series Data. Econometrica 37:55–72.

  51. Wansbeek T, Kapeteyn A (1989) Estimation of Error–components Model with Incomplete Panels. Journal of Econometrics 41(3):341–361.

  52. Zellner A (1962) An Efficient Method of Estimating Seemingly Unrelated Regression and Tests for Aggregation Bias. Journal of American Statistical Association 57:348–368.

Download references

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to thank Marco Vivarelli, Martin Carree and an anonymous referee for their helpful comments. The usual disclaimer applies.

Author information

Correspondence to Mario Pianta.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vaona, A., Pianta, M. Firm Size and Innovation in European Manufacturing. Small Bus Econ 30, 283–299 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-006-9043-9

Download citation

Key words

  • product innovation
  • process innovation
  • firm size
  • determinants of innovation
  • European industries

JEL codes

  • L11
  • O31
  • O33
  • L26