Small Business Economics

, Volume 30, Issue 3, pp 283–299 | Cite as

Firm Size and Innovation in European Manufacturing

  • Andrea Vaona
  • Mario PiantaEmail author


The paper investigates the differences between small, medium-sized and large firms regarding their performance in the introduction of new products and processes. After a review of the relevant literature, two models are proposed and tested in search for different business strategies and innovation inputs connected to product and process innovations. The empirical analysis uses innovation survey (CIS 2) data at the industry level for 22 manufacturing sectors, broken down in three firm size classes, for eight European countries. Special attention is devoted to tackling the issues of possible endogeneity of the regressors and of unobserved sectoral heterogeneity. The results – strengthening the findings of previous studies – show that product and process innovations, though having some complementarities, are associated to different innovative inputs and strategies pursued by firms. Systematic differences also emerge between the behaviour of large firms and SMEs.

Key words

product innovation process innovation firm size determinants of innovation European industries 

JEL codes

L11 O31 O33 L26 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.



The authors would like to thank Marco Vivarelli, Martin Carree and an anonymous referee for their helpful comments. The usual disclaimer applies.


  1. Acs ZJ Audretsch DB (1987) Innovation, Market Structure and Firm Size. Review of Economics and Statistics 69:567–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Acs ZJ, Audretsch DB (1988) Innovation in Large and Small Firms: An Empirical Analysis. American Economic Review 78:678–690.Google Scholar
  3. Acs ZJ, Audretsch DB (1990) Innovation and Small Firms. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  4. Acs ZJ, Audretsch DB (1991) R&D, Firm Size and Innovative Activity. In Acs ZJ, Audretsch DB (eds.), Innovation and Technological Change, Harvester Wheatsheaf, London 39–59.Google Scholar
  5. Acs ZJ, Audretsch DB, Feldman MP (1994) R&D Spillovers and Recipient Firm Size. Review of Economics and Statistics, 76(2):336–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Amemya T (1971) The Estimation of the Variances in a Variance-covariance Model. International Economic Review 12:1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Antonucci T, Pianta M (2002) The Employment Effects of Product and Process Innovations in Europe. International Review of Applied Economics 16(3):295–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Arvanitis S (1997) The Impact of Firm Size on Innovative Activity – an Empirical Analysis Based on Swiss Firm Data. Small Business Economics 9:473–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Audretsch D, Vivarelli M (1994) Small Firms and R&D Spillovers: Evidence from Italy. Revue d’Economie Industrielle 67(1):225–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Balestra P, Nerlove M (1973) Pooling Cross Section and Time Series Data in the Estimation of Error Components Models. Journal of Econometrics 1:17–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Baltagi BH (1985) Pooling Cross Sections with Unequal Time Series Length. Economics Letters 18:133–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Baltagi BH (2003) Econometric Analysis of Panel Data. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  13. Berman E, Bound J, Machin S (1998) Implications of Skill Biased Technological Change: International Evidence. Quarterly Journal of Economics 113:1245–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Berry S (1994) Estimating discrete-choice models of product differentiation. Rand Journal of Economics 25:242–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Black S, Lynch L (2001) How to Compete: The Impact of Workplace Practices and Information Technology on Productivity. Review of Economics and Statistics 83(3):434–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bound J, Cummins C, Griliches Z, Hall BH, Jaffe A (1984) Who Does R&D and Who Patents. In Griliches Z (eds.), R&D Patents and Productivity, University of Chicago Press for the NBER Chicago.Google Scholar
  17. Cohen WM, Klepper S (1994) Firm Size and the Nature of Innovation within Industries: the Case of Process and Product R&D. Review of Economics and Statistics 788(2):232–243.Google Scholar
  18. Cohen WM, Klepper S (1996) A Reprise of Size and R&D. Economic Journal 106:925–951.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cohen WM (1995) Empirical Studies of Innovation Activity. Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
  20. Crepon B, Duguet E, Mairesse J (1998) Research, Innovation and Productivity: an Econometric Analysis at the Firm Level. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 7(2):115–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Crespi, F. and M. Pianta, 2005, Technical Strategies, Demand and Innovation. mimeo.Google Scholar
  22. Davis P (2002) Estimating Multi-way Error Components Models with Unbalanced Data Structures. Journal of Econometrics 106:67–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Davis P., 2003, ‚System Estimation of Multi-way Error Component Models using Unbalanced Data Structures’. mimeo.Google Scholar
  24. de Jong, J. and P. Vermeulen, 2004, ‚Determinants of Product Innovation in Small Firms: a Comparison Across Industries’, SCALES paper N200410, EIM, Zoetermeer, the Netherlands.Google Scholar
  25. Edquist C, Hommen L, McKelvey M (2001) Innovation and Employment: Product versus Process Innovation. Elgar Cheltenham.Google Scholar
  26. European Commission (2003) Observatory of European SMEs. SMEs in Europe 2003/7. European Commission, Luxembourg .Google Scholar
  27. European Commission-Eurostat (2001) Statistics on innovation in Europe. Data 1996–1997. European Commission, Luxembourg.Google Scholar
  28. European Commission-Eurostat (2004) Innovation in Europe. Results for the EU, Iceland and Norway. Data 1998–2001. European Commission, Luxembourg.Google Scholar
  29. Fuller WA, Batese GE (1973) Estimation of Linear Functions with Crossed-error Structure. Journal of Econometrics 2:67–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hausman JA (1978) Specification tests in Econometrics. Econometrica 46:1251–1271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Link A (1982) A Disaggregated Analysis of Industrial R&D Product versus Process Innovation. In Sahal D (eds.) The Transfer and Utilization of Technical Knowledge, Lexington Books, Lexington, MA.Google Scholar
  32. Loof H, Heshmati A (2002) “Knowledge Capital and Performance Heterogeneity: A firm-level Innovation Study. International Journal of Production Economics 76(1):61–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Love JH, Ashcroft B (1999) Market Versus Corporate Structure in Plant-level Innovation Performance. Small Business Economics 13(2):97–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Malerba, F. (ed.), 2004, Sectoral Systems of Innovation, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Mazodier P (1972) L’Estimation de Modèles à Errors Composées. Annales de l’INSEE 7:43–72.Google Scholar
  36. Moulton BR, Randolph WC (1989) Alternative Tests of the Error Components Model. Econometrica 57:685–693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Moulton BR (1986) Random Group Effects and the Precision of Regression Estimates. Journal of Econometrics 32:385–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Nerlove A (1971a) Further Evidence on the Estimation of Dynamic Economic Relations from Time Series of Cross Sections. Econometrica 39:359–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Nerlove A (1971b) A Note on Error Components Models. Econometrica 39:383–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pianta M (2001) Innovation, Demand and Employment. In Petit P, Soete L (eds.), Technology and the future of European Employment. Elgar, Cheltenham 142–165.Google Scholar
  41. Rogers M (2004) Networks, Firm Size and Innovation. Small Business Economics 22:141–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rothwell R, Dodgson M (1994) Innovation and Size of Firm. In Dodgson M, Rothwell R (eds.), The Handbook of Industrial Innovation, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK.Google Scholar
  43. Roy SN (1957) Some Aspects of Multivariate Analysis. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  44. Scherer FM (1965) Firm Size, Market Structure, Opportunity and the Output Patented Inventions. American Economic Review 55:1097–1125.Google Scholar
  45. Scherer FM (1984) Innovation and Growth: Schumpeterian Perspectives. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  46. Scherer FM (1991) Changing Perspectives on the Firm Size Problem. In Acs et ZJ, Audretsch DB (eds.) Innovation and Technological Change: an International Comparison, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
  47. Schumpeter, J. A., 1942, Theory of Economic Development, Cambridge (Mass.), Harvard University Press (1st edn 1911).Google Scholar
  48. Soete LLG (1979) Firm Size and Innovative Activity: the Evidence Reconsidered. European Economic Review 12:319–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Van Dijk B, Hertog R, Menkveld B, Thurik R (1997) Some New Evidence on the Determinants of Large and Small – Firm Innovation. Small Business Economics 9:335–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wallace TD, Hussain A (1969) The Use of Error Components Models in Combining Cross-section and Time-series Data. Econometrica 37:55–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wansbeek T, Kapeteyn A (1989) Estimation of Error–components Model with Incomplete Panels. Journal of Econometrics 41(3):341–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Zellner A (1962) An Efficient Method of Estimating Seemingly Unrelated Regression and Tests for Aggregation Bias. Journal of American Statistical Association 57:348–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Pavia and Kiel Institute for the World EconomyPaviaItaly
  2. 2.Istituto di Scienze Economiche Universitá di Urbino, Facoltá di Economia UrbinoItaly

Personalised recommendations