The Effects of Ownership and Governance on SMEs’ International Knowledge-based Resources
- 814 Downloads
Small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) play an important role in today’s global economy. However, there are significant differences in how they respond to the opportunities and threats in international markets. This study␣suggests SMEs’ ownership and governance systems significantly influence the development of knowledge-based resources necessary for internationalization. Using a sample of 384 US SMEs, we find a positive relationship between both the equity held by top management team members and venture capitalists and the development of these important resources. This positive association is further accentuated by the presence of independent outside directors on SMEs’ boards, supporting their monitoring and enterprising roles.
KEY WORDSgovernance internationalization ownership SMEs
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
We appreciate the comments of Morten Huse, Lorraine M Uhlaner, Mike Wright, R. Isil Yavuz, and Patricia H. Zahra on earlier drafts of this paper. Data collection was supported by a grant from the Glavin Center for Global Management at Babson College.
- Adler P. S., Kwon S. (2002). Social Capital: Prospects for a New Concept Academy of Management Review 27(1): 17–40.Google Scholar
- Bennett, R. J. and P. J. A. Robson, 2004, ‹The Role of Boards of Directors in Small and Mediumsized Firms’, Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development 11(1), 95–113Google Scholar
- Bloodgood J. M., Sapienza H. J., Almeida J. G. (1996). The Internationalization of New High-Potential U.S. Ventures: Antecedents and Outcomes Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 20(4): 61–76.Google Scholar
- Filatotchev I., Wright M. (2005). The Corporate Governance Life Cycle. In Filatotchev I., Wright M. (eds) The Life Cycle Of Corporate Governance. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 1–19.Google Scholar
- Gedajlovic, E. and S. A. Zahra, 2005, Entrepreneurship, organizational learning, and capability building. In S. W. Floyd, J. Roos, C. Jacobs and F. Kellermanns (eds.), Innovating strategy processes. Cambridge: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
- Grant, R. M. (1996). Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm Strategic Management Journal, 17(Special Issue: Knowledge and the Firm): 109–122.Google Scholar
- Johannisson, B. and M, Huse, 2000, Recruiting outside board members in the small family business: An ideological challenge. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 12.Google Scholar
- Johnson J. L., Daily C. M., Ellstand A. E. (1996). Boards and Directors: A Review and a Research Agenda Journal of Management 22(3): 408–429.Google Scholar
- Keasey K., Wright M. (1993). Issue in Corporate Accountability and Governance: An Editorial Accounting and Business Research 23(91A): 291–303.Google Scholar
- Lynall, M. D., B. R. Golden and A. J. Hillman, 2003, ‹Board Composition from Adolescence to Maturity: A Multitheoretical View,’ Academy of Management Review 28, 416–431Google Scholar
- OECD, 2002, OECD SME policy outlook. Paris: Centre for Entrepreneurship, SMEs and Local Development.Google Scholar
- OECD, 2004, 3–5 June, Promoting entrepreneurship and innovative SMEs in global economy. Paper presented at the 2nd OECD Conference of ministers responsible for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), Istanbul, Turkey.Google Scholar
- Oviatt B. M., McDougal P. P. (1997). Challenges for Internationalization Process Theory: the Case of International New Ventures Management International Review 37(2): 85–99.Google Scholar
- Perry, L. T. (1988). Venture Capital Connection: How Relationships between Founders and Venture Capitalists Affect Innovation in New Ventures Academy of Management Executive 2: 205–212.Google Scholar
- Short H., Keasey K., Hull A., Wright M. (1998). Corporate Governance, Accountability and Enterprise Scholarly Research and Theory Papers 6(3): 151–165.Google Scholar
- Short H., Keasey K., Wright M., Hull A. (1999). Corporate Governance: From Accountability to Enterprise Accounting and Business Research 29(4): 337–352.Google Scholar
- Statistical Abstract of the US, 1995–2003, www.census.gov/prod/www/statistical-abstract-us.html.Google Scholar
- Szulanksi, G. (1996). Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(Winter Special Issue): 27–43.Google Scholar
- Troy L., 1995–2003, Almanac of Business and Industrial Financial Ratios. Englewood Cliffs, N.J: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
- Tyebjee T. T., Bruno A. V. (1984) A Model of Venture Capitalist Investment Activity Management Science 30: 1051–1066.Google Scholar
- US International Trade Association, 2005, Small & medium-sized exporting companies: A statistical handbook- Results from the exporter database. Washington, DC: Office of Trade and Industry Information (http://www.ita.doc.gov/td/industry/otea/).
- Van den Berghe L. A. A., Levrau A. (2003). Measuring the Quality of Corporate Governance: In Search of a Tailormade Approach? Journal Of General Management 28(3) 71–86.Google Scholar
- Wiklund J. (1998). Small Firm Growth and Performance Jönköping University, Jönköping.Google Scholar
- Zahra S. A., Neubaum D., Huse M. (1997). The Effect of the Environment on the Firm’s Export Intensity Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice 22 (1): 25–46.Google Scholar