Advertisement

Small Business Economics

, Volume 29, Issue 3, pp 309–327 | Cite as

The Effects of Ownership and Governance on SMEs’ International Knowledge-based Resources

  • Shaker A. Zahra
  • Donald O. Neubaum
  • Lucia Naldi
Article

Abstract

Small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) play an important role in today’s global economy. However, there are significant differences in how they respond to the opportunities and threats in international markets. This study␣suggests SMEs’ ownership and governance systems significantly influence the development of knowledge-based resources necessary for internationalization. Using a sample of 384 US SMEs, we find a positive relationship between both the equity held by top management team members and venture capitalists and the development of these important resources. This positive association is further accentuated by the presence of independent outside directors on SMEs’ boards, supporting their monitoring and enterprising roles.

KEY WORDS

governance internationalization ownership SMEs 

JEL Classifications

L26 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Notes

Acknowledgments

We appreciate the comments of Morten Huse, Lorraine M Uhlaner, Mike Wright, R. Isil Yavuz, and Patricia H. Zahra on earlier drafts of this paper. Data collection was supported by a grant from the Glavin Center for Global Management at Babson College.

References

  1. Acs Z. J., Preston L. (1997). Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises, Technology, and Globalization: Introduction to a Special Issue on Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises in the Global Economy Small Business Economics 9(1): 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adler P. S., Kwon S. (2002). Social Capital: Prospects for a New Concept Academy of Management Review 27(1): 17–40.Google Scholar
  3. Andersson, S. (2004). Internationalization in Different Industrial Contexts Journal of Business Venturing 19(6): 851–875.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beatty R. P., Zajac E. J. (1994). Top Management Incentives, Monitoring, and Risk Sharing: A Study of Executive Compensation, Ownership, and Board Structure in Initial Public Offerings Administrative Science Quarterly 39: 313–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bell J., McNaughton R., Young S., Crick D. (2003). Towards an Integrative Model of Small Firm Internationalization Journal of International Entrepreneurship 1(4): 339–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bennett, R. J. and P. J. A. Robson, 2004, ‹The Role of Boards of Directors in Small and Mediumsized Firms’, Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development 11(1), 95–113Google Scholar
  7. Bloodgood J. M., Sapienza H. J., Almeida J. G. (1996). The Internationalization of New High-Potential U.S. Ventures: Antecedents and Outcomes Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 20(4): 61–76.Google Scholar
  8. Boter H., Holmquist C. (1996). Industry Characteristics and Internationalization Processes in Small Firms Journal of Business Venturing 11(6): 471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brush C. G., Chaganti R. (1999). Businesses Without Glamour? An Analysis of Resources on Performance by Size and Age in Small Service and Retail Firms Journal of Business Venturing 14(3): 233–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Buckley P. J. (1997). International Technology Transfer by Small and Medium Sized Enterprises Small Business Economics 9(1): 67–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Calof J. L. (1993). The Mode Choice and Change Decision Process and its Impact on International Performance International Business Review 2(1): 97–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Carpenter M. A., Pollock T. G., Leary M. M. (2003). Testing a Model of Reasoned Risk-Taking: Governance, the Experience of Principals and Agents, and Global Strategy in High-Technology IPO Firms Strategic Management Journal 24(9): 803–820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Daily C. M., Dalton D. R. (1992) The Relationship Between Governance Structure and Corporate Performance in Entrepreneurial Firms Journal of Business Venturing 7(5): 375–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Daily C. M., McDougall P. P., Covin J. G., Dalton D. R. (2002). Governance and Strategic Leadership in Entrepreneurial Firms Journal of Management 28(3): 387–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Delios A., Beamish P. W. (1999). Geographic Scope, Product Diversification, and the Corporate Performance of Japanese Firms Strategic Management Journal 20(8): 711–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dess G., Gupta A., Hennart J.-F., Hill C. W. L. (1995). Conducting and Integrating Strategy Research at the International, Corporate, and Business Levels: Issues and Directions Journal of Management 21(3): 357–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dunning J. H. (2000). The Eclectic Paradigm as an Envelope for Economic and Business Theories of MNE Activity International Business Review 9(2): 163–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dyer J. H., Singh H. (1998). The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganizational Competitive Advantage Academy of Management Review 23(4): 660–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Filatotchev I., Wright M. (2005). The Corporate Governance Life Cycle. In Filatotchev I., Wright M. (eds) The Life Cycle Of Corporate Governance. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 1–19.Google Scholar
  20. Gedajlovic E., Lubatkin M., Schulze W. S. (2004). Crossing the Threshold from Founder Management to Professional Management: A Governance Perspective Journal of Management Studies 41(5): 899–912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gedajlovic, E. and S. A. Zahra, 2005, Entrepreneurship, organizational learning, and capability building. In S. W. Floyd, J. Roos, C. Jacobs and F. Kellermanns (eds.), Innovating strategy processes. Cambridge: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  22. George G., Wiklund J., Zahra S. A. (2005). Ownership and the Internationalization of Small Firms Journal of Management 31: 210–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Grant, R. M. (1996). Toward a knowledge-based theory of the firm Strategic Management Journal, 17(Special Issue: Knowledge and the Firm): 109–122.Google Scholar
  24. Henderson A. D. (1999). Firm Strategy and Age Dependence: A Contingent View of the Liabilities of Newness, Adolescence and Obsolescence Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2): 281–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Johannisson, B. and M, Huse, 2000, Recruiting outside board members in the small family business: An ideological challenge. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 12.Google Scholar
  26. Johanson J., Vahlne J.-E. (2003). Business Relationship Learning and Commitment in the Internationalization Process Journal of International Entrepreneurship 1(1): 83–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Johnson J. L., Daily C. M., Ellstand A. E. (1996). Boards and Directors: A Review and a Research Agenda Journal of Management 22(3): 408–429.Google Scholar
  28. Keasey K., Wright M. (1993). Issue in Corporate Accountability and Governance: An Editorial Accounting and Business Research 23(91A): 291–303.Google Scholar
  29. Kogut B., Zander U. (1992). Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology Organization Science 3(3, Focused Issue: Management of Technology): 383–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Le S. A., Walters B., Kroll M. (2006). The Moderating Effects of External Monitors on the Relationship between R&D Spending and Firm Performance Journal of Business Research 59(2): 278–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lu J. W., Beamish P. W. (2001). The Internationalization and Performance of SMEs Strategic Management Journal 22(6–7): 565–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lynall, M. D., B. R. Golden and A. J. Hillman, 2003, ‹Board Composition from Adolescence to Maturity: A Multitheoretical View,’ Academy of Management Review 28, 416–431Google Scholar
  33. MacMillan I. C., Kudlow D. M., Khoylian R. (1989). Venture Capitalists’ Involvement in their Investments: Extent and Performance Journal of Business Venturing 4: 27–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. MacMillan I. C., Seigel R., Subbanarasimha P. N. (1985). Criteria used by Venture Capitalists to Evaluate New Venture Proposals Journal of Business Venturing 1: 119–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. McDougall P. P., Oviatt B. M. (1996). New Venture Internationalization, Strategic Change, and Performance: A Follow-up Study Journal of Business Venturing 11(1): 23–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. McNulty T., Pettigrew A. (1999). Strategists on the Board Organization Studies 20: 47–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Mitchell W., Shaver J. M., Yeung B. (1992). Getting there in a Global Industry: Impacts on Performance of Changing International Presence Strategic Management Journal 13 (Sept.): 419–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Nahapiet J., Ghoshal S. (1998). Social Capital, Intellectual Capital and the Organizational Advantage Academy of Management Review 23(2): 242–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Nickerson J. A., Zenger T. R. (2004). A Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm: The Problem-Solving Perspective Organization Science 15(6): 617–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. OECD, 2002, OECD SME policy outlook. Paris: Centre for Entrepreneurship, SMEs and Local Development.Google Scholar
  41. OECD, 2004, 3–5 June, Promoting entrepreneurship and innovative SMEs in global economy. Paper presented at the 2nd OECD Conference of ministers responsible for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), Istanbul, Turkey.Google Scholar
  42. Oviatt B. M., McDougal P. P. (1997). Challenges for Internationalization Process Theory: the Case of International New Ventures Management International Review 37(2): 85–99.Google Scholar
  43. Perry, L. T. (1988). Venture Capital Connection: How Relationships between Founders and Venture Capitalists Affect Innovation in New Ventures Academy of Management Executive 2: 205–212.Google Scholar
  44. Reuber A. R., Fischer E. (1997). The Influence of the Management Team’s International Experience on the Internationalization Behaviors of SMEs Journal of International Business Studies 28(4): 807–825.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Samiee S., Walters P. G. P. (1990). Influence of Firm Size on Export Planning and Performance Journal of Business Research 20: 235–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sanders W. G., Carpenter M. A. (1998). Internationalization and Firm Governance: The Roles of CEO Compensation, Top Team Composition, and Board Structure Academy of Management Journal 41: 158–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sapienza, H. J. (1992), When Do Venture Capitalists Add Value? Journal of Business Venturing 7: 9–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Short H., Keasey K., Hull A., Wright M. (1998). Corporate Governance, Accountability and Enterprise Scholarly Research and Theory Papers 6(3): 151–165.Google Scholar
  49. Short H., Keasey K., Wright M., Hull A. (1999). Corporate Governance: From Accountability to Enterprise Accounting and Business Research 29(4): 337–352.Google Scholar
  50. Sirmon D. G., Hitt M. A. (2003). Managing Resources: Linking Unique Resources, Management, and Wealth Creation in Family Firms Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 27(4): 339–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sriram V., Manu F. (1995). Country-of-Destination and Export Marketing Strategy: A Study of U.S. Exporters Journal of Global Marketing 8(3–4): 171–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Statistical Abstract of the US, 1995–2003, www.census.gov/prod/www/statistical-abstract-us.html.Google Scholar
  53. Szulanksi, G. (1996). Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(Winter Special Issue): 27–43.Google Scholar
  54. Troy L., 1995–2003, Almanac of Business and Industrial Financial Ratios. Englewood Cliffs, N.J: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  55. Tyebjee T. T., Bruno A. V. (1984) A Model of Venture Capitalist Investment Activity Management Science 30: 1051–1066.Google Scholar
  56. US International Trade Association, 2005, Small & medium-sized exporting companies: A statistical handbook- Results from the exporter database. Washington, DC: Office of Trade and Industry Information (http://www.ita.doc.gov/td/industry/otea/).
  57. Van den Berghe L. A. A., Levrau A. (2003). Measuring the Quality of Corporate Governance: In Search of a Tailormade Approach? Journal Of General Management 28(3) 71–86.Google Scholar
  58. Van Gils A. (2005) Management and Governance in Dutch SMES European Management Journal 23(5): 583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wade J., O’Reilly C. A, Chandratat I. (1990). Golden Parachutes: CEOs and the Exercise of Social Influence Administrative Science Quarterly 35: 587–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Westhead P., Wright M., Ucbasaran D. (2001). The Internationalization of New and Small Firms: A Resource-Based View Journal of Business Venturing, 16(4): 333–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Wiklund J. (1998). Small Firm Growth and Performance Jönköping University, Jönköping.Google Scholar
  62. Wiklund J., Shepherd D. (2003). Knowledge-Based Resources, Entrepreneurial Orientation, and the Performance of Small and Medium-Sized Businesses Strategic Management Journal 24(13): 1307–1314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Wright P., Ferris S., Sarin A., Awasthi V. (1996). Impact of Corporate Insider, Blockholder, and Institutional Equity Ownership on Firm Risk Taking Academy of Management Journal 39(2): 441–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Wright M., Robbie K. (1998). Venture Capital and Private Equity: A Review and Synthesis Journal of Business Finance and Accounting 25(5–6): 521–570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Yli-Renko H., Autio 0E., Sapienza H. J. (2001). Social Capital, Knowledge Acquisition, and Knowledge Exploitation in Young Technology-Based Firms Strategic Management Journal 22(6–7): 587–613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Zahra S. A. (1996). Governance, Ownership, and Corporate Entrepreneurship: The Moderating Impact of Industry Technological Opportunities Academy of Management Journal 39(6): 1713–1735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Zahra S. A. (2003). International Expansion of U.S. Manufacturing Family Businesses: The Effect of Ownership and Involvement Journal of Business Venturing 18(4): 495–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Zahra S. A., Filatotchev I. (2004). Governance of the Entrepreneurial Threshold Firm: A Knowledge-Based Perspective Journal of Management Studies 41(5): 885–897.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Zahra S. A., Ireland D. R., Hitt M. A. (2000). International Expansion by New Venture Firms: International Diversity, Mode of Market Entry, Technological Learning, and Performance Academy of Management Journal 43(5): 925–950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Zahra S. A., Neubaum D., Huse M. (1997). The Effect of the Environment on the Firm’s Export Intensity Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice 22 (1): 25–46.Google Scholar
  71. Zahra S. A., Neubaum D. O., Huse M. (2000). Entrepreneurship in Medium-Size Companies: Exploring the Effects of Ownership and Governance Systems Journal of Management 26(5): 947–976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Zahra S. A., Pearce J. A. (1989). Boards of Directors and Corporate Financial Performance: A Review and Integrative Model Journal of Management 15: 291–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Zajac E. J., Westphal J. D. (1994). The Costs and Benefits of Managerial Incentives and Monitoring in Large U.S. Corporations: When is More not Better? Strategic Management Journal 15: 121–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Zutshi R. K., Tan W. L., Allampalli D. G., Gibbobs P. G. (1999) Singapore Venture Capitalists (VCs) Investment Evaluation Criteria: A Re-examination Small Business Economics 1(13): 9–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shaker A. Zahra
    • 1
  • Donald O. Neubaum
    • 2
  • Lucia Naldi
    • 3
  1. 1.Center for Entrepreneurial Studies & Strategic Management & Organization Department Carlson School of ManagementUniversity of MinnesotaMinneapolisUSA
  2. 2.Oregon State University College of BusinessCorvallisUSA
  3. 3.Jönköping International Business SchoolJönköpingSweden

Personalised recommendations