Advertisement

Small Business Economics

, Volume 29, Issue 3, pp 295–308 | Cite as

Corporate Governance and Strategic Change in SMEs: The Effects of Ownership, Board Composition and Top Management Teams

  • Olof Brunninge
  • Mattias Nordqvist
  • Johan Wiklund
Article

Abstract

This paper investigates how governance mechanisms affect the ability of small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) to introduce strategic change. Previous research typically assumes that governance mechanisms operate independently of each other. Building on agency theory and insights from the literature on small firm governance, we hypothesize that governance variables related to ownership, the board of directors and the top management team all affect strategic change and that it is important to examine the interaction effects of these governance mechanisms. Using a longitudinal sample of over 800 SMEs, our general logic and hypotheses are supported by the analyses. We find that closely held firms exhibit less strategic change than do SMEs relying on more widespread ownership structures. However, to some extent, closely held firms can overcome these weaknesses and achieve strategic change by utilizing outside directors on the board and/or extending the size of the top management teams. Implications for theory and management practice in SMEs are discussed.

Key words

corporate governance small- and medium-sized enterprises strategic change 

Jel Classification

L26 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Amason A. C. (1996) Distinguishing the Effects of Functional and Dysfunctional Conflict on Strategic Decision Making: Resolving a Paradox for Top Management Teams Academy of Management Journal 39(1):123–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amason A. C., Sapienza H. J. (1997) The Effects of Top Management Team Size and Interaction Norms on Cognitive and Affective Conflict Journal of Management 23(4):495–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ansoff I. (1965) Corporate Strategy. New York, McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  4. Aronoff, C. E. and J. L. Ward, 1997, ‘Preparing Your Family Business for Strategic Change’, Family Business Leadership Series, 9 Marietta, Georgia: Business Owner Resources.Google Scholar
  5. Barach, J. A., 1984, ‚Is There a Cure for the Paralyzed Family Board?’, Sloan Management Review Fall, 3–12Google Scholar
  6. Baysinger B. D., Hoskisson R. E. (1990) The Composition of Boards of Directors and Strategic Control Academy of Management Review 15(1):72–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Beatty R. P., Zajac E. J. (1994) Managerial Incentives, Monitoring, and Risk Bearing: A Study of Executive Compensation, Ownership, and Board Structure in Initial Public Offerings Administrative Science Quarterly 39(2):313–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bennedzen M., Wolfenzon D. (1999) The Balance of Power in Closely held Corporations Journal of Financial Economics 58:113–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bethel J. E., Liebeskind J. (1993) The Effects of Ownership Structure on Corporate Restructuring, Strategic Management Journal 14(special issue):15–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Boeker W. (1989) Strategic Change: The Effects of Founding and History, Academy of Management Journal 32(3):489–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Borch O. J., Huse M. (1993) Informal Strategic Networks and the Board of Directors Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 18(1):23–36.Google Scholar
  12. Brunninge O., Nordqvist M. (2004) Ownership Structure, Board Composition and Entrepreneurship: Evidence from Family Firms and Venture-Capital Backed Firms International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research 10(1/2):85–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Carney M. (2005) Corporate Governance and Competitive Advantage in Family-Controlled Firms Entrepreneurship Theory & Practice 29(3):249–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chandler A. D. (1990) Scale and Scope. The Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism Cambridge, MA, The Belknap Press.Google Scholar
  15. Cohen J., Cohen P. (1983) Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Hillsdale, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  16. Covin J. G., Slevin D. P. (1986) The Development and Testing of an Organizational-level Entrepreneurship Scale In Ronstadt R., Hornaday J. A., Peterson R., Vesper K. H. (eds.), Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research. Wellesley, MA, Babson College, 628–639.Google Scholar
  17. Covin J. G., Slevin D. P. (1989) Strategic Management of Small Firms in Hostile and Benign Environments Strategic Management Journal 10(1):75–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cowling M. (2003) Productivity and Corporate Governance in Smaller Firms Small Business Economics 20:335–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Daily C. M., Dalton D. R. (1993) Boards of Directors Leadership and Structure: Control and Performance Implications Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 17:65–81.Google Scholar
  20. Denis D. J., Denis D. K., Sarin A. (1997) Agency Problems, Equity Ownership, and Corporate Diversification Journal of Finance 52(1):135–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Eisenhardt K. M. (1989) Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review Academy of Management Review 14(1):57–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ensley M. D., Pearson A. W. (2005) An Exploratory Comparison of the Behavioral Dynamics of Top Management Teams in Family and Nonfamily New Ventures: Cohesion, Conflict, Potency, and Consensus Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice 29:267–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Fama E. F. (1980) Agency Problems and the Theory of the Firm Journal of Political Economy 88:288–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fama E. F., Jensen M. C. (1983) Separation of Ownership and Control Journal of Law and Economics 26:301–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Fiegener M. K. (2005) Determinants of Board Participation in the Strategic Decisions of Small Corporations Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice 29(5):627–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Floyd S. W., Woolridge B. (1992) Middle Management Involvement in Strategy and its Association with Strategic Type: A Research Note Strategic Management Journal 13(Summer):153–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Forbes D. P., Milliken F. J. (1999) Cognition and Corporate Governance: Understanding Boards of Directors as Strategic Decision-Making Groups Academy of Management Review 24(3):489–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ford R. H. (1988) Outside Directors and the Privately-Owned Firm: Are they Necessary? Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice 13(1):49–57.Google Scholar
  29. Fredborg L. (1992) Sweden International Financial Law Review 11(4, Special Report):39–44.Google Scholar
  30. George G., Wiklund J., Zahra S. A. (2005) Ownership and the Internationalization of the Small Firm Journal of Management 31(2):210–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gersick K. E., Davis J. A., McCollom Hampton M., Lansberg I. (1997) Generation to Generation – Life Cycles of the Family Business. Boston, Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  32. Gibbons P. T., O’Connor T. (2005) Influences on Strategic Planning Processes among Irish SMEs Journal of Small Business Management 43:170–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Golden B. R., Zajac E. J. (2001) When Boards Influence Strategy? Inclination × Power = Strategic Change Strategic Management Journal 22:1087–1111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Goodstein J. G., Boeker W. B. (1991) Turbulence at the Top: A New Perspective on Governance Structure Changes and Strategic Change Academy of Management Journal 34(2):306–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Goodstein J. G., Gautam G. K., Boeker W. B. (1994) The Effects of Board Size and Diversity on Strategic Change Strategic Management Journal 15:241–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hambrick D. C., Mason P. A. (1984) Upper Echelons: The Organization as a Reflection of its Top Managers Academy of Management Review 9(2):193–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hill C. W. L., Snell S. A. (1988) External Control, Corporate Strategy and Firm Performance in Research-Intensive Industries Strategic Management Journal 9(6):577–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hoskisson R. E., Hitt M. A., Johnson R. A., Grossman W. (2000) Conflicting Voices: The Effects of Institutional Ownership Heterogeneity and Internal Governance on Corporate Innovation Strategies Academy of Management Journal 45(4):697–716.Google Scholar
  39. Hoskisson R. E., Johnson R. A., Moesel D. D. (1994) Corporate Divestiture Intensity in Restructuring Firms: Effects of Governance, Strategy, and Performance Academy of Management Journal 37(5):1207–1252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hung H. (1998) A Typology of the Theories of the Roles of Governing Boards Corporate Governance: An International Review, 6(2):101–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Huse M. (2000) Boards of Directors in SMEs: A Review and Research Agenda Entrepreneurship and Regional Development 12(4):271–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Jensen M. C., Meckling W. H. (1976) Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behaviour, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure Journal of Financial Economics 3:305–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Johannisson B., Huse M. (2000) Recruiting Outside Board Members in the Small Family Business: An Ideological Challenge Entrepreneurship and Regional Development 12(4):353–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Johnson G. (1988) Rethinking Incrementalism Strategic Management Journal 9:75–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Johnson J. L., Daily C. M., Ellstrand A. E. (1996) Boards of Directors: A Review and Research Agenda Journal of Management 22(3):409–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Johnson R. A., Greening D. W. (1999) The Effects of Corporate Governance and Institutional Ownership Types on Corporate Social Performance Academy of Management Journal 42(5):564–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Jonnergård K., Kärreman M. (2004) Board Activities and the Denationalization of Ownership – The Case of Sweden Journal of Management and Governance 8:229–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Keasey, K., S. Thompson and M. Wright (eds.), 2005, Corporate Governance: Accountability, Enterprise and International Comparisons. London: Wiley.Google Scholar
  49. Keck S. L. (1997) Top Management Team Structure: Differential Effects by Environmental Context. Organization Science 8(2):143–156.Google Scholar
  50. Kets de Vries M. F. R. (1993) The Dynamics of Family Controlled Firms: The Good and the Bad News Organisational Dynamics 21(3):59–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Kimberly J. R., Bouchikhi H. (1995) The Dynamics of Organizational Development and Change: How the Past Shapes the Present and Constrains the Future Organization Science 6(1):9–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Leonard D., Sensiper S. (1998) The Role of Tacit Knowledge in Group Innovation California Management Review 40(3):112–132.Google Scholar
  53. Lumpkin T. G., Dess G. G. (1996) Clarifying the Entrepreneurial Orientation Construct and Linking it to Performance Academy of Management Review 21(1):135–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Mace M. L. (1986) Directors: Myth and Reality 2nd ed. Boston, Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  55. Melin L., Hellgren B. (1994) Patterns of Strategic Processes: Two Change Typologies In: Thomas H., O’Neal T., White R., Hurst D. (eds.), Building the Strategically-Responsive Organisation Chichester, Wiley.Google Scholar
  56. Meyer M. W., Zucker L. G. (1989) Permanently Failing Organizations Newbury Park, Sage.Google Scholar
  57. Mintzberg H., Ahlstrand B., Lampel J. (1998) Strategy Safari: A Guided Tour Through the Wilds of Strategic Management. New York, Free Press.Google Scholar
  58. Monks R. A. G., Minow N. (2004) Corporate Governance 3rd ed. Oxford, Blackwell Business.Google Scholar
  59. Mustakallio M., Autio E., Zahra S. A. (2002) Relational and Contractual Governance in Family Firms: Effects on Strategic Decision Making Family Business Review 15(3):205–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Nordqvist M., Melin L. (2002) The Dynamics of Family Firms: An Institutional Perspective on Corporate Governance and Strategic Change In Fletcher D. (ed.) Understanding the Small, Family Firm. London, Routledge.Google Scholar
  61. Nunnally J. C. (1967) Psychometric Theory New York, McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  62. Nunnally J. C., Bernstein I. H. (1994) Psychometric Theory 3 New York, McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  63. Nutek (Swedish Agency for Economic and Regional Growth), 2004, ‘Ägarskiften och ledarskiften i företag. En fördjupad analys’, Nutek B 2004:6, Stockholm.Google Scholar
  64. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) (2002) Small and Medium Enterprise Outlook. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  65. Pettigrew A. (1992) On Studying Managerial Elites Strategic Management Journal 13:163–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Pettigrew A., Whipp R. (1991) Managing Change for Competitive Success. London, Blackwell.Google Scholar
  67. Pfeffer J., Salancik G. R. (1978) The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. New York, Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  68. Poutziouris P. Z., Steier L. P., Smyrnios K. X. (2004) Guest Editorial: A Commentary on Family Business Entrepreneurial Developments International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research 10(1/2):7–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Rediker K. J., Seth A. (1995) Board of Directors and Substitution Effects of Alternative Governance Mechanisms Strategic Management Journal 16(2):85–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Rindova V. (1999) What Corporate Boards have to do with Strategy: A Cognitive Perspective Journal of Management Studies 36(7):953–975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Robbins K. D., Pearce III J. A. (1992) Turnaround: Retrenchment and Recovery Strategic Management Journal 13(4):287–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Schulze W. S., Lubatkin M. H., Dino R. N., Buchholtz A. K. (2001) Agency Relationships in Family Firms: Theory and Evidence Organization Science 12(2):99–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Schulze W. S., Lubatkin M. H., Dino R. N. (2002) Altruism, Agency and the Competitiveness of Family Firms Managerial and Decision Economics 23:247–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Schulze W. S., Lubatkin M. H., Dino R. N. (2003) Toward a Theory of Agency and Altruism in Family Firms Journal of Business Venturing 18(4):473–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Sharma P., Chrisman J. J., Chua J. H. (1997) Strategic Management of the Family Business: Past Research and Future Challenges Family Business Review 10(1):1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Shleifer A., Vishny R. (1997) A Survey of Corporate Governance Journal of Finance 52:737–783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Short H., Keasey K., Wright M., Hull A. (1999) Corporate Governance: From Accountability to Enterprise Accounting and Business Research 29(4):337–352.Google Scholar
  78. Tricker R. (1996) Corporate Governance: The Ideological Imperative. In Thomas H. T., Neal D. (eds.) Strategic Integration. Chicester, John Wiley.Google Scholar
  79. Tricker R. (1997) Editorial: All Corporate Entities Need to be Governed Corporate Governance 5(1):1–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Tushman M. L., Romanelli E. (1985) Organizational Evolution: A Metamorphosis Model of Convergence and Reorientation In: Cummings L. L., Staw B. M. (eds). Research in Organizational Behavior 7. Greenwich, JAI Press, 171–222.Google Scholar
  81. Ucbasaran D., Lockett A., Wright M., Westhead P. (2003) Entrepreneurial Founder Teams: Factors Associated with Member Entry and Exit Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice 28(2):107–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Ward J. L. (1991) Creating Effective Boards for Private Enterprises Marietta, Business Owners Resources.Google Scholar
  83. Wiklund, J., 1998, ‘Small Firm Growth and Performance: Entrepreneurship and Beyond’, JIBS Dissertation Series No. 3, Jönköping International Business School.Google Scholar
  84. Wiklund J., Davidsson P., Delmar F. (2003) What Do They Think and Feel about Growth? An Expectancy-Value Approach to Small Business Managers’ Attitudes Toward Growth Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice 27(3):247–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Zahra S. A., Pearce III J. A. (1989) Board of Directors and Corporate Financial Performance: A Review and Integrative Model Journal of Management 15:291–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Zajac E., Westphal J. D. (1994) The Costs and Benefits of Managerial Incentives and Monitoring in Large U.S. Corporations: When is more not better?, Strategic Management Journal 15:121–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Olof Brunninge
    • 1
  • Mattias Nordqvist
    • 1
  • Johan Wiklund
    • 1
  1. 1.EMMJönköping Intl. Business SchoolJonkopingSweden

Personalised recommendations