Small Business Economics

, Volume 28, Issue 1, pp 23–35 | Cite as

Are Small Innovators Credit Rationed?

Article

Abstract

Drawing upon a sample of 256 small firms who applied for bank loans, the current paper is concerned with the extent to which ‘innovativeness’ is associated with a lower level of loan application success. The paper records the proportion of loan successfully applied for and estimates a series of tobit models utilising a number of proxy measures for innovation (in terms of inputs, outputs, and commercial significance to the firm) and incorporating standard controls. In general, the models suggest (as anticipated) that the most innovative firms are less successful in loan markets than their less innovative peers – though there is some variation by proxy. Moreover, there is tentative evidence that ‘a little innovation may be a good thing’.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adams A. (1982). Barriers to Product innovation in Small Firms: Policy Implications. European Small Business Journal 1: 67–86 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arrow K. (1971). Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention. In: Arrow, K. (eds) Essays in the Theory of Risk-Bearing, pp. Markham, Chicago Google Scholar
  3. Baldwin J., G. Gellatly and V. Gaudreault, 2002, Financing innovation in new small firms: New evidence from Canada, 11F0019, No. 190, Micro-Economic Analysis Division, Statistics CanadaGoogle Scholar
  4. Bank of England, 1996, The Financing of Technology-Based Small Firms, London, OctoberGoogle Scholar
  5. Bank of England, 2001, The Financing of Technology-Based Small Firms, London, FebruaryGoogle Scholar
  6. Bank of England, 2004. Finance for Small Firms An Eleventh Report, London, AprilGoogle Scholar
  7. Beck T., A. Demirgüç-Kunt and V. Maksimovic, 2003, Bank Competition, Financing Obstacles, and Access to Credit, World Bank Policy Research WP 2996Google Scholar
  8. Binks M., 1979, Finance for expansion in the small firm, Lloyds Bank Review, OctoberGoogle Scholar
  9. Binks M. R. and Ennew C. T. (1996). Growing Firms and the Credit Constraints. Small Business Economics 8: 17–25 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Boocock G. and Woods M. (1997). The evaluation criteria used by venture capitalists: evidence from a UK venture fund. International Small Business Journal 16: 36–57 Google Scholar
  11. Brophy D. and Shulman J. (1993). Financial Factors which Stimulate Innovation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 17: 61–75 Google Scholar
  12. Bullock A. and A. Hughes, 2000, The Survey Method, the SME Panel Database and Sample Attrition, in CBR British Enterprise in Transition, ESCR Centre for Business Research, University of CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  13. Canepa A. and P. Stoneman, 2002, Financial constraints on innovation: A European cross country study, United Nations University, Institute for New Technologies, Maastricht, NLGoogle Scholar
  14. CBI, 1996. Tech Stars: Breaking the growth barriers for technology-based SMEs, LondonGoogle Scholar
  15. Centre for Business Research (CBR), 1996, The Changing State of British Enterprise, Department of Applied Economics, University of CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  16. Centre for Business Research (CBR), 1998, Enterprise Britain, Department of Applied Economics, University of CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  17. Centre for Business Research, 2000, British Enterprise in Transition, Department of Applied Economics, University of CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  18. Centre for Business Research (CBR), 2003, Enterprise Challenged, Department of Applied Economics, University of CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  19. Cohen W. (1995). Empirical Studies of Innovative Activity. In: Stoneman, P. (eds) Handbook of the Economics of Innovation and Technological Change, pp 182–264. Blackwell, Oxford Google Scholar
  20. Cosh A., A. Hughes and E. Wood, 1998, Innovation surveys and very small enterprises, WP89, Centre for Business Research, University of CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  21. Cressy R. (1996). Are Business Startups Debt Rationed. The Economic Journal 106: 1253–1270 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Cressy R. and Olofsson C. (1997). European SME Financing: An Overview. 9: 87–86 Google Scholar
  23. Ennew C. and Binks M. (1995). The Provision of Finance to Small Firms: Does the Banking Relationship Constrain Performance?. Journal of Small Business Finance 4: 69–85 Google Scholar
  24. Freel M. (1999). The Financing of Small Firm Product Innovation in the UK. Technovation 19: 707–719 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Freel M. (2003). Sectoral Patterns of Small Firm Innovation, Networking and Proximity. Research Policy 32: 751–770 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Giudici G. and Paleari S. (2000). The Provision of Finance to Innovation: A Survey Conducted Among Italian Technology-based Small Firms. Small Business Economics 14: 37–53 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Guiso L. (1998). High-tech Firms and Credit Rationing. Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organization 35: 39–59 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. HM Treasury, 1998, Financing of High Technology Businesses: A report to the Paymaster General, London, NovemberGoogle Scholar
  29. Hoffman K., Milady P., Bessant J. and Perren L. (1998). Small firms, R&D, Technology and Innovation in the UK: A Literature Review. Technovation 18: 39–55 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jensen J. B. and McGuckin R. H. (1997). Firm Performance and Evolution: Empirical Regularities in the US Microdata. Industrial and Corporate Change 6: 25–47 Google Scholar
  31. Keeton W. (1979). Equilibrium Credit Rationing. Garland Publishing, New York Google Scholar
  32. Levenson A. R. and Willard K. L. (2000). Do Firms Get the Financing They Want? Measuring Credit Rationing Experienced by Small Businesses in the U.S.. Small Business Economics 14: 83–94 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Love B. and Roper S. (1999). The Determinants of Innovation: R&D, Technology Transfer and Networking Effects. Review of Industrial Organisation 15: 43–64 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Martin S. and Scott J. (2000). The Nature of Innovation Market Failure and the Design of Public Support for Private Innovation. Research Policy 29: 437–448 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Moore I. and Garnsey E. (1993). Funding for Innovation in Small Firms: The Role of Government. Research Policy 22: 507–519 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Murray G. and Lott J. (1993). Have UK Venture Capitalists a Bias against Investment in New Technology-based Firms?. Research Policy 24: 283–299 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Myers S. and Majluf N. (1984). Corporate Financing and Investment Decisions when Firms have Information that Investors do not. Journal of Financial Economics 13: 187–221 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Oakey R., 1997, A Review of Policy and Practice Relating to High Technology Small Firms in the United Kingdom, WP 359, MBS, University of ManchesterGoogle Scholar
  39. Oakey R., R. Rothwell and S. Cooper, 1988, Management of Innovation in High Technology Small Firms, Pinter, LondonGoogle Scholar
  40. Parker S. (2002). Do Banks Ration Credit to New Enterprises? And should Governments Intervene?. Scottish Journal of Political Economy 49: 162–195 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. SBRC, 1992. The State of British Enterprise, Department of Applied Economics, University of CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  42. Seaton J. and Walker I. (1997). The Pattern of R&D Finance for Small UK Companies. In: Oakey, R. and Mukhtar, S.-M. (eds) New technology-based firms in the 1990s, pp 71–91. Paul Chapman, London Google Scholar
  43. Stiglitz J., 1993. Endogenous growth and cycles, NBER WP 4286Google Scholar
  44. Stinchcombe A. L. (1965). Social Structure and Organizations. In: March, J. G. (eds) Handbook of Organizations, pp 142–193. Rand McNally & Company, Chicago Google Scholar
  45. Storey D., 1994. Understanding the Small Business Sector, London, RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
  46. Symeonidis G., 1996. Innovation, Firm Size and Market Structure: Schumpeterian Hypotheses and Some New Themes, Economics Dept. WP 161, OECD, ParisGoogle Scholar
  47. Tabachnik B. and L. Fidell, 2001. Using multivariate statistics, 4th ed., Pearson, Needham Heights, MAGoogle Scholar
  48. Tylecote A. (1994). Financial Systems and Innovation. In: Dodgson, M. and Rothwell, R. (eds) The Handbook of Industrial Innovation, pp 259–267. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham Google Scholar
  49. Westhead P. and Storey D. (1997). Financial Constraints on the Growth of High-Technology Small Firms in the United Kingdom. Applied Financial Economics 7: 197–201 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of ManagementUniversity of OttowaOttowaCanada

Personalised recommendations