Small Business Economics

, Volume 24, Issue 3, pp 311–321 | Cite as

The Effect of Entrepreneurial Activity on National Economic Growth

Abstract

Entrepreneurial activity is generally assumed to be an important aspect of the organization of industries most conducive to innovative activity and unrestrained competition. This paper investigates whether total entrepreneurial activity (TEA) influences GDP growth for a sample of 36 countries. We test whether this influence depends on the level of economic development measured as GDP per capita. Adjustment is made for a range of alternative explanations for achieving economic growth by incorporating the Growth Competitiveness Index (GCI). We find that entrepreneurial activity by nascent entrepreneurs and owner/managers of young businesses affects economic growth, but that this effect depends upon the level of per capita income. This suggests that entrepreneurship plays a different role in countries in different stages of economic development.

Keywords

entrepreneural activity economic growth economic development nascent entrepreneurs 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Acs, Z. J., Audretsch, D. B. 1990Innovation and Small FirmsMIT PressCambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  2. Acs, ZJ, Audretsch, DB 2003

    Innovation and technological change

    Acs, ZJAudretsch, DB eds. Handbook of Entrepreneurship ResearchKluwer Academic PublishersBoston
    Google Scholar
  3. Audretsch, D. B. 1995Innovation and Industry EvolutionMIT PressCambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  4. Audretsch, D. B., Feldman, M. 1996R&D spillovers and the Geography of Innovation and ProductionAmerican Economic Review86630640Google Scholar
  5. Audretsch, D. B., Fritsch, M. 2002Growth Regimes Over Time and SpaceRegional Studies36113124Google Scholar
  6. Audretsch, D. B., Keilbach, M. 2004Entrepreneurship Capital and Economic PerformanceRegional Studies38949959Google Scholar
  7. Audretsch, D. B., Stephan, P. 1996Company-scientist Locational Links: The Case of BiotechnologyAmerican Economic Review86641652Google Scholar
  8. Audretsch, D. B., Thurik, A. R. 2001What is New about the New Economy: Sources of Growth in the Managed and Entrepreneurial EconomiesIndustrial and Corporate Change10267315Google Scholar
  9. Audretsch, D. B.Thurik, A. R.Verheul, I.Wennekers, A. R. M. eds. 2002Entrepreneurship: Determinants and Policy in a European–US ComparisonKluwer Academic PublishersBoston/DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  10. Banerjee, A. V., Newman, A. F. 1993Occupational Choice and the Process of DevelopmentJournal of Political Economy101274298Google Scholar
  11. Barreto, H. 1989The Entrepreneur in Microeconomic Theory: Disappearance and ExplanationRoutledgeLondonGoogle Scholar
  12. Baumol, W. J. 1968Entrepreneurship in Economic TheoryAmerican Economic Review Papers and Proceedings586471Google Scholar
  13. Blanchflower, D. G. 2000Self-employment in OECD CountriesLabour Economics7471505Google Scholar
  14. Bleaney, M., Nishiyama, A. 2002Explaining Growth: A Contest Between ModelsJournal of Economic Growth74356Google Scholar
  15. Carree, M., Stel, A., Thurik, R., Wennekers, S. 2002Economic Development and Business Ownership: An Analysis Using Data of 23 OECD Countries in the Period 1976–1996Small Business Economics19271290Google Scholar
  16. Carree, M. A., Thurik, A. R. 1999

    Industrial Structure and Economic Growth

    Audretsch, D. B.Thurik, A. R. eds. InnovationCambridge University PressIndustry Evolution and Employment, Cambridge86110
    Google Scholar
  17. Carree, M. A., Thurik, A. R. 2003

    The Impact of Entrepreneurship on Economic Growth

    Acs, Z. J.Audretsch, D. B. eds. Handbook of Entrepreneurship ResearchKluwer Academic PublishersBoston437471
    Google Scholar
  18. Caves, RE 1998Industrial Organization and New Findings on the Turnover and Mobility of Firms’Journal of Economic Literature3619471982Google Scholar
  19. Chandler, AD,Jr. 1990Scale and Scope: The Dynamics of Industrial CapitalismHarvard UniversityCambridgeGoogle Scholar
  20. Cornelius, P. K., McArthur, J. W. 2002

    The Executive Opinion Survey

    Porter, M. E.Sachs, J. D.Cornelius, P. K.McArthur, J. W.Schwab, K. eds. The Global Competitiveness Report 2001–2002Oxford University PressNew York166177
    Google Scholar
  21. Eliasson, G., 1995, ‘Economic Growth Through Competitive Selection’, paper presented at the 22nd EARIE-conference, Juan les Pins, September 1995.Google Scholar
  22. Freeman, C., Perez, C. 1988

    Structural Crises of Adjustment: Business Cycles and Investment Behavior

    Dosi, G.Freeman, C.Nelson, R.Silverberg, G.Soete, L. eds. Technical Change and Economic TheoryPinter PublishersLondon
    Google Scholar
  23. Geroski, P. A. 1989Entry, Innovation, and Productivity GrowthReview of Economics and Statistics71572578Google Scholar
  24. Iyigun, M. F., Owen, A. L. 1999Entrepreneurs, Professionals, and GrowthJournal of Economic Growth4213232Google Scholar
  25. Kirchoff, BA 1994Entrepreneurship and Dynamic CapitalismPraegerWestport, CTGoogle Scholar
  26. Kirzner, I 1973Competition & EntrepreneurshipUniversity of Chicago PressChicagoGoogle Scholar
  27. Lloyd-Ellis, H., Bernhardt, D. 2000Enterprise, Inequality and Economic DevelopmentReview of Economic Studies67147168Google Scholar
  28. Lucas, R. E. 1988On the Mechanics of Economic DevelopmentJournal of Monetary Economics22339Google Scholar
  29. McArthur, J. W., Sachs, J. D. 2002

    The Growth Competitiveness Index: Measuring Technological Advancement and the Stages of Development

    Porter, M. E.Sachs, J. D.Cornelius, P. K.McArthur, J. W.Schwab, K. eds. The Global Competitiveness Report 2001–2002Oxford University PressNew York2851
    Google Scholar
  30. Nickell, S., Nicolitsas, P., Dryden, N. 1997What Makes Firms Perform Well?European Economic Review41783796Google Scholar
  31. Nickell, S. J. 1996Competition and Corporate PerformanceJournal of Political Economy104724746Google Scholar
  32. Nooteboom, B. 1994Innovation and Diffusion in Small Business: Theory and Empirical EvidenceSmall Business Economics6327347Google Scholar
  33. Reynolds, PD, Bygrave, WD, Autio, E, Cox, LW, Hay, M 2002Global Entrepreneurship Monitor, 2002 Executive ReportWellesley, MABabson CollegeGoogle Scholar
  34. Romer, P. M. 1990Endogenous Technological ChangeJournal of Political Economy9871101Google Scholar
  35. Romer, P. M. 1994The Origins of Endogenous GrowthJournal of Economic Perspectives8322PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Rothwell, R 1983‘Innovation and Firm Size: A Case for Dynamic Complementarity; Or, is Small Really so Beautiful’?Journal of General Management8525Google Scholar
  37. Sala-i-Martin, X. 1997I Just Ran Two Million RegressionsAmerican Economic Review87178183Google Scholar
  38. Schumpeter, J. A. 1934The Theory of Economic DevelopmentHarvard University PressCambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  39. Schumpeter, JA 1950Capitalism, Socialism and DemocracyHarper and RowNew YorkGoogle Scholar
  40. Stel, A., Carree, M. 2004Business Ownership and Sectoral Growth: An Empirical Analysis of 21 OECD CountriesInternational Small Business Journal22389419Google Scholar
  41. Van Stel, A., M. Carree and R. Thurik, 2004, ‘The Effect of Entrepreneurship on National Economic Growth: An Analysis Using the GEM Database’, EIM Scales Paper N200320, Zoetermeer, NL: EIM. This paper can be downloaded from www.eim.net.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Max Planck Institute for Research into Economic SystemsJenaGermany
  2. 2.University of MaastrichtGermany
  3. 3.Erasmus University Rotterdam EIM Max Planck Institute JenaGermany

Personalised recommendations