Small Business Economics

, Volume 26, Issue 2, pp 117–123 | Cite as

Testing Gibrat’s Law for Small, Young and Innovating Firms

Article

Abstract

This article analyses whether small, young, and innovating firms have experienced a greater employment growth than other Spanish firms over the period 1990–2000. The study draws upon a sample of 1272 manufacturing firms in which only 967 of the firms survived for the entire ten year period. The analyses test Gibrat’s law, both by least squares and by utilizing the procedure proposed by Heckman in which a probit survival equation is first estimated to correct for sample selection bias. Two estimators correcting for selection bias are utilized: one that incorporates the inverse Mill’s ratio and the other that employs maximum likelihood methods. All the results reject Gibrat’s law and support the proposition that small firms have grown larger. Additionally, the results show that old firms grow less than young ones, and innovating activity – both process and product – is a strong positive factor in the firm’s survival and its employment growth.

Jel Classification

L11 L25 

References

  1. Almus, M., Nerlinger, E. 1999‘Growth of New Technology-Based Firms: Which Factors Matter?’Small Business Economics13141154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Almus, M., Nerlinger, E. 2000‘Testing Gibrat´s law for young firms – empirical results for West Germany’Small Business Economics15112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Audretsch, D. 1995‘Innovation, growth and survival’International Journal of Industrial Organization13441457Google Scholar
  4. Audretsch, D., Santarelli, E., Vivarelli, M. 1999‘Start-up size and industrial dynamics: some evidence from Italian manufacturing’International Journal of Industrial Organization17965983CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Birch, D. L. 1979The Job Generation ProcessMIT Program on Neighbourhood and Regional ChangeCambridgeGoogle Scholar
  6. Calvo, J. and M.J. Lorenzo, 1993, ‘La Participación de las PYMES en la Economía Española’, Documento de Trabajo 93001. Madrid: Instituto de la Pequeña y Mediana Empresa IndustrialGoogle Scholar
  7. Calvo, J., 1996, ‘Determinantes de la actividad innovadora de las Pymes manufactureras españolas: un análisis descriptivo’, Documento de Trabajo 9601, Departamento de Análisis Económico, UNED y Unidad de Estudios del IMPIGoogle Scholar
  8. Calvo, J., 1998, ‘Las Empresas Manufactureras Españolas de Alto Crecimiento en el período 1990–1994’, Documento de Trabajo 9801. Madrid: Departamento de Análisis Económico, UNEDGoogle Scholar
  9. Calvo, J. 2000‘Una caracterización de la Innovación Tecnológica en los Sectores Manufactureros Españoles: Algunos datos’Economía Industrial331139150Google Scholar
  10. Calvo, J. and M. J. Lorenzo, 2001, ‘Une caractérisation des entreprises manufacturières Espagnoles à Forte Croissance: 1994–1998’. Revue Internationale P.M.E. 14 (3–4), 45–66. Also published in Revue Gestion 2000, bimestrel 5, Septembre–Octobre 2002, 57–75Google Scholar
  11. Caves, R. E. 1998‘Industrial Organization and New Findings on the Turnover and Mobility of Firms’Journal of Economic Literature3619471982Google Scholar
  12. Freel, M. S. 2000‘Do Small innovating firms outperform non-innovators?’Small Business Economics14195210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Geroski, P. A. 1995‘What do we know about entry?’International Journal of Industrial Organization13421440Google Scholar
  14. Harhoff, D., Stahl, K., Woywode, M. 1998‘Legal form, growth and exit for West German firms – Results for manufacturing, construction, trade and service industries’The Journal of Industrial EconomicsXLVI453488Google Scholar
  15. Heshmati, A. 2001‘On the growth of micro and small firms: evidence from Sweden’Small Business Economics17213228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hekcman, J. 1979‘Sample selection bias as a specification error’Econometrica47153161Google Scholar
  17. Impi, 1994, Informe Anual de la Pequeña y Mediana Empresa en España 1993. Instituto de la Pequeña y Mediana Empresa IndustrialGoogle Scholar
  18. Impi, 1995, Informe Anual de la Pequeña y Mediana Empresa en España 1994. Instituto de la Pequeña y Mediana Empresa IndustrialGoogle Scholar
  19. Licht, G., Nerlinger, E. 1998‘New technology-based firms in Germany: a survey of the recent evidence’Research Policy2610051022CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Maddala, G. S. 1983Limited Dependent and Qualitative Variables in EconometricsCambridge University PressCambridgeGoogle Scholar
  21. Reid, G. C. 1992‘Early life cycle behaviour of micro-firms in Scotland’Small Business Economics78995Google Scholar
  22. Storey, D. B., Tether, B. 1998‘New technology-based firms in the European union: an introduction’Research Policy269331026Google Scholar
  23. Sutton, J. 1997‘Gibrats legacy’Journal of Economic Literature354059Google Scholar
  24. Wagner, J. 1992‘Firm size, firm growth, and persistence of chance: testing Gibrat’s law with establishments data from lower saxony, 1978–1989’Journal of Small Business Economics4125131Google Scholar
  25. Weiss, C. R. 1998‘Size, Growth, and Survival in the Upper Austrian Farm Sector’Small Business Economics10305312CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Economic Analysis INational University for Distance Education (UNED)MadridSpain

Personalised recommendations