Advertisement

Theory and Society

, Volume 48, Issue 5, pp 709–732 | Cite as

Recruitment: an undertheorized mechanism for workplace control

  • Brian W. HalpinEmail author
  • Vicki Smith
Article

Abstract

It has been nearly half a century since the publication of Harry Braverman’s Labor and Monopoly Capital. That, along with Michael Burawoy’s subsequent interrogation of Braverman—Manufacturing Consent—set the terms for a robust and enduring research agenda that has focused on labor processes: the deskilling of work, managerial control over workers, consent, and the extraction of surplus value. This article endeavors to advance the labor process paradigm by highlighting recruitment as a tool by which employers maximize the likelihood that they will hire people who will consent to their objectives, broadly defined. Drawing on a broad range of literatures, we show how recruitment and hiring practices constitute part of an overarching apparatus of control wherein managers imagine that particular people will be ideal for particular jobs and positions. We conclude by sketching a research agenda that sociologists of work and labor processes might undertake in order to understand these issues more thoroughly.

Keywords

Consent Employment Ideal worker Labor process Recruitment Workplace control 

Notes

References

  1. Acker, J. (1990). Hierarchy, jobs, and bodies: A theory of gendered organizations. Gender and Society, 4, 139–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alvesson, M., & Wilmott, H. (2002). Identity regulation as organizational control: Producing the appropriate individual. Journal of Management Studies, 39, 619–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Attewell, P. (1987). The deskilling controversy. Work and Occupations, 14, 323–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Autor, D. (2003). Outsourcing at will: The contribution of unjust dismissal doctrine and the growth of employment outsourcing. Journal of Labor Economics, 21(1), 1–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barber, A., Wesson, M., Roberson, Q., & Taylor, S. M. (1999). A tale of two job markets: Organizational size and its effects on hiring practices and job search behavior. Personnel Psychology, 52, 841–868.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barley, S., & Kunda, G. (2004). Gurus, hired hands, and warm bodies: Itinerant experts in a knowledge economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Barron, J., & Bishop, J. (1985). Extensive search, intensive search, and hiring costs: New evidence on employer hiring activity. Economic Inquiry, 23, 363–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Benner, C. (2002). Work in the new economy: Flexible labor markets in Silicon Valley. Oxford: Blackwell Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bernhardt, A., Spiller, M., & Polson, D. (2013). All work and no pay: Violations of employment and labor law in Chicago, Los Angeles, and new York City. Social Forces, 91, 725–746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bertrand, M., & Mullainathan, S. (2004). Are Greg and Emily more employable than Lakisha and Jamal? A field experiment on labor market discrimination. American Economic Review, 94, 991–1013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Braverman, H. (1974). Labor and monopoly capitalism: The degradation of work in the twentieth century. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
  12. Bryman, A. (2004). The Disneyization of society. London and Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  13. Burawoy, M. (1979). Manufacturing consent: Changes in the labor process under monopoly capitalism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  14. Burawoy, M. (1985). The politics of production: Factory regimes under capitalism and socialism. London: Verso Press.Google Scholar
  15. Callaghan, G., & Thompson, P. (2002). ‘We recruit attitude’: The selection and shaping of routine call Centre labour. Journal of Management Studies, 39, 233–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Caraway, T. (2007). Assembling women: The feminization of global manufacturing. Ithaca: Cornell/ILR Press.Google Scholar
  17. Chatman, J. (1991). Matching people and organizations: Selection and socialization in public accounting firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, 459–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Chun, J. (2001). Flexible despotism: The intensification of insecurity and uncertainty in the lives of silicon valley’s high-tech assembly workers. In R. Baldoz, C. Koeber, & P. Kraft (Eds.), The critical study of work: Labor, technology, and global production (pp. 127–154). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Collinson, D. (2003). Identities and insecurities: Selves at work. Organization, 10, 527–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Correll, S. J. (2001). Gender and the career choice process: The role of biased self-assessments. American Journal of Sociology, 106, 1691–1730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cowie, J. (2001). Capital moves: RCA’s seventy-year quest for cheap labor. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
  22. Dattner, B. (2013). How to use psychometric testing in hiring. Harvard Business Review, 12, 2013 https://hbr.org/2013/09/how-to-use-psychometric-testing.Google Scholar
  23. Dineen, B., & Allen, D. (2014). Internet recruiting 2.0: shifting paradigms. In K. Y. T. Yu & D. Cable (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Recruitment (pp. 382–401). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Dixon, M., Weng, S., Calvin, J., Dineen, B., & Tomlinson, E. (2002). The panel interview: A review of empirical research and guidance for practice. Public Personnel Management, 31, 397–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Du Gay, P. & Salaman, G. (1992). The cult[ure] of the customer. Journal of Management Studies, 29, 615–633.Google Scholar
  26. Edwards, R. (1979). Contested terrain: The transformation of the workplace in the twentieth century. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  27. England, P. (1989). “An overview of segregation and the sex gap in pay.” Paper presented at the meetings of the American Statistical Association.Google Scholar
  28. Farkas, G. (2003). Cognitive skills and noncognitive traits and behaviors in stratification processes. Annual Review of Sociology, 29, 541–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Fernandez, R., & Friedrich, C. (2011). Gender and race sorting at the application interface. Industrial Relations, 50, 591–609.Google Scholar
  30. Fernandez, R., & Mors, M. L. (2008). Competing for jobs: Labor queues and gender sorting in the hiring process. Social Science Research, 37, 1061–1080.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Fernandez, R., & Weinberg, N. (1997). Sifting and sorting: Personal contacts and hiring in a retail bank. American Sociological Review, 62, 883–902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Findlay, A., & McCollum, D. (2012). Imagining and producing the ‘good’ migrant: The role of recruitment agencies in shaping bodily goodness. ESRC Centre for population change working paper 19.Google Scholar
  33. Finlay, W., & Coverdill, J. (2002). Headhunters: Matchmaking in the labor market. Ithaca: Cornell University/ILR Press.Google Scholar
  34. Foucault, M. (1975). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  35. Fuller, L., & Smith, V. (1991). Consumers’ reports: Management by customers in a changing economy. Work, Employment and Society, 5, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Gatta, M. (2014). All I want is a job! Unemployed women navigating the public workforce system. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Gershon, I. (2017). Down and out in the new economy: How people find (or don’t find) work today. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ghayad, R. (2014). “The jobless trap.” Working Paper. Northeastern University. http://media.wix.com/ugd/576e9a_f6cf3b6661e44621ad26547112f66691.pdf
  39. Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Anchor Books.Google Scholar
  40. Goldthorpe, J. H., Lockwood, D., Bechhofer, F., & Platt, J. (1967). The Affluent Worker and the Thesis of Embourgeoisement: Some Preliminary Research Findings. Sociology, 1(1), 11–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Gorman, E. (2005). Gender stereotypes, same-gender preferences, and organizational variation in the hiring of women: Evidence from law firms. American Sociological Review, 70, 702–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Gramsci, A. (1989). Selections from the prison notebooks. New York: International Publishers Co..Google Scholar
  43. Granovetter, M. (1974). Getting a job: A study of contacts and careers. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  44. Grey, C. (1994). Career as a project of the self and labour process discipline. Sociology, 28, 479–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Gutman, H. (1973). Work, culture, and society in industrializing America, 1815-1919. The American Historical Review, 78, 531–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Halpin, B. (2015). Subject to change without notice: Mock schedules and flexible employment in the United States. Social Problems, 62, 419–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Halpin, B. (2016) Employment management work: Third wave marketization and the fictitious commodification of labor. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of California, Davis.Google Scholar
  48. Halpin, B., & Smith, V. (2017). Employment management work: A case study and theoretical framework. Work and Occupations, 44, 339–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Hamori, M., Bonet, R., & Capelli, P. (2011). How organizations obtain the human capital they need. In A. Burton-Jones & J. C. Spender (Eds.), Oxford handbook of human capital (pp. 309–332). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Hanser, A. (2008). Service encounters: Class, gender, and the market for social distinction in China. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Hatton, E. (2011). The temp economy: From Kelly Girls to permatemps in postwar America. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Ho, K. (2009). Liquidated: An ethnography of Wall Street. Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Hochschild, A. (1983). The managed heart: Commercialization of human feeling. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  54. Hodson, R. (2001). Dignity at work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Holzer, H. (1996). What employers want: Job prospects for less-educated workers. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  56. Hossfeld, K. (1990). Their logic against them: Contradictions in sex, race, and class in Silicon Valley. In K. Ward (Ed.), Women workers and global restructuring (pp. 149–178). Ithaca: Cornell University/ILR Press.Google Scholar
  57. Huffcutt, A. (2011). An empirical review of the interview construct literature. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 19, 62–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Jacobs, J. (1995). Gender and academic specialties: Trends among recipients of college degrees in the 1980’s. Sociology of Education, 68, 81–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Jacoby, S. (1985). Employing bureaucracy: Managers, unions, and the transformation of work in American industry, 1900–1945. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  60. Kalleberg, A. (2011). Good jobs, bad jobs: The rise of polarized and precarious employment systems in the United States, 1970s to 2000s. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  61. Kalleberg, A., & Vallas, S. (2017). Probing precarious work: Theory, research, and politics. Research in the Sociology of Work, 31, 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Kilbourne, B. S., England, P., Farkas, G., Beron, K., & Weir, D. (1994). Returns to skills, compensation differentials, and gender bias: Effects of occupational characteristics on the wages of white men and women. American Journal of Sociology, 100, 689–719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Kirschenmann, J., & Neckerman, K. (1991). ‘We’d love to hire them, but…’ the meaning of race for employers. In C. Jencks & P. Peterson (Eds.), The urban underclass (pp. 203–234). Washington: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
  64. Lee, C. K. (1995). Engendering the worlds of labor: Women workers, labor markets, and production politics in the south China economic miracle. American Sociological Review, 60, 378–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Leidner, R. (1993). Fast food/fast talk: Service work and the routinization of everyday life. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  66. Leidner, R. (2006). Identity and work. In M. Korczynski, R. Hodson, & P. Edwards (Eds.), Social theory at work (pp. 424–463). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  67. Levashina, J., Hartwell, C., Morgeson, F., & Campion, M. (2014). The structured employment interview: Narrative and quantitative review of the research literature. Personnel Psychology, 67, 241–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Lopez, S. (2006). Emotional labor and organized emotional care: Conceptualizing nursing home care work. Work and Occupations, 33, 133–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. López-Sanders, L. (2014). Embedded and external brokers: The distinct role of intermediaries in workplace inequality. American Behavioral Scientist, 58, 331–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Marsden, P., & Gorman, E. (2001). Social networks, job changes, and recruitment. In E. Berg & A. Kalleberg (Eds.), Sourcebook of labor markets (pp. 467–502). Netherlands: Kluwar Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. McDowell, L. (2009). Working bodies: Interactive service employment and workplace identities. New Jersey: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Moss, P., & Tilly, C. (2001). Stories employers tell: Race, skill, and hiring in America. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  73. Neff, G. (2012). Venture labor: Work and the burden of risk. Cambridge: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. O’Riain, S. (2011). Human capital formation regimes: States, markets, and human capital in an era of globalization. In A. Burton-Jones & J. C. Spender (Eds.), Oxford handbook of human capital (pp. 558–617). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  75. Otis, E. (2011). Markets and bodies: Women, service work, and the making of inequality in China. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  76. Pager, D. (2003). The mark of a criminal record. American Journal of Sociology, 108(5), 937–975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Pager, D., & Karafin, D. (2009). Bayesian bigot? Statistical discrimination, stereotypes, and employer decision making. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 621, 7–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Pager, D., & Pedulla, D. (2015). Race, self-selection, and the job search process. American Journal of Sociology, 120, 1005–1054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Pager, D., Western, B., & Bonikowski, B. (2009). Discrimination in a low-wage labor market: A field experiment. American Sociological Review, 74, 777–799.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Pedulla, D. (2018a). Emerging frontiers in audit study research: Mechanisms, variation, and representativeness. In S. M. Gaddis (Ed.), Audit studies: behind the scenes with theory, method, and nuance (pp. 179–195). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Pedulla, D. (2018b). Making the cut: Hiring decisions, bias, and the consequences of nonstandard, mismatched, and precarious employment. Princeton University Press, forthcoming.Google Scholar
  82. Plankey-Videla, N. (2012). We are in this dance together: Gender, power, and globalization at a Mexican garment firm. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  83. Polanyi, K. (2001). The great transformation. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  84. Purser, G. (2006). “Waiting for work: An ethnography of a day labor agency.” ISSI Fellows Working Papers, UC Berkeley.Google Scholar
  85. Reskin, B. (2003). Including mechanisms in our models of ascriptive inequality. American Sociological Review, 68, 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Reskin, B., & Roos, P. (1990). Job queues, gender queues: Explaining women’s inroads into male occupations. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  87. Rivera, L. (2015). Pedigree: How elite students get elite jobs. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Rivera, L., & Tilcsik, A. (2016). The gendered effect of social class signals in an elite labor market. American Sociological Review, 81, 1097–1131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Roediger, D., & Esch, E. (2012). The production of difference: Race and the management of labor in U.S. history. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  90. Sallaz, J. (2009). The labor of luck: Casino capitalism in the United States and South Africa. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  91. Sallaz, J. (2013). Labor, economy, and society. Cambridge: Palgrave Press.Google Scholar
  92. Sallaz, J. (2015). Permanent pedagogy: How post-fordist firms generate effort but no consent. Work and Occupations, 42, 3–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Salzinger, L. (2003). Genders in production: Making workers in Mexico’s global factories. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  94. Sharone, O. (2013). Flawed system/flawed self: Job searching and unemployment experiences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Sharone, O. (2017). LinkedIn or linkedout? How social networking sites are reshaping the labor market. Research in the Sociology of Work, 30, 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Sherman, R. (2007). Class acts: Service and inequality in luxury hotels. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  97. Shestakofsky, B. (2017). Working algorithms: Software automation and the future of work. Work and Occupations, 44, 376–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Shwed, U., & Kalev, A. (2014). Are referrals more productive or more likeable? Social networks and the evaluation of merit. American Behavioral Scientist, 58, 288–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Smith, C. (2006a). The double indeterminacy of labour power: Labour effort and labour mobility. Work, Employment and Society, 20, 401–414.Google Scholar
  100. Smith, C. (2006b). The dormitory labour regime in China as a site for control and resistance. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 17, 1456–1470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Smith, S. (2010a). Race and trust. Annual Review of Sociology, 36, 453–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Smith, V. (1990). Managing in the corporate interest: Control and resistance in and American bank. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  103. Smith, V. (2001). Crossing the great divide: Worker risk and opportunity in the new economy. Ithaca: Cornell University/ILR Press.Google Scholar
  104. Smith, V. (2006). Research in the sociology of work: “Worker participation, practices, and possibilities. Vol. 16.Google Scholar
  105. Smith, V. (2008). Workers, risk, and the new economy. Human Relations, 61, 1163–1169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Smith, V. (2010b). Enhancing employability: Human, social, and cultural capital in an era of turbulent unpredictability. Human Relations, 63, 279–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Smith, V. & Neuwirth, E. (2008). The Good Temp. Ithaca: Cornell University/ILR Press.Google Scholar
  108. Smith, V., Flynn, H., & Isler, J. (2006). Finding jobs and building careers: Reproducing inequality in state-sponsored job search organizations. Research in the Sociology of Work, 16, 375–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Spence, M. (1973). Job market signaling. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87, 355–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Stainbeck, K., Tomaskovich-Devey, D., & Skaggs, S. (2010). Organizational approaches to inequality: Inertia, relative power, and environments. Annual Review of Sociology, 36, 225–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Storey, J., Salaman, G., & Platman, K. (2005). Living with enterprise in an enterprise economy: Freelance and contract workers in the media. Human Relations, 58, 1033–1054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. Taylor, F. (1991). The principles of scientific management. New York and London: Harper Bros.Google Scholar
  113. Thomas, R. (1985). Citizenship, gender, and work: The Social Organization of Agriculture. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  114. Thompson, P., Newsome, K., & Commander, J. (2013). ‘Good when they want to be’: Migrant workers in the supermarket supply chain. Human Resource Management Journal, 23, 129–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Tilcsik, A. (2011). Pride and prejudice: Employment discrimination against openly gay men in the United States. American Journal of Sociology, 117, 586–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Vallas, S., & Christin, A. (2018). Work and identity in an era of precarious employment: How workers respond to ‘personal branding’ discourse. Work and Occupations, 45, 3–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. Vallas, S., & Cummins, E. (2015). Personal branding and identity norms in the popular business press: Enterprise culture in an age of precarity. Organization Studies, 36, 293–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  118. Waldinger, R., & Lichter, M. (2003). How the other half works: Immigration and the social organization of labor. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  119. Williams, J. (2000). Unbending gender: Why family and work conflict and what to do about it. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  120. Williams, C. (2006). Inside toyland: Working, shopping, and social inequality. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  121. Williams, C., & Connell, C. (2010). Looking good and sounding right: Aesthetic labor and social inequality in the retail industry. Work and Occupations, 37, 349–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Yakubovich, V. (2006). Passive recruitment in the Russian urban labor market. Work and Occupations, 33, 307–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Yu, K. Y. T., & Cable, D. (Eds.). (2014). The Oxford handbook of recruitment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyUniversity of CaliforniaDavisUSA

Personalised recommendations