Advertisement

Theory and Society

, Volume 47, Issue 6, pp 717–735 | Cite as

Explaining the capitalist city: an idea of progress in Harvey’s Marxism

  • David ChampagneEmail author
Article
  • 319 Downloads

Abstract

What allows theories to evolve, to progress? A contentious notion, progress still haunts a number of contemporary theories. However, little research invites us to rethink progress in a comprehensive way. In this article, I contribute to this issue by considering the paradigmatic case of David Harvey’s Marxism. A pathbreaking thinker in geography, sociology, and urban studies, Harvey claims his theory intrinsically surpasses its inherent contradictions. However, numerous authors suggest otherwise, as it fails to engage with essential urban processes such as those based on state, gendered, racial, or environmental dynamics. These aspects of social life challenge his dialectical ambition. I argue that Harvey’s attachment to an orthodox Marxism ultimately limits his claim to theoretical progress. Reviewing Harvey’s overall body of work, I focus on his metatheory regarding space and his examination of the Paris Commune. I argue that his ideas on the progress of theory follow from his dialectical assumptions, which in turn inhibit his portrayal of practical realities and a continuous dialogue with concrete cases.

Keywords

Geographical Marxism Paris Commune Political economy Social theory Theoretical progress Urban studies 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This article is greatly indebted to the insights and guidance of Seth Abrutyn, Thomas Kemple, Trevor Barnes, and Louis Jacob. In addition, I owe many thanks to Charles-Olivier Simard and Michel Verdon for decisive epistemological inspirations. Finally, I extend my very special thanks to the Theory and Society Editors and reviewers for their generous comments and critiques.

References

  1. Alexander, J. C. (1982). Positivism, presuppositions, and current controversies—Theoretical logic in sociology vol. 1. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  2. Alexander, J. C. (1990). Between progress and apocalypse: Social theory and the dream of reason in the twentieth century. In J. C. Alexander & P. Sztompka (Eds.), Rethinking progress: Movements, force and ideas at the end of the twentieth century (pp. 15–38). Boston: Unwin Hyman.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bachelard, G. (2002 [1938]). The formation of the scientific mind. Manchester: Clinamen Press.Google Scholar
  4. Balibar, É. (2014 [1993]). The philosophy of Marx. New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  5. Barnes, T. (2006a). Between deduction and dialectics: David Harvey on knowledge. In D. Gregory & N. Castree (Eds.), David Harvey a critical reader (pp. 26–46). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barnes, T. (2006b). Saying yes without saying yes to progress: Comments on David Livingstone’s 2005 Progress in human geography lecture. Progress in Human Geography, 30, 580–584.Google Scholar
  7. Bauman, Z. (2005). Liquid life. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  8. Beck, U. (1992 [1986]). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  9. Beck, U. (2010). Climate for change, or how to create a green modernity? Theory, Culture and Society, 27(2–3), 254–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Beck, U. (2013). Why ‘class’ is too soft a category to capture the explosiveness of social inequality at the beginning of the 21st century. British Journal of Sociology, 64(1), 63–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Benjamin, W. (2002 [1927–1940]). The arcades project. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Berry, B. J. L. (1974). David Harvey: Social justice and the city, Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins Press. Antipode, 6(2), 142–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bourdieu, P. (1984 [1979]). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Brenner, N. (2009). What is critical urban theory? City, 13(2), 198–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cameron, J., & Gibson-Graham, J. K. (2003). Feminising the economy: Metaphors, strategies, politics, gender. Place & Culture, 10(2), 145–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Castree, N. (1996). Birds, mice and geography: Marxisms and dialectics. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series, 21(2), 342–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Castree, N. (2006). The detour of critical theory. In D. Gregory & N. Castree (Eds.), David Harvey a critical reader (pp. 247–269). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Castree, N. (2007). David Harvey: Marxism, capitalism and the geographical imagination. New Political Economy, 12(1), 97–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Christophers, B. (2011). Revisiting the urbanization of capital. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 101(6), 1347–1364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Clerval, A. (2011). David Harvey et le matérialisme historico-géographique. Espaces et sociétés, 4(147), 173–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Coffin, G. (2014). The politics of women's work: The Paris garment trades, 1750–1915. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Corbridge, S. (1998). Reading David Harvey: Entries, voices, loyalties. Antipode, 30(1), 43–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Cosgrove, D. (1983). Towards a radical cultural geography: Problems of theory. Antipode, 15(1), 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Cronon, W. (1991). Nature’s metropolis: Chicago and the great west. New York: W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  25. Dawson, A. (2017). Extreme cities: The peril and promise of urban life in the age of climate change. New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  26. Deutsche, R. (1991). Boys town. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 9, 5–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Doel, M. (2006). Dialectical materialism: Stranger than friction. In D. Gregory & N. Castree (Eds.), David Harvey a critical reader (pp. 55–79). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Driver, F. (1988). Consciousness and the urban experience: Studies in the history and theory of capitalist urbanization by David Harvey. Geographical Review, 78(1), 85–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Duncan, J., & Ley, D. (1982). Structural Marxism and human geography: A critical assessment. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 72(1), 30–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Fainstein, S. S. (2004). Paris, capital of modernity. American Planning Association. Journal of the American Planning Association, 70(4), 496.Google Scholar
  31. Feagin, J. R. (1987). Bringing space back into urban social science: The work of David Harvey. Sociological Forum, 2(2), 417–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Federici, S. (2004). Caliban and the witch. New York: Autonomedia.Google Scholar
  33. Foster, J. B. (1999). Marx’s theory of metabolic rift. American Journal of Sociology, 105(2), 366–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Foucault, M. (1966). Les mots et les choses. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
  35. Fraser, N. (2013). A triple movement? Parsing the politics of crisis after Polanyi. New Left Review, 81, 119–132.Google Scholar
  36. Fraser, N. (2014). Can society be commodities all the way down? Post-polanyian reflections on capitalist crisis. Economy and Society, 43(4), 541–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Gibson-Graham, J. K. (2006[1996]). The end of capitalism (As we knew it): A feminist critique of political economy. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  38. Gould, R. V. (1993). Trade cohesion, class unity, and urban insurrection: Artisanal activism in the Paris Commune. American Journal of Sociology, 98(4), 721–754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Gregory, D. (2006). Troubling geographies. In D. Gregory & N. Castree (Eds.), David Harvey a critical reader (pp. 1–25). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  40. Hall, S., Hobson, D., Lowe, A., & Willis, P. (Eds.). (2005 [1980]). Culture, media, language working papers in cultural studies 1972–1979. London: Taylor & Francis E-Library.Google Scholar
  41. Harvey, D. (1969). Explanation in geography. London: Edward Arnold Publishers.Google Scholar
  42. Harvey, D. (1973). Social justice and the city. Georgia: University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar
  43. Harvey, D. (1982). The limits of capital. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
  44. Harvey, D. (1985a). Consciousness and the urban experience. Maryland: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Harvey, D. (1985b). The urbanization of capital. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
  46. Harvey, D. (1989a). The condition of postmodernity: An enquiry into the origins of cultural change. Oxford: Blackwell Publishings.Google Scholar
  47. Harvey, D. (1989b). The urban experience. Maryland: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Harvey, D. (1996). Justice, nature and the geography of difference. Cambridge: Blackwell Publishers.Google Scholar
  49. Harvey, D. (2000). Spaces of hope. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  50. Harvey, D. (2003). Paris, capital of modernity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  51. Harvey, D. (2006). Spaces of global capitalism: Towards a theory of uneven geographical development. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  52. Harvey, D. (2007a). Neoliberalism and the city. Studies in Social Justice, 1(1), 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Harvey, D. (2007b). Neoliberalism as creative destruction. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 610, 22–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Harvey, D. (2009a). Cosmopolitanism and the geographies of freedom. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  55. Harvey, D. (2009b). The urban process under capitalism: A framework for analysis. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 2(1–4), 101–131.Google Scholar
  56. Harvey, D. (2012). Rebel cities: From the right to the city to the urban revolution. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  57. Herod, A. (2008). Spaces of global capitalism: Towards a theory of uneven geographical development by David Harvey. Labour/Le Travail, 61, 317–319.Google Scholar
  58. Jessop, B. (1990). State theory: Putting the capitalist state in its place. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
  59. Johnston, R. (2001). Spaces of hope by David Harvey. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 91(2), 449–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Katz, C. (2006). Messing with ‘the project’. In D. Gregory & N. Castree (Eds.), David Harvey a critical reader (pp. 234–246). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  62. Lefebvre, H. (1968). Le droit à la ville. Paris: Anthropos.Google Scholar
  63. Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  64. Livingston, D. N. (2006). Putting progress in its place. Progress in Human Geography, 30(5), 559–587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Löw, M. (2013). The city as experiential space: The production of shared meaning. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37(3), 894–908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Magraw, R. (2002). France, 1800–1914: A Social History. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  67. Mohr, J. W., & Ghaziani, A. (2014). Problems and prospects of measurement in the study of culture. Theory & Society, 43(3/4), 225–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Moore, J. W. (2015). Capitalism in the web of life. New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  69. Parr, J. (1990). The gender of breadwinners: Women, men, and change in two industrial towns, 1880–1950. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  70. Pilbeam, P. (2006). David Harvey, Paris, capital of modernity, New York and London, Routledge, Revue d’histoire du XIXe siècle, 32. http://rh19.revues.org/1113.
  71. Polanyi, K. (2001 [1944]). The great transformation: The political and economic origins of our time. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  72. Rancière, J. (2011 [1957–1981]). Staging the people. New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  73. Sheppard, E. (2006). David Harvey and dialectical space-time. In D. Gregory & N. Castree (Eds.), David Harvey a critical reader (pp. 121–141). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Storper, A., & Scott, A. J. (2016). Current debates in urban theory: A critical assessment. Urban Studies, 53(6), 1114–1136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Sze, J. (2006). Noxious New York: The racial politics of urban health and environmental justice. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  76. Szelenyi, I. (1986). The last of the Marxist urban sociologists? Consciousness and the urban experience: Studies in the history and theory of capitalist urbanization by David Harvey. Contemporary Sociology, 15(5), 707–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Taylor, D. (2014). Toxic communities: Environmental racism, industrial pollution, and residential mobility. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  78. Tombs, R. (1999). The Paris Commune 1871. London and New York: Longman.Google Scholar
  79. Vandenbergh, F. (2004). Les conditions de possibilité de la connaissance de l’objet et de l’objet de la connaissance en sociologie. Revue du MAUSS, 2(24), 375–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Verdon, M. (1998). Rethinking households. An atomistic perspective on European living arrangements. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Wright, M. (2006). Differences that matter. In D. Gregory & N. Castree (Eds.), David Harvey a critical reader (pp. 80–101). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Zukin, S. (2006). David Harvey on cities. In D. Gregory & N. Castree (Eds.), David Harvey a critical reader (pp. 102–120). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations