Advertisement

Theory and Society

, Volume 46, Issue 4, pp 261–284 | Cite as

On Desmond: the limits of spontaneous sociology

  • Michael Burawoy
Article

Abstract

Matthew Desmond’s “Relational ethnography,” is a manifesto for a relational turn in ethnography, liberating it from the “substantialism” of bounded places, processed people and group culture. Substantialism, however, proves to be a largely mythical category that obscures two types of relational ethnography: Desmond’s empiricist transactional ethnography and an alternative, theoretically driven structural ethnography. Drawing on Desmond’s own ethnographies, On the Fireline and Evicted, I explore the limitations of his transactional ethnography—a “spontaneous sociology” that rejects the theoretical engagement and comparative logic. I elaborate and illustrate structural ethnography, drawing out the implications for public and policy sociology.

Keywords

Bourdieu – Empiricism Ethnography Eviction Extended case method Relational sociology 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This engagement with Matthew Desmond began in the ethnography collective with Ghaleb Attrache, Aya Fabros, Andrew Jaeger, Allison Logan, Santiago Molina, and Phung Su. It underwent the scalpel of my dissertation group—Zach Levenson, Shelly Steward, Ben Shestakofsky, Andrew Jaeger, and Josh Seim—as well as comments from Rachel Sherman, Ching Kwan Lee, Dylan Riley, Mike Levien, Erik Wright, Cinzia Solari, Mona Abaza, Jocelyn Viterna, and Berkeley’s Workshop on Methodology and Epistemology in the Social Sciences. It was delivered as a keynote address to the conference “Unbounding Ethnography: Theory and Method Beyond the Disciplines” at University Massachusetts, Amherst, November 4, 2016.

References

  1. Abbott, A. (1995). Sequence Analysis: New Methods for Old Ideas. Annual Review of Sociology., 21, 93–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, E. (1981). A Place on the Corner. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  3. Boltanski, L. (2011). On Critique: A Sociology of Emancipation. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bourdieu, P. (1984 [1979]). Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgment of Taste. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bourdieu, P. (1998 [1998]). Acts of Resistance: Against the Tyranny of the Market. New York: New Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bourdieu, P. (2000 [1997]). Pascalian Meditations. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bourdieu, P. (2003 [2001]). Firing Back: Against the Tyranny of the Market. New York: New Press.Google Scholar
  8. Bourdieu, P. (2005). The Social Structures of the Economy. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  9. Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J.-C. (1977 [1970]). Reproduction in Education, Society and Culture. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  10. Bourdieu, P., Passeron, J.-C., & Chamboredon, J.-C. (1991 [1968]). The Craft of Sociology: Epistemological Preliminaries. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bourdieu, P., et al. (1999 [1993]). The Weight of the World: Social Suffering in Contemporary Society. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Burawoy, M. (2009). The Extended Case Method: Four Countries, Four Decades, Four Great Transformations and one Theoretical Tradition. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  13. Burawoy, M., Burton, A., Ferguson, A. A., Fox, K. J., Gamson, J., Gartrell, N., Hurst, L., Kurzman, C., Salzinger, L., Schiffman, J., & Ui, S. (1991). Ethnography Unbound. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  14. Burawoy, M., Blum, J. A., George, S., Gille, Z., Gowan, T., Haney, L., Klawiter, M., Lopez, S. H., Riain, S. Ó., & Thayer, M. (2000). Global Ethnography. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  15. Desmond, M. (2007). On the Fireline: Living and Dying with Wildland Firefighters. Chicago: University of Chicago.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Desmond, M. (2012a). Disposable Ties and the Urban Poor. American Journal of Sociology, 117, 1295–1335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Desmond, M. (2012b). Eviction and the Reproduction of Urban Poverty. American Journal of Sociology, 118, 88–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Desmond, M. (2014). Relational Ethnography. Theory and Society, 43(5), 547–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Desmond, M. (2016). Evicted: Poverty and Property in the American City. New York: Crown Books.Google Scholar
  20. Desmond, M., & Gershenson, C. (2016). Housing and Employment Insecurity among the Working Poor. Social Problems, 2016(63), 46–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Desmond, M., & Shollenberger, T. (2015). Forced Displacement from Rental Housing: Prevalence and Neighborhood Consequences. Demography, 52, 1751–1772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Desmond, M., & Valdez, N. (2013). Unpolicing the Urban Poor: Consequences of Third-Party Policing for Inner-City Women. American Sociological Review, 78, 117–141.Google Scholar
  23. Duneier, M. (1994). Slim's Table: Race, Respectability, and Masculinity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  24. Emirbayer, M. (1997). Manifesto for a Relational Sociology. American Journal of Sociology, 103, 281–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Emirbayer, M., & Desmond, M. (2012). Race and Reflexivity. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 35, 574–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fligstein, N., & Dauter, L. (2007). The Sociology of Markets. Annual Review of Sociology, 33, 105–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Glazer, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Hawthorne: Aldine.Google Scholar
  28. Gouldner, A. (1968). The Sociologist as Partisan: Sociology and the Welfare State. American Sociologist, 3, 103–116.Google Scholar
  29. Harvey, D. (2003). The New Imperialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Harvey, D. (2008). The Right to the City. New Left Review, 53, 23–42.Google Scholar
  31. Krippner, G. (2001). The Elusive Market: Embeddedness and the Paradigm of Economic Sociology. Theory and Society, 30, 771–810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Marcus, G. (1998). Ethnography through Thick and Thin. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Polanyi, K. (1944). The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of our Times. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  34. Przeworski, A. (1985). Material Bases of Consent. Chapter 4 in Capitalism and Social Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Purser, G. (2016). The Circle of Dispossession: Evicting the Urban Poor in Baltimore. Critical Sociology, 42(3), 393–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rosen, E. (2014). Rigging the Rules of the game: How Landlords Geographically Sort Low-Income Renters. City and Community, 13(4), 310–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sallaz, J. (2009). The Labor of Luck: Casino Capitalism in the United States and South Africa. Berkeley: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  38. Sherman, R. (2007). Class Acts: Service and Inequality in Luxury Hotels. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  39. Tavory, I., & Timmermans, S. (2014). Abductive Analysis: Theorizing Qualitative Research. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  40. Thompson, G. (2004). Is All the World a Complex Network? Economy and Society, 33(3), 411–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Tilly, C. (1998). Durable Inequality. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  42. Wacquant, L. (2004). Body and Soul: Notebooks of an Apprentice Boxer. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Wacquant, L. (2015). For a Sociology of Flesh and Blood. Qualitative Sociology, 38, 1–11.Google Scholar
  44. Whyte, W. F. (1943). Street Corner Society: The Social Structure of an Italian Slum. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  45. Wolfe, E. (1982). Europe and the People Without History. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  46. Zorbaugh, H. (1929). The Gold Coast and the Slum: A Sociological Study of Chicago’s Near North Side. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyUniversity of CaliforniaBerkeleyUSA

Personalised recommendations