Advertisement

Theory and Society

, Volume 46, Issue 1, pp 57–93 | Cite as

Intellectual property and industrialization: legalizing hope in economic growth

  • Laura R. FordEmail author
Article

Abstract

This article draws on theoretical resources from economic sociology and sociology of law to intervene in economic debates about the relationship between intellectual property and industrialization. Utilizing historical evidence from the earliest period of American intellectual property law and from a formative company in the New England textile industry, I propose a social process of influence that connects intellectual property law to industrialization. I argue that, consistent with the findings of New Economic Sociology, social relationship structures and social capital are the proximate influential force in industrialization. However, I also argue that transformative changes in those social relationship structures are rooted in the emergence of a particular type of political culture: what I call here, borrowing from Hannah Arendt and Frank Dobbin, a “Natal-Industrial Culture.” A Natal-Industrial Culture, as I propose it here, is a political culture in which collective hopes for the future are placed in new technologies and new cultural products, as means for achieving economic growth. Intellectual property law contributed to the emergence of this new type of political culture by holding out the promise of property, as a reward for the provision of new technologies or new cultural products. Because of the way that hope works on motivation—through cognitive pre-rehearsals of future attainment, which involve semantically-meaningful propositions and contribute to positive emotional experience—the promise of property provided a powerful stimulant to social capital formation. Working through the semantic resonances of property, intellectual property law contributed to a political culture in which invention and creativity were expected to secure a future of growth within the political community, both for particular members and for the political community, as a whole. By fostering a Natal-Industrial Culture, intellectual property law contributed to systematic invention and social capital-formation, leading, in turn, to the transformative changes in working and material provisioning that constitute industrialization.

Keywords

Economic growth Hope Industrialization Innovation Intellectual property law Political culture 

Notes

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank two Theory and Society reviewers for very helpful and thoughtful comments, which contributed to substantive and (I hope) improving revisions. I am also very grateful to the Editors of Theory and Society, for creating a space in which an article such as this one can be published. For helpful conversations in which the ideas presented in this article were developed and reworked, I wish to especially thank Mark Bartholomew, Guyora Binder, Michael Halberstam, Errol Meidinger, and Richard Swedberg.

References

  1. Acts and Laws of the State of Connecticut in America (1796). Hartford: Hudson & Goodwin.Google Scholar
  2. American Jurist & Law Magazine (1829). Manufacturing Corporations, 92–118.Google Scholar
  3. Ames, W. E. (1972). A history of the national intelligencer. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
  4. An Act for the encouragement of learning, by securing the copies of maps, charts, and books, to the authors and proprietors of such copies, during the times therein mentioned, 1 Stat. 124, (1790).Google Scholar
  5. An Act to promote the progress of useful Arts, 1 Stat. 109, (1790).Google Scholar
  6. Anonymous [John Trumbull] (1783). For the Connecticut Courant. Connecticut Courant, 1–2.Google Scholar
  7. Appleby, J. (2000). Inheriting the revolution: the first generation of Americans. Cambridge & London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Appleton, N. (1858). Introduction of the power loom and origin of Lowell. Lowell: Proprietors of the Locks and Canals on Merrimack River.Google Scholar
  9. Arendt, H. (1978). The life of the mind, volume 2: willing. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
  10. Arendt, H. (1998). The human condition (2d ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Aron, R. (1968). Eighteen lectures on industrial society. Littlehampton Book Services Ltd..Google Scholar
  12. Baehr, P. (2002). Identifying the unprecedented: Hannah Arendt, totalitarianism, and the critique of sociology. American Sociological Review, 804–831.Google Scholar
  13. Baehr, P. (2005). Personal dilemma or intellectual influence? The Relationship Between Hannah Arendt and Max Weber. Max Weber Studies, 125–130.Google Scholar
  14. Baehr, P. (2010). Hannah Arendt, totalitarianism, and the social sciences. Stanford: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bagnall, W. R. (1893). The textile Industries of the United States. Cambridge: The Riverside Press.Google Scholar
  16. Barlow, Joel. Letter from Joel Barlow to the continental congress. Primary sources on copyright. 1783. www.copyrighthistory.org (accessed 2012).
  17. Beckert, J. (2009). The social order of markets. Theory and Society, 245–269.Google Scholar
  18. Beckert, J. (2013a). Capitalism as a system of expectations: toward a sociological Microfoundation of political economy. Politics & Society, 323–250.Google Scholar
  19. Beckert, J. (2013b). Imagined futures: fictional expectations in the economy. Theory and Society, 48(3), 219–240.Google Scholar
  20. Bell, D. (1999). The coming of post-industrial society. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  21. Bellah, R. N. (2006). Introduction. In: The Robert Bellah reader, by Robert N. Bellah & Steven M. Tipton (eds.), 1–17. Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Boston Manufacturing Company (1813–1874). Director & proprietor records. Baker Library Historical Collections, Harvard Business School, MSS 442.Google Scholar
  23. Bourdieu, P. (1985). The forms of capital. In: Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education, by J.G. Richardson (ed.), 241–58. New York: Greenwood.Google Scholar
  24. Bracha, O. (2008). Commentary on the Connecticut copyright statute 1783. Primary sources on copyright. www.copyrighthistory.org.
  25. Brown, P. (2000). Augustine of hippo: a biography (New ed.). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  26. Brown, G. S. (2009). Incidental architect: William Thornton and the cultural life of early Washington, D.C., 1794–1828. Athens: Ohio University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Bugbee, B. W. (1967). The genesis of american patent and copyright law. Washington, D.C.: Public Affairs Press.Google Scholar
  28. Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural holes: the social structure of competition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Burt, R. S. (2004). Structural holes and good ideas. The American Journal of Sociology, 349–399.Google Scholar
  30. Burt, R. S. (2005). Brokerage and closure: an introduction to social capital. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Byers, S.C. (2006). The meaning of voluntas in Augustine. Augustinian Studies, 171–189.Google Scholar
  32. Byers, S. C. (2013). Perception, sensibility, and moral motivation in Augustine: a Stoic-platonic synthesis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Campbell, J. (1999). Recovering Benjamin Franklin: an exploration of a life of science and service. Chicago: Open Court.Google Scholar
  34. Carruthers, B. G. (1996). City of capital: politics and markets in the english financial revolution. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Carruthers, B. G., & Ariovich, L. (2004). The sociology of property rights. Annual Review of Sociology, 23–46.Google Scholar
  36. Chalmers, G. (1814). Opinions of eminent lawyers on various points of English jurisprudence, chiefly concerning the colonies, fisheries, and commerce of great Britain. London: Reed and Hunter, Law Booksellers for Lincoln's Inn.Google Scholar
  37. Charters and General Laws of the Colony and Province of Massachusetts Bay (1814). Published by order of the general court. Boston: T.B. Wait & Co.Google Scholar
  38. Chignell, A. (2013). Rational hope, moral order, and the revolution of the will. In the divine order, the human order, and the order of nature: historical perspectives, by Eric Watkins (ed.), 197–218. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Chignell, A., & Newlands, S., Project Co-Directors (2016). The science of hope & optimism. Hope & Optimism Project Website, available at http://hopeoptimism.com/pages/funding-initiatives/the-science-of-hope-and-optimism (last accessed July 11, 2016).
  40. Chorev, N. (2012). Changing global norms through reactive diffusion: the case of intellectual property protection of AIDS drugs. American Sociological Review, 831–853.Google Scholar
  41. Clark, V. S. (1916). History of manufactures in the United States 1607–1860. Washington, D.C.: Carnegie Institution of Washington.Google Scholar
  42. Coleman, J.S. (1988a).Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, S95–S120.Google Scholar
  43. Coleman, J.S. (1988b). The creation and destruction of social capital: implications for the law. Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics, & Public Policy, 75–404.Google Scholar
  44. Commissioner of Patents (1872). A list of patents granted by the United States from April 10, 1790 to December 31, 1836 with an appendix containing Reports on the Condition of the Patent-Office in 1823, 1830, and 1831. Washington.Google Scholar
  45. Cowie, A. (1936). John Trumbull, Connecticut wit. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
  46. Crafts, N. F. R. (1985). British economic growth during the industrial revolution. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  47. Crawford, F. (1975). Pre-constitutional copyright statutes. Bulletin of the Copyright Society of the USA, 11–37.Google Scholar
  48. Curtis, G. T. (1893). Life of Daniel Webster. New York: D. Appleton & Company.Google Scholar
  49. Dalzell Jr., R. F. (1987). Enterprising elite: the Boston associates and the world they made. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Deazley, R. (2004). On the origin of the right to copy: charting the movement of copyright law in eighteenth-century Britain (1695–1775). Oxford & Portland: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
  51. Dobbin, F. (1994). Forging industrial policy: the United States, Britain, and France in the railway age. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Dobbin, F. (2009). Inventing equal opportunity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Dobusch, L., & Quack, S. (2013). Framing standards, mobilizing users: copyright versus fair use in transnational regulation. Review of International Political Economy, 52–88.Google Scholar
  54. Donner, I. (1992). The copyright clause of the U.S. Constitution: why did the framers include it with unanimous approval? The American Journal of Legal History, 361–78.Google Scholar
  55. Durkheim, E. (1957). Professional ethics and civic morals. Edited by University of Istanbul (H.N. Kubali, Marcel Mauss & Istanbul Faculty of Law. London & New York: Routledge, (1898–1900).Google Scholar
  56. Eisler, B. (Ed.). (1977). The Lowell offering: writings by New England mill women (1840–1845). New York: W.W. Norton & Company, Inc..Google Scholar
  57. Felin, T. (2012). Sociology of intellectual property? Orgtheory.net. Wordpress.org.Google Scholar
  58. Fessenden, T. G. (1810). An essay on the law of patents for new inventions with an appendix, containing the french patent law, forms, etc. Boston: D. Mallory & Co..Google Scholar
  59. Fisk, C. L. (2009). Working knowledge: employee innovation and the rise of corporate intellectual property, 1800–1930. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Fligstein, N. (1990). The transformation of corporate control. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  61. Fligstein, N. (2001). The architecture of markets. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  62. Fligstein, N., & Dauter, L. (2007). The sociology of markets. Annual Review of Sociology, 105–128.Google Scholar
  63. Ford, E. E. F. (1912). Notes on the life of Noah Webster. Edited by Emily Ellsworth Ford Skeel. New York: Privately Printed.Google Scholar
  64. Ford, L.R. (2011). Semantic ordering as an organizing force: an interpretation of Max Weber's sociological theory of property. Max Weber Studies.Google Scholar
  65. Ford, L.R. (2014). Intellectual property: a study in the formulation and effects of legal culture. Dissertation Submittted for the Ph.D. in Sociology, Cornell University. Ithaca, May 25.Google Scholar
  66. Ford, L.R. (2015). Prerogative, nationalized: the social formation of intellectual property. Journal of the Patent & Trademark Office Society, 270–306.Google Scholar
  67. Ford, L.R. (2016). Patenting the social: Alice, abstraction, and functionalism in software patent claims. Cardozo Public Law, Policy, and Ethics Journal, 259–342.Google Scholar
  68. Franklin, B. (1818). The private correspondence of Benjamin Franklin, volume I. Edited by William temple Franklin. London: Henry Colburn.Google Scholar
  69. Franklin, B. (1868). Autobiography of Benjamin Franklin. Edited by John Bigelow. London: J.B. Lippincott & Co..Google Scholar
  70. Geertz, C. (1973a). Ethos, world view, and the analysis of sacred symbols. In: the interpretation of cultures: selected essays, by Clifford Geertz, 126–41. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  71. Geertz, C. (1973b). Ideology as a cultural system. In: the interpretation of cultures: selected essays, by Clifford Geertz, 193–233. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  72. Gephart, W. (2015). Law, culture, and society: Max Weber's comparative cultural sociology of law. Translated by Johannes Nanz. Frankfurt: Vittorio Klostermann Verlag.Google Scholar
  73. Gibb, G. S. (1950). The Saco-Lowell shops: textile machinery building in New England, 1813–1949. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Gómez-Arostegui, H.T. (2014). Copyright at common law in 1774. Connecticut Law Review, 1–57.Google Scholar
  75. Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of Embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 481–510.Google Scholar
  76. Grasso, C. (1995). Print, poetry, and politics: John Trumbull and the transformation of public discourse in revolutionary America. Early American Literature, 5–31.Google Scholar
  77. Grasso, C. (1999). A speaking aristocracy. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
  78. Greenspan, A. (2004). Remarks by chairman Alan Greenspan on intellectual property rights at the Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research Economic Summit, Stanford, California. Federal Reserve Board Speech, given February, 27, 2004, available at http://www.federalreserve.gov/boarddocs/speeches/2004/200402272 last accessed July 11, 2016.
  79. Halliday, T. C., & Carruthers, B. G. (2007). The recursivity of law: global norm making and national lawmaking in the globalization of corporate insolvency regimes. American Journal of Sociology, 1135–1202.Google Scholar
  80. Halliday, T. C., & Carruthers, B. G. (2009). Bankrupt: Global lawmaking and systemic financial crisis. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  81. Hedström, P., & Swedberg, R. (1998). Social mechanisms. In Social mechanisms: an analytical approach to social theory, by Peter Hedström & Richard Swedberg (eds.), 1–31. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  82. Helion, C., & Pizarro, D. (2015). Beyond dual-processes: the interplay of reason and emotion in moral judgment. In Springer Handbook for Neuroethics, by N. Levy & J. Clausen (eds.), pp. 109–25. Springer.Google Scholar
  83. Hobsbawn, E. (1999). Industry and empire: the birth of the industrial revolution. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  84. Howe, D. W. (2007). What hath god wrought: the transformation of America, 1815–1848. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  85. Isaacson, W. (2004). Benjamin Franklin: an American life. New York: Simon & Schuster Articlebacks.Google Scholar
  86. Journals of the American Congress from 1774-1788, Volume 4. (1823).Washington: Way and Gideon.Google Scholar
  87. Kapczynski, A. (2008). The access to knowledge mobilization and the new politics of intellectual property. Yale Law Journal, 804–885.Google Scholar
  88. Ketcham, R. (1990). James Madison. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia.Google Scholar
  89. Khan, B.Z. (1995). Property rights and patent litigation in early nineteenth-century American. The Journal of Economic History, 58–97.Google Scholar
  90. Khan, B.Z. The democratization of invention: patents and copyrights in American economic development, 1790–1920. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
  91. Krippner, G. (2011). Capitalizing on crisis: the political origins of the rise of finance. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  92. Krippner, G. R., & Alvarez, A. S. (2007). Embeddedness and the intellectual projects of economic sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 219–240.Google Scholar
  93. Krippner, G. et al. (2004). Polanyi symposium: a conversation on embeddedness. Socio-Economic Review, 109–135.Google Scholar
  94. Lang, M. (2010). The anti-patent movement revisited: institutional change and cognitive frames in nineteenth century Germany. SSRN.Google Scholar
  95. Laws of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, ch. 65. An act defining the general powers and duties of manufacturing corporations. March 3, 1809.Google Scholar
  96. Laws of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, ch. 92. An act to incorporate the Boston Manufacturing Company. Feb. 23, 1813.Google Scholar
  97. Ledyard, J. (1783). Petition to His Excellency the Governor and the Honorable the General Assembly of the State of Connecticut. available at Primary Sources on Copyright (1450–1900), eds L. Bently & M. Kretschmer, www.copyrighthistory.org.
  98. Library of Congress (1906). Copyright enactments of the United States, 1783–1906. Edited by Thorvald Solberg. Washington: Government Printing Office, (2d ed. revised).Google Scholar
  99. Lin, N. (2002). Social capital: a theory of social structure and action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  100. Liu, S., & Halliday, T. C. (2009). Recursivity in legal change: Lawyers and reforms of China's criminal procedure law. Law & Social Inquiry, 911–950.Google Scholar
  101. Machlup, F. (1958). An economic review of the patent system. Senate judiciary committee report. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  102. Machlup, F., & Penrose, E. (1950). The patent controversy in the nineteenth century. The Journal of Economic History, 1–29.Google Scholar
  103. MacIntyre, A. (1988). Whose justice? Which rationality? Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
  104. MacIntyre, A. (1999). Dependent rational animals. Chicago: Open Court.Google Scholar
  105. MacIntyre, A. (2007). After virtue (3d ed.). Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
  106. Malone, P. A. (2009). Waterpower in Lowell: engineering and industry in nineteenth-century America. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  107. Marsden, R. (1888). Cotton spinning: its development, principles, and practice. London: George Bell & Sons.Google Scholar
  108. Merges, R. P., et al. (2012). Intellectual property in the new technological age (6th ed.). New York: Wolters Kluwer.Google Scholar
  109. Merton, R.K. (1935). Fluctuations in the rate of industrial invention. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 454–474.Google Scholar
  110. Meyer, D. R. (2006). Networked machinists: high-technology industries in Antebellum America. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  111. Miller, S. (1803). A brief retrospect of the eighteenth century, part first, in two volumes, containing a sketch of the revolutions and improvements in science, arts, and literature, during that period. Vol. II. New-York: T. and J. Swords.Google Scholar
  112. Mokyr, J. (2009a). Intellectual property rights, the industrial revolution, and the beginnings of modern economic growth. American Economic Review, 349–355.Google Scholar
  113. Mokyr, J. (2009b). The enlightened economy: an economic history of Britain 1700–1850. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  114. Moran, W. (2002). The belles of New England: the women of the textile Mills and the families whose wealth they wove. New York: St. Martins Press.Google Scholar
  115. Moser, P. (2005). How do patent Laws influence innovation? Evidence from nineteenth-century World's fairs. The American Economic Review, 1214–1236.Google Scholar
  116. Nettels, C. P. (1962). The emergence of a national economy 1775–1815. Armonk & London: M. E. Sharpe, Inc..Google Scholar
  117. Nolan, D.R. (1994). Sir William Blackstone and the New American republic: a study of intellectual impact. New York University Law Review, 731–768.Google Scholar
  118. Noll, M. A. (2002). America's god: from Jonathan Edwards to Abraham Lincoln. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. North, D. C. (1981). Structure and change in economic history. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  120. North, D. C., & Weingast, B. R. (1989). Constitutions and commitment: the evolution of institutions governing public choice in seventeenth-century England. The Journal of Economic History, 803–832.Google Scholar
  121. Nussbaum, M. C. (2001). Upheavals of thought: the intelligence of emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Nussbaum, M. C. (2013). Political emotions: why love matters for justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  123. Parsons, F. (1922). The friendly club and other portraits. Hartford: Edwin Valentine Mitchell.Google Scholar
  124. Patterson, L.R. & Joyce, C. (2003). Copyright in 1791: an essay concerning the founders' view of the copyright power granted to congress. Emory Law Journal, 910–952.Google Scholar
  125. Pelanda, Brian Lee (2011). Declarations of cultural independence: the nationalistic imperative behind the passage of early american copyright laws, 1783–1787. Journal of the Copyright Society of the USA, 431–454.Google Scholar
  126. Perrow, C. (2005). Organizing America: wealth, power, and the origins of corporate capitalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  127. Polanyi, K. (2001). The great transformation: the political and economic origins of our time. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  128. Portes, A. (1998). Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 1–24.Google Scholar
  129. Powell, W. W., & Owen-Smith, J. (1998). Universities and the market for intellectual property in the life sciences. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 253–277.Google Scholar
  130. Powell, W. W., & Snellman, K. (2004). The knowledge economy. Annual Review of Sociology, 199–220.Google Scholar
  131. Prager, F.D. (1961). The Influence of Mr. Justice story on american patent law. The American Journal of Legal History, 254–264.Google Scholar
  132. Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. Rivard, P. E. (2002). A new order of things: How the textile industry transformed New England. Hanover & London: University Press of New England.Google Scholar
  134. Robinson, H. H. (1898). Loom and spindle, or life among the early mill girls. New York: Thomas Y. Crowell & Company.Google Scholar
  135. Rosenberg, C. M. (2011). The life and times of Francis Cabot Lowell, 1775–1817. Lanham: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  136. Sewell, William H. Jr. (1992). A theory of structure: duality, agency, and transformation. The American Journal of Sociology, 1–29.Google Scholar
  137. Sewell Jr., W. H. (2005). Logics of history: social theory and social transformation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  138. Smith, S.S. (1812). D.D., LL.D. Lectures corrected and improved. New York & Trenton: Whiting & Watson.Google Scholar
  139. Sorabji, R. (2000). Emotion and peace of mind: from Stoic agitation to Christian temptation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  140. Stearns, P. N. (2013). The Industral revolution in world history (fourth ed.). Boulder: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  141. Stern, S. (2012). From author's right to property right. University of Toronto Law Journal, 29–91.Google Scholar
  142. Story, J. (1987). Abridged commentaries on the constitution of the United States. Durham: Carolina Academic Press (1833).Google Scholar
  143. Streeck, W. (2012). How to study contemporary capitalism. European Archives of Sociology, 1–28.Google Scholar
  144. Suchman, M.C. (1989). Invention and ritual: notes on the interrelation of magic and intellectual property in preliterate societies. Columbia Law Review, 1264–1294.Google Scholar
  145. Suchman, M.C. (2003). The contract as social artifact. Law & Society Review, 91–142.Google Scholar
  146. Swedberg, R. (2003). Principles of economic sociology. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  147. Swedberg, R. (2006). Max Weber's contribution to the economic sociology of law. Annual Review of Law & Social Science, 61–81.Google Scholar
  148. Swedberg, R. (2007). The sociological study of hope and the economy: introductory remarks. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  149. Swedberg, R. (2009). Tocqueville's political economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  150. The South Carolina Historical and Genealogical Magazine (1908). Historical notes. January 55–58.Google Scholar
  151. Thompson, E.P. The making of the English working class. Vintage, 1966.Google Scholar
  152. Thornton, W. To the citizens of the United States. The National Intelligencer. March 5, 1811.Google Scholar
  153. Toynbee, A. (1956). The industrial revolution. Boston: The Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  154. Trumbull, J. (1820). Memoir of the author. In the poetical works of John Trumbull, by John Trumbull, 7–22. Hartford: Samuel G. Goodrich.Google Scholar
  155. Unger, H. G. (1998). The life and times of an American patriot. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc..Google Scholar
  156. Uzzi, B. (1996). The sources and consequences of Embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: the network effect. American Sociological Review, 674–698.Google Scholar
  157. Uzzi, B. (1999). Embeddedness in the making of financial capital: how social relations and networks benefit firms seeking financing. American Sociological Review, 481–505.Google Scholar
  158. Walsh, P. (2015). Arendt contra sociology: theory, society and its science. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  159. Weber, M. (1967). Max Weber on law in economy and society. In M. Rheinstein (Ed.), Translated by Edward Shils & Max Rheinstein. New York: Simon & Schuster [1922].Google Scholar
  160. Weber, M. (1978). Economy and society. Berkeley & Los Angeles: University of California Press (1922).Google Scholar
  161. Webster, N. (1793). The American spelling book: containing an easy standard of pronunciation, being the first part of a grammatical Institute of the English Language. Boston: Thomas & Andrews (7th ed.)Google Scholar
  162. Webster, N. (1843). Origin of the copy-right Laws in the United States. In a collection of articles on political, literary, and moral subjects, by Noah Webster, 173–78. New York: Webster & Clark.Google Scholar
  163. Webster, N. (1953). Letters of Noah Webster. Edited by Harry R. Warfel. New York: Library Publishers.Google Scholar
  164. Webster, Noah. Memoir of Noah Webster, LL.D. In: The autobiographies of Noah Webster, by Richard M. Rollins (ed.), 127–86. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press, 1989.Google Scholar
  165. Weil, S. (1952). The need for roots. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  166. Weil, F. (1998). Capitalism and Industrialization in New England, 1815–1845. Journal of American History, 1334–1354.Google Scholar
  167. Wolterstorff, N. (2012). Augustine's rejection of eudaimonism. In Augustine's City of god: a critical guide, by James Wetzel (ed.), pp. 149–66. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  168. Wood, G. S. (2009). Empire of liberty: a history of the early republic, 1789–1815. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyBard CollegeAnnandale-on-HudsonUSA

Personalised recommendations