Theory and Society

, Volume 43, Issue 3–4, pp 311–332 | Cite as

Tools from moral psychology for measuring personal moral culture

Article

Abstract

Moral culture can mean many things, but two major elements are a concern with moral goods and moral prohibitions. Moral psychologists have developed instruments for assessing both of these and such measures can be directly imported by sociologists. Work by Schwartz and his colleagues on values offers a well-established way of measuring moral goods, while researchers using Haidt’s Moral Foundations Theory have developed validated measures of moral prohibitions. Both values and moral foundations are distributed across the social landscape in systematic, sociologically interesting ways. Although typically measured using questionnaires, we show that values and moral foundations also can be used to analyze interview, archival, or “big data.” Combining psychological and sociological tools and frameworks promises to clarify relations among existing sociological treatments of moral culture and to connect such treatments to a thriving conversation in moral psychology.

Keywords

Culture Measurement Moral psychology Morality Values 

References

  1. Abend, G. (2008). Two main problems in the sociology of morality. Theory and Society, 37(2), 87–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Beckers, T., Siegers, P., & Kuntz, A. (2012). Congruence and performance of value concepts in social research. Survey Research Methods, 6(1), 13–24.Google Scholar
  3. Bellah, R. N., Madsen, R., Sullivan, W. M., Swidler, A., & Tipton, S. M. (1996). Habits of the heart: Individualism and commitment in American life (2nd ed.). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bilsky, W., Janik, M., & Schwartz, S. H. (2011). The structural organization of human values-evidence from three rounds of the European Social Survey (ESS). Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 42(5), 759–776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blackburn, S. (1999). Think: A compelling introduction to philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Blair-Loy, M. (2003). Competing devotions: Career and family among women executives. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Cisneros, J. D. (2008). Contaminated communities: the metaphor of “immigrant as pollutant” in media representations of immigration. Rhetoric & Public Affairs, 11(4), 569–601.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. DiMaggio, P. (1997). Culture and cognition. Annual Review of Sociology, 23(1).Google Scholar
  9. Durkheim, É. (1964). The division of labor in society. New York: Free Press of Glencoe.Google Scholar
  10. Fischer, C. S. (2010). Made in America: A social history of American culture and character. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Graham, J., Haidt, J., & Nosek, B. A. (2009). Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(5), 1029–1046.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Graham, J., Nosek, B. A., Haidt, J., Iyer, R., Koleva, S., & Ditto, P. H. (2011). Mapping the moral domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(2), 366–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Greene, J. D., Morelli, S. A., Lowenberg, K., Nystrom, L. E., & Cohen, J. D. (2008). Cognitive load selectively interferes with utilitarian moral judgment. Cognition, 107(3), 1144–1154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Haidt, J. (2012). The righteous mind: Why good people are divided by politics and religion. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
  15. Haidt, J., & Graham, J. (2007). When morality opposes justice: conservatives have moral intuitions that liberals may not recognize. Social Justice Research, 20(1), 98–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Haidt, J., & Graham, J. (2009). Planet of the Durkheimians, where community, authority, and sacredness are foundations of morality. In J. T. Jost, A. C. Kay, & H. Thorisdottir (Eds.), Social and psychological bases of ideology and system justification (pp. 371–402). New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Haidt, J., Graham, J., & Joseph, C. (2009). Above and below left-right: ideological narratives and moral foundations. Psychological Inquiry, 20, 110–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hitlin, S. (2008). Moral selves, evil selves: The social psychology of conscience. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hitlin, S., & Vaisey, S. (2013). The new sociology of morality. Annual Review of Sociology, 39(1), 51–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Inbar, Y., Pizarro, D. A., & Cushman, F. (2012). Benefiting from misfortune: when harmless actions are judged to be morally blameworthy. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(1), 52–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Inglehart, R., & Baker, W. E. (2000). Modernization, cultural change, and the persistence of traditional values. American Sociological Review, 65(1), 19–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Joas, H. (2000). The genesis of values. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  23. Kluckhohn, C. (1951). Values and value-orientations in the theory of action: An exploration in definition and classification. In T. Parsons & E. A. Shils (Eds.), Toward a general theory of action (pp. 388–433). New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  24. Kluckhohn, C., & Murray (Eds.). (1948). Personality: In nature, society and culture. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  25. Kohlberg, L. (1981). The philosophy of moral development: Moral stages and the idea of justice. San Francisco: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  26. Lamont, M. (1992). Money, morals, and manners: The culture of the French and American upper-middle class. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lamont, M. (2000). The dignity of working men: Morality and the boundaries of race, class, and immigration. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Lee, S., Song, J., & Kim, Y. (2010). An empirical comparison of four text mining methods. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 1–10.Google Scholar
  29. Lichterman, P. (1996). The search for political community: American activists reinventing commitment. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Longest, K. C., Hitlin, S., & Vaisey, S. (2013). Position and disposition: the contextual development of human values. Social Forces, 91(4), 1499–1528.Google Scholar
  31. McAdams, D. P., Albaugh, M., Farber, E., Daniels, J., Logan, R. L., & Olson, B. (2008). Family metaphors and moral intuitions: how conservatives and liberals narrate their lives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(4), 978–990.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Miles, A. (2013). The (re)genesis of values: Examining the importance of values for action. Unpublished manuscript. Duke Unversity, Department of Sociology.Google Scholar
  33. Pennebaker, J. W., Mehl, M. R., & Niederhoffer, K. G. (2003). Psychological aspects of natural language use: our words, our selves. Annual Review of Psychology, 54(1), 547–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sagi, E., & Dehghani, M. (2013). Measuring moral rhetoric in text. Social Science Computer Review, 1–13.Google Scholar
  35. Schnall, S., Haidt, J., Clore, G. L., & Jordan, A. H. (2008). Disgust as embodied moral judgment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(8), 1096–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 1–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Schwartz, S. H. (2011). Studying values: personal adventure, future directions. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 42(2), 307–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Schwartz, S. H., Cieciuch, J., Vecchione, M., Davidov, E., Fischer, R., Beierlein, C., et al. (2012). Refining the theory of basic individual values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(4), 663–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Smith, C. (2003). Moral, believing animals: Human personhood and culture. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Stets, J. E., & Carter, M. J. (2012). A theory of the self for the sociology of morality. American Sociological Review, 77(1), 120–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Swedberg, R. (2005). The Max Weber dictionary: Key words and central concepts. Stanford: Stanford Social Sciences.Google Scholar
  42. Taylor, C. (1989). Sources of the self. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Thomas, W. I. (1923). The unadjusted girl. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.Google Scholar
  44. Thomson, I. T. (2010). Culture wars and enduring American dilemmas. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  45. Turiel, E. (2002). The culture of morality: Social development, context, and conflict. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Vaisey, S. (2009). Motivation and justification: a dual-process model of culture in action. American Journal of Sociology, 114(6), 1675–1715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Vaisey, S. (2010). What people want: rethinking poverty, culture, and educational attainment. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 629(1), 75–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Walder, A. G. (2009). Political sociology and social movements. Annual Review of Sociology, 35, 393–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Zerubavel, E. (1997). Social mindscapes: An invitation to cognitive sociology. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Sociology DepartmentDuke UniversityDurhamUSA

Personalised recommendations