Advertisement

Theory and Society

, Volume 42, Issue 1, pp 1–23 | Cite as

Associating, mobilizing, politicizing: local developmental agency from without

  • László Bruszt
  • Balázs Vedres
Article

Abstract

Decades of increase in external aid programs sparked a wide range of criticisms pointing to misaligned interests, lack of accountability, and the reproduction of developmental traps. The success of development from without is more likely if it generates domestic developmental agency. In this article, we contribute by conceptualizing and measuring dimensions of developmental agency. Our research analyzes the strategic case of European Union regional development programs in Eastern Europe, where this external organization spent nearly a decade on establishing local developmental agency. We collected survey data of 1200 local organizations from two regions each in Czech Republic, Hungary, and Poland. We examine the post-accession position of organizations that participated in pre-accession assistance programs. We test a hypothesis of marginalization in the framework of recentralized developmental governance, and we examine links between patterns of pre-accession involvement and post-accession developmental agency. We identify factors that might make external developmental programs more likely to foster local developmental agency.

Keywords

Development Assistance programs EU regional developmental programs 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Insightful comments and suggestions by Wade Jacoby, Jonathan Zeitlin, and the Theory and Society Editors and reviewers are gratefully acknowledged.

References

  1. Barca, F. (2009). An Agenda for Reformed Cohesion Policy -A place-based approach to meeting European Union challenges and expectations. Independent Report prepared at the request of Danuta Hübner, Commissioner for Regional Policy.Google Scholar
  2. Bebbington, A., Guggenheim, S., Olson, E., & Woolcock, M. (2004). Exploring social capital debates at the World Bank. Journal of Development Studies, 40(5), 33–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Börzel, T. A. (2009). New modes of governance and enlargement. The paradox of double weakness. In T. A. Börzel (Ed.), New modes of governance and enlargement. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  4. Börzel, T. A and Buzogany, A. (2009). Greening the East: Weak States and Even Weaker Societies? Paper prepared for the EUSA Eleventh Biennial International Conference Los Angeles, California, April 23–25.Google Scholar
  5. Brown, L., Khagram, S., Moore, M, and Frumkin, P. (2001). Globalization, NGOs, and Multi-Sectoral Relations. In J. S. Nye, Jr., and J. D. Donohue (Eds.), Governance in a Globalizing World. Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
  6. Bruszt, L. (2008). Multi-level governance—the Eastern versions: emerging patterns of regional developmental governance in the new member states. Regional and Federal Studies, 18(5), 607–627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bruszt, L., & Holzhacker, R. (2009). Three converging literatures of transnationalization and the varieties of transnationalization. In L. Bruszt & R. Holzhacker (Eds.), The transnationalization of economies, states and civil societies new challenges for governance in Europe. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bruszt, L., & McDermott, G. A. (2009). Transnational integration regimes as development programs. In L. Bruszt & R. Holzhacker (Eds.), The transnationalization of economies, states and civil societies new challenges for governance in Europe. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bruszt, L., & Stark, D. (2003). Who counts? Supranational norms and societal needs. East European Politics and Societies, 17, 74–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Djelic, M. L., & Quack., S. (2003). Theoretical building blocks for a research agenda linking globalization and institutions. In M.-L. Djelic & S. Quack (Eds.), Globalization and institutions: redefining the rules of the economic game. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  11. Djelic, M. L., & Sahlin-Andersson, K. (2006). Transnational governance. Institutional dynamics of regulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Easterly, W. R. (2006). The white man’s burden: why the West’s efforts to aid the rest have done so much ill and so little good. New York: Penguin Press.Google Scholar
  13. Easterly, W. R. (2008). Reinventing foreign aid. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  14. Edwards, M., & Hulme, D. (1996). Too close for comfort? The impact of official aid on non-governmental organizations. World Development, 24, 961–974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. European Commission (2007). Supporting enlargement—what does evaluation show? Ex post evaluation of Phare support allocated between 1999–2001, with a brief review of post-2001 allocations July 2007.Google Scholar
  16. Evans, P. (2000). Fighting marginalization with transnational networks: counter-hegemonic mobilization. Contemporary Sociology, 29(1), 230–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Evans, P. (2004). Development as Institutional change: the Pitfalls of monocropping and the potentials of deliberation. Studies in Comparative International Development, 38(4), 30–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gerstenberg, O., & Sabel, C. F. (2002). Directly deliberative polyarchy: an Institutional ideal for Europe? In C. Joerges & R. Dehousse (Eds.), Good Governance in Europe’s integrated market (pp. 289–341). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Goetz, K. (2008). Governance as a path to Government. West European Politics, 31(1–2), 258–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gregersen, B., & Johnson, B. (1997). Learning economies, innovation systems and european integration. Regional Studies, 31(5), 479–490.Google Scholar
  21. Henderson, S. (2002). Selling civil society—Western aid and the nongovernmental organization sector in Russia. Comparative Political Studies, 35(2), 139–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hirschman, A. (1958). The strategy of economic development. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Jacoby, W. (2004). The enlargement of the European Union and NATO: ordering from the menu in Central Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jacoby, W. (2008). Minority traditions and postcommunist politics: how do IGO’s matter. In M. Orenstein, S. Bloom, & N. Lindstrom (Eds.), Transnational actors in central and East European transitions. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
  25. Keating, M. (2006). Territorial government in the new member states. In A. Sadurski, J. Ziller, & K. Zurek (Eds.), Apre` s enlargement: legal and political responses in Central and Eastern Europe. Florence: EUI-RSCAS.Google Scholar
  26. Keating, M. (2008). Thirty years of territorial politics. West European Politics, 31(1–2), 60–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Koslinski, M. C., & Reis, E. (2008). Transnational and domestic relations of NGOs in Brazil. World Development, 37(3), 714–725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lundvall, B. (1992). National systems of innovation. Towards a theory of innovation and interactive learning. London: Pinter Publishers.Google Scholar
  29. Magnatti, P., Ramella, F., Trigilia, C., & Viesti, G. (2005). Patti territoriali. Lezioni per lo sviluppo. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
  30. Moss, T. J., Pettersson, Gunilla, and V. Walle. (2006). An Aid-Institutions Paradox? A review essay on aid dependency and State building in Sub-Saharan Africa. (January 2006). Center for Global Development Working Paper No. 74; Mario Einaudi Center for International Studies Working Paper No. 11–05.Google Scholar
  31. Orenstein, M., & Schmitz, H. P. (2006). The new transnationalism and comparative politics. Comparative Politics, 38(4).Google Scholar
  32. Pregibon, D. (1980). Goodness of link tests for generalized linear models. Applied Statistics, 29(1), 15–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making democracy work. Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Rodrik, D. (1999a). The new global economy and developing countries: making openness work. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Rodrik, D. (1999b). Where did all the growth go? External shocks, social conflicts, and growth collapses. Journal of Economic Growth, 4(4), 385–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sabel, C. (1993). Studied trust: building new forms of cooperation in a volatile economy. Human Relations, 46(9).Google Scholar
  37. Sabel, C. (1994). Learning by monitoring: the institutions of economic development. In S. Neil & S. Richard (Eds.), Handbook of economic sociology (pp. 137–165). Princeton: Princeton University Press and Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  38. Sabel, Ch. (1996). Ireland: local partnerships and social innovation. OECD Publications.Google Scholar
  39. Sabel, Ch., and Zeitlin, J. (2007). Learning from difference: the new architecture of experimentalist governance in the European Union.” European Governance (EUROGOV) Papers. Google Scholar
  40. Safford, S. (2009). Why the garden club couldn’t save Youngstown. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Sedelmeier, U., & Epstein, R. (2008). Beyond conditionality: international institutions in postcommunist Europe after enlargement. Journal of European Public Policy, 15(6), 795–805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sissenich, B. (2007). Building states without society: European union enlargement and social policy transfer to Poland and Hungary. Lanham: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  43. Stallings, B. (1990). The role of foreign capital in economic development. In G. Gereffi & D. L. Wyman (Eds.), Manufacturing miracles. Paths of industrialization in Latin America and East Asia. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Stark, D., Vedres, B., & Bruszt, L. (2006). Rooted transnational publics: integrating foreign ties and civic activism. Theory and Society, 35(3), 323–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Stiglitz, J. (1999). Wither reform? Ten years of transition. Keynote Address, World Bank Annual Bank Conference on Development Economics, Washington, April 28–30, 1999.Google Scholar
  46. Streeck, W., & Schmitter, P. C. (1985). Community, market, state—and associations? The prospective contribution of interest governance to social order. In Streeck & Schmitter (Eds.), Private interest government. Beyond market and state. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  47. Tallberg, J. (2002). Paths to compliance: enforcement, management, and the European Union. International Organization, 56(3), 609–643.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. The World Bank. (2007). Results-based National Development Strategies Assessment and challenges ahead. Google Scholar
  49. Trigilia, C. (2001). Social capital and local development. European Journal of Social Theory, 4(4), 427–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Vedres, B., & Stark, D. (2010). Structural folds: generative disruption in overlapping groups. The American Journal of Sociology, 115(4), 1150–1190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Woolcock, M. (2001). Using social capital: getting the social relations right in the theory and practice of economic development. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Political and Social SciencesEuropean University InstituteSan Domenico di FiesoleItaly
  2. 2.Central European UniversityBudapestHungary

Personalised recommendations