Advertisement

Theory and Society

, Volume 41, Issue 5, pp 425–449 | Cite as

On the public commitment of intellectuals in late socialist China

  • Maurizio Marinelli
Article

Abstract

This article investigates the intense debate on the figure of “Chinese public intellectuals,” which has gained increasing importance, both inside and outside Mainland China, during the last decade. The climax was reached in the year 2004, when the debate on the search for and against a role for the “public intellectuals” became the litmus test of the intellectual intersections between the State actors and the public. Through a close reading of the crucial documents, this article critically engages with the terminology and the interpretive paradigms employed. Thus the article highlights the contribution of the scholars examined to a dialogue on the role of critical thinking within China as well as globally. In fact, the exploration of the diversity of contemporary Chinese thought on the topic of “public intellectuals” can be inscribed within the framework of the following questions: How is the social category of “public intellectuals” used and why? And, ultimately, what does it really means to be an intellectual for the public in China today? In this sense, the article sheds light on the indigenous and foreign understandings of “public” and “intellectual.”

Keywords

Chinese public intellectuals Party-State Market Liu Xiaobo 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The author would like to express his grateful thanks to the Senior Editors of Theory and Society for their thought-provoking comments and suggestions. The paper has also benefited from advice and insightful comments from two anonymous peer-reviewers.

References

  1. Andersen, B. (1991). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. London: Verso Books.Google Scholar
  2. Ash, T.G. (2004). Mental metics. The Guardian.Google Scholar
  3. Bourdieu, P. (1980). Questions de sociologie. Paris: Editions des Minuit.Google Scholar
  4. Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgment of taste. London: Routledge (original edition, Paris, Minuit, 1979).Google Scholar
  5. Cheek, T. (2006). Xu Jilin and the thought work of China’s public intellectuals. China Quarterly, 186, 401–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cheek, T. (2007). The new Chinese intellectual: Globalised, disoriented, reoriented. In L. M. Jensen & T. B. Weston (Eds.), China’s transformation (pp. 265–284). Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  7. Chen, J. (1971). The May fourth movement in Shanghai. Leiden: E.J. Brill.Google Scholar
  8. Chen, G., & Wu, C. (2004). Zhongguo nongmin diaocha (Investigation of the Chinese peasants). Beijing: Renmin wenxue chubanshe. English translation (2006) Will the boat sink the water? The life of China’s peasants. London: PublicAffairs.Google Scholar
  9. Chow, T. (1960). The May fourth movement: Intellectual revolution in modern China. Cambridge: Harvard U. P.Google Scholar
  10. Confucius. (1965a). Lunyu, XIII, 3. In B. Yang (Ed.), Lunyu yizhu (pp. 140–142). Beijing: Zhonghua shuju.Google Scholar
  11. Confucius. (1965b). Lunyu, XII, 17. In B. Yang (Ed.), Lunyu yizhu (p. 136). Beijing: Zhonghua shuju.Google Scholar
  12. Davies, G. (2007a). Worrying about China: The language of Chinese critical inquiry. Cambridge: Harvard U. P.Google Scholar
  13. Davies, G. (2007b). Habermas in China: theory as catalyst. China Journal, 57, 61–85.Google Scholar
  14. Davies, G., Barmé, G., & Cheek, T. (2007). Chinese visions: A provocation, 2007. Paper prepared for the Conference “Chinese visions on a planetary scale” (p. 8). Australia: Monash University.Google Scholar
  15. De Certeau, M. (1997). The capture of speech and other political writings. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  16. Delporte, C. (1996). Intellettuali e politica (orig. title: Intellectuels et politique). Firenze: Giunti.Google Scholar
  17. Deng, X. (1979). Zai zhongguo wenxueyishu gongzuozhe disici daibiaodahuishang de zhuci (Greeting words to the Fourth Congress of Chinese literary and art workers). In X. Deng (Ed.) (1983), Deng Xiaoping wenxuan dierjuan (Selected Works of Deng Xiaoping, Vol. II) (pp. 207–214). Beijing: Renmin chubanshe.Google Scholar
  18. Dirlik, A. (1986). Ideology and organization in the May fourth movement: some problems in the intellectual historiography of the May fourth period. Republican China, 12(1), 3–19.Google Scholar
  19. Dolezelova-Velingerova, M., & Kral, O. (Eds.). (2001). The appropriation of cultural capital: China’s May fourth project. Cambridge: Harvard U.P.Google Scholar
  20. Donatich, J., et al. (2001). The future of public intellectual: a forum. The Nation. On-line edition http://www.thenation.com/doc/20010212/forum. Accessed 02/02/2006.
  21. Du, W. (1997). A tradition of engagement: the public intellectual as a Confucian idea. Harvard Asia Pacific Review, 1(2), 88.Google Scholar
  22. Du, W. (1999). Renwen xueke yu gongzhong zhishifenzi (Humanist science and public intellectuals). Ziran bianzhengfa yanjiu, 15(1), 58–62.Google Scholar
  23. Du, W. (2001). ‘Gonggong zhishifenzi’ yu ruxuede xiandaixing fazhan (Public intellectuals and the modern development of Confucianism), Guizhou Shifan daxue xuebao (Guizhou Normal University Journal) (pp. 1–2).Google Scholar
  24. Duke, M. (1985). Blooming and contending. Bloomington: Indiana U.P.Google Scholar
  25. Fan, Z. (2002). In Y. Li & R. Wang (Eds.), Fan Zhongyan quan ji (Complete works of Fan Zhongyan). Chengdu: Sichuan daxue chubanshe.Google Scholar
  26. Foucault, M. (1994). Truth and power. In J. D. Faubion (Ed.), Essential works of Michel Foucault (pp. 111–133). New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
  27. Franke, W. (1960). The reform and abolition of the traditional Chinese examination system. East Asian Monograph Series N.10. Cambridge: Harvard University Asia Centre.Google Scholar
  28. Goldman, M. (Ed.). (1977). Modern Chinese literature in the May fourth era. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Goldman, M. (2005). The role of China’s public intellectuals at the start of the twenty-first century public intellectuals in China. Testimony for congressional executive commission on China, http://www.cecc.gov/pages/roundtables/031005/Goldman.php. Accessed on 25/04/07).
  30. Goldman, M. (2006). From comrade to citizen: The struggle for political rights in China. Cambridge: Harvard U.P.Google Scholar
  31. Gramsci, A. (1949a). In F. Platone (Ed.), Gli intellettuali e l'organizzazione della cultura. Torino: Einaudi.Google Scholar
  32. Gramsci, A. (1949). Il materialismo storico e la filosofia di Benedetto Croce. In Opere di Antonio Gramsci vol. 2 (pp. 1947–1972). Torino: Einaudi.Google Scholar
  33. Gramsci, A. (1971). The intellectuals. In Q. Hoare & G. N. Smith (Eds.), Selections from the prison notebooks (pp. 3–23). New York: International Publishers.Google Scholar
  34. Gu, E., & Goldman, M. (Eds.). (2004). Chinese intellectuals between the state and the market. London: RoutledgeCurzon.Google Scholar
  35. Gu, Q., Qiao, B., Song, Q., Tang, Z., & Zhang, Z. (1996). Zhongguo haishi neng shuo bu: guoji guanxi bianshu yu women xianshi yingdui (China can still say no – the sequel of China can say no. The variable of international relations and our realist approach). Beijing: Zhongghua wenlian chubanshe.Google Scholar
  36. Habermas, J. (1991). In T. Burger & F. Lawrence (Eds.), The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. Cambridge: MIT.Google Scholar
  37. Hamrin, C. L., & Cheek, T. (Eds.). (1986). China’s establishment intellectuals. Armonk: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
  38. Havel, V., et al. (1985). 1985. In J. Keane (Ed.), The power of the powerless. Citizens against the state in central-eastern Europe (pp. 23–96). Armonk: Sharpe.Google Scholar
  39. He, Q. (1997). Zhongguode xianjing (China’s pitfalls). Hong Kong: Mingjing chubanshe.Google Scholar
  40. He, Q. (1998). Xiandaihua de xianjing: dangdai zhongguo de jingji shehui wenti (The pitfalls of modernization: Economic and social problems in contemporary China). Beijing: Jinri zhongguo chubanshe.Google Scholar
  41. He, Q. (2000). China’s listing social structure. Available on-line at: www.cosa.uchicago.edu/Socialstructure. Html, 5. Accessed 10/11/2008.
  42. Headland, T., Pike, K., & Marvin, H. (Eds.). (1990). Emics and etics: The insider/outsider debate. Alsoks: Sage.Google Scholar
  43. Hu, S. (1926). Wenxue gailiang chui. (A preliminary proposal on literary reform). In Hu Shi Wencun (Collected works of Hu Shi), Vol. 1 (pp. 5–21). Shanghai: Yadong tushuguan.Google Scholar
  44. Hunters, T. (Ed.) (2003). Introduction. In H. Wang (Ed.) China’s new order: Society, politics, and economy in transition (pp. 3–39). Cambridge: Harvard U.P.Google Scholar
  45. Jacoby, R. (2000). The last intellectuals: American culture in the age of academe. New York: Basic Books. first edition 1987.Google Scholar
  46. Ji, F. (2004). Touguo biaoxing kan shizhi—xi ‘gonggong zhishifenzi’ lun (See through the appearances to perceive the essence–Analysis of the essay on “public intellectuals”). Jiefang Ribao, Renmin Ribao, 25 November 2004.Google Scholar
  47. Jia, Q. (1996). Zhongguo bujinjin shuobu. Beijing: Zhonghua gongshang lianhe chubanshe.Google Scholar
  48. Kelly, D. A. (2004/2005) The importance of being public: gagging China’s thinkers. China Review (London), 31, 28–37.Google Scholar
  49. Li, Z. (1987). Zhongguo xiandai sixiang shilun (On the history of modern Chinese intellectual history). Beijing: Dongfang chubanshe.Google Scholar
  50. Li, C. (2001). China’s leaders: The new generation. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  51. Li, Z. (2002). Dangdai zhishifenzi de bianyuanhua he gonggongxing de sangshi (The marginalization of contemporary intellectuals and the mourning of public nature). Chongqing Shiyuan Xuebao (pp. 72–76).Google Scholar
  52. Li, C., & White, L. T. (2003). Dialogue with the West: a political message from avant-garde artists in Shanghai. Critical Asian Studies, 35(1), 59–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Liu, B. (1982). Speech at the fourth Congress of the all-China federation of literary and artistic circles. In H. Goldblatt (Ed.), Chinese literature in the 1980s (pp. 105–106). Armonk: M.E. Sharpe.Google Scholar
  54. Liu, L. (1995). Translingual practice: Literature, national culture and translated modernity—China, 1900-1937. Stanford: Stanford U. P.Google Scholar
  55. Liu, X. (2009). Wo meiyou diren—Wode zuihou chengshu (I have no enemies: my final statement), http://www.bullogger.com/blogs/stainlessrat/archives/351520.aspx. Accessed 25/10/2010.
  56. Lu, X. (1918). Nahan zixu (Preface to call to arms). In X. Lu. Lu Xun quanji (The complete works of Lu Xun), vols. 16, Beijing: Renmin wenxue, 1981, vol. 1, pp. 415–421.Google Scholar
  57. Lu, X. (1923). Kuangren riji (Diary of a madman). In X. Lu. Lu Xun quanji (The complete works of Lu Xun), vols. 16, Beijing: Renmin wenxue, 1981, vol. 1, pp. 422-433.Google Scholar
  58. Mao, Z. (1942). Zai Yan’an wenyi zuotanhuishangde jianghua (Speeches at the Yan’an forum on literature and art). In Mao Z. (Ed.) (1953), Mao Zedong Xuanji (Selected work of Mao Zedong), vol. 3 (pp. 847–879) Beijing: Renmin Chubanshe.Google Scholar
  59. Mao, Z. (1953). Datui zichanjieji youpai de jingong (Beat back the attacks of the bourgeois rightists). In Z. Mao (Ed.) (1992) Mao Zedong xuanji (Selected works of Mao Zedong), vol. 5 (pp. 457-472). Beijing: Renmin chubanshe.Google Scholar
  60. McGregor, R. (2005). A new push to enforce the unwritten rules. Financial Express. Accessed 30/01/2006.Google Scholar
  61. Mitter, R. (2004). A bitter revolution: China’s struggle with the modern world. New York: Oxford U.P.Google Scholar
  62. Pipes, R. (Ed.). (1961). The Russian intelligentsia. New York: Columbia U.P.Google Scholar
  63. Posner, R. (2002). Public intellectual: A history of decline. Harvard U.P. In Chinese: Gonggong zhishifenzi: Shuailuo zhi yanjiu. Beijing: Zhongguo Zhengfadaxue Chubanshe.Google Scholar
  64. Prospect/FT Top 100 Public Intellectuals (2004). http://www.foreignpolicy.com/story/cms.php?story_id=3249 Accessed 10/02/2007, Prospect, n. 100, 1–22, available also on-line: http://www.prospect-magazine.co.uk/vis_index.php?select_issue=479. Accessed 10/02/2009.
  65. Raeff, M. (1996). Origins of the Russian intelligentsia: The eighteenth-century nobility. New York: Harcourt, Bruce & World Inc.Google Scholar
  66. Random House. (1987). The Random House Dictionary of the English language. 2nd ed., unabridged (2nd ed.). Westminister: Random House.Google Scholar
  67. Said, E. W. (1983). The world, the text, the critic. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  68. Said, E. W. (1994). Representations of the intellectual. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
  69. Schneider, L. (1971). Ku Chieh-kang and China's new history: Nationalism and the quest for alternative traditions. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  70. Schwarcz, V. (1984). Curse on the Great Wall: the problem of enlightenment in modern China. Theory and Society, 13(3), 455–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Schwarcz, V. (1986a). Remapping May fourth: between nationalism and enlightenment. Republican China, 12(1), 20–35.Google Scholar
  72. Schwarcz, V. (1986b). The Chinese enlightenment: Intellectuals and the legacy of the May fourth Movement of 1919. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  73. Schwarcz, V. (2003). Book review of Milena Dolezelova-Velingerova and Kral (Eds.). The appropriation of cultural capital: China’s May Fourth movement. Journal of Asian Studies, 62(1), 236–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Small, H. (Ed.). (2002). The public intellectual. Oxford: Blackwell Publ.Google Scholar
  75. Song, Q., Zhang, Z., & Qiao, B. (1996). Zhongguo keyi shuo bu: Lengzhanhou shidai de zhengzhi yu qinggan jueze (China can say no – political and emotional choices in the post-Cold War era). Beijing: Zhongghua gongshang lianhe chubanshe.Google Scholar
  76. Tong, J. (1999). “Suzhi jiaoyu” yingyi bianxi (An analysis of the English translations of “suzhi jiaoyu”). Changjiang zhigong daxue xuebao (Journal of Chanjiang Vocational University), 16(4), 1–3.Google Scholar
  77. U, Eddy (2003). The making of zhishifenzi: the critical impact of the registration of unemployed intellectuals in the early PRC. China Quarterly, 173, 100–121.Google Scholar
  78. U, Eddy (2009). Reification of the Chinese intellectual: on the origins of zhishifenzi. Modern China, 35(6), 604–631.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Villa, D. R. (1992). Postmodernism and the public sphere. American Political Science Review, 86(3), 712–721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Wang, C. (2003). One China, many paths. New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  81. Wang, Y. (2004). Yingxiang zhongguo gonggong zhishifenzi: Shui zhengzai yingxiang womende shidai? (The fifty public intellectuals who have influenced China. Who is influencing our times?) Nanfang Renwu Zhoukan. Available online at http://business.sohu.com/s2004/zhishifenzi50.shtml Accessed on 23/02/2006.
  82. Xiao, P. (Ed.). (1997). Zhongguo ruhe miandui xifang. Hong Kong: Minjing chubanshe.Google Scholar
  83. Xie, Y. (1999). Shiqude niandai: Ziyou zhishifenzide minyun (The lost period: The destiny of the liberal intellectuals). Beijing: Wenhua Yishu Chubanshe.Google Scholar
  84. Xu, J. (2003). Cong teshu zouxiang pubian: zhuangyehua shidai gonggong zhishifenzi ruhe keneng? (Moving from special to universal: how is it possible for public intellectuals in the era of specialization?). Zhexue Yanjiuwan (Philosophy Research Network) (pp. 32–36).Google Scholar
  85. Xu, G. (2005). China and the great war: China's pursuit of a new national identity and internationalization. Cambridge: Cambridge U. P.Google Scholar
  86. Ye, W. (2004). Discourses of dissent in post-imperial China. In W. C. Kirby (Ed.), Realms of freedom in modern China (pp. 165–197). Stanford: Stanford U. P.Google Scholar
  87. Yu, R. (2002). “Gongzhong zhishifenzi” yu “sange yiyi shijie” (“Public intellectuals” and the “three meaning worlds). Shoudu Shifandaxue Xuebao (Capital Normal University Journal), Shehui kexueban (pp. 1–5).Google Scholar
  88. Zhang, X. (1996). Zhongguo heyi shuobu (How China can say no). Beijing: Hualing chubanshe.Google Scholar
  89. Zhang, Q. (2001). Jindai zhongguo yu ‘gong’ yu ‘gonggong’ de biaoda (The representation of “gong” and “gonggong” in modern China). In J. Xu (Ed.), Gonggongxing yu gonggong zhishifenzi (Public commitment and public intellectuals) (pp. 192–220). Nanjing: Jiangsu Renmin Chubanshe.Google Scholar
  90. Zhu, X. (1999a). Wusi yilai de liangge jingshen bingzao (Two spiritual pathogeneses since the May fourth movement). Zhanlue yu guanli (Strategy and Management), 35, 62–66.Google Scholar
  91. Zhu, Y. (Ed.). (1999b). Zhishifenzi yinggai gan shenme? (What should the intellectuals do?). Beijing: Shishi Chubanshe.Google Scholar
  92. Zhu, S. (2003). Zhongguo dangdai gonggong zhishifenzi de shehui jiangou (The social construct of contemporary Chinese public intellectuals). Shehuixue Yanjiu (Sociological Research), 2, 101–113.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.China Research CentreUniversity of Technology SydneySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations